Archive for November, 2006
![abbamainpic98.jpg](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20130124020133im_/http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/archives/abbamainpic98.jpg)
From Billboard via Brooklyn Vegan
An ABBA museum dedicated to the music, clothing and history of the legendary Swedish pop group and its four members will open in Stockholm in 2008, organizers said today (Nov. 28).
The interactive museum will feature original outfits and instruments used by the group, handwritten song lyrics, a display of different awards and “all other things we can think of and find,” said Ulf Westman, an event consultant who is spearheading the project with his wife Ewa Wigenheim-Westman.
The museum will also feature a studio where visitors can record their own ABBA songs, and an interactive experience that “will recreate the feeling of being at Wembley stadium and seeing ABBA live with 50,000 others,” Westman said.
Organizers are still searching for a suitable location for the museum, but said it will open somewhere in central Stockholm during 2008.
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » 2 Comments » by freewilliamsburg Thursday, November 30th, 2006, 10:33 am
![Hissingfauna.jpg](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20130124020133im_/http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/archives/Hissingfauna.jpg)
The Sunlandic Twins was one of our favorites last year. You can stream Of Montreal’s new one, Hissing Fauna, Are You The Destroyer? here. It’s out January 23.
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » 1 Comment » by freewilliamsburg Wednesday, November 29th, 2006, 9:44 am
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » 1 Comment » by freewilliamsburg Tuesday, November 28th, 2006, 10:15 am
Because, evidently, stickin’ to your guns is more important than listening to facts. From the AP
President Bush, under pressure to change direction in Iraq, said Tuesday he will not be persuaded by any calls to withdraw American troops before the country is stabilized.
“There’s one thing I’m not going to do, I’m not going to pull our troops off the battlefield before the mission is complete,” he said in a speech setting the stage for high-stakes meetings with the Iraqi prime minister later this week. “We can accept nothing less than victory for our children and our grandchildren.”
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » 15 Comments » by freewilliamsburg Tuesday, November 28th, 2006, 10:10 am
From Washington Post via Jesus Politics
There will be no victory or defeat for the United States in Iraq. These terms do not reflect the reality of what is going to happen there. The future of Iraq was always going to be determined by the Iraqis — not the Americans.
Iraq is not a prize to be won or lost. It is part of the ongoing global struggle against instability, brutality, intolerance, extremism and terrorism. There will be no military victory or military solution for Iraq. Former secretary of state Henry Kissinger made this point last weekend.
The time for more U.S. troops in Iraq has passed. We do not have more troops to send and, even if we did, they would not bring a resolution to Iraq. Militaries are built to fight and win wars, not bind together failing nations. We are once again learning a very hard lesson in foreign affairs: America cannot impose a democracy on any nation — regardless of our noble purpose.
We have misunderstood, misread, misplanned and mismanaged our honorable intentions in Iraq with an arrogant self-delusion reminiscent of Vietnam. Honorable intentions are not policies and plans. Iraq belongs to the 25 million Iraqis who live there. They will decide their fate and form of government.
It may take many years before there is a cohesive political center in Iraq. America’s options on this point have always been limited. There will be a new center of gravity in the Middle East that will include Iraq. That process began over the past few days with the Syrians and Iraqis restoring diplomatic relations after 20 years of having no formal communication.
What does this tell us? It tells us that regional powers will fill regional vacuums, and they will move to work in their own self-interest — without the United States. This is the most encouraging set of actions for the Middle East in years. The Middle East is more combustible today than ever before, and until we are able to lead a renewal of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, mindless destruction and slaughter will continue in Lebanon, Israel and across the Middle East.
We are a long way from a sustained peaceful resolution to the anarchy in Iraq. But this latest set of events is moving the Middle East in the only direction it can go with any hope of lasting progress and peace. The movement will be imperfect, stuttering and difficult.
America finds itself in a dangerous and isolated position in the world. We are perceived as a nation at war with Muslims. Unfortunately, that perception is gaining credibility in the Muslim world and for many years will complicate America’s global credibility, purpose and leadership. This debilitating and dangerous perception must be reversed as the world seeks a new geopolitical, trade and economic center that will accommodate the interests of billions of people over the next 25 years. The world will continue to require realistic, clear-headed American leadership — not an American divine mission.
The United States must begin planning for a phased troop withdrawal from Iraq. The cost of combat in Iraq in terms of American lives, dollars and world standing has been devastating. We’ve already spent more than $300 billion there to prosecute an almost four-year-old war and are still spending $8 billion per month. The United States has spent more than $500 billion on our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And our effort in Afghanistan continues to deteriorate, partly because we took our focus off the real terrorist threat, which was there, and not in Iraq.
We are destroying our force structure, which took 30 years to build. We’ve been funding this war dishonestly, mainly through supplemental appropriations, which minimizes responsible congressional oversight and allows the administration to duck tough questions in defending its policies. Congress has abdicated its oversight responsibility in the past four years.
It is not too late. The United States can still extricate itself honorably from an impending disaster in Iraq. The Baker-Hamilton commission gives the president a new opportunity to form a bipartisan consensus to get out of Iraq. If the president fails to build a bipartisan foundation for an exit strategy, America will pay a high price for this blunder — one that we will have difficulty recovering from in the years ahead.
To squander this moment would be to squander future possibilities for the Middle East and the world. That is what is at stake over the next few months.
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » No Comments » by freewilliamsburg Sunday, November 26th, 2006, 10:35 am
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » No Comments » by freewilliamsburg Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006, 11:50 am
![joshua-muravchik_tv_15aug05.jpg](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20130124020133im_/http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/archives/joshua-muravchik_tv_15aug05.jpg)
Joshua Muravchick
This American Enterprise “scholar” says diplomatic relations have not worked. No matter, we haven’t spoken to the Iranians since April 7, 1980.
Here’s Muravchick’s tirade:
WE MUST bomb Iran.
It has been four years since that country’s secret nuclear program was brought to light, and the path of diplomacy and sanctions has led nowhere.
First, we agreed to our allies’ requests that we offer Tehran a string of concessions, which it spurned. Then, Britain, France and Germany wanted to impose a batch of extremely weak sanctions. For instance, Iranians known to be involved in nuclear activities would have been barred from foreign travel ‚Äî except for humanitarian or religious reasons ‚Äî and outside countries would have been required to refrain from aiding some, but not all, Iranian nuclear projects.
But even this was too much for the U.N. Security Council. Russia promptly announced that these sanctions were much too strong. “We cannot support measures … aimed at isolating Iran,” declared Foreign Minister Sergei V. Lavrov.
It is now clear that neither Moscow nor Beijing will ever agree to tough sanctions. What’s more, even if they were to do so, it would not stop Iran, which is a country on a mission. As President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad put it: “Thanks to the blood of the martyrs, a new Islamic revolution has arisen…. The era of oppression, hegemonic regimes and tyranny and injustice has reached its end…. The wave of the Islamic revolution will soon reach the entire world.” There is simply no possibility that Iran’s clerical rulers will trade this ecstatic vision for a mess of Western pottage in the form of economic bribes or penalties.
So if sanctions won’t work, what’s left? The overthrow of the current Iranian regime might offer a silver bullet, but with hard-liners firmly in the saddle in Tehran, any such prospect seems even more remote today than it did a decade ago, when students were demonstrating and reformers were ascendant. Meanwhile, the completion of Iran’s bomb grows nearer every day.
(more…)
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » No Comments » by freewilliamsburg Tuesday, November 21st, 2006, 10:03 am
![john_mccain_ft.jpg](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20130124020133im_/http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/archives/john_mccain_ft.jpg)
This is one reason why McCain scares us. From Think Progress
STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me ask one question about abortion. Then I want to turn to Iraq. You’re for a constitutional amendment banning abortion, with some exceptions for life and rape and incest.
MCCAIN: Rape, incest and the life of the mother. Yes.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So is President Bush, yet that hasn’t advanced in the six years he’s been in office. What are you going to do to advance a constitutional amendment that President Bush hasn’t done?
MCCAIN: I don’t think a constitutional amendment is probably going to take place, but I do believe that it’s very likely or possible that the Supreme Court should — could overturn Roe v. Wade, which would then return these decisions to the states, which I support.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And you’d be for that?
MCCAIN: Yes, because I’m a federalist. Just as I believe that the issue of gay marriage should be decided by the states, so do I believe that we would be better off by having Roe v. Wade return to the states. And I don’t believe the Supreme Court should be legislating in the way that they did on Roe v. Wade.
We have to credit him for his political shrewdness, as callous as it seems. As Frank Rich points out:
His call for more troops even when there are no more troops is about presidential politics, a dodge that allows him to argue in perpetuity that we never would have lost Iraq if only he had been heeded from the start.
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » 1 Comment » by freewilliamsburg Monday, November 20th, 2006, 10:28 am
TAGS: uncategorized
Permalink » Comments Off by freewilliamsburg Saturday, November 18th, 2006, 11:54 am