A method to estimate objectively the surface wind fields associated with tropical cyclones using only data from multiple satellite platforms and satellite-based wind retrieval techniques is described. The analyses are computed on a polar grid using a variational data-fitting method that allows for the application of variable data weights to input data. The combination of gross quality control and the weighted variational analysis also produces wind estimates that have generally smaller errors than do the raw input data. The resulting surface winds compare well to the NOAA Hurricane Research Division H*Wind aircraft reconnaissance–based surface wind analyses, and operationally important wind radii estimated from these wind fields are shown to be generally more accurate than those based on climatological data. Most important, the analysis system produces global tropical cyclone surface wind analyses and related products every 6 h—without aircraft reconnaissance data. Also, the analysis and products are available in time for consideration by forecasters at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center, the Central Pacific Hurricane Center, and the National Hurricane Center in preparing their forecasts and advisories. This Multiplatform Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis (MTCSWA) product is slated to become an operationally supported product at the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (NESDIS). The input data, analysis method, products, and verification statistics associated with the MTCSWA are discussed within.
An Automated, Objective, Multiple-Satellite-Platform Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis
Authors:
John A. Knaff, Mark DeMaria, and Debra A. MolenarAffiliationsNOAA/NESDIS Regional and Mesoscale Meteorological Branch, Fort Collins, Colorado Charles R. SampsonAffiliations
Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California Matthew G. SeyboldAffiliations
NOAA/NESDIS Product Implementation Branch, Camp Springs, Maryland
Received: 7 October 2010
Final Form: 18 May 2011
Published Online: 24 October 2011
October 2011
![Publication Cover](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20170121092757im_/http://journals.ametsoc.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/ams/journals/content/apme/2011/15588432-50.10/15588432-50.10/production/15588432-50.10.cover.jpg)
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JAMC Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Agee et al.
August 2016, Vol. 55, No. 8
|
. |
Feng et al.
July 2016, Vol. 55, No. 7
|
. |
Christy et al.
March 2016, Vol. 55, No. 3
|
. |
Zhou et al.
March 2016, Vol. 55, No. 3
|
. |
Pfeifroth et al.
January 2016, Vol. 55, No. 1
|
. |
Ortega et al.
April 2016, Vol. 55, No. 4
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An UpdateKainJanuary 2004, Vol. 43, No. 1 -
2. On the Average Value of Correlated Time Series, with Applications in Dendroclimatology and HydrometeorologyWigley et al.February 1984, Vol. 23, No. 2 -
3. Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud ModelLin et al.June 1983, Vol. 22, No. 6 -
4. A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous TerrainDaly et al.February 1994, Vol. 33, No. 2 -
5. Lanczos Filtering in One and Two DimensionsDuchonAugust 1979, Vol. 18, No. 8 -
6. ClimateWNA—High-Resolution Spatial Climate Data for Western North AmericaWang et al.January 2012, Vol. 51, No. 1