Obama at the Chamber of Commerce / Solar Panels Versus Trees / Remembering Reagan

President Obama calls for U.S. businesses to help boost competitiveness. The U.S. and Russia sign the START nuclear arms reduction treaty. Is it a good idea to chop down trees to accommodate a solar energy system? Some of U.S. President Reagan’s accomplishments outlived him.

Obama on Competitiveness
(mobile version)
President Obama says U.S. businesses, working together with the government, can make the economy more competitive. In a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Obama calls on U.S. companies to help make the United States “the best place on earth to do business.”  Left, Obama is greeted by U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue.


Egypt Is “Not Going Back”
(mobile version)
President Obama says after nearly two weeks of political unrest in Egypt, the country “is not going to go back to what it was….The Egyptian people want freedom. They want free and fair elections. They want a representative government. They want a responsive government,” Obama says during a Fox News interview.

New START for U.S., Russia
(mobile version)
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov exchange diplomatic documents in Munich, concluding a two-year effort to reduce nuclear arsenals to their lowest levels in more than 50 years. Clinton, right, and Lavrov, left, sign instruments of ratification to implement the New START treaty which reduces the number of nuclear warheads to 1,550 for each nation from 2,200 warheads.

Solar Panels Versus Trees
(mobile version)
What is more important for the environment and for humans in the long run: clean energy or trees? As the United States continues to develop renewable power sources and encourage homeowners to take advantage of solar and wind power tax credits, clean energy advocates increasingly run into opposition from environmentalists who fear for the trees that are often lost to allow better access to sun and wind.

Reagan’s Enduring Legacy
(mobile version)
February 6 was the 100th anniversary of the birth of U.S. President Ronald Reagan, whose policies brought about the end of the Cold War and new freedom in Europe. Among his accomplishments, President Reagan advanced three key principles that remain fundamental to security relationships in Europe: “trust, but verify”; no artificial divisions into “blocs” or “spheres of influence”; and “mutual assured destruction” is not an acceptable nuclear deterrence policy.

Intergenerational Democracy, Part I

A big part of my blogging experience has been meeting and working with the parade of super-smart younger colleagues who lately have arrived at the Bureau. But there is a downside: upon submitting to Tanya my “biography,” I received a return note suggesting that her Dad and I would have a lot to talk about.

Word of this crushing blow spread fast. As I wandered aimlessly through the hallways, male co-workers approached sympathetically: “There, there,” said one, patting me on the shoulder. “This happens to every man some day,” added another.

Sadly enough, though, I think Tanya’s on to something. I do believe that shared experience shapes generational outlook. Arguably younger people can in general be more idealistic, and more disillusioned when their hopes are dashed. My Dad, for instance, believes along with many Americans his age that John F. Kennedy was a leader nonpareil and that our nation was damaged irrevocably by his death. Back in the Miocene Era, I held similar views about President Ronald Reagan, who differed politically from JFK but shared Kennedy’s idealistic temperament and ability to inspire. My point’s not a political one, but rather a suggestion that age cohorts can differ in how they perceive leaders, issues, and events.

[image src="http://photos.state.gov/libraries/amgov/4110/pod/042909_AP081105043178_300.jpg" caption="Members of the younger generation celebrating Barack Obama's election" align="left"]Today, many of my younger colleagues and their peers are heavily invested—both intellectually and emotionally—in the success of the new Obama Administration. As a patriotic American, I also want my new President to succeed, but at an age where I’ve more in common with Tanya’s dad, I am a bit more detached about the obstacles to what my colleagues call “change.” With James Madison, I view obstacles as “interests,” and consider their clash the sound of republican government at work. I do retain a bit of my youthful idealism, though, and hope the kids won’t lose theirs if this does not prove quite the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.

If generational differences encompass style, taste, and temperament (one example: loud and very personal cell phone conversations on public transportation—have these young ‘uns no shame?), they also can reflect diverging interests, and thus pose a real challenge to democratic governance.

More on this tomorrow….