| State/Substate Region | Illicit Drug Use in Past Month | Illicit Drug Use Other Than Marijuana in Past Month |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Illicit Drugs Other Than Marijuana include cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||
| Virginia | 7.07 | (6.10 - 8.18) | 3.39 | (2.80 - 4.10) |
| Region 1 | 7.11 | (5.52 - 9.10) | 3.48 | (2.52 - 4.78) |
| Region 2 | 6.57 | (5.05 - 8.50) | 2.95 | (2.11 - 4.12) |
| Region 3 | 7.51 | (5.77 - 9.71) | 3.87 | (2.84 - 5.25) |
| Region 4 | 7.39 | (5.72 - 9.51) | 3.71 | (2.64 - 5.20) |
| Region 5 | 7.04 | (5.52 - 8.92) | 3.21 | (2.31 - 4.43) |
| State/Substate Region | Marijuana Use in Past Month |
Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana1 |
Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking Marijuana Once a Month |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|||||||
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Average annual rate = 100*{[X1 ÷ (0.5 * X1 + X2)] ÷ 2}, where X1 is the number of marijuana initiates in the past 24 months and X2 is the number of persons who never used marijuana. Both of the computation components, X1 and X2, are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach. Note that the age group is based on a respondent's age at the time of the interview, not his or her age at first use. The prediction intervals for Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana use a simultaneous solution for First Use of Marijuana and Never Used Marijuana outcomes, which had age group-specific random effects that were allowed to be correlated across the two outcomes. The associated Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains were used to calculate the posterior variance. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||||||||||
| Virginia | 5.36 | (4.55 - 6.31) | 1.57 | (1.37 - 1.80) | 39.74 | (37.05 - 42.50) | ||||||
| Region 1 | 5.47 | (4.12 - 7.22) | 1.76 | (1.35 - 2.30) | 38.46 | (33.48 - 43.69) | ||||||
| Region 2 | 5.01 | (3.79 - 6.61) | 1.24 | (0.93 - 1.65) | 36.45 | (32.25 - 40.87) | ||||||
| Region 3 | 5.89 | (4.48 - 7.72) | 1.71 | (1.29 - 2.26) | 42.98 | (37.73 - 48.39) | ||||||
| Region 4 | 5.25 | (3.90 - 7.03) | 1.48 | (1.14 - 1.92) | 40.83 | (35.85 - 46.01) | ||||||
| Region 5 | 5.35 | (4.05 - 7.04) | 1.79 | (1.40 - 2.29) | 40.93 | (36.32 - 45.72) | ||||||
| State/Substate Region | Marijuana Use in Past Year |
Cocaine Use in Past Year | Nonmedical Use of Pain Relievers in Past Year |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|||||||
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||||||||||
| Virginia | 9.27 | (8.18 - 10.48) | 2.50 | (1.98 - 3.15) | 4.42 | (3.75 - 5.21) | ||||||
| Region 1 | 9.50 | (7.53 - 11.92) | 2.64 | (1.86 - 3.73) | 5.02 | (3.84 - 6.54) | ||||||
| Region 2 | 8.13 | (6.45 - 10.20) | 1.99 | (1.34 - 2.95) | 3.82 | (2.86 - 5.06) | ||||||
| Region 3 | 10.43 | (8.32 - 12.99) | 2.67 | (1.87 - 3.81) | 5.51 | (4.24 - 7.13) | ||||||
| Region 4 | 9.40 | (7.38 - 11.89) | 2.79 | (1.89 - 4.10) | 4.09 | (3.02 - 5.52) | ||||||
| Region 5 | 9.39 | (7.54 - 11.63) | 2.63 | (1.82 - 3.77) | 4.12 | (3.11 - 5.42) | ||||||
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Use in Past Month |
Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month1 |
Perceptions of Great Risk of Having Five or More Drinks of an Alcoholic Beverage Once or Twice a Week |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|||||||
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||||||||||
| Virginia | 50.52 | (47.74 - 53.30) | 22.10 | (20.11 - 24.23) | 43.92 | (41.22 - 46.65) | ||||||
| Region 1 | 51.69 | (46.03 - 57.31) | 24.78 | (21.14 - 28.81) | 42.37 | (37.88 - 46.98) | ||||||
| Region 2 | 55.93 | (51.24 - 60.50) | 20.65 | (17.73 - 23.91) | 44.97 | (40.97 - 49.03) | ||||||
| Region 3 | 42.89 | (37.35 - 48.60) | 21.96 | (18.44 - 25.93) | 43.41 | (38.78 - 48.16) | ||||||
| Region 4 | 48.96 | (43.58 - 54.36) | 21.63 | (18.20 - 25.50) | 45.02 | (40.51 - 49.61) | ||||||
| Region 5 | 50.83 | (45.77 - 55.88) | 22.48 | (19.08 - 26.29) | 43.32 | (38.88 - 47.87) | ||||||
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Use in Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 20 |
Binge Alcohol Use in Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 201 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||
| Virginia | 27.06 | (24.90 - 29.33) | 18.60 | (16.81 - 20.54) |
| Region 1 | 30.42 | (26.46 - 34.70) | 22.18 | (18.67 - 26.14) |
| Region 2 | 25.95 | (22.38 - 29.87) | 18.24 | (15.16 - 21.78) |
| Region 3 | 29.19 | (25.09 - 33.67) | 20.79 | (17.26 - 24.82) |
| Region 4 | 25.31 | (21.61 - 29.40) | 15.81 | (12.92 - 19.19) |
| Region 5 | 25.63 | (21.98 - 29.66) | 17.00 | (14.02 - 20.46) |
| State/Substate Region | Cigarette Use in Past Month |
Tobacco Product Use in Past Month1 |
Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking One or More Packs of Cigarettes Per Day |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|||||||
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1 Tobacco Products include cigarettes, smokeless tobacco (i.e., chewing tobacco or snuff), cigars, or pipe tobacco. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||||||||||
| Virginia | 24.93 | (22.72 - 27.27) | 29.35 | (27.12 - 31.69) | 74.01 | (71.71 - 76.18) | ||||||
| Region 1 | 27.34 | (23.61 - 31.42) | 32.36 | (28.31 - 36.70) | 71.95 | (68.09 - 75.52) | ||||||
| Region 2 | 18.63 | (15.97 - 21.63) | 23.15 | (20.10 - 26.51) | 77.76 | (74.58 - 80.64) | ||||||
| Region 3 | 29.28 | (25.36 - 33.53) | 34.86 | (30.62 - 39.35) | 72.23 | (68.26 - 75.89) | ||||||
| Region 4 | 26.43 | (22.80 - 30.40) | 30.61 | (26.74 - 34.77) | 72.01 | (68.07 - 75.64) | ||||||
| Region 5 | 25.97 | (22.57 - 29.68) | 29.16 | (25.62 - 32.97) | 73.94 | (70.47 - 77.13) | ||||||
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Dependence in Past Year | Illicit Drug Dependence in Past Year1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Dependence is based on the definition found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 1Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||
| Virginia | 3.29 | (2.67 - 4.03) | 1.86 | (1.49 - 2.32) |
| Region 1 | 3.18 | (2.23 - 4.50) | 1.87 | (1.30 - 2.69) |
| Region 2 | 3.19 | (2.28 - 4.44) | 1.61 | (1.13 - 2.29) |
| Region 3 | 3.42 | (2.45 - 4.75) | 2.04 | (1.44 - 2.89) |
| Region 4 | 3.45 | (2.45 - 4.83) | 1.85 | (1.27 - 2.68) |
| Region 5 | 3.25 | (2.33 - 4.52) | 2.02 | (1.41 - 2.88) |
| State/Substate Region | Alcohol Dependence or Abuse in Past Year |
Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse in Past Year1 |
Dependence on or Abuse of Illicit Drugs or Alcohol in Past Year1 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|||||||
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. NOTE: Dependence or abuse is based on definitions found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 1 Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||||||||||
| Virginia | 7.30 | (6.26 - 8.49) | 2.64 | (2.16 - 3.22) | 8.50 | (7.44 - 9.70) | ||||||
| Region 1 | 7.02 | (5.46 - 8.97) | 2.66 | (1.92 - 3.67) | 8.30 | (6.61 - 10.37) | ||||||
| Region 2 | 7.34 | (5.82 - 9.22) | 2.20 | (1.58 - 3.05) | 8.20 | (6.63 - 10.10) | ||||||
| Region 3 | 8.11 | (6.26 - 10.45) | 2.97 | (2.15 - 4.08) | 9.48 | (7.58 - 11.80) | ||||||
| Region 4 | 7.18 | (5.58 - 9.21) | 2.72 | (1.94 - 3.79) | 8.38 | (6.69 - 10.45) | ||||||
| Region 5 | 6.86 | (5.33 - 8.80) | 2.81 | (2.02 - 3.88) | 8.29 | (6.59 - 10.38) | ||||||
| State/Substate Region | Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Alcohol Use in Past Year1 |
Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug Use in Past Year2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for alcohol, but not receiving treatment for an alcohol problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], and mental health centers). 2Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for illicit drugs, but not receiving treatment for an illicit drug problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], and mental health centers). Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||
| Virginia | 6.87 | (5.87 - 8.03) | 2.21 | (1.81 - 2.68) |
| Region 1 | 6.76 | (5.17 - 8.81) | 2.24 | (1.61 - 3.12) |
| Region 2 | 6.95 | (5.48 - 8.76) | 1.77 | (1.27 - 2.48) |
| Region 3 | 7.73 | (5.95 - 9.98) | 2.38 | (1.71 - 3.31) |
| Region 4 | 6.53 | (5.07 - 8.37) | 2.31 | (1.63 - 3.25) |
| Region 5 | 6.44 | (5.03 - 8.20) | 2.46 | (1.76 - 3.42) |
| State/Substate Region | Serious Psychological Distress in Past Year1 |
Having at Least One Major Depressive Episode in Past Year2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
Estimate | 95% Prediction Interval |
|
| NOTE: For Substate Region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. NOTE: Estimates are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach, and the 95 percent prediction (credible) intervals are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. 1Serious Psychological Distress (SPD) is defined as having a score of 13 or higher on the K6 scale. Because of questionnaire changes, these estimates are not comparable with estimates from the 2002-2004 substate report. For details, see Section B.7 of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. Data for SPD are not defined for 12 to 17 year olds; therefore, the estimates reflect only those aged 18 or older. 2 Major Depressive Episode (MDE) is defined as in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), which specifies a period of at least 2 weeks when a person experienced a depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in daily activities and had a majority of specified depression symptoms. There are minor wording differences in the questions in the adult and adolescent MDE modules. Therefore, data from youths aged 12 to 17 were not combined with data from persons aged 18 or older to get an overall estimate (12 or older). Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006. |
||||
| Virginia | 10.76 | (9.43 - 12.25) | 7.35 | (6.11 - 8.83) |
| Region 1 | 11.69 | (9.46 - 14.36) | 8.05 | (6.06 - 10.61) |
| Region 2 | 9.34 | (7.66 - 11.35) | 6.82 | (5.23 - 8.85) |
| Region 3 | 12.34 | (9.95 - 15.21) | 8.33 | (6.24 - 11.04) |
| Region 4 | 10.86 | (8.78 - 13.37) | 7.11 | (5.30 - 9.47) |
| Region 5 | 10.43 | (8.47 - 12.77) | 6.91 | (5.21 - 9.13) |
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.
NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 345 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see Section D of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health.
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
This page was last updated on . |
|
SAMHSA, an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services, is the Federal Government's lead agency for improving the quality and availability of substance abuse prevention, addiction treatment, and mental health services in the United States.
* PDF formatted files require that Adobe Acrobat Reader® program is installed on your computer. Click here to download this FREE software now from Adobe. |