Home > State Appraiser Regulatory Programs > State Compliance Reviews

State Compliance Reviews


The ASC monitors each State’s appraiser licensing and certification regulatory program to ensure the State:

(1) recognizes and enforces the standards, requirements and procedures pre­scribed by Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, (Title XI);

(2) has adequate authority to permit it to carry out its Title XI-related functions; and

(3) makes decisions concerning appraisal stan­dards, appraiser qualifications and supervision of appraiser practices consistent with Title XI. The ASC, in general, satisfies these responsibilities by performing on-site Compliance Reviews of State agency programs and maintaining close communications with appraisers, State and Federal agencies, and users of appraisal services. Written communica­tions are available on our website under the FOIA Reading Room, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).


Each Compliance Review assesses every facet of a State’s appraiser regulatory program. Particular emphasis is placed on the State agency’s enforcement program. Reviews usually are scheduled to coincide with a meeting of the State agency’s decision-making body and are conducted over two to four days. ASC staff presents its Preliminary Findings and recommendations to the State. The State is allowed 60 days to respond to the Preliminary Findings.


After receiving the State’s response, or once the 60-day response period has passed, whichever occurs first, all correspondence and staff recommendations are forwarded to the ASC for final consideration. The ASC issues a final ASC Compliance Review Report with the ASC’s findings and required actions.  You will find copies of a past State Compliance Review Reports in our Public Documents Library under “State Compliance Review correspondence”.



2011 ASC State Compliance Review Summary

 

 State     Date of Review  ASC Finding  Review Cycle 
Tennessee                January In Substantial Compliance         Two Year
Kentucky     January In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Idaho February Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Utah     February Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
District of Columbia March     In Substantial Compliance Two Year 
Delaware March In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Indiana March Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
Mississippi April  In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Virginia     May In Substantial Compliance Two Year
South Carolina May In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Alaska May Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Rhode Island June In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Wyoming June Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Montana June Not In Substantial Compliance One Year
Iowa July In Substantial Compliance Two Year
New Hampshire July In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Hawaii August Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Wisconsin August Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Maine September In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Nebraska September In Substantial Compliance Two Year
New York September Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Kansas October Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Oklahoma October In Substantial Compliance Two Year
New Mexico November In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Illinois November Not In Compliance One Year - Accelerated Periodic Supervision
Ohio November In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Florida December Not in Substantial Compliance One Year


 

2012 ASC State Compliance Review Summary

 

State   Date of Review  ASC Finding  Review Cycle 
Puerto Rico                  January    

 In Substantial Compliance       

Two Year                                 

Georgia     February In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Connecticut April     In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Maryland February Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
Arkansas March     Not In Substantial Complaince Two Year
Oregon July In Substantial Compliance Two Year
North Dakota July In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Alabama  January     Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
Louisiana March     Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
New Jersey March     Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
Washington May Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Texas May Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Michigan June Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
South Dakota August In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Nevada June Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Colorado    September In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Arizona April Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Pennsylvania May Not in Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up
North Carolina September  In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Montana June Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Massachusetts June Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Minnesota July Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year
Missouri August Not In Substantial Compliance Two Year with Follow-up