Toxic Substances Hydrology Program
Headlines
|
||||
Sometimes the Question Is "Who Isn't Living There?"
|
|
In a paper recently published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (Janssen and others, 2011) the scientists defined the role (or function) of different organisms in a community that lives in or on the sediments (the benthic community) at the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard Superfund Site, California (see text box). The scientists compared the total function of PCB-contaminated and uncontaminated benthic communities. The functions they studied included feeding method (food sources that are sediment borne or water borne, organisms that are carnivores, parasites, ...), reproductive method (egg laying, broadcast spawner, ...), and position in the sediment (a surface dweller protected from the sediment vs a burrower that is exposed to the sediment and its contaminants). Because it's important to know what organisms are and are not living in an area, the scientists assessed the population of benthic organisms in both the contaminated and uncontaminated sediments. By relating functional composition of the benthic community and its members to PCB bioavailability that is potentially induced by in situ remediation, the model provides a measure of the ecosystem recovery expected if the in situ treatment is effective. This is the first time the challenge of defining the effectiveness of the in situ sequestering of PCB's has been addressed in terms of the function of the local community of organisms.
This study was funded by the USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology, Hydrologic Research and Development, and Priority Ecosystem Science Programs, and by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP - ER-1552).
Janssen, E.M.L., Thompson, J.K., Luoma, S.N., and Luthy, R.G., 2011, PCB-induced changes of a benthic community and expected ecosystem recovery following in situ sorbent amendment: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, v. 30, no. 8, p. 1819-1826, doi:10.1002/etc.574.