Patient Safety in Ambulatory Care
Download: Adobe Reader    Email      Print

Background

Despite the fact that the vast majority of health care takes place in the outpatient, or ambulatory care, setting, efforts to improve safety have mostly focused on the inpatient setting. However, a body of research dedicated to patient safety in ambulatory care has emerged over the past few years. These efforts have identified and characterized factors that influence safety in office practice, the types of errors commonly encountered in ambulatory care, and potential strategies for improving ambulatory safety.

Factors Influencing Safety in Ambulatory Care

Ensuring patient safety outside of the hospital setting poses unique challenges for both providers and patients. A recent article proposed a model for patient safety in chronic disease management, modified from the original Chronic Care Model. This model broadly encompasses three concepts that influence safety in ambulatory care:

  • The role of the community and health system
  • The role of provider-patient interactions
  • The role of patient and caregiver behaviors

Specific types of errors can be linked to each of these three concepts.

Types of Safety Events in Ambulatory Care

Finally, although an increasing amount of attention has been devoted to measuring and improving the culture of safety in acute care settings, less is known about safety culture in office practice. Burnout and work dissatisfaction, particularly among primary care physicians, may also adversely affect the quality of care. The AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture is designed to assess safety culture in ambulatory care, and its comparative database (which includes data from more than 900 participating practices) is freely available from AHRQ.

Categories of missing clinical information during primary care visits: lab results (45%), letters/dictation (39.5%), radiology results (28.2%), history and physical exam (26.8%), current and prior medications (23.3%), pathology results (15%), immunization records (12.3%), procedures (7.3%).

Source: Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C, et al. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA. 2005;293:565-571. [go to PubMed]

The nature of interactions between patients and providers—and between different providers—may also be a source of adverse events. Patients consistently voice concerns about coordination of care, particularly when one patient sees multiple physicians, and indeed communication between physicians in the outpatient setting is often suboptimal. Poorly handled care transitions (for example, when a patient is discharged from the hospital or when care is transferred from one physician to another) also place patients at high risk for preventable adverse events. When a clinician is not immediately available—for example, after hours—patients may have to rely on telephone advice for acute illnesses, an everyday practice that has its own inherent risks.

Since face-to-face interactions between providers and patients in the ambulatory setting are limited and occur weeks to months apart, patients must assume a much greater role in and responsibility for managing their own health. This elevates the importance of patient education and ensuring that patients understand their illnesses and treatments. Medication errors are very common in ambulatory care, with one landmark study finding that more than 4.5 million ambulatory care visits occur every year due to ADEs. Because the likelihood of a medication error is linked to a patient's understanding of the indication, dosage schedule, proper administration, and potential side effects, low health literacy and poor patient education contribute to increased error risk.

Low and marginally literate patients have difficulty following the prescription label instruction

Source: Wolf MS, Davis TC, Shrank W, et al. To err is human: Patient misinterpretations of prescription drug label instructions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:293-300. [go to PubMed]

Finally, the need for outpatients to self-manage their own chronic diseases requires that they monitor their symptoms and, in some cases, adjust their own lifestyle or medications. For example, a diabetic patient must measure her own blood sugars and perhaps adjust her insulin dose based on blood sugar values and dietary intake. A patient's inability or failure to perform such activities may compromise safety in the short term and clinical outcomes in the long term. Patients must also understand how and when to contact their caregivers outside of routine appointments and must often play a role in ensuring their own care coordination (for example, by keeping an updated list of medications).

Improving Safety in Ambulatory Care

Improving outpatient safety will require both structural reform of office practice functions as well as engagement of patients in their own safety. While EHRs hold great promise for reducing medication errors and tracking test results, these systems have yet to reach their full potential. Coordinating care between different physicians remains a significant challenge, especially if the doctors do not work in the same office or share the same medical record system. Efforts are being made to increase use of EHRs in ambulatory care, and physicians believe that use of EHRs leads to higher quality and improved safety.

Patient engagement in outpatient safety involves two related concepts: first, educating patients about their illnesses and medications, using methods that require patients to demonstrate understanding (such as "teach-back"); and second, empowering patients and caregivers to act as a safety "double-check" by providing access to advice and test results and encouraging patients to ask questions about their care. Success has been achieved in this area for patients taking high-risk medications, even in patients with low health literacy at baseline.


Current Context

Regulatory efforts to improve safety have largely focused on hospital care; in fact, 12 of the 16 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals are considered "not applicable to ambulatory care." It seems likely that the increased attention to ambulatory safety being evidenced in increased research funding and output will be reflected in growing attention by accreditors and regulators in the not too distant future.

 
What's New in Patient Safety in Ambulatory Care on AHRQ PSNet
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Medical malpractice: why is it so hard for doctors to apologize?
Sanghavi D. Boston Globe Magazine. January 27, 2013.
PRESS RELEASE/ANNOUNCEMENT
Warning! Severe burns and permanent scarring after glacial acetic acid (≥99.5%) mistakenly applied topically.
National Alert Network for Serious Medication Errors. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and Institute for Safe Medication Practices; January 23, 2013.
STUDY
Building a culture of safety through team training and engagement.
Thomas L, Galla C. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec 4; [Epub ahead of print].
STUDY
Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research.
Hanson JL, Stephens MB, Pangaro LN, Gimbel RW. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:407.
STUDY
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.
Wolf JA, Moreau J, Akilov O, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jan 16; [Epub ahead of print].
COMMENTARY
Quality improvement: Universal Protocol use in office-based gastrointestinal procedure units.
Hardee LK. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012;35:380-382.
PRESS RELEASE/ANNOUNCEMENT
Important change to heparin container labels to clearly state the total drug strength.
MedWatch Safety Alert. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; December 6, 2012.
Editor's Picks for Patient Safety in Ambulatory Care
Patient Safety: A Perspective from Office Practice.
Richard J. Baron, MD. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. May 2009
In Conversation with...Dean Schillinger, MD.
AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. February/March 2009
The Role of Health Literacy in Patient Safety.
Michael S. Wolf, PhD, MPH; Stacy Cooper Bailey, MPH. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. February/March 2009
Patient Safety in the Physician Office Setting.
Nancy C. Elder, MD, MSPH. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. May 2006
No News May Not Be Good News.
Carlton R. Moore, MD, MS. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. August 2012
 
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. Classic icon
DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:50-60.
Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community. Classic icon
van Walraven C, Taljaard M, Bell CM, et al. CMAJ. 2008;179:1013-1018.
Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—Ambulatory Version. Classic icon
Modak I, Sexton JB, Lux TR, Helmreich RL, Thomas EJ. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1-5.
Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Classic icon
Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488-496.  
Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. Classic icon
Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556-1564.
Refocusing the lens: patient safety in ambulatory chronic disease care. Classic icon
Sarkar U, Wachter RM, Schroeder SA, Schillinger D. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:377-383.
Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Classic icon
Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1578-1586.
Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record.
El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:464-468.
Adverse drug events in U.S. adult ambulatory medical care. Classic icon
Sarkar U, López A, Maselli JH, Gonzales R. Health Serv Res. 2011;46:1517-1533.
Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. Classic icon
Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, Li J. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1334-1348.
BOOK/REPORT
2012 User Comparative Database Report: Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
Sorra J, Famolaro T, Dyer N, Smith S, Liu H, Ragan M. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2012. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0052.
Meeting the Challenge of Patient Safety in the Ambulatory Care Setting.
Turney S, Evans EW, Callaway E, et al. Englewood Cliffs, CO: Medical Group Management Association; 2009.
2008 Update on Consumers' Views of Patient Safety and Quality Information.
Kaiser Family Foundation, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; October 2008.
TOOLS/TOOLKIT
Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2010.
WEB RESOURCE
National Patient Safety Goals.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2011.
 
Last Updated: October 2012