U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; National Institute of Justice The Research, Development, and Evaluation Agency of the U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice ProgramsNational Institute of JusticeThe Research, Development, and Evaluation Agency of the U.S. Department of Justice

Developing Effective Police Workforces: The Importance of Staffing Structures

Jeremy M. Wilson, Associate Director for Research, Michigan State University School of Criminal Justice
NIJ Conference 2010
June 14-16

This player requires Adobe's Flash Player Exit Notice

Developing Effective Police Workforces: The Importance of Staffing Structures

Jeremy M. Wilson, Associate Director for Research, Michigan State University School of Criminal Justice
NIJ Conference 2010
June 14-16

Jeremy M. Wilson: What we did was a national survey of police recruitment retention, and what we found is that some agencies have a very large proportion of officers in a third-year service cohort, so 20 to 30 years. Other agencies have a very large proportion of officers in the junior cohort, like zero to 10 years, and so this creates a number of management problems as these individuals progress through the system, as we think about training, getting field experience, supervision, the cost of providing patrol, for example. And so the implication here is that it's very important to kind of manage the profile so that the officers feel that they have a valuable career ahead of them while at the same time it meets the needs of the organization because our other models that we built as part of this project showed that often recruitment retention strategies have relatively little impact. And so it's even more important to manage these workforce profiles because the type of strategies that are available are often limited to kind of manage those structures. So the bottom line is agencies not only need to think about the number of officers they need but what their profiles look like; set goals for them and try to manage them proactively over time as opposed to responding to them in kind of a more crisis fashion.

A profile in this sense, it can be based on a number of dimensions — age, seniority, functional allocation, what have you. What we did in this is look at the seniority profiles, and what we see often is when agencies will have, like, a hiring boom or a hiring freeze, this creates sort of a pattern in the profile where there can be a large number or a small number of a certain type of officer in the department, like those that are more senior or more junior. And that works through the system over time and can make, for example, the cost of patrol significantly different from point A to point B depending on the seniority of the officers. It can also create challenges in terms of getting officers promoted, getting them trained. And then when there's, for example, a large number of officers that retire, it can create sort of a vacuum in the agency in terms of experience, and that can make the workforce structure start to oscillate. So as agencies have a large number of senior officers, they retire. There's a loss of experience, but then they're filled with a large number of junior officers so we see that start to oscillate over time, which makes it more important to kind of manage that process to make sure there's a healthy balance between the more junior and more senior officers.

Reuse or Repost This Video

Information generated by the National Institute of Justice is in the public domain. It may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without permission. Please cite NIJ as the source of the information by using the following words:

"The [insert the name of you organization] gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, for allowing us to reproduce, in part or in whole, the video [insert title]. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this video are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice."

U.S. Department of Justice Disclaimer

The content presented in this video results from NIJ-funded research, development and evaluation projects. The content is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal.

Opinions or points of view expressed in this video represent those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Any products and manufacturers discussed in this video are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice.

See additional Legal Policies and Disclaimers for all U.S. Department of Justice Web content.

NIJ Conference
Interview
June 2010
Jeremy Wilson, Associate Director for Research, Michigan State University School of Criminal Justice

NIJ Conference 2010 Highlights

Date created: August 18, 2010