Daily Feminist Cheat Sheet

Happy centennial to Delta Sigma Theta!

Only sluts straddle motorbikes, amirite?

Forty years of Roe and we’ve never been so scared.

Justice Sotomayor will be the first Latina to swear in a president.

Wronging Rights asks: “What if we responded to sexual assault by limiting men’s freedom like we limit women’s?”

(Trigger warning) The Guardian‘s Suzanne Moore leaves Twitter after revealing her transphobia.

Maureen Dowd apparently doesn’t remember her own columns.

Miss America is a Brooklynite. Burn your hippest bras.

Fourteen ways Obama can push for gun control without Congress.

Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking: Ilyse Hogue named next president of NARAL

An exciting day for the future of reproductive rights activism–Ilyse Hogue, a great thinker, writer and activist has been named the next president of NARAL!

Full press release:

Washington, D.C.–The boards of directors of NARAL Pro-Choice America and the NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation announced today that Ilyse Hogue has been chosen to succeed Nancy Keenan as president of the organization.

“I am absolutely thrilled to be given the honor of leading this great organization,” Hogue said. “This is a critical moment to engage a new generation of young people in the conversation about what choice means in a modern age.  We have a unique opportunity to ignite the pro-choice values most Americans share, solidify our longstanding pro-choice base, and expand its reach moving forward.”

Hogue joins NARAL Pro-Choice America as the former co-founder and co-director of Friends of Democracy Super PAC, a group that works to advance campaign finance reform. She is also a former senior advisor to Media Matters for America, the not-for-profit media accountability organization, and the former director of political advocacy and communications for MoveOn.org.

Janet Denlinger, chair of NARAL Pro-Choice America’s board of directors, said the organization was fortunate to find such a uniquely qualified candidate to lead the organization.

“I am delighted by this decision,” Denlinger said. “Ilyse is the ideal candidate to build on the legacy of the pro-choice movement and raise this cause to new heights. Not only does she have a strong background in political and multi-issue organizing, Ilyse also has conveyed passion and a vision to rally a new generation of young people around the issue of choice.” Read More »

Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Best and Worst of the Golden Globes

Last night everyone in the world (read: everyone I follow on Twitter) watched the Golden Globes, which promised to be an important event for women in entertainment with Amy Poehler and Tina Fey hosting and a bunch of talented ladies nominated. In case you had better things to do than watch (read a book, take a nap, feed your cat), we’ve compiled the best and worst moments from the night—from a feminist perspective, of course.

The Top Feminist Moments:

5. Lena Dunham wins stuff. I get that this is a controversial call, and I’m pretty ambivalent about Dunham. I absolutely agree that she is no progressive feminist leader; the “Girls” creator/director/writer/star has some serious thinking to do about race on her show, and I have a big problem with how the series handles sexual violence and harassment. With all that being said, I have to respect this young woman’s choice to portray (some) realistic bodies and awkward, often disturbing sex on television. Despite my reservations, then, I think it’s cool that she was celebrated for that last night with two awards (Best Comedy or Musical and Best Actress, Comedy or Musical), and pissed off a bunch of male establishment critics by winning. Her Best Actress speech also ended pretty beautifully: “This award is for every woman who’s ever felt that there wasn’t a space for her. This show has made a space for me.”

Read More »

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Susan B. Anthony list to create training programs to help Republicans talk about rape

The only instruction that Republicans need about talking about rape these days is to…stop. Or, well, keep talking–so we can continue to learn about their curious and frightening logix about pregnancy, sex, consent, and magic uteri. I imagine Susan B. Anthony list’s training is going to be some form of–”doh, just stop talking about it!” But these fine men just can’t help themselves, because they actually believe what is coming out of their mouths.

via Politico. 

Marina Ein, whose public relations firm does crisis communications, said the party needs some kind of “sensitivity training” for its candidates if it wants to do better in the next elections.

“It all boils down to whether or not the Republican Party thinks this is a problem,” she said. “If they want to make inroads with women, then they need to subject every one of their candidates to sensitivity training — not to mention reality training.”

The training would have to “educate politicians on subjects that are absolutely taboo, except to say, ‘I sympathize with the pain of anyone who goes through fill-in-the-blank,’” she said.

Madden’s advice is simply to stop talking.

The problem is, that it is not their talking points that are the problem, it’s the beliefs that inform the talking points that are the problem. If you fundamentally believe that women have a mechanism to “shut that whole thing down”–sensitivity training is the tip of the iceberg. We should start with science text books and anatomy drawings.

(LOL’ing at image of Republicans sitting around anatomy chart asking questions).

As a legislator, the only concern you should have about sexual assault is what you can do, with your power, to end rape and the culture that allows it to happen. Anything short of that and you are part of the problem and shitty at your job.

via Think Progress. 

 

Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Delhi is different from Steubenville

Pic via.

Nicholas Kristof has a recent op-ed titled, “Is Delhi so different from Steubenville?” which makes the case that sexual assault is an international and universal epidemic. He writes,

Gender violence is one of the world’s most common human rights abuses. Women worldwide ages 15 through 44 are more likely to die or be maimed because of male violence than because of cancer, malaria, war and traffic accidents combined. The World Health Organization has found that domestic and sexual violence affects 30 to 60 percent of women in most countries.

In some places, rape is endemic: in South Africa, a survey found that 37 percent of men reported that they had raped a woman. In others, rape is institutionalized as sex trafficking. Everywhere, rape often puts the victim on trial: in one poll, 68 percent of Indian judges said that “provocative attire” amounts to “an invitation to rape.”

Americans watched the events after the Delhi gang rape with a whiff of condescension at the barbarity there, but domestic violence and sex trafficking remain a vast problem across the United States.

He’s right–sexual assault is a global problem that is largely ignored or mishandled by leaders both here and abroad. Kristof is known for making sweeping statements backed up with gruesome details to paint a picture of women as victims. And while his white savior complex goes deep, I don’t fall in the full on anti-Kristof camp, because I do think his writing and work have pushed important and hard to face issues into the mainstream–even if the framing leaves something to be desired.

His global homogenization of women’s experiences is, I imagine, an attempt to register these tragedies as something that happens here as much as it happens elsewhere. Reminding us that sexual assault happens everywhere and that our reaction and treatment of it is not much better than the “less civilized 3rd world” is an important and necessary point to make. But it runs the risk of overshadowing specific differences between the cultural contexts within which sexual assault occurs.

As an American-born South Asian, graduate school educated feminist, I am well equipped with tools for effective cross-cultural comparison. We’ve learned from the mistakes of our Western feminist predecessors not to assume we understand the experience of women in different societies and to avoid universalizing our path to feminist enlightenment as the “liberated women” here to save our downtrodden third world sisters. I understand the importance of holding our words accountable in the face of hegemony, racism, colonization and cultural relativism. Read More »

Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments
192 queries. 0.693 seconds