Foreign policy has been largely absent from the stage in this election, but in many ways, the job of the Vice President has been to wrangle especially challenging national security issues. Vice President Biden, that portfolio has included Iraq, a country which you once suggested be divided in three.

In a New York Times op-ed, and in advance of the October 22 foreign policy debate between the presidential candidates, Danielle Pletka, vice president of foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) writes that:“Mr. Romney must give a clear explanation of how...

But no leader, and certainly not the commander in chief of the U.S. military, should be constrained in how he articulates America's commitment to its allies, intolerance of threats to the global order, and vision for the nation's role in the world.

If it hadn’t been for the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the United States Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Mitt Romney probably wouldn’t be giving a speech on foreign policy in the waning weeks of this election season.

Dear Mitt Romney, More on that WSJ piece. You can’t beat something with nothing, and your op-ed this morning was way too light on substance and vision. Allow me to be useful.

Dear Mitt Romney, About that WSJ piece. I don’t write to you often, I know you’re really slammed right now. But listen:

It's no secret how a group gets designated as terrorists in the eyes of the U.S. government. Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act enumerates the authorities of the secretary of state in listing a group as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO).

Ever since his maiden foreign policy outing in Cairo, Barack Obama and administration officials have too often insisted that America is the root cause of its own troubles in the world. Don’t take my word for it. Here’s the evidence.