Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5101
![]() ABSTRACTThe Roanoke River is an important natural resource for North Carolina, Virginia, and the Nation. Flood plains of the lower Roanoke River, which extend from Roanoke Rapids Dam to Batchelor Bay near Albemarle Sound, support a large and diverse population of nesting birds, waterfowl, freshwater and anadromous fish, and other wildlife, including threatened and endangered species. The flow regime of the lower Roanoke River is affected by a number of factors, including flood-management operations at the upstream John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir. A three-dimensional, numerical water-quality model was developed to explore links between upstream flows and downstream water quality, specifically in-stream dissolved-oxygen dynamics. Calibration of the hydrodynamics and dissolved-oxygen concentrations emphasized the effect that flood-plain drainage has on water and oxygen levels, especially at locations more than 40 kilometers away from the Roanoke Rapids Dam. Model hydrodynamics were calibrated at three locations on the lower Roanoke River, yielding coefficients of determination between 0.5 and 0.9. Dissolved-oxygen concentrations were calibrated at the same sites, and coefficients of determination ranged between 0.6 and 0.8. The model has been used to quantify relations among river flow, flood-plain water level, and in-stream dissolved-oxygen concentrations in support of management of operations of the John H. Kerr Dam, which affects overall flows in the lower Roanoke River. Scenarios have been developed to mitigate the negative effects that timing, duration, and extent of flood-plain inundation may have on vegetation, wildlife, and fisheries in the lower Roanoke River corridor. Under specific scenarios, the model predicted that mean dissolved-oxygen concentrations could be increased by 15 percent by flow-release schedules that minimize the drainage of anoxic flood-plain waters. The model provides a tool for water-quality managers that can help identify options that improve water quality and protect the aquatic habitat of the Roanoke River. |
First posted June 14, 2012
For additional information contact: Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. |
García, A.M., 2012, Effects of flood control and other reservoir operations on the water quality of the lower Roanoke River, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5101, 36 p.
Abstract
Introduction
Purpose and Scope
Study Area
Data Used for Model Development and Application
Description of the Modeling System
Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC)
Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP)
Configuration of Models
Numerical Finite-Difference Grid
EFDC Model Setup and Calibration
WASP Setup and Calibration
Scenario Evaluation
Effects of Point Sources on Roanoke River Water Quality
Effects of Variation in Upstream Dissolved-Oxygen Levels on Roanoke River Water Quality
Effects of Hydropower Peaking Operations on Roanoke River Water Quality
Roanoke River Water Quality under Existing Operations and Alternative 6b
Evaluation of a Dynamic Stepping-Down Release Schedule (Betterment Plan)
Summary
References