Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Morin talks sequestration, near-term budget actions
 
Photos 
Sequestration challenge
Acting under secretary of the Air Force Dr. Jamie Morin speaks at an Air Force Association breakfast in Arlington, Va., Jan. 15, 2013. Morin spoke about the Air Forces current actions related to budget uncertainty, as well as the strategic decisions facing the department in regards to balancing the force structure, today's readiness and modernization for the future. (U.S. Air Force photo/Michael J. Pausic)
Download HiRes
 
Related Stories
 Air Force implements civilian hiring freeze - 1/17/2013
 Air Force leaders deliver budget guidance to force - 1/17/2013
 Air Force leaders deliver budget guidance to force - 1/17/2013
 Air Force leaders deliver budget guidance to force - 1/17/2013
 Air Force implements civilian hiring freeze - 1/18/2013
Morin talks sequestration, near-term budget actions

Posted 1/17/2013   Updated 1/17/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Staff Sgt. David Salanitri
Air Force Public Affairs Agency


1/17/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The acting under secretary of the Air Force described how the nation's fiscal challenges are affecting the service to a group of civic and industry leaders in Arlington, Va., Jan. 15.

Dr. Jamie Morin spoke to members of industry, the Air Force, the Air Force Association and media as part of AFA's monthly breakfast program that provides a venue for senior Air Force and Department of Defense leaders to communicate directly with the public and the press.

Despite the encouraging progress made by Congress by enacting the Defense Authorization Bill and delaying the spending cuts that would have been put in place by the budget control act, Morin said, "there's a lot more work to be done." 

Air Force officials are bracing for the potential combined impact of operating under a continuing resolution and the looming possibility of sequestration.

"The uncertainty associated with this threat makes it even harder for the institutions of defense," Morin said. "It greatly complicates resource planning at a time when we need to squeeze the maximum amount of combat capability out of each tax dollar that is entrusted to us."

Morin and Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Larry Spencer issued guidance to all major commands Jan. 14, outlining near-term actions to reduce spending rates and minimize budget execution risks.

"We put restrictions in place of civilian hiring; we directed curtailment of non-readiness and non-mission critical flight operations and travel; we also said defer, curtail and reduce any non-essential purchases," said Morin.

"Similarly, we said we're willing to accept a bit of pause in our facility sustainment, renovations modernization and we should focus resources only on emergency work."

At a glance, these actions may seem substantial, but Morin emphasized that sequestration would be much harsher.

"The actions that we've directed so far, only take a small step towards sequestration reductions," said Morin. "This is in no way, shape or form implementing a sequestration reduction. If sequestration is triggered and we remain under a continuing resolution for a year, the impacts are blunt, the impacts are heavy, and they are very serious."

In light of the unknown, Morin stressed the importance of leaders working together and sticking to the defense strategy.

"The tighter the resource environment, the more critical that the Nation and the defense establishment align closer to the new strategic guidance," he said. "Uncertainty does not give us a pass on our need to do good strategy and our need to make good resource choices in the near term, medium term and the long term."

Though Morin said he believes the strategy aligns well with U.S. security and economic interests, as well as the global environment, there are a host of implications that come from the strategy - to include a balanced force structure, the need to improve readiness levels and a requirement to modernize the force.

"These are principles that Air Force leaders use to guide budget decisions in 2013; principles that we intend to stick by in 2014, and the future," Morin said, highlighting the importance of preserving the Air Force's distinctive capabilities. "We believe the current budget is right-sized to provide those goals and to meet the requirements, but it involves making tough choices."

One of those choices was to trade size for quality, he said, adding that throughout the budget planning process leaders will remain focused on preserving key military advantage.

"We are facing a complicated, uncertain fiscal environment. There will be pressure to choose between fiscal responsibility and a strong national defense -- that is, in my mind at least, a false choice," Morin said. "We can and should recognize that the long-term health of the U.S. economy, the U.S. military and our position in the world depends on us being good stewards in defense and getting more combat capability out of each dollar."



tabComments
2/7/2013 11:15:23 AM ET
Meanwhile the AF just announced its sponsorship in NASCAR 2013 amazing.
Steve, FL
 
1/24/2013 10:10:49 AM ET
The bands do provide wonderful PR and increase the morale of our troops both in times of peace and war. If Congress allowed the military bands to market their music they would also have wonderful ROI that would more than pay for their costs. As it stands now they are banned from selling their CDsbut the music industry has carte blanch access to the music so they can repress and sell for a profit. These men and women choose to serve the military as enlisted members despite the fact that they have degrees and most have advanced degrees in their profession. Show me the military officers that degrees in military tactics and strategy. Yes our officers are degreed. We have pilots who have degrees in history music geography engineering and business to name but a few.The Air Force has approximately 24 bands throughout all commands with a total budget less than 80M. Source Rep. Betty McCollum D-MN. The AF spends more than that with end-of-year fall out money. Bands are unique
Bryan, Scott
 
1/22/2013 10:44:21 PM ET
Becky I agree with you. Congress should do their job or not get paid. I also say what good does recruiting do if the new recruits won't get paid for their work
Ret MSgt, SATX
 
1/22/2013 2:36:12 PM ET
I think an argument could be made for elimating the outrageous re-enlistment bonuses that the kids are getting today as well as flight pay. Having a job these days should be a bonus enough. Quite wasting money already
Retired Senior Master Sergeant, SW USA
 
1/22/2013 2:02:30 PM ET
My first thought when I joined in 2008 was Tops in Blue and airshows a waste of money and resources. Civilians come on base for the latter trash it and we waste our all our airman's time to do FOD walks all around base. For what contribution The USAF isn't a circus..though some may object to that statement PFast forward 4.5 years where many of my friends bosses and co-wokers have been forced to separate retire crosstrain and even I am having my CJR dangled in front of my face and am told my career is completely volatile and uncertain. My shop went from eight 7-levels down to one crosstrained 7-level two 5-levels and two 3-levels.I loved my job and everything involved with it. Our shop was productive and knowledgeable. Now with overworking an undermanned shop questioning whether we'll even have a job next year and budget contraints so tight we have to practically beg for funding to do necessary maintenance getting out and using that Post 911 GI Bill is more
Theo, Idaho
 
1/22/2013 11:28:32 AM ET
Well seems to me that if we're talking money issues...why are pilotsaircrews receiving bonuses still Those were designed to keep pilots in uniform when the market on the outside was better. That is no longer the case. Airlines still haven't started hiring again and if they are...it's at a slow pace. Why Air Battle Managers get bonuses is beyond me. They have no translatable skills to the outside job markets other than the standard managerial ability any Officer or NCO develops over the course of a career. If you want to save money stop paying people extra to do a job they should be doing for the standard pay everyone else gets. Service before self.
Big Ed, Virginia
 
1/22/2013 10:48:22 AM ET
Start with Washington DC. The military and military civilians have downsized enough through outsourcing and other programs. We have downsized so much that one civilian or Airman is now doing 3 jobs. No office help or experts in their field because we have to do too many jobs at once. No training because of budget cuts. When are you going to stop hurting the military and start looking at Washington DC Politicians They have Office Assistants for Office Assistants. They have the best retirement program ever. They have people driving them around and taking unnecessary party trips. Showing up to work when they feel like it. Not doing THEIR job like balancing the budget. Taking advantage of the American People who pay their salary and retirements. Start with the overpaid underworked politicians Maybe some of us vote them in but Im sure we dont monitor what they do on a daily basis when they are changing the rules to suit themselves. We have too much to worry about in our own homes in
Becky, New Mexico
 
1/22/2013 10:27:26 AM ET
I wonder if they will cancel the AFA conferences
Craig, Texas
 
1/22/2013 9:28:24 AM ET
Trimming the fat would include the PA entertainment I would think before a Civilian Furlow
Glenn, Tyndall AFB
 
1/20/2013 11:19:05 AM ET
Tops in Blue 100K I.G. again.
I.G., I.G.
 
1/18/2013 3:42:14 PM ET
we're cutting 31percent of our base personnel who wants to tell them their jobs over because we need TIBThunderbirds and other entertainment
Blue, Michigan
 
1/18/2013 3:29:44 PM ET
As someone who has spent the last 6 years overseas I think the Tops in Blue and related recruting tools are a waste of money. If recruting is really your goal you could reach thousands more people with a simple YouTube video than you ever could with a band of amature musicians. The audiences that do see them are too jaded to enjoy them anyways. Tell Coke thank you but please support Wounded Warriors instead.
Chris, Langley
 
1/18/2013 2:12:10 PM ET
Interestingly has anyone else noted the number of retired GOs in the AFA audience which the Undersecretary is addressing. Sequestration will impact their companys contracts more than impact the line Airmen. Not feeling sorry for industry as their inflated costs help get us in this mess
RSO, Saddle Rock Colo
 
1/18/2013 11:04:36 AM ET
I agree that air shows and Tops in Blue are good recruiting and morale tools but I have been an AF employee in one form or another for over 32 years and I have only seen the bands at a few high level events that were only there because a general officer wanted to see them. Never saw them before I joined. I believe most others could care less. BTW Tyndall has already cancelled their Air Show this time due to current budget constraints
Rick Venable, Tyndall AFB
 
1/18/2013 10:52:29 AM ET
@Willie Jones - You say that the air shows Tops in Blue and the the AF band give the public a look into what we do HOWEVER the Air Force isn't a show or a band. Those are just a small fraction of a percent of what the Air Force is. I agree that they are recruiting tools but as the military will be cutting personnel due to budget cuts where is the need for recruiting
James, Virginia
 
1/18/2013 10:40:18 AM ET
Why is it that everytime our government and military go through fiscal growing pains everyone wants to cut the bands Military bands are an excellent PA tool especially in parts of the world that don't particularly like us. We put a different and more positive face on the United States and the Armed Forces. I can tell every single one of you that want to cut the bands that we are no different than anyone else in the military and we do not get special treatment. I have deployed twice and been to combat training twice and I have played for troops and foreign dignitaries all over the world including Iraq and Afghanistan. Entertainment and troop morale is just a small part of what we do. I also would like to add that it is Federal Law that every veteran in this great country of ours is afforded full military honors if they wish at their time of death. Imagine having to tell the spouse and family of a fallen soldier airman seaman marine or coast guardsman Sorry but we don't
MTD, Nebraska
 
1/18/2013 10:35:10 AM ET
This is part of the price that needs to be paid for all the outrageous spending the military has done for so long. This is a good time to really look at where money really needs to be focused in the military such as all levels of training and operations. Comfort is nice but not in any way critical and new furniture computers TV's and all the shiny objects that look nice aren't necessary. We need to be more concerned with making things last instead of replacing everything to be more economical instead of wasteful.
James, Virginia
 
1/18/2013 10:30:15 AM ET
Does anyone posting about the Air Force Band have the actual budgetary figures or are we speaking without knowing the facts? The reason that I ask is because I remember in going to a Tops in Blue concert that they said Coca Cola was the sponsor. How much does the Air Force actually contribute to the funding? Personnel salaries will always be an expense, yes, but it is also my understanding that if deployment needs should arise all band members can be immediately called to duty. Comments on the Thunderbirds warrant similar prudent thought. The use of the aircraft is still a form of training and they too as always stated can be rapidly converted back to military readiness if the need should arise. Although I don't recall them stating as heavily they had sponsors for Thunderbird events as they do for the Tops in Blue.
Jason, Tinker AFB
 
1/18/2013 9:17:38 AM ET
Tough times tough decisions to be made regarding how to spend USAF money. There are surely a lot of good ideas out there from the boots on the ground let's start getting input from those directly engaged in our daily mission.
Henry, DMAFB
 
1/18/2013 9:09:24 AM ET
Cheif of Staff needs a hotline for those who can contribute to cost saving ideas from the ground level without fear of retribution. Plenty of savings out there but base leadership may not want to see it happen on their base
Brian , Colorado
 
1/18/2013 9:08:12 AM ET
Air shows AF bands Tops in Blue and other high visibility organizations are recruiting tools and it gives the public a look inside some of the things we do. These things help strengthens the relationship between the civilian public and the military. I for one would leave things as they are. These programs should not be touched.
Willie Jones Jr., Scott AFB
 
1/18/2013 8:45:00 AM ET
We should really look at our expendatures on non-mission critical items such as furniture playgrould equipment and other frivolous things. We could save millions at each base just by using what we have and not buying new. Just because some high ranking officer decides he wants brown carpet instead of blue for his whole office doesn't mean that he gets it.
John, Barksdale
 
1/18/2013 8:08:35 AM ET
Drew-How many people joined the Air Force because they went to an Air Force Band concert Other than of course people who join the Air Force to be in the band. The bands are NOT effective recruiting tools and never have been. If leadership is telling everyone that only mission critical items are being funded and then keep the bands going that sends a message about what they think is really important...the show not the bombs on target.
james, Ohio
 
1/18/2013 7:03:37 AM ET
Cut Civil Engineers. The AF dont need us any more
Rob Jubie, Birmingham AL
 
1/17/2013 4:58:16 PM ET
AF should cut the Thunderbirds and open houses. We would realize much more savings than cutting the bands. But I agree cut the bands too
Jess, Scott AFB
 
1/17/2013 3:01:19 PM ET
@Jerry - Air Force bands should be the first to go my friend you hit the nail on the head. They are not nor have they ever been mission essential just a black hole of tax payer dollars. You should see the Greyhound style bus they have here at Peterson AFB. Fraud waste and abuse
Jeff, Peterson AFB
 
1/17/2013 2:20:02 PM ET
JerryThat cliche can be fought over and over again. However the cost savings when comparing the use of simulators to offset the decrease in flying hours and disbanding the Air Force's recruiting efforts is just shoddy math.We all know it's much more cost-effective to decrease flying hours by a small percentage curtail non-essential IT upgrades and personnel freezes than it is to fire a few Airmen and decrease morale even further within the force in times of economic crisis.
Drew, Beale AFB
 
1/17/2013 1:06:04 PM ET
Of course we will continue to fund all Air Force bands and Tops in Blue 100 percent. After all you can cut flying hours but don't touch the entertainment.
Jerry , Oklahoma
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
2012 climate survey shows overall satisfaction with jobs, leaders  5

Medical wing, San Antonio hospital collaborate to hone AF nursing skills

First Afghan Air Force C-208 CASEVAC a success

ACC continues planning for sequestration impacts

SecAF presents Panetta with Exceptional Civilian Service Award   1

AF splits space, missile career field for officers  4

SecDef announces Distinguished Warfare Medal  23

Lazyman inspires participants to overcome obstacles  1

AF airlift support to Mali hits 2 million-pound mark  3

Nellis prepares for F-35 arrival   1

Former MTI sentenced during sexual misconduct trial  2

Air Force Week in Photos  2

CSAF and CMSAF visit the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing  |  VIDEO

AF implements enlisted date of separation rollback   9

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Plan ahead for those you love  1

'Domestic violence can't happen to me' -- yes it can


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing