Forbes asks: When will we finally prosecute 9/11 terrorists?
Posted by
Randy
|
May 26, 2011
Last night during the floor debate of the annual national defense policy bill, I had the opportunity to lead the opposition to an amendment offered by House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Adam Smith (WA-09). His amendment would overturn the inclusion of language agreed to last year on a bipartisan basis to prevent the transfer of detainees to the United States for the purpose of standing trial.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to analyze and comment on the posts featured on this blog, but please understand that comments which include campaign content, engage in personal attacks, or include vulgar, profane, obscene, or inappropriate language will be removed from the site. Please note that there may be a brief delay in the publication of your comment.
|
SEARCH BLOGRECENT POSTS01/09/2013 - Question of the week: Do you believe the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman is constitutional for purposes of federal law?01/07/2013 - How are we doing? (Rate Our Work) 12/21/2012 - Question of the Week: In light of last week’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, which of the following statements represent your views? 12/14/2012 - Protecting children from exploitation 12/05/2012 - Question of the week: Do you support the continuation of current law, which prohibits detainees from Guantanamo Bay from being transferred to prisons in the United States? 11/30/2012 - Question of the week: Given China’s growing military capabilities, do you consider China…. ARCHIVESBy YearBy Issue
|