NASA BLOGS
Dashboard |  Welcome: guest |
NASA.gov: Behind the Page
1 - 7 of 39 posts. Total pages: 6     Go To
Death Star Response Inspiring Future Explorers?
 Posted on Feb 05, 2013 01:22:08 PM | Jim Wilson
 0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent

we the people Death Star petitionThe White House response to a petition on building a Death Star (and the resulting media attention) led to some pretty interesting data here at NASA.gov. While the petitioners wanted to focus on a big project done a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, the response led to thousands of Americans finding out about projects NASA is currently working on right here on Earth and in our Solar System.

One example is a reference to NASA’s Spot the Station tool, which helps direct people to where and when to see the International Space Station in the night sky. Over 10,000 people signed up for the tool on Jan. 12, the day after the blog response was posted. Compared to similar periods, NASA saw a 1,400% increase in Spot the Station site usage.

Both NASA’s Mars Curiosity and International Space Station pages had their highest traffic days of the month on Jan. 12. Both saw a jump in page views between one and two times the monthly average.

The impact on NASA's Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Office (C3PO) page was huge. Traffic to the site increased about 200x between Jan. 10 - 12. The traffic over that weekend represents more than half the traffic to that page for the entire month.

The White House response goes on to mention NASA’s Kepler mission, the Voyager mission, the Solar Probe Plus mission, the agency’s upcoming James Web Telescope, and the free-flying Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, Reorient, Experimental Satellites (SPHERES).

One major goal of NASA and the Administration is to encourage students to take interest in science, math, engineering and technology. Maybe the idea of a Death Star petition wasn’t so crazy. Maybe a few future explorers were inspired by some of NASA’s space missions.

And if Star Wars fans need something spacey to watch while waiting for Star Wars: Episode VII to arrive in theaters, why not tune into NASA’s YouTube Channel and see some of the amazing things being done by folks here on planet Earth.

Image Above: The White House response to the We The People "Death Star" petition, with click-throughs highlighted. View the full size image here.



What's Next for NASA.gov?
 Posted on Nov 13, 2012 09:12:54 AM | Brian Dunbar
 0 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent

We're starting on the next go-round of what NASA.gov looks like and want to know what you think.

The digital universe has changed radically since we overhauled www.NASA.gov in 2007. When we released that version (NASA.gov 5.0) we were most concerned with reorganizing our content so that it reflects how the general public sees NASA and its work, making things easier for people to find. (Your feedback said we largely succeeded, though with a site as complex as NASA's it will never be perfect.) We also added blogs and the ability for users to rate and comment on our content.

The biggest change since then has obviously been the growth of social media. You've probably seen some of the numbers: NASA has 1.3 million Facebook likes and 3.1 million Twitter followers, and more than 280,000 people circle us on Google+. I was wondering if that would mean a drop in visitors to the site as people became content with the information they could get on social media. In fact, visits to the site dropped from 2008 to 2009 and again from 2009 to 2010.  Then we set a record with 150 million visits to the site in 2011 and already have 166 million this year. With four years of data, it's now no surprise that they don't correlate: while there's some overlap between the two audiences, almost 70 percent of our site visitors aren't really influenced by social media. 

Meantime, we've been trying to bring the conversation back to NASA.gov. Social media sites are great for flashing the latest news or multimedia item around the world, but the depth and context are here on the site. We want to make sure people know that they can always learn more about what they're most interested in by coming to the site. 

We also want our regular visitors to know that there's NASA content available off the site. We've embedded the @NASA Twitter feed in the home page so visitors can see the latest updates. We're pushing streams of NASA TV to Ustream and videos to YouTube, and offering programming there that isn't on NASA TV. We've covered recent news events by putting up a splash page that combines live NASA TV with Twitter feeds and active commenting.

Hand-in-hand with social media's growth has been the public's adoption of smartphones to access websites. We launched the mobile version of www.NASA.gov a couple of years ago and have watched its usage grow. We recently put it through some user testing and made some changes based on the results.

So -- do you like something you've seen? Is something missing? How do you interact with NASA online? Where else do you get your NASA news from? We're opening up an online forum at Ideascale to take your feedback. You can offer ideas of your own or comment and vote on others' suggestions. You can post comments here. We'll take all the data and do some prototyping, then see what you think.


Changes to Our News Section
 Posted on Jun 12, 2012 11:04:21 AM | Brian Dunbar
17 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
Back in January we changed how we presented the main news stories on NASA's Home Page. Under the old treatment

image of www.nasa.gov news feature
News-feature treatment before January 2012.

some people said they could not find stories other than the top one, even though the stories cycled through the main slot. And with our upcoming events "ticker" above the image, it was easy to mistake that line for the headline, which was actually below the picture. Finally, we had had perpetual complaints about it being impossible to find older stories once they dropped off the main page.

So we changed to the current format, which has only one photo with nothing cycling. We pulled the headlines for other important stories up to the right of the main image, and visually separated the ticker from the main news box. We also added an archive to older stories.

image of proposed news-feature treatment
Proposed news-feature treatment.

There was no overwhelming reaction. Our customer-satisfaction survey showed the exact same ratings for overall satisfaction and look and feel for the three months before the switch and the five months since. The navigation rating dropped a single point.

Still there were some complaints, primarily about having only one image. People expected to have an image come up in relation to the secondary stories. We've tried to address that, and you can see the result on this mockup. Instead of headlines for other stories, you have thumbnails that link to them, with an additional link to the archive. In keeping with the original changes, nothing happens as you move your mouse. You have to click. When you do, the large thumbnail and text comes up for that story.

We're interested in your feedback -- please let us know what you think. And a heads up that we'll be coming back to you within a month or so for your ideas on what the next major overhaul of www.NASA.gov should look like.



What Does 'Content As Data' Mean, Anyway?
 Posted on May 23, 2012 04:39:08 PM | Jim Wilson
2 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent

Editor's Note: Jim Wilson is Senior Producer of www.nasa.gov and served on detail as project manager for the .Gov Reform Task Force, which helped develop the Digital Government Strategy.

The newly released Digital Government Strategy calls for a fundamental shift in how government treats digital information, taking an information-centric approach and treating all content as data. But what exactly does "content as data" mean?

Many of us probably hear the word "data" and think of a long list of facts and figures or maybe that android guy from "Star Trek." But here we're talking about "structured data," which is just a fancy way of saying we build our content so that it can be read by machines as well as humans. If you've ever subscribed to a podcast or an RSS news feed, you were using this idea.

So what would this look like, and how could it help the government reach citizens? Well, we already know, because we're already doing it.

Here at NASA, we consume a lot of our own data. This means that we structure things like press releases, images and videos so they can be syndicated across the site and subscribed to by users. Our entire collection of videos on www.nasa.gov/video  is presented this way. Anytime a new video is published, it gets added to the appropriate feed, which automatically get pulled into the appropriate pages, without having to manually add to pages and publish multiple times.

Shuttle page using data feeds

NASA.gov homepage using dynamic feeds to provide updates on STS-135 mission. 

Our most high-profile use of this technique came during the final flight of the space shuttle in July 2011, when we set up a special version of the NASA.gov homepage with multiple data feeds from around the country. At any given time, users could see a real-time text stream of mission updates, as well as the latest videos and photos from the mission. This information could be updated from multiple sources in Florida, Texas, Washington, DC and elsewhere. And the homepage itself rarely had to be touched. Simply by setting up the feeds, NASA let all the data flow into a single, easily accessible place. The page was tweeted more than 8.000 times and got more than 42,000 likes on Facebook.

Another example of this approach is the "create once, publish everywhere" mindset used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to liberate its content from presentation. In other words, you don't have to go to their webpage and look at the information in their look-and-feel. You can get the information directly from them in lots of different places, on your terms.

So how does that work?

CDC's content is structured in tagged so that it can be syndicated and consumed both within the agency and externally. Within its own channels, content is updated once then easily displayed on the main CDC.gov web site, the mobile site at m.cdc.gov, and in the various modules of the CDC mobile app. In 2011, CDC’s liberated content was syndicated to 700 registered partners in all 50 US states, the District of Columbia and 15 countries and accounted for an additional 1.2 million page views.

Opening government information in this way has huge potential. Citizens can take content and mash it up to fit their unique needs, while private sector firms can develop government data-driven apps that the government couldn't build on its own.

We want our users to get the content however they want. If it's good for them to come to our site, great. But if they can get the information they need some other way, just as great. Our mission, after all, isn't driving up page views to our homepage; it's providing the best digital information and services to citizens.



NASA.gov and Social Media: Where Do They Meet?
 Posted on Mar 16, 2012 09:39:41 AM | Brian Dunbar
1 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
We released our last redesign in 2007. Since then social media have exploded and changed how people get information online. Social media have also raised the question of whether its participants are using their newer tools more exclusively, or are they still visiting existing web sites.

One of the questions we ask in our customer-satisfaction survey is how frequently a visitor accesses certain kinds of content or engages in particular activities. They respond on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always). Here are the results for 2011, with each activity, followed by the percentage of people who answered 3, 4, or 5 (in other words, with some frequency), and then the percentage of people who answered 1 (never).

Images: 86%, 4%
Feature stories & news updates: 81%, 6%
Video Features: 70%, 10%
NASA TV streaming: 48%, 28%
Interactive Features: 48%, 23%
NASA calendar: 45%, 27%
Bookmark or tag pages: 32%, 43%
e-Mail updates: 28%, 57%
Read blogs: 26%, 47%
Use social networks to find out about NASA: 22%, 65%
myNASA: 27%, 53%
Podcasts: 20%, 57%
Add comments, ratings or reviews: 19%, 60%


No surprises at the top. Images and video have been the most popular elements on the site since I started editing it in 1995. The most interesting thing to me is that 2/3 of respondents say they don't use social media to find out about NASA. We have a related question asking people what other tools besides NASA.gov do they use to find out about NASA. The responses:
  
  Watch NASA video on YouTube: 37%  
Visit newsmedia sites like cnn.com: 27%  
  Other: 20%  
  Participate in online communities like Facebook regarding NASA missions: 12%  
  Read blogs: 9%  
  Follow NASA Twitter feeds: 9%  
  RSS feeds: 5%  
  None: 5%  
  SMS/Texting: 1%  

Taken together, the two questions suggest that NASA's web audience and social-media audiences are still distinct, only overlapping a small amount. As we move forward into the next version of NASA.gov, which we hope to start working on in the next few weeks, we'll need to keep this in mind. We want to integrate more social media into the web site, but we can't move totally in that direction because there's still a large part of audience that hasn't done so at all.

Please offer any feedback you'd like to in the comments section.

Changes Are Coming to NASA TV on the Web
 Posted on Sep 22, 2011 04:31:35 PM | Brian Dunbar
4 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
We've been streaming NASA TV on the web in earnest since 2004, when the Mars Exploration Rovers landed. Then 50,000 people watched our mission coverage on RealMedia, in windows probably not much bigger than today's smartphone screen. Seven years later, more than 560,000 people watched the launch of the last space shuttle mission, many of them on an HD feed in Adobe Flash that filled a 22-inch monitor quite respectably. Others watched on their phones and tablets. Over the course of the mission, all that video meant that in two weeks we shipped almost as much data (1.2 petabytes, or more than 1.2 billion megabytes) than we did in all 2010.

And, unfortunately, we can't afford to keep that up. Before adding HD and iOS streaming, we were streaming about 50 TB a month. Now we're averaging five times that. This doesn't fit well under a firm fixed-price contract. So while we've been able to find some additional funds, we're also going to have to reduce our usage somewhat. Specifically, we're going to:
  • Continue streaming the NASA TV public channel in HD at its current top resolution
  • Continue streaming to iOS devices at the current top resolution
  • Shift the ISS video stream to Ustream. (The mission audio stream, and the NASA TV media and educational channels, may also switch to Ustream.)
  • Discontinue streaming in RTSP format.
That last will affect users of older Android phones, those operating on OS 2.1 or earlier. Unfortunately, the cost of the RTSP stream was quite high (higher even that the main HD feed of NASA TV) and the audience was never very big, fewer than 800 during peaks that saw hundreds of thousands of users on other formats. So it simply didn't make sense to keep doing it that way. While we hate to shut down any capability, we do have to manage the taxpayers' money smartly.

You'll see these changes take affect late next week. We're sorry for any inconvenience.

Why Do You Have to Type out ‘www’ to Get to our Website?
 Posted on Jun 10, 2011 10:11:33 AM | Brian Dunbar
36 Comments | | Poor Fair Average Good Excellent

It seems really simple – just three letters. But they seem to annoy some of our users, who have let us know: "Why do I have to type www.nasa.gov and not just nasa.gov? Don't you people even know the basics of running a web site?"

 

The answer goes back to the early 1990s, when the Internet existed – but the World Wide Web did not. NASA was on the Net very early in its history, and the nasa.gov Domain Name Servers (DNS) – the Internet's version of a phone book (OK, online directory) – handled bulletin board systems, Gopher and more. When the World Wide Web came along,  www.nasa.gov became the agency's primary home online.

 

Today the World Wide Web is still one of the many, many networked services NASA provides, all based on the nasa.gov domain. But along the way the web became the public's most widely used aspect of the Internet, so much that the "www" became almost implicit. It started to disappear from the URLs of popular websites. NASA never made that switch, and our domain servers still do not forward users looking for nasa.gov to www.nasa.gov. (Though many web browsers now do that automatically once you've visited a site.)

 

Setting up our infrastructure to do that is technically straightforward: we need to add more servers to handle a lot of additional traffic on the front end, before people get to content. There are both implementation and ongoing operational costs to doing so, and that's where the decision point is. Is this the best use of NASA's resources?

 

We are in the age of zero-sum budgets: when we spend money in one area, we don't spend it on another. In the last year we've been improving our on-demand video capability, optimizing our mobile site and expanding the reach of our live video via Ustream and smartphones. All of those things are increasing the reach of www.nasa.gov, probably more than the DNS fix would.

 

Still, we've got the plans and are evaluating them and the opportunity costs of implementing. We'll keep you apprised.


1 - 7 of 39 posts. Total pages: 6     Go To