Thursday, January 03, 2013

Pat Condell Articulates Hard Truths: the Middle East Conflict is Religious, Not Political

Pat Condell is a Brit who is righteously critical of Islam and tells the unvarnished truth in his recent video:  the Middle East Conflict is a religious war, not a political one.  Islam's basic tenets are that Muslims must hate and kill all Jews that refuse to submit to dhimmitude (and even then, must kill them all before the Last Day before the Judgment).

There is no other outcome that will appease the Muslims of the Middle East.  There is no political solution.  A Palestinian state won't stop the Muslim aggression against Israel.  The only possibility for peace is for Muslims to either abandon or greatly moderate their hateful and murderous religion.

View Condell's latest critique at Bare Naked Islam.

The Principal Problem of Western Europe






























This writer describes the spoiled brats of Western Europe, but his description also applies to those in the Occupy Movement as well.

New generations grew within the culture of rights and went to a school that taught them that life was a game and they didn't have to worry much about the future, because there is someone, the welfare state, which is responsible for their prosperity. These are the outraged, those weaned brats that we see today in the cities of Western Europe, asking for rights that nobody can give them. They are the major victims of the empty promises of the welfare state and their disappointment is manifest, as well as their growing frustration. They were born under the syndrome of the free lunch and the progress secured (by others), and their mental dullness prevents them from understanding such obvious things as every right has a cost, and that cost is called duty, hard and daily effort, personal responsibility and willingness to innovative.

By Mauricio Rojas -- Author of another rightest blog in Spanish (and one that I will add to my sidebar now).

Translated into English from an article at El Opinado Compulsivo.

The photo is interesting and funny, but really hasn't much to do with the article!  (I don't know about you, but  I want these monkeys as part of my landscaping!)

Insane Leftists Suspend Six Year Old for Pointing a Finger Like a Gun

The Left is insane.  They are completely bonkers, nuts, crazy and weird.

The Washington Compost has the story:
The parents of a 6-year-old Silver Spring boy are fighting the first-grader’s suspension from a Montgomery County public school for pointing his finger like a gun and saying “pow,” an incident school officials characterized in a disciplinary letter as a threat “to shoot a student.”

The first-grader was suspended for one day, Dec. 21. The family’s attorney filed an appeal Wednesday, asking that the incident be expunged from the boy’s school record amid concerns of long-term fallout.
EEEEEK!  He's Got Fingers!
Note to Leftists:  a finger is not a gun.  It cannot be loaded.  It cannot fire bullets.  In the old days, we used to call such incidents "playing."  I even had semi-realistic mock-ups of guns -- cap guns and squirt guns.  If someone brought one of those to this idiotic school, perhaps he would be convicted of a felony and imprisoned for years to come.

I have to wonder about the motivations of the school administrators for such unhinged behavior (on their part).  Did they do this because they are prone to gross overreaction and have no sense of proportion? Are they unhinged fanatics with absolutely no judgment?

Or did they do this to instill in the minds of school children that guns are so evil and terrible, that one cannot even pretend to fire one, lest he be arrested as a potential terrorist?  This would seem to be brainwashing children to become the docile adults necessary for mindless obedience to Big Brother.

Note to Parents:  Get your kids out of public school.  Stop the brainwashing!  If you can't afford private school, home school.

Hat Tip:  El Opinador Compulsivo

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

Department of Homeland Security Preparing for Civil War?

The Department of Homeland Security -- Why Is It Buying Millions of Hollow Point Rounds?

It sounds incredible -- on second thought, not so incredible anymore -- that the Department of Home Security is preparing for a civil war or an economic collapse.  One website claims the DHS has purchased over a billion hollow point rounds of ammunition.  The site further claims that international law prohibits the use of hollow points by the military, and that they can only be used domestically.  Putting two and two together, one might conclude that the DHS is preparing for civil war.  See their video here.

The same video documents the massive public purchases of firearms following Obama's re-election, as well as massive buying of ammunition.  Many Americans appear to be preparing for a civil war as well....as rebels.  Much of the public instinctively knows a great internal conflict is coming and want to be ready.

The same website claims that the Illinois State legislature is planning to ram through a state law banning all firearms from the state, with confiscation to follow.

The Signs Are There:  the Federal Government Has Become a Threat to Liberty

More and more, our federal government appears to be plotting to end our freedoms and impose a form of fascism on the country.  Obama's re-election has emboldened the Left, and they appear to be seizing an historic opportunity to transform the United States into a socialist/fascist tyranny.  They have been at this for decades, but previously were content with a slow gradualism of transformation, a subtle pollution of the zeitgeist.  The metaphor most often quoted for this is "boiling the frog."  If you drop a frog into a pan of boiling water (the theory goes), it will immediately jump out to save itself.  However, if you increase the heat a degree at a time, the frog will be cooked before it realizes the danger.

We seem to be moving from slowly increasing the heat to microwaving the frog.  Feinstein's fascist gun confiscation bill is proof.  Obama, a radical punk, continues his destruction of the economy and forcing many more citizens onto the welfare rolls, making them dependents of the state.  A New York Times Op-Ed this week advocated ending the Constitution of the United States so that government politicians can do whatever they like.

A few months ago, a military magazine carried an article advising the military on how to prepare for and fight an internal insurrection -- a civil war.  Of course, that eventuality will be moot if the populace is disarmed and unable to fight.  In any case, statists are recognizing the possibility of civil war.

Time to Bring Back the Militias?

I believe it is time to bring back the militias, and to support them and fund them.  Under Bill Clinton's regime, many concerned citizens feared the destruction of their rights, and formed unofficial and unrecognized militias.  Militias were groups of armed men who practiced target shooting together and even trained together in military tactics.  They held meetings and discussed survival tactics and techniques.  These militia members saw themselves as the "unorganized militia," as provided for in Title 10, Subtitle A, Chapter 13 -- United States Code.

The Left did its usual slander job on the militias following Timothy McVeigh's bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma.  McVeigh was not a member of any militia, nor was he acting from any philosophy or dogma put out by the militias.  Nevertheless, the Left successfully tainted the reputation of the militias, and hung the McVeigh albatross around militia members' necks.  Now when you mention "militias," many people automatically envision mass murderer Timothy McVeigh.

In spite of this, it's time to bring these militias back.  The threat of an oppressive, unconstitutional federal government is now greater than ever.  Once gun confiscation begins in mass, it will be time to fight.  We cannot give up our guns meekly.

Will the Military Step In, and If So, Whose Side Will They Take?

The U.S. Military is largely patriotic, loyal and conservative.  If civil war breaks out, will they support the federal usurpers, or will they support the Constitution and the people?  Aren't the military sworn to oppose all enemies, foreign and domestic?  If there is a domestic enemy, will they consider that enemy us, or the Democrats in office?  What about Posse Comitatus?

Since the Obama and the Democrats are already busily dismantling all of our constitutional protections, why should the Military be any different?  Military leaders should privately think on these awful possibilities, and what their reaction will be in the event of civil war.  Instead of becoming an arm of tyranny, they could become the sword of liberty, by deposing an out-of-control, leftist tyranny.

"Les Miserables": Republicans Man the Barricades Against the Monarchists, 1832

The June Rebellion, Paris, 1832
Yesterday my wife and I went to see the musical version of Les Miserables, a famous novel by French author Victor Hugo, written in 1862.  Over the years, the novel has been presented in plays, operas and films.  Normally, I don't care for musical representations of dramatic historical events.  I prefer to see the famous personages and actors portraying events realistically, rather than singing their way through wars and riots and famines.

The current musical film of Les Miserables was not an exception for me.  Most of the singing was simple tunes to convey daily events of French life in 1832 -- not terribly memorable. The major exception was when Fantine, a poor single mother, resorts to prostitution in order to support her young daughter, Cosette.  Fantine, played by Anne Hathaway, sings "I Dreamed a Dream," a worthy composition.  (Hathaway's version can be heard here, although Susan Boyle did a much better job of it here, creating quite a sensation when she did so.)

I will say that the musical does touch on many, if not all, of the major plot devices of the novel and is a fair representation of Hugo's work.  Further, its attention to authentic historical detail is remarkable.  See here for examples.

French Uniform
Les Miserables
French Uniform,
Actual
Les Miserables has a scene from 1832 when citizens of Paris create barricades in the center of Paris and fight the French National Guard.  Eventually, the rebels are wiped out, after courageously fighting off National Guard attacks.  The National Guard waves the French tricolor flag, but the rebels wave red flags.  This bothered me, because the red flags looked identical to those of the Communist revolutions.  Was this historical fact, or was Hollywood trying to associate this citizen revolt with later Communist revolutions, perhaps to convey upon the latter an undeserved righteousness?  I decided to find out and went to the web to see what was going on in France in 1832 -- and if there was such an incident in real life.  I learned that there was.

The street fighting portrayed in Les Miserables was an actual event, known as the June Rebellion.  France had been marked by two major opposing forces since the guillotine executions of Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette, in 1793:  the monarchists (or royalists) and various other groups, i.e. the radicals, the socialists, the Bonapartists, the republicans.  The former supported the monarchy, or rule by a king, and the others, rule by a parliament or other form of democratic government (more or less).  The republicans were supported by the Marquis de Lafayette, the French hero who supported the United States in its war for independence.

I can't say the republicans were "the good guys," since it is all a bit more complicated (real life often is); but they had a point.  The time for monarchies was passing into history and people were looking for a better alternative.  The French working class in 1832 were angry because of rising prices and food shortages.  In addition, thousands of citizens had died from a cholera epidemic.  Since germs were not understood, conspiracy theories abounded, especially the notion that the Royalists were poisoning the wells to finish off the working class.  All of these factors provided the atmosphere for yet another rebellion against the existing order.  Wikipedia explains:
The republicans were led by secret societies formed of the most determined members of their movement.[4] The secret societies planned to provoke riots similar to those that had led to the 1830 July Rebellion against the ministers of Charles X.[4] The "Society for the Rights of Man" was one of the most instrumental. It was organized like an army, divided into sections of twenty members each (to evade the law that forbade the association of more than twenty persons), with a president and vice president for each section.[4]

The republicans made their move at the public funeral of the popular General Lamarque on June 5. Groups of republicans took charge of the cortege and directed it to the Place de la Bastille. They were reinforced by Polish, Italian, and German refugees, who had fled to Paris in the aftermath of crackdowns on republican and nationalist activities in their homelands, as well as by workers and local youth. They gathered around the catafalque on which the body rested. Speeches were made about Lamarque's support for Polish and Italian liberty, of which he was a strong advocate in the months before his death. When a member of the crowd waved a red flag bearing the words "Liberty or Death", the crowd broke into rebellion and shots were exchanged with government troops.[2]Marquis de Lafayette, who had given a speech in praise of Lamarque, called for calm, but the disorder spread.[7]

An insurrection began which for one night made the insurgents masters of the eastern districts of Paris. However, the rebellion failed to spread. In the night national guard forces were reinforced by 25,000 regular army troops who pacified the peripheral districts of the capital. The insurgents made their stronghold in the Faubourg Saint-Martin, in the historic city center. They constructed barricades in the narrow streets around the Rue Saint-Martin and Rue Saint-Denis. On the morning of June 6 the last rebels were surrounded at the intersection of rue Saint-Martin and Saint-Merry. At this point Louis-Philippe decided to show himself in the streets to confirm that he was still in control of the capital.[8] The final struggle came at the Cloître Saint-Merry (June 5–6),[4], which resulted in about 800 casualties. Anyone who continued to fight was shot immediately. The army and national guard lost 73 killed, 344 wounded; on the insurgent side there were 93 killed and 291 wounded.[1] The forces of the insurrection were spent.[6]
And the red flags depicted in the film?  Apparently, a true representation of historical fact as noted in the above quote.

Conclusions:  The musical film of Les Miserables is true to Hugo's novel as well as to historical fact, an unusual occurrence in Hollywood, to be sure. Now I better understand the forces in play that are depicted in this famous tale.

Update:  I was also curious as to the authenticity of the French uniforms of the time period and discovered that the film's representation was accurate. (I so enjoy authenticity in films about historical events.) I added the above graphics of French soldiers, one as presented in the film, the other as the actual uniform.  See also here, of three actor-soldiers taking a snooze on the set of Les Mis.  More scenes from the film can be viewed here.

Institute for Policy Studies Celebrates 50 Years of Internal Subversion

The Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. is a far-left organization that has initiated, supported and celebrated communist subversion of the US for the past fifty years.  Trevor Loudon of New Zeal writes:
For half a century IPS has been one of the most subversive and destructive organizations in the US.

Both domestically and internationally IPS has been pushing its leftist agenda relentlessly.

From the extreme wing of the civil rights movement, to the feminist and gay rights movements, the anti South Africa campaigns, the anti military movements, anti corporate campaigns, right through to the Occupy Movement, IPS has had its thumbprint on virtually every major subversive movement in the last five decades.
Read the whole story of this subversive organization here.

Tuesday, January 01, 2013

New York Times Op-Ed Raises Some Interesting Possibilities for Conservatives

Some forward thinker at the New York Times has written an op-ed column stating that it is time to get rid of the U.S. Constitution.  Then and only then can progressives carry out plans to turn the once greatest nation in the world into a banana republic and socialist tyranny.

The great thinker in question, one Louis Michael Seidman, writes:
As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is. Imagine that after careful study a government official — say, the president or one of the party leaders in Congress — reaches a considered judgment that a particular course of action is best for the country. Suddenly, someone bursts into the room with new information: a group of white propertied men who have been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves might have disagreed with this course of action. Is it even remotely rational that the official should change his or her mind because of this divination?
Hey, Seditious Seidman may have a point.  How many times have you wanted to firebomb the presses of the New York Times?  Unfortunately, there's this pesky First Amendment that makes it illegal.  With no more Constitution, we can exercise lawless, mob action to do what is undoubtedly correct:  shutting up the traitors among us.

Some other possibilities:
  1. Making it illegal for anyone to be a leftist.
  2. Outlawing the Democrat Party.
  3. Outlawing labor unions.
  4. Licensing all print and broadcast media and enforcing a code of conduct, i.e., to promote, support and celebrate capitalism, traditional marriage, free markets, laissez-faire economics, and to oppose, denigrate and ridicule socialism, collectivism, and smelly hippies.  Those who fail to support the code of conduct will have their licenses to publish canceled and subject to arrest and summary execution.
  5. Mass firing of all college professors who are leftists, communists, Marxists, progressives or Democrats (I realize that those categories widely overlap).  Michael Savage will be appointed education czar and will have the responsibility of hiring all university professors.
  6. Mass deportation of all Muslims and illegal immigrants.
  7. Outlawing rap music.
  8. Outlawing facial studs and tattoos.
  9. Legally recognizing abortion as murder and practitioners thereof subject to summary execution.
There's a point to my madness.  The Constitution even protects the unworthy, like Seidman and the publishers of the New York Times.

And now a warning to "progressives" everywhere:  We will fight in the streets, if necessary, to preserve the Constitution.  We do not accept the seditious transformation of our country into a socialist tyranny.  Do not underestimate us.

Kathy Griffin, Classless Creep Kisses Cooper's Crotch

Suggested Appearance for Serving Gay Men
Kathy Griffin is a vile leftist "comedienne," one whom I have Photoshopped twice before for her vileness.

Two years ago I pictured her as a lady of the night, and wrote:
Of course, Kathy Griffin isn't an actual whore. She would need actual customers for that. But she is a figurative whore for attention and publicity, and uses highly unethical means to achieve it.
Last night Griffin proved me right when she kissed Anderson Cooper's crotch on live TV, over the CNN network.  The New York Post says she "simulated oral sex" on Cooper.

Cooper is gay, so didn't enjoy the female-provided crotch play.  Maybe Griffin should have worn a fake handlebar mustache and spoke in a deep baritone, to make it more pleasurable for Cooper.

My friend Adrienne has links and another photo of Griffin in the act, here.

The New York Post has more commentary and pictures here.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Gun Control and the Long Night of Tyranny: a Cuban Exile Speaks


Guest post from Carlos Perera
I arrived in the U. S. in 1962, a child-exile from Communist Cuba. I will be eternally grateful to the American people for having offered my parents and me a place of refuge and the opportunity to make a place for ourselves in this country (allowing us to rise from absolute poverty to comfortable middle class status in the space of a few years . . . albeit with a great deal of hard work and disciplined husbandry). Because of the great love that I bear this, my adopted country, I am made sad beyond my powers of expression, by the apparent willingness of so many of its people to surrender the ancient liberties recognized by the U. S. Constitution, of which the right to keep and bear arms is one of the most important. (Note that only the fundamental rights of conscience and its expression come before it in the Bill of Rights.)

One of the first steps historically taken by would-be totalitarians is to disarm the population to be ruled: the Bolsheviks did this in Russia, the Nazis in Germany and the occupied countries, the Maoists in China, the Castroites in Cuba, and on and on. In some cases, as in Cuba, weapons of limited military value, like single- or double-barrelled shotguns, are allowed--as a privilege and under permit--to be possessed by the well-behaved . . . though permitted ammunition is generally limited to birdshot. (Of course, especial rules apply to members of the _nomenklatura_, e.g., many of the Soviet big-wigs were avid big-game hunters.)

I fear that our Leftist ruling class--cynically and heartlessly following Rahm Emanuel's dictum never to let a serious crisis go to waste--are exploiting the Newtown, Connecticut, tragedy to take the first (of many to come) steps intended to disarm the American people. Note that they are artfully "shaping the narrative" in terms of limiting the possession of "unneeded" military-type weapons, like semiautomatic rifles and pistols, while grandly and generously permitting us to retain what they deem to be "acceptable" weapons for self-defense and hunting . . . though you can bet the farm that this latter category of acceptable weapons will be progressively whittled down, until, if we are lucky and our overlords are generous, we shall be allowed to retain single- or double-barrelled shotguns with a "reasonable" number of birdshot cartridges.

The right to keep and bear arms has next to nothing to do with hunting or self-defense (though these are admittedly useful incidental consequences), and everything to do with the people's ability, when all peaceful political action fails, to defend their ancient liberties. A tyrant can never feel secure when he tries to impress his will on an armed populace, which is why the regimes to which I alluded above moved early and vigorously to disarm their populaces. If we let the the crowd now in power do the same to us, our future as a free people shall be compromised for a long time to come. We must fight them, else we shall deserve the long, dark night of tyranny that shall eventually descend on us.

Surprise, Surprise: Prez Commie Obamie To Go For Guns in 2013


Our Marxist President has stated that he will go after guns in 2013, in order to "do everything we can to make sure that something like what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary does not happen again.”

Actually, Barack Obama has been against the 2nd amendment for all of his political life, and has sought to ban private ownership of guns long before he ever darkened the halls of Congress or the White House. Sandy Hook merely provides him with an excuse to once again argue for the disarmament of the American people, a long-time Marxist goal.

It is clear to me that the Republican strategy for the next four years should be to block, defer, oppose, filibuster, challenge and vote "no" on any and all policy initiatives put forth by the Obama administration.

Meanwhile, is there any state government, anywhere, who is willing to stand up to this extremist, to nullify unconstitutional federal dictates, to just say "NO"?

Friday, December 28, 2012

Communist Revolution: I Never Thought It Would Come to This

Since I was about 12, I have known that the communist left was dedicated to replacing America with a collectivist tyranny.  I remember Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the table at the United Nations and threatening "We will bury you!"  I became a news junkie at 13, scouring the San Jose Mercury News each morning for the latest Cold War developments.

I never could understand it.  How could anyone believe in a totalitarian tyranny that destroys freedom, starves millions and executes millions more?  Apparently, a lot of people do -- or at least, believe in their version of it.  The long march through the institutions was completed some time ago, and both academia and media have a near monopoly on the transmission of biased news, cultural demolition and the ability to affect public attitudes.  The "closing of the American mind" is just about complete.  Moonbattery blog has an article today called "Brainwashing Works."  The author, Dave Blount, points to a sign in NYC's Penn Station where a graffiti artist has penned "Kill All Republicans!"  This sentiment is not an isolated occurrence.  Twitchy.com reports daily the most vile bile from the left, the unhinged hatred, the desire for violence against Republicans and conservatives.   The Democrat Media Complex has created a vast swath of human botnets, which can be set off in mass to launch denial-of-liberty attacks on any and all who oppose the New Progressive Order.  Like computer botnets, the human variety is programmed and programmable and act in concert, unhindered by scruples or actual thought.

Lately swarms of human maggots on Twitter have tweeted their joy at the death of General Norman Schwarzkopf yesterday, expressing hope that he died painfully and is now burning in Hell.  They have said similar things about former President George H.W. Bush, who is in the hospital with a serious illness, hoping that he dies "in agony."  I do not recognize this leftist human scum as fellow citizens, but as traitors, agents of hostile foreign powers and ideologies.  With the election of one of their own to the presidency, they are now emboldened to finish off the Republic, and as Blount notes at Moonbattery, are now in a rush to disarm us.  A generation ago, Diane Feinstein's proposed gun control bill (to photograph and fingerprint all gun owners) would have resulted in widespread outcry and alarm.  A day or so after its announcement, there is hardly a peep from the populace.

Feeling Fine This Morning

Everyone has some health issue; I am disgustingly healthy with regard to cholesterol, heart function and blood pressure.  My only health issue is clinical depression and, apparently, anxiety attacks.

This past week I tried to stop taking my SSRI (because I hate the side effects) and last night I had an anxiety or panic attack as a result.  Why the feeling of panic?  Because you feel like you are suffocating -- it is some function of the brain, according to what I read on the web.  They call it a "misdirected suffocation alarm mechanism."  You aren't actually suffocating and you aren't going to die, but it feels like sheeeee-it.

I got up and googled info on the web, and was able to finally overcome the attack with breathing exercises, walking and by taking my SSRI.

I feel fine this morning, quite normal.  Just a little tired from not getting enough sleep last night.

Meanwhile, my G.P. doctor has prescribed Cymbalta for me to try in lieu of Zoloft.  However, I am not going to just jump into a new SSRI.  I am going to do some private research first.

My 2013 resolutions:  (1) better manage my mental states (depression, anxiety) and (2) increase my personal energy levels for greater productivity.

Update:  Cymbalta costs $300 for a month's supply of pills.  Now there's a side effect (bankruptcy) that I am sure I wouldn't like.  So that option is out.

Experiment Over: Anxiety Attack! Back on My Meds.

Well now I know I can't merely quit my SSRI.  I woke up with a panic attack, a feeling of suffocation, of not getting enough oxygen.  Is this what waterboarding feels like?   I took a pill.

Anxiety attacks are also called panic attacks, and I see why.  The feeling is one of panic.  This is not the first time I have tried to go off the meds, and it is not the first time I have had an anxiety attack.  I was half expecting one.  However, I had forgotten just how terrible the feeling is, how it comes upon you so suddenly.

All of a sudden, I know what it feels like to be mad, to have the screaming heebie-jeebies.  I'm not screaming, however.  I might be, if I believed the attack would not end sometime soon.

I can see why someone might commit suicide, the feeling is that terrible.  I, however, know that the feeling will pass, eventually.  Nevertheless, I can empathize with those who feel suicidal.  Mental anguish can be so terrible, so painful, that one might do anything to stop it.  I am not there, so don't worry about me.  No, I am not just whistling past the graveyard.  However, I have had a glimpse of that anguish tonight.  Walked a mile in those shoes.  Had a look at those demons.  Ugly little fuckers. I understand them better now.

I do not, however, feel in any way hostile to anyone or capable of violence.  I want to make that clear right off the top.  Whether on my meds or off, I am psychologically incapable of harming anyone.  That much I know, that much I am sure of.  I mention this only because of the false charges and misconceptions that are currently numerous against the effects of SSRI medications (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).  The theory is that if you take SSRI's, they turn you into Adam Lanza.  Or Jared Loughner.  They don't.  Those fellows were tormented by a different legion of demons, ones unknown to me.  I have never had a glimpse of that tribe.  Anxiety is not the same thing as psychopathic rage.  A drowning person has no desire or purpose of harming others... he just wants to breathe.

I dare not lay down again tonight.  Or so I feel at this moment.

I don't know how much of the attack is psychological and how much is organic, i.e. the result of an imbalance in my brain chemistry.  The imbalance that some say does not exist, self-appointed experts like commenter OhReilly.  Sure feels real OhReilly.  I think it may partly be psychological -- I fear the feeling of panic so much that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.  There is no doubt, however, that much of it is organic, the result of stopping my medication four days ago.

Feeling somewhat better now.  Or am I?

Oh great, it seems I have two options:  (1) to view life though a chemical haze, or (2) be tormented by anxiety attacks.  I want a third option:  to view life through a normal lens.  No anxiety, no depression, no SSRI side effects.  I don't know if option 3 is available to me anymore, but I intend to find out.  I think I need more than my General Practitioner family doctor to guide me through this.  It's time to find a specialist.

Updates:  I googled "How to stop an anxiety attack."  There is a lot of info on the web.  One of the best bits of info is that anxiety attacks are fairly common.  I learned that it is helpful to (1) cool the body down (stand in front of an air conditioner, open a window, etc) (2) take a walk (3) breathe into a paper bag.  I did all these things and feel better.  Another set of suggestions includes drinking a cup of Chamomile tea.  Doing that now.

A couple of websites recommend keeping a journal or blogging as a coping mechanism.  However, the best natural ways to treat depression and anxiety include (1) breathing exercises, (2) physical exercise and (3) sunlight.  The latter has beneficial effects and the sites recommend a minimum of 15 minutes of sunlight per day.  If you live in Seattle, you can get something called a light tunnel to take the place of natural sunlight.

One website explained the feeling of suffocation during a panic attack.  It is a false feeling resulting from the misfiring of a "suffocation alarm mechanism" in the brain, making the patient feel that death is imminent.  Other scientists dispute this theory, but I believe it, having just experienced it.

Well it's 3:24 AM, I think I'll try to get some sleep.

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Feinstein's Bill to Destroy the 2nd Amendment: It Is Way Past Time to Openly Defy the Federal Government

The federal government is now the enemy of freedom and the Constitution, and it is time to openly defy it. Diane Feinstein, US Senator from Marxist California, has proposed a federal gun control bill that will make numerous existing handguns and rifles illegal. The bill would create a federal database of gun owners, and require photographing and fingerprinting gun owners. Like hell, bitch.

You can read the details of this Orwellian overreach at Powerline today.

Every day seems to bring a new federal outrage to light. Absolutely nothing that the Party of Treason does surprises me anymore. If this bill ever passes, I will personally defy it. I will neither obey nor recognize such a law. Meanwhile, I will seek to purchase a Glock handgun and a Bushmaster rifle, and begin regular shooting practice with them, at shooting ranges; and I will seek professional instruction on the safe handling and use of such firearms. I will register such weapons with my state, as indeed I have no choice; but I recognize the constitutionality of state law. I will not register any firearms with the federal government. I will rejoin the NRA.

Reasonable gun control laws should be passed by the states; the federal government has no such authority. It is time for "civil disobedience" to the Marxists now in control of the nation, and we must prepare ourselves for civil war in the event the Feds decide to play rough.

Note to state governments: get off your asses and protect the constitutional rights of your citizens. Nullify such laws and arrest any federal officials who attempt to enforce them. Call up state militias if necessary to oppose federal force, e.g. by such agencies as the BATF.

Business as usual is not an option. At the very least, it is time to discuss and plan for such contingencies at the state and local level. It is time to draw a line in the sand.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The Day After Christmas: Watching "Sons of Anarchy" Episodes on TV; Memories of Stockton

My youngest son and his girlfriend and puppy are here for the holidays. With rain pouring outside, we have been watching multiple episodes of "Sons of Anarchy." It's about a motorcycle gang in San Joaquin County, near Stockton, California, where I lived as a child, from 4th through 7th grade, before moving to San Jose.

Stockton was a great town back then, in the mid 1950's. It was a quiet, rural area, where we felt safe taking the bus downtown to see a movie, though we were not yet in our teens. Not so today, as Stockton is now a high crime area. My niece was robbed at gunpoint there some months ago, on the street.

Why is this true? I don't really know, but suspect our changing racial demographics have a lot to do with it -- fewer white people is not a good thing and it's time we admitted this non-PC fact of life. There were no drug-dealing gangs in Stockton when I was a kid -- or if there were, they kept out of sight.



Off My Meds! Horrors!

I have two major goals for 2013: (1) to optimize and better manage my mental state and (2) to increase my energy level to increase personal productivity.

Three days ago I went off Zoloft cold turkey. After 15 years on this drug, I am tired of feeling drunk, dizzy, medicated and anesthetized. I'll take my chances with depression, and if I have to return to an SSRI, I'll try a different one. Right now I feel as dizzy as ever, because my body hasn't acclimated. I do not, however, feel depressed.

The reason why so many people quit their meds is for this reason: they don't like the unnatural feeling of being medicated. For the seriously disturbed, this is dangerous. My wife's best friend has a son who is schizophrenic, went off his meds, and is now in jail. I, however, pose no such danger, even to myself. I was a voluntary partaker of Zoloft. I just don't like the side effects: lethargy, dizziness, the irresistible compulsion to stockpile automatic weapons and ammunition. Okay, that last one was a joke.

Or WAS it? Spooky music: doo doo doo doo, doo doo doo doo! (Think Twighlight Zone.)

Monday, December 24, 2012

Merry Christmas 2012

Merry Christmas to all my friends and fellow bloggers on the internet, as well as my readers and relatives who sometimes wander this way.


Sunday, December 23, 2012

How To Save Your Marriage (French Text)

I saw this at Facebook and was pleasantly surprised that I could understand 90% of it without using a French-English dictionary.  I took French in high school 50 years ago and still understand it well in written form.  I recently completed my second semester of Spanish, and I don't understand it nearly as well as I do French.

Try out your French, read this short tale and see how much you understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mariés ou non, vous devriez lire ceci ...

"Quand je suis rentré ce soir-là, et que ma femme a servi le dîner, je lui tenais la main et dit: J'ai quelque chose à vous dire. Elle s'assit et mangea tranquillement. Encore une fois j'ai observé la douleur dans ses yeux.

Tout à coup, je ne savais pas comment ouvrir ma bouche. Mais je devais lui dire ce que je pensais. « Je veux divorcer ». J'ai soulevé le sujet calmement. Elle ne semblait pas être ennuyé par mes paroles, bien au contraire elle me demanda doucement : pourquoi?

J'ai évité la question. Cela la mit en colère. Elle a jeté les couverts et me cria : tu n'es pas un homme! Cette nuit-là, on ne s’est pas parlé l’un l'autre. Elle pleurait. Je savais qu'elle voulait savoir ce qui était arrivé à notre mariage. Mais je ne pouvais lui donner une réponse satisfaisante, elle avait perdu mon cœur, car il s’était tourné vers Jane. Je ne l'aimais pas du tout, j’avais juste pitié d’elle!

Avec un profond sentiment de culpabilité, j'ai rédigé une lettre de divorce, qui stipulait qu'elle pouvait avoir notre maison, notre voiture, et 30% du capital de ma société. Elle la regarda, puis la déchira en mille morceaux. La femme qui avait passé dix ans de sa vie avec moi était devenue une étrangère. J’étais désolé pour elle et pour la perte de temps, de ressources et d'énergie, mais je ne pouvais pas reprendre ce que j'avais dit car j'aimais Jane chèrement. Enfin, elle a crié haut et fort en face de moi, et c'est ce que je m'attendais à voir. Pour moi son cri était en fait une sorte de libération. L'idée d'un divorce qui m'avait obsédée pendant plusieurs semaines semblait être plus ferme et plus clair maintenant.

Le lendemain, je suis rentré très tard et l’ai trouvée entrain d’écrire quelque chose à la table. Je n'ai pas pris le souper, mais je suis allé directement au lit et m'endormi très vite parce que j'étais fatigué après une journée bien remplie avec Jane. Lorsque je me suis réveillé, elle était toujours là au bureau. Je n'y ai pas prêté attention, je me suis retourné et ai encore dormi.

Dans la matinée, elle a présenté ses conditions de divorce: elle ne voulait rien de moi, mais elle avait besoin d'un mois de préavis avant le divorce. Elle a demandé que, dans cette période d'un mois nous aurons tous deux à lutter pour vivre une vie aussi normale que possible. Ses raisons sont simples: notre fils aura ses examens dans un mois, et elle ne voulait pas lui perturber le morale par notre mariage brisé.

Ce fut agréable pour moi. Mais elle avait quelque chose de plus, elle m'a demandé de me rappeler comment je l'avais transporté dans la chambre nuptiale le jour de notre mariage. Elle a demandé que tous les jours pendant la durée du mois, je l'emmène hors de notre chambre à la porte chaque matin. Je croyais qu'elle devenait folle. Afin de rendre nos derniers jours d’ensemble agréables, j'ai accepté sa demande bizarre.

J'ai parlé à Jane des conditions de divorce de ma femme. . Elle éclata de rire, et trouva cela absurde : « Peu importe les méthodes qu’elle appliquera, elle doit faire face au divorce », dit-elle avec mépris.

Ma femme et moi n'avions pas eu de contact de corps depuis que mon intention de divorce a été explicitement exprimée. Donc quand je l'ai portée le premier jour, nous avons tous deux paru maladroits. Notre fils applaudit derrière nous disant : « papa tient maman dans ses bras. » Ses paroles m'ont apporté un sentiment de douleur. De la chambre au salon, puis à la porte, j'ai marché plus de dix mètres avec elle dans mes bras. Elle ferma les yeux et dit doucement, ne dis rien à notre fils au sujet du divorce. J'ai hoché la tête, me sentant quelque peu bouleversé. Je l’ai posée devant la porte. Elle est allée à attendre le bus pour aller au travail. J'ai conduit seul et partis au bureau.

Le deuxième jour, nous l’avons fait beaucoup plus facilement. Elle se pencha sur ma poitrine. Je pouvais sentir le parfum de son chemisier. J'ai réalisé que je n'avais pas regardé cette femme attentivement pendant une longue période. J'ai réalisé qu'elle n'était pas jeune non plus. Il y avait des fines rides sur son visage, ses cheveux grisonnaient! Notre mariage avait fait des ravages sur elle. Pendant une minute, je me suis demandé ce que j'avais fait d’elle.

Le quatrième jour, quand je l'ai soulevée, j’ai senti au retour un sentiment d'intimité. Ce fut la femme qui avait donné dix ans de sa vie pour moi. Le cinquième jour, et le sixième, j'ai compris que notre sentiment d'intimité renoué était croissant. Je n'ai rien dit à Jane à ce sujet. Il est devenu plus facile de la porter au fur et mesure que le mois s'écoulait. Peut-être que la séance d'entraînement quotidienne m'a rendu plus fort.

Et un matin, elle se mit à chercher quoi porter. Elle a essayé pas mal quelques robes mais ne pouvait pas trouver une qui la convienne. Puis elle soupira : « toutes mes robes ont grandi ». J'ai soudain réalisé qu'elle avait tellement maigri, c'était la raison pour laquelle je pouvais la porter plus facilement.

Tout à coup, cela m'a frappé ... elle avait enduré tant de douleur et d'amertume dans son cœur. Inconsciemment, j'ai tendu la main et toucha sa tête.

Notre fils est venu en ce moment et dit: Papa, il est temps de porter maman. Pour lui, voyant son père portant sa mère était devenue une partie essentielle de sa vie. Ma femme fit un geste à notre fils de venir plus près et le serra étroitement. Je tournais mon visage parce que j'avais peur, je pourrais changer d'avis à la dernière minute. Je l’ai alors prise dans mes bras, marchant de la chambre, à travers le salon, dans le couloir. Elle mit doucement et naturellement ses mains autour de mon cou. Je l'ai serrée contre moi. C’était comme le jour de notre mariage.

Mais son poids beaucoup plus léger m'a rendu triste. Le dernier jour, lorsque je l'ai tenue dans mes bras, je pouvais à peine bouger d'un pas. Notre fils était allé à l'école. Je l'ai tenue fermement et lui dit: Je n'avais pas remarqué que notre vie manquait d'intimité. J'ai conduit et suis allé au bureau .... J’ai sauté de la voiture rapidement sans verrouiller la porte. J'avais peur qu’il soit tard pour moi de changer d'avis ... Je pris les escaliers. Jane ouvrit la porte et je lui ai dit, Désolé, Jane, je ne veux plus de divorce.

Elle me regarda, étonnée, puis toucha mon front : « As-tu de la fièvre? » Dit-elle. J’ai enlevé sa main de ma tête : « Désolé, Jane », je dis, « je ne vais pas divorcer. Ma vie conjugale était ennuyeuse sans doute parce qu'elle et moi n'avions pas valorisé les détails de nos vies, et non parce que nous ne nous aimions plus. Maintenant je me rends compte que depuis que je l'ai amenée à mon domicile le jour de notre mariage, je suis censé la garder jusqu'à ce que la mort nous sépare ». Jane semblait soudainement se réveiller. Elle m'a donné une claque forte puis claqua la porte et fondit en larmes. Je descendis et m'en allais. À la boutique de fleurs sur le chemin, j'ai commandé un bouquet de fleurs pour ma femme. La vendeuse m'a demandé ce qu’elle pouvait écrire sur la carte. J'ai souri et j’ai écrit : Je te porterais chaque matin jusqu'à ce que la mort nous sépare.

Ce soir je suis arrivé à la maison, des fleurs dans mes mains, un sourire sur mon visage. Je montais les escaliers, mais seulement, hélas, pour trouver ma femme dans le lit, morte. Ma femme avait été lutté contre le cancer depuis des mois et j'ai été tellement occupé avec Jane, que je n’ai même pas remarqué. Elle savait qu'elle allait mourir bientôt et elle a voulu me sauver de la réaction négative de notre fils, au cas où nous aurions divorcé. Du moins, aux yeux de notre fils - je suis un mari aimant ... .

Les petits détails de votre vie sont ce qui importe vraiment dans une relation. Ce n'est pas la maison, la voiture, la propriété, l'argent à la banque. Ceux-ci créent un environnement propice pour le bonheur mais ne peut pas donner le bonheur en eux-mêmes.

Donc, trouver du temps pour être l'ami de votre conjoint et de faire ces petites choses pour l'autre qui construisent l'intimité. Faire un vrai mariage heureux!

Si vous ne partagez pas ceci, rien ne vous arrivera.

Si vous le faites, vous venez peut-être de sauver un mariage. Beaucoup d'échecs de la vie sont dus au fait que les gens ne se rendent pas compte à quel point ils étaient près du succès au moment où ils ont abandonné. ♥ — with Annie Kaz, Pappy Matshim, Tina Makolo and Joel Kalombo.

Statistics on Gun Use in Crime, Self-Defense (Graphic)

More good stuff from El Opinador Compulsivo:

Saturday, December 22, 2012

A Posted Sign That Will Prevent Gun Violence In Schools

You decide.  (Hat tip:  El Opinador Compulsivo)


























Actually, I think the sign on the right might prove too frightening to many. I would be satisfied by a sign that merely says "These premises guarded by armed and trained personnel."  Or even "These premises guarded by professional security" with an image of a uniformed guard.  No depiction of a firearm would be necessary -- it would be implied by the image.

UPDATE:  I photoshopped another alternative, less scary but possibly just as effective:



Homesick for the Land of Gorch: 1975 Saturday Night Live

Land of Gorch Muppets, Left to Right:
Mighty Favog, Scred (holding a chicken), Queen Peuta, 

Her Son Wisss, Vazh and King Ploobis (with horns)
At night before sleep I have been watching old episodes of "Saturday Night Live" on my iPad, via Netflix.  I am currently watching shows from 1975, and it is interesting to see the original cast again, in their youth:  Chevy Chase, John Belushi, Dan Akroyd, Garrett Morris, Gilda Radner, Lorraine Newman and Jane Curtin.    This group was known as "The Not Ready for Prime Time Players."

I still laugh a lot when Chevy Chase, news anchor, allows a counter-viewpoint to be expressed on his news show "Week End Update": Chase then mocks the speaker from the background, making faces, mouthing words and pretending to mirror the speaker's body language.

Jim Henson's muppets had a part in the 1975 episodes, not the cute little critters from Sesame Street, but some weird and ugly creatures from "The Land of Gorch."  I loved them!  In my opinion, they were the best of Henson's muppets.  The Land of Gorch was described like this:

Come with us now … from the bubbling tarpits to the sulfurous wasteland … from the rotting forest to the stagnant mud flats … to the long lost Land of Gorch!

The creatures lived in a rocky and craterous landscape surrounded by sulfurous volcanos and an orange sky.  The Kingdom of Gorch was presided over by a comically gross monster named King Ploobis, attended to by his loyal servant, Scred, and nagged constantly by his hag of a wife, Queen Peuta.  Whenever King Ploobis needed spiritual or other advice, he would visit the god of Gorch, a sphinx-like character with a strong Jewish accent and facial demeanor, whose name was the Mighty Favog.  Favog would answer questions for a sacrifice, usually of a chicken, which was inserted into a barrel held by Favog, where it would be flushed somewhere.  Wisss was the son of King Ploobis and Queen Peuta, who was constantly getting high by sticking his long nose into holes in the rocks and sniffing the foul gasses emitted therefrom.

Servant Scred always refers to King Ploobis in hilarious terms:  "Your Flatulence," "Your Grossness," etc.

Ploobis also had a maid-servant and mistress named Vazh, who by Gorchian standards was pretty hot stuff. Those early days of Saturday Night Live were the best, I think.

"An Opinion on Gun Control" Article Goes Viral

An excellent and informative essay on guns, crime and gun control has been posted at a site called Monster Hunter Nation.  The author is Larry Correia, a gun expert who has sold weapons to police and military, is widely knowledgeable of existing gun control laws, and has trained police and others in the operation of firearms and shoot/no shoot scenarios.  The article has gone viral, with thousands of people visiting the site to read it.

The article is An Opinion on Gun Control; it is a long article but worth the time to read.  Correia states important points like these:

Correia's Qualifications: 
Basically for most of my adult life, I have been up to my eyeballs in guns, self-defense instruction, and the laws relating to those things. So believe me when I say that I’ve heard every argument relating to gun control possible. It is pretty rare for me to hear something new, and none of this stuff is new.
Arming Teachers: 
No. Hear me out. The single best way to respond to a mass shooter is with an immediate, violent response. The vast majority of the time, as soon as a mass shooter meets serious resistance, it bursts their fantasy world bubble. Then they kill themselves or surrender. This has happened over and over again.
The average number of people shot in a mass shooting event when the shooter is stopped by law enforcement: 14. The average number of people shot in a mass shooting event when the shooter is stopped by civilians: 2.5. The reason is simple. The armed civilians are there when it started.
Gun Free Zones
Gun Free Zones are hunting preserves for innocent people. Period.

Think about it. You are a violent, homicidal madman, looking to make a statement and hoping to go from disaffected loser to most famous person in the world. The best way to accomplish your goals is to kill a whole bunch of people. So where’s the best place to go shoot all these people? Obviously, it is someplace where nobody can shoot back.

In all honesty I have no respect for anybody who believes Gun Free Zones actually work. You are going to commit several hundred felonies, up to and including mass murder, and you are going to refrain because there is a sign? That No Guns Allowed sign is not a cross that wards off vampires. It is wishful thinking, and really pathetic wishful thinking at that.

The only people who obey No Guns signs are people who obey the law. People who obey the law aren’t going on rampages.
Read it all here. Link it, refer it to others.

Friday, December 21, 2012

The NRA: Target and Scapegoat for the Hyper-Angry Left

Over at Twitchy.com there are many examples of hateful tweets put out by famous celebrities.  The latest hate-fest is against the National Rifle Association, a target of misdirected ire over the Connecticut school shootings of a week ago.  The latest is from author Joyce Carol Oates, who wants NRA members to be victims of gun violence so that they can better sympathize with other gun victims and allow gun control.

One of the characteristics of the loony left is a hair-pin trigger for anger, over-developed adrenal glands and a strong tendency to find a scapegoat for the cathartic expiation of their emotions.  When the actual source of their anger (the shooter) is not available for punishment, a substitute will do just as well.  They need someone or something to hate, someone to act as punching-bag for their anger, someone to blame.

Their strange logic goes like this:  crazy man gets guns, kills people.  The NRA supports the rights of gun ownership.  Therefore, the NRA killed those kids in Connecticut.  Brilliant logic. Or not.

Actually, the NRA has, for over 100 years, supported the safe and responsible ownership and use of rifles and guns.  They teach firearm safety courses.  When I was around 11 years old I went to one of them, as a precondition for going deer hunting with my father.

There are those on the wacky right (the Alex Jones types) who find scapegoats of their own, namely, antidepressant medications, which have nothing to do with the murderous rampages of the insane.  But blaming the medication satisfies a human need to find someone or something to blame.

So is anything to blame for the recent murderous rampages of the insane?  Yes.  Just supply your favorite pet peeve here:  keeping God out of schools; the deterioration of family values; income disparity among the populace, etc, ad infinitum.  However, I think there are objectively considered, real reasons for the violence.  They may (with emphasis on "may," as an admission that I don't have all the answers) include:

1.  The mainstreaming of the dangerous insane, rather than institutionalizing them.  Yes, we want to avoid institutionalizing the non-dangerous insane -- like the professor in "A Beautiful Life" or the man who believed in a giant rabbit named Harvey.  However, when a mental patient has a history of hurting people or expresses a reoccurring desire to harm or kill someone, he should be institutionalized if, say, two independent psychiatrists agree.

2.  The creation of target rich environments by specifying certain areas as "gun free zones."  This is nonsense.  There is no logic in assuming that making people defenseless will make them safer.  All areas where lots of people congregate should make provisions for defending against the occasional mad shooter, areas like schools, colleges, shopping malls, train stations, airports and movie theaters.

3.  Absurdly restrictive Gun Control Laws.  California is a good example of how absurd gun control can be. You cannot carry a loaded gun in public, concealed or unconcealed.  If you are caught doing so, you are subject to arrest and imprisonment, even when such incidences are accidental.  If you carry a gun in your car, it had better be locked up and in the trunk; it may not be loaded, and the magazine may not be close by the gun.  This is allegedly to prevent traffic rage incidents where drivers shoot each other.  It also prevents defense from carjacking or robbery while in the car.  We need the right to carry loaded concealed weapons, under a reasonable training and licensing program.

4. Overly Lax Gun Control Laws.  Those who wish to carry concealed weapons should know what they are doing and how to prevent accidental discharge of weapons.  Along with mandatory training, testing and licensing, I wouldn't be opposed to some kind of psych examination of applicants either, at the very least, a questionnaire:  "Have you ever murdered anyone?  Do you plan to do so?  Are you a lunatic?"  The usual background check for a criminal past should also be a requirement for licensing.

Conservatives tend to oppose any kind of gun control, but I think that is going to have to end.  No one should be able to buy a gun without a procedure for licensing, training and a background check.  No buying guns at pawnshops, Craig's List or gun shows, without first undergoing a licensing and training procedure.  Mark David Chapman murdered John Lennon with a pistol he bought at a pawnshop.

5.  Irresponsible Handling of Guns by Gun Owners.  Too often crazy killers get access to their parents' guns and then use them to murder.  Obligatory training courses for gun ownership should include restricting access to one's guns by unauthorized or unlicensed family members, with criminal penalties for those who fail to do so when such failure results in gun deaths.  Adam Lanza had access to his mother's guns and used them to murder school children.  The Columbine shooters also used their parents' guns to commit mass murder.

6.  Extreme Violence in Movies and Video Games.  It isn't clear how much the extreme violence in movies and video games contributes to insane gun rampages.  Logically, I would assume that they have some impact upon the impressionable and undoubtedly contribute to gun violence.   This would be especially true for psychotics who cannot differentiate between fantasy and reality.  More study is needed.

7.  One More:  Teenage Bullying in High Schools.  High school is a terrible time in the lives of many.  You are either one of the cool, in-crowd, or one of the despised and ridiculed masses.  Many teenagers love to bully, beat up and humiliate the less popular.  Sometimes the bullied get pushed too far and snap.  Harris and Klebold were two such teenagers, and finally struck back with mass murder.  Bullying in high schools cannot be allowed, with strict and swift punishment for those who practice it.

That's the way I see it.


Wednesday, December 19, 2012

O Tannebaum: My Favorite Vince Guaraldi Christmas Jazz (Video)

I love the music of Vince Guaraldi, and the Christmas season always makes people aware of him. He was the jazz pianist and composer who wrote and performed the musical scores for the "Charlie Brown" cartoon series, including "A Charlie Brown Christmas," which is played every Christmas season on television. It first appeared for Christmas in 1965. My favorite Guaraldi Christmas tune is "O Tannebaum," which is German for "O Christmas Tree," if I am not mistaken. Guaraldi's mellow jazz interpretation of this song is fantastic, and I particularly love it when the string bass and drums start several measures into the song.

Here it is:  enjoy!


 

"In Cold Blood" Killers' Bodies Exhumed

Richard Hickock (L) and Perry Smith (R)
The skeletal remains of two famous criminals were exhumed yesterday in an effort to solve another murder case.  The bodies were those of Richard Hickcock and Perry Smith, murderers of the Clutter family in 1959 and subjects of the Truman Capote book, "In Cold Blood."

In February of 2009 I wrote about the famous murder case described in Truman Capote's 1966 book, "In Cold Blood."  That famous crime involved the murder of a family of four in Holcomb, Kansas, the Clutter family.  Two recently released petty criminals, Perry Smith and Richard Hickock, invaded the family's rural home in the middle of the night on November 15, 1959.  The criminals had heard from a fellow inmate that Herb Clutter, owner of the ranch and house, had a safe in his office stuffed with cash.  It was bad information; there was no safe and very little cash.  So Smith and Hickock tied up the family of four and executed them one by one, with shotgun blasts to the head.  The victims were Herb Clutter, 48; Bonnie Clutter, 45; Nancy, 16; and Kenyon, 15.  My post, along with links to pictures and videos, can be viewed here.

Smith and Hickock were on the run for the next six weeks, and spent some time in Sarasota County, Florida.  During their stay there, another family was murdered: Cliff and Christine Walker and their two young children on Dec. 19, 1959, in their home in Osprey.  Christine was beaten and raped.  All four members of the family were murdered, the youngest child by drowning in the bathtub.  The crime was never solved, and police have long speculated that it was Perry Smith and Richard Hickock who were the perpetrators.

Smith and Hickcock were arrested in Las Vegas for the Clutter murders on December 30, 1959.  They were tried, convicted and, on April 14, 1965, hanged.  Their bodies were buried in Mt. Muncie Cemetery in Lansing, Kansas (See here and here).

The exhumation of Smith's and Hickock's skeletal remains yesterday was to obtain DNA samples to match to semen taken from Christine Walker's underwear.  The only purpose of the investigation is to provide closure to the family of Cliff and Christine Walker, since the potential perpetrators are already dead.

In 1967, a movie of "In Cold Blood" was made, based on Capote's non-fiction novel, and many of the scenes were eerily filmed in the same places where the actual events unfolded:  the Clutter's house, the Kansas courtroom.  Robert Blake played Perry Smith, and his physical resemblance to Smith gives an added realism to the film.  Scott Wilson played the role of Richard Hickcock.

During the exhumation, bone fragments were taken from each grave to use as a source for DNA.  Each body was then re-interred.  Read more about it here.

If you want to know more about this famous case, I recommend the 1967 film "In Cold Blood," as well as Truman Capote's excellent non-fiction novel of the same name.

Update:  Here's a CNN Video that was just released:

Robert Bork Has Died

Chronicles magazine reports:
Today brings the sad news that Robert Bork has passed away. The sadder news for America, though, came in 1987, when the Senate unjustly rejected his nomination to the Supreme Court. There is no doubt that, had Bork been confirmed, Roe v Wade would have been overturned in 1992 when the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v Casey. Unlike Anthony Kennedy, whom the Senate ultimately confirmed and who voted to reaffirm Roe in Casey, Bork possessed the fortitude to stand up to the pressures that exist in the Beltway to move to the left.
Read it all here. 

Judge Bork was demonized to an extreme during his senate confirmation hearings for appointment to the Supreme Court.  Led by the execrable and unlamented Ted Kenney, Bork was slandered to such a degree that a new verb was invented for the personal destruction of an individual, "to bork."  Naturally, his appointment was voted down by the Democrat controlled Senate. Judge Bork is but one of many principled men of accomplishment whose potentially great service to the nation was blocked by the neo-Bolsheviks of the Democrat Party.

Are You a Psychopath? Take the Test!

My cousin the psychiatrist sent me the following list for judging the degree of psychopathy in mental patients.   After reading it, you may recognize some people you know.

Test for Psychopathy

For each of the 20 characteristics, give a score of 0 if it does not apply, 1 if it applies partially and 2 if it is a perfect match.

Glib and Superficial Charm  
The tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example.
       
2  Grandiose Self-Worth    
A grossly inflated view of one's abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.
            
 Need for Stimulation or Proneness to Boredom  
An excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Psychopaths often have a low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine.  
             
Pathological Lying Can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.   

Conning and Manipulativeness  
The use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one's victims. 

6  Lack of Remorse or Guilt               
A lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one's victims.
             
Shallow Affect   
Emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.   

8  Callousness and Lack of Empathy
A lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.
    
Parasitic Lifestyle             
An intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.
  
10 Poor Behavioral Controls              
Expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily.
 
11  Promiscuous Sexual Behavior     
A variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests. 
            
12  Early Behavior Problems               
A variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.
   
13  Lack of Realistic, Long-Term Goals              
An inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.  
        
14  Impulsivity          
The occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.    
   
15 Irresponsibility  
Repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements. 
           
16  Failure to Accept Responsibility for Own Actions
A failure to accept responsibility for one's actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial. 

17  Many Short-Term Marital Relationships 
A lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital. 
   
18  Juvenile Delinquency    
Behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness. 
             
19  Revocation of Condition Release              
A revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.  
 
20 Criminal Versatility          
A diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes. 
        
TOTAL  DIAGNOSIS                                     

Hillary Arkancide



Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Crazy Hatred on the Left, plus Illogical Solutions to Lunatic Violence

A rabidly leftist professor at a Rhode Island University has called for the assassination of NRA head Wayne LaPierre. The professor, one Erik Loomis, is also a blogger at the far left screed sheet known as "Lawyers, Guns and Money."

Loomis was enraged by the Connecticut school shootings, but weirdly and inappropriately blamed the National Rifle Association for the massacre. Some left wing extremists believe that any and all gun violence is the fault of the NRA, for merely lobbying to preserve the Second Amendment. These extremists want all private ownership of guns outlawed and the Second Amendment altered or revoked. Radicals like Loomis believe the NRA to be the major obstacle to this goal. Once all guns are gone, everlasting peace will reign -- or so they seem to illogically think.

Loomis and his ilk never seem to consider the fact that not all guns can or will be confiscated, or that criminals and crazies will find alternative weapons. These leftists are strenuously opposed to furnishing guns to say, school teachers or shop owners, for protection against such threats. Somehow people will be safer if they are defenseless -- even though statistics on gun ownership and crime show the opposite to be true.

Loomis has incurred much heat over his hateful remarks on Twitter and his blog, and has been visited by the police. Donald Douglas has the complete story, with links, at American Power here.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Psycho + Guns = Tragedy: The Solution Is More Guns, Not Less

Taser:  A Tool For Stopping Violent Criminals
Adam Lanza has joined the pantheon of mass-murdering psychopaths in what might be called the SUPER "revenge of the nerds"  -- socially awkward people with mental problems who kill and then commit suicide.  Well, not all of them commit suicide -- take Jared Loughner and James Eagan Holmes, for example.

However, there is a distinct and predictable pattern here, expressed by the scientific formula:  psycho + guns + numerous available targets = tragedy.

How can we keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill?  That would surely decrease the number of mass murders.  We could ban all guns, forcing nut jobs to use knives, swords, baseball bats or bombs instead.  Then they might kill less (maybe more if bombs are used).  In any case, a young female school teacher would still be at a severe disadvantage when a Lanza enters her classroom looking for targets.  The size and strength differential between the teacher and psycho would be reduced to zero had the teacher a loaded gun.

The truth is, guns cannot be sufficiently banned to stop such incidents.  Outlawing guns means the criminal will have a gun and you won't.  What is needed is more guns, not less.  Teachers should be packing.  Anywhere there is a crowd of people -- in theaters, hospitals, schools and the shopping malls -- someone sane and trained needs to be armed and ready for psychos who show up with intent to kill.

Weapons for defense need not be limited to handguns.  Perhaps stun guns or better yet, tasers, could be issued to teachers, head ushers, hospital guards and others in lieu of traditional firepower.  Tasers can be used to floor someone from a distance, generally 15 feet for civilian tasers and 21 feet for police tasers.  The problem is that you only get one shot and if you miss, you're likely to be dead.  Still, a taser is a lot better than nothing.  Discussion, experimentation, training and research are needed to increase the options for civilians in dangerous situations.

We cannot disarm the bad guys, but we can arm their potential victims, so the latter will have a fighting chance at survival.

Related Post:  See Joseph Farah's article on How to Stop the Slaughter of Innocents.

Lots of Nonsense About Mental Health on the Web Following the School Shooting

Every time some psychopath goes postal and starts murdering innocents, a lot of self-appointed mental health "experts" come out of the woodwork to rail against the evil of psychotropic drugs, particularly SSRI's (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) -- drugs like Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil and Cymbalta.  There is a school of thought on the wacky right that has built a near-religion around the demonization of these drugs, almost on a par with 911 trutherism and Alex Jones style paranoia, and with the same willful ignorance of facts.

Invariably one of these drugs will be prescribed to someone who is quite unbalanced in the off chance that it may help the patient with his mental problems.  Then the person becomes violent and kills someone, and the ignoramuses start screaming about the SSRI being the cause.  One might as well argue that bandaids cause cuts, or aspirins headaches.  The fact that the SSRI was ineffective in a particular case does not mean it was the cause of the violence.  It has been said  many times before and needs to be repeated once again:  Correlation is not causation.  Don't put 2 and 2 together and get 5.

An SSRI does one thing only:  it increases the amount of the brain hormone serotonin in the synapses -- your own serotonin that is produced by your very own brain.  The brain puts the hormone into your synapses and then reabsorbs it.  An SSRI inhibits the reabsorption, leaving more of the hormone in your synapses for a longer period of time. Without enough serotonin, a person goes into clinical depression and/or experiences anxiety attacks.  These conditions are very unpleasant:  the patient is in psychic pain, often to an extreme degree.  Suicide may be the result.  However, I have never heard of someone who is clinically depressed committing mass murder.  Clinical depression is not psychosis; it is a chemical imbalance in the brain, and it cannot be fixed with positive thinking or wishful thinking, because not every function of the brain is subject to the conscious will.

What does cause maniacs like Adam Lanza, James Eagan Holmes, Jared Loughner, Seung Hui-Cho, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris to commit mass murder?  I put the question to my cousin, a psychiatrist and M.D. in Dallas, Texas.  He said the major cause of such events is rage.  The angrier a person is, the more irrational they become.  Their brains shift into the rage/kill software program.  Where does the rage come from?  From a malfunctioning brain, where delusions seem very real and where emotions may be totally out of all proportion to external stimuli.  Insanity is not completely understood and cures for it not well defined.  What works for one patient may not work on another.

Apparently, a psychopath and a psychotic are not one and the same thing.  They're both pretty messed up mentally, but a psychopath is mean and angry his whole life.  They have little or no empathy for other human beings and enjoy causing others to suffer.  Psychotics may have trouble differentiating reality from delusion, but most psychotics are not dangerous.  It is difficult to predict who will become so, and so mass institutionalization of psychotics is not considered a practical solution to preventing violence.  My cousin says we would need to know a lot of Lanza's personal history to diagnose him, but at first glance Lanza seems to be a paranoid psychotic rather than a psychopath.  Not that it matters much now:  crazy is as crazy does.

By way of disclosure, I have clinical depression and take generic Zoloft, an SSRI.  I have been taking it for 15 years.  It has some side effects that I do not like, namely, dizziness and lethargy.  Those are my side effects, not every patient suffers the same ones from the same drug.  We all have a different and unique biochemistry.  I plan to try Cymbalta as an alternative, on the advice from my cousin, the psychiatrist.  I can assure the Alex Jones amateur psychologists out there that their only danger from me is sarcasm.

Related articles are linked at American Power here.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Evil Rules - How Can We Fight It?

A worthless creep murders 26 people at an elementary school. Two courageous and heroic women give their lives to save children. Once again we are outraged by unspeakable evil while simultaneously revering the heroes who died trying to stop it.

I really don't know what to say. All we can do is oppose evil with whatever tools we have and never surrender to it.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

More B.S. from Union Thugs

Some Michigan union official has promised to send union thugs to the soccer games of Governor Snyder's daughter. To me, the words "union" and "thug" are synonymous.

Bullies and hoodlums have traditionally been a major turnoff for the American people. However, the leftist media filters out so much these days, many people won't hear about it.

Still, if we must fight in the streets to take back the country, then perhaps it's time we did so. Any union thugs who show up at said soccer games should be beaten to bloody pulps. That's the way I see it anyway.