Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You Know" Slut-Shamers Of Tumblr

Teenage girls find a great many things to do on Tumblr, but one of the more prominent, and more damaging, uses is slut-shaming each other. How a few little pictures started (and continue) a meme-based tirade against women and girls.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You Know...
Katie Heaney

Last summer was big for slut-shaming on Tumblr. (That is, if there can be a time that's especially "big" for something as persistent and widespread as slut-shaming.) The above image, first uploaded to Instagram by the picture's subject — a girl named Sabrina, who otherwise posts largely inoffensive selfies and, occasionally, GIFs of her kissing her boyfriend — was posted to the site on June 18, and though it was quickly deleted by its owner, the image had already started to spread.

A year earlier, in the summer of 2011, an image of model Cole Mohr holding a sign reading "Dear Girls: DON'T BE INSECURE/You don’t need make-up & nice clothes/ you’re all fucking beautiful.” The post attracted attention, but it was only after a parody photo set by Tumblr user "einsteinonacid" was posted that "Dear Girls" became a meme. Einsteinonacid's post had over 150,000 notes in the span of two months. By summer 2012, "Dear Girls" was a thing, roundly criticized by bloggers and fellow Tumblr users alike. But since then, the meme's Tumblr tag has gone relatively quiet. (Though, as Amanda Marcotte noted on Wednesday, where Tumblr users' natural-beauty-concern-trollers might have faltered, The New York Times recently picked up the torch.)

A sexist meme is a sexist meme, but is one that is introduced by a guy somehow easier to quash?

Cole Mohr's original image, set above the meme-ified parody response of Tumblr user "einsteinonacid." Source: knowyourmeme.com

"Hey Girls, Did You Know" is a sexist meme — another image-regulating, slut-shaming meme — that persists. But it's one started and largely perpetrated by girls themselves.

Not unlike "Dear Girls," the original photo set has been widely mocked among Tumblr users both male and female — again, many of whom responded both intelligently and hilariously, and some of whom responded in a way that created entirely new issues of their own.

But not all the posts you'll find searching the "Hey Girls, Did You Know" Tumblr tag aim to contradict the original post's slut-shaming message. Many of them support it — some mimic the original text almost exactly, while others object to obvious makeup use. (And in doing so, circling us back to "Dear Girls," formerly an entirely separate meme. It's the way these things tend to grow, building on each other and metastasizing and getting progressively worse and worse.)

The funniest retorts are from girls. But so are the meanest.

A response to the "Hey Girls, Did You Know" meme. One of the great ones. Source: geeky-n-fit

A Facebook page created in "honor" of the original meme, founded last June, has nearly 37,000 likes. While many of the fan-submitted posts are critical (or at least reduce the meme to silliness), the most popular ones, and the ones most frequently reposted by the page's owner, are ones like this one — posts created by girls to shame and tear down other girls.

It seems there's just something very likable — in the internet sense, at least — about a girl using social media to attack other girls. It may well be easier to build a coalition against an "enemy" who is different from you — as in the girls vs. boys nature of the responses to Boy In Outer Space — but it's another when the enemy IS you. "You're not being a girl in the right way" is still a very popular argument to make. So, too, is "I'm not like other girls."

One of the "Hey Girls, Did You Know" page's most-liked posts.

One of the weirdest things about the Facebook page (if you could pick just one) is the juxtaposition of hateful, misogynistic images like these with the many wholesomely simple, teenage pop-culture-y posts, like this picture of SpongeBob, or this cute cartoon about a dinosaur family.

It's only really surprising until, I suppose, you remember your own years in middle school. It's a strange and cruel age range, no question. You are a kid and you are not.

There are dozens of reasons why young girls (and not-young women) might feel the need to hate and publicly criticize other girls and their gendered behavior: personal insecurity, the societally-enforced perception that doing so is what gets you male approval, jealousy, internalized misogyny, etc. Tumblr notes and Facebook likes are only the newest incentives among many.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

More ▾

Facebook Conversations

          

    24 Responses So Far

    • kerry reyes thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 2 hours ago
    • andi   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about 3 hours ago
    • Lolhelper 4 hours ago

      Meh, it's just the internet. A meme or some silly pics can't really change you, control you, dominate you, make you feel inferior to others, etc. You laugh with it or you just close your darn computer. Fight for your rights when it's really necessary, like, in real life, not on the internet. Duh.

    • andream7 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about 4 hours ago
    • Jack Nathanson 4 hours ago

      I heard Amber Delacio made out with a hot dog

    • bashh thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 5 hours ago
    • Arielle Calderon thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 6 hours ago
    • laurenb41 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is WTF  about 7 hours ago
    • NomNoms   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about 10 hours ago
    • Taiga Star 10 hours ago

      um, maybe a girl's boobs should be in her shirt? unless she wants the attention. i have a drawer full of cleavage shirts because i have amazing huge boobs. i'm also an adult. i guess. i dunno maybe i missed the point. but reading from the comments, i'm not the only one.

    • mollyl5 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about 11 hours ago
    • derekl9 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 13 hours ago
    • Alejandra Villa thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about 15 hours ago
    • RandomPanda 15 hours ago

      My boobs go wherever they want!

    • yttek thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is LOL  about 17 hours ago
    • carlaaalvarado   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s LOL & Win  about 17 hours ago
    • ~DRE~ thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 17 hours ago
    • alexdee thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Win  about 18 hours ago
    • mariauraa thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Win  about 18 hours ago
    • ozana thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is WTF  about 19 hours ago
    • lez9 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about 19 hours ago
    • alyg2 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is LOL  about 19 hours ago
    • chasityc thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Win  about 20 hours ago
    • Steinbeck32   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s Fail, LOL & WTF  about 20 hours ago
    • HMD thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is LOL  about 20 hours ago
    • Courtney Mastin thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Trashy  about 20 hours ago
    • jumjimbo 21 hours ago

      Who cares? Everything on the internet is like an advertisement: if you ignore it, it'll go away.

    • PsychedelicSoulPizza thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is WTF, cool story bra & Fail  about 21 hours ago
    • Sessee   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s Ew & Fail  about 21 hours ago
    • cutmylifeintopizza thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is OMG  about 21 hours ago
    • emilyisfabulous   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s Old  about 21 hours ago
    • hanna2   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about 21 hours ago
    • gwynnethr   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about 22 hours ago
    • Elis thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra & LOL  about a day ago
    • M3L thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about a day ago
    • stefani   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • quantumff a day ago

      All highly ironic. A boy posts something that is ultimately meant well and has a nugget of nice sentiment at it's core but isn't worded in exactly the way a fragment of the population wants it to be. So, instead of pointing out politely and calmly what is wrong with the wording the fragment heads straight for insults and topless hand gestures. Nice. Shame really that 1984 didn't come true eh? You couldn't say anything in the wrong way then.  And you know what, when did it become not okay to say anything negative about women? If a guy goes around shirtless and sort of oily he's a douchebag. If a woman goes around with her tits out and slathered in makeup she's a brave amazonian warrior or something. In reality they're both likely to be immature, last time I checked that's not illegal though.

    • robinh16 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about a day ago
    • sylph thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about a day ago
    • thedoctor   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s cool story bra, Trashy & WTF  about a day ago
    • aegyeol thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about a day ago
    • nipples thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Fail  about a day ago
    • markstp thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about a day ago
    • abbyanomie   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • jodieh2   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • aa6496   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • soap a day ago

      The original intent of of the “Dear Girls” poster seems nice, so why be so angry. It is like no mater what anyone ever says it is wrong. This article is a bunch of stupid hypocrisy.

      • greenribbon a day ago

        The original intent is nice. The way it was done was not. He utilized controlling and commanding language (saying, Don't be or You don't need) while addressing women which has been a problem for a long time now and is one thing feminists are fighting against (can't treat someone equally if you are commanding or controlling them).
        Had he just said something like, I think you look beautiful with and without make-up that would have been much more effective. It is respectful and sweet, and I'm sure what the poster was trying to convey in the first place.
        This article is not a bunch of hypocrisy, though, I understand that parts might need to be expanded on more in greater depth.
        I hope this provides more insight.

      • soap 20 hours ago

        Honestly everyone is reading way to much into this. I am sorry you think I don't have “insight.” I just think it is absurd how much things get twisted, if declarative sentences are now politicly incorrect I just don't know what to say.

      • oOo 17 hours ago

        I'm with you, soap, in the sense that what is being labeled as command language here is in other situations not called out. Don't be mad, don't be upset, don't have a cow, don't freak out, don't be so down on yourself, don't worry, don't sell yourself short, don't let them get to you - these all qualify as command language but everybody uses them all the time very casually, very generically, and very easily and nobody is starting an advocacy group over it.  I'm all for reconsidering reality and changing and improving entrenched culture and mindsets with constructive input and arguments, but sometimes it feels like things like this go too far and become a response in search of a stimulus, a hypersensitive recasting of everything through a manufactured lens that only focuses on one area on the basis of an assumed agenda against that area, decrying things as injustices that happen elsewhere without any kind of protest from the same crusaders. It seems like people who are going out with good intentions to shine light on distorted thinking wind up with distortions of their own. Rather than drawing people in to listen and learn, it just tarnishes other parts of the larger agenda and creates more deaf ears, causes more babies to be thrown out with the bathwater.

      • greenribbon 17 hours ago

        You know I wasn't trying to be snarky or mean. I'm just giving you my view of things. Shouldn't we as a society try to learn more about the different sides to arguments, ideas, and stories. Wouldn't that help to understand each other and to better get along? I'm sorry if I offended you I was just trying to explain how others might view the guy's message.

    • elektraj a day ago

      i very much appreciate this post.

    • Kater thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about a day ago
    • Seraphica thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Trashy, Fail & WTF  about a day ago
    • ravenp thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is cool story bra  about a day ago
    • kristinep4 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Trashy  about a day ago
    • WAKATINE thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Win & LOL  about a day ago
    • tenzlilbabe thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is Win  about a day ago
    • avivah thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is OMG  about a day ago
    • You are my least favorite thing about BuzzFeed.
      I need to start closing your articles as soon as I see your name.

    • teryhung   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • sylph a day ago

      I don't feel though that Space-Boy was being offensive- girls say a lot how much they detest social standards of beauty, so what harm is there in saying they're beautiful anyway? Slut-shaming is a problem, but I feel there's a difference between that and you're-gorgeous messages. :)

    • Sylvie thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is LOL  about a day ago
    • Asha a day ago

      Also why is the dude with the poster being bashed? Girls complain all fucking day about how guys hold them up to these unrealistic expectations and expect them to look picture perfect, but when a guy says you are beautiful without the makeup and glam you STILL fucking complain!

      • greenribbon a day ago

        Insight on why the “Don't be Insecure meme” is included in the article.
        Look at the language. “Don't be Insecure.” “You don't need make-up and nice clothes.”
        “Don't be insecure” is a commanding and controlling phrase. This is problematic seeing as feminists have been trying to do away with this kind of language and these ideals (see patriarchy) for quite a while now. “You don't need make-up or nice clothes” Once again a controlling statement. A man telling a woman what she does not need. Then when strung with the last line, “You're all fucking beautiful” there is all of a sudden A LOT of assumptions made, ie you're wearing make-up and nice clothes because you are insecure.
        I get the nice intention behind boy's Dear Girls message, but if he wanted to really be respectful and more on the side of feminism he could've written it with less controlling language. Even a simple statement. Something like, I think you're beautiful with make-up and without. That's just a simple, sweet observation.

    • Asha a day ago

      Can someone explain this article to me? It sounds like the author is making a big ass deal out of nothing? I really don't get it.

      • veronical2 a day ago

        Yeah, the author must be bored or just overanalyzes everything. Waste of my time

      • ericaa4 20 hours ago

        this is copy and pasted from Greenribbon's above comment: The original intent is nice. The way it was done was not. He utilized controlling and commanding language (saying, Don't be or You don't need) while addressing women which has been a problem for a long time now and is one thing feminists are fighting against (can't treat someone equally if you are commanding or controlling them).
        Had he just said something like, I think you look beautiful with and without make-up that would have been much more effective. It is respectful and sweet, and I'm sure what the poster was trying to convey in the first place.
        This article is not a bunch of hypocrisy, though, I understand that parts might need to be expanded on more in greater depth.
        I hope this provides more insight.

    • amandac27   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s Win  about a day ago
    • amandac27 added Diamonds play to the mix about a day ago
    • Wendyg321   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • caitlinc14 thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is OMG  about a day ago
    • alexaj thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is WTF & Fail  about a day ago
    • hellosuperman thinks Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... is WTF  about a day ago
    • honeyriver   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You...  about a day ago
    • Plum Jo a day ago

      Isn't calling it “slut-shaming” sexist or anti-feminist in itself? By saying someone is “slut-shaming” someone else you're still calling the person being attacked a slut, that someone was shaming them for being a slut. “Style Shaming” would be more accurate, wouldn't it? Then it could refer to the way they dress, do their hair, behave, etc., and not be calling anyone a slut— which is really the point, isn't it? To not be passing judgment at all?

      • tylerw4 a day ago

        it's the i've-taken-intro-sociology vocabulary word of the moment. use it first, understand it later/never. we dealt with this same thing last year when “infantilizing” was getting dropped in vapid articles everywhere. back in the day “privilege” was at the core of several textbooks i couldn't wait to throw away.

      • greenribbon 12 hours ago

        I thought that was a very interesting question to ask. I asked the blogger from http://stfusexists.tumblr.com/ and this was her response: “I think the term “slut” in that context is a reclamation. By adopting the term that detractors use against sexually active women and taking the venom out of it, the phrase serves the double purpose of taking power from the slur and making the negative behavior surrounding it unacceptable. I dislike the term because I think it sounds like a cutesy cover for “fucking disgusting Victorian-era misogyny,” and I prefer to call things what they are.” I do know that some feminists have turned to reclamation for other words too such as cunt. I at least think that answers the question of the original source of the phrase.

    • fanaca   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s cool story bra & LOL  about a day ago
    • Schittferbreinz   Girl-On-Girl Crime: The "Did You... and thinks it’s cool story bra  about a day ago
    • Amy Ash a day ago

      This article is completely missing the point. Now girls are wearing makeup at younger ages more than ever, and have a need to wear revealing clothes, and live more superficial lifestyles.  This response, though coming from a negative rather than a loving stance, is coming out of frustration for girls who feel pressured to fall in line with this increasing sexualization and materialism of young girls.  Instead of demonizing them, and practicing the same malice that you attempt to call into question, why not try to understand the reasons behind their behavior and make a real analysis. These are young girls, children, after all and therefore require as sensitive an analysis and support as any other child.

    • dafuq did i just read? i have no idea if this article is pro-unpopular meme, or against it. and then she started talking about sexism for no reason. this is like textual diarrhea of a teenager with malformed and undeveloped opinions.

    • shutupjackie a day ago

      its so hard to know whats considered sexist and whats not considered sexist nowadays. CAN'T. KEEP. UPPPPP. always thought a girl posting slutty selfies of herself solely to attract male attention was frowned upon by the feminist community, but i guess not? not really bothered by it, because when girls get out of control taking pictures that i find a little gross, i just delete them from my newsfeed and let them do their thing. anyway, im just confused.

      • nicolefloresl a day ago

        why would posting selfies be a problem for Feminists? and how do you know what the motivation is for doing so?
        (but overall I cannot blame you for being confused about these things, I am also confused :) )

    • I can only laugh at this and the authors responses to the other comments on here… I'm glad I'm gay… I don't have to worry about telling a woman she's pretty and then being called an asshole because I didn't say she was smart in sensible shoes… just saying

    • tylerw4 a day ago

      cool, we leaned a new word, “slut-shaming”. last year it was “infantilizing”. but, intro-to-womens-studies vocabulary aside, this article bravely exposes the world's worst-kept-secret: there are pan-gender mean people on the internet. a breathtaking lack of depth in this one. an article built around a concept that the author neither fully understands or develops at all. move along.

    • oOo a day ago

      I was thinking about this, but how is this different from every other form of mocking or trashing people online? It seems to be the internet community's primary activity. Such-and-such social group is contemptible, bros are dumb because X, people of Wal-Mart are redneck clowns, Republicans are this, Democrats are that, haha religious people, if you listen to this or that band you're X, lol bridge & tunnel crowd, look at that fucking hipster, gay stuff, racist stuff, xenophobic stuff, etc. All of them are designed to shame, chide, poke, etc., some more casually than others. This one seems pretty mild by comparison to many of them, at least in the context of this article. Why is it a special category? It feels like reaching to turn this into something more.

    Now Buzzing