Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

close
 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Surprise: New insurance fee in health overhaul law

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Your medical plan is facing an unexpected expense, so you probably are, too. It's a new, $63-per-head fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

    The charge, buried in a recent regulation, works out to tens of millions of dollars for the largest companies, employers say. Most of that is likely to be passed on to workers.

    Employee benefits lawyer Chantel Sheaks calls it a "sleeper issue" with significant financial consequences, particularly for large employers.

    "Especially at a time when we are facing economic uncertainty, (companies will) be hit with a multi-million dollar assessment without getting anything back for it," said Sheaks, a principal at Buck Consultants, a Xerox subsidiary.

    Based on figures provided in the regulation, employer and individual health plans covering an estimated 190 million Americans could owe the per-person fee.

    The Obama administration says it is a temporary assessment levied for three years starting in 2014, designed to raise $25 billion. It starts at $63 and then declines.

    Most of the money will go into a fund administered by the Health and Human Services Department. It will be used to cushion health insurance companies from the initial hard-to-predict costs of covering uninsured people with medical problems. Under the law, insurers will be forbidden from turning away the sick as of Jan. 1, 2014.

    The program "is intended to help millions of Americans purchase affordable health insurance, reduce unreimbursed usage of hospital and other medical facilities by the uninsured and thereby lower medical expenses and premiums for all," the Obama administration says in the regulation. An accompanying media fact sheet issued Nov. 30 referred to "contributions" without detailing the total cost and scope of the program.

    Of the total pot, $5 billion will go directly to the U.S. Treasury, apparently to offset the cost of shoring up employer-sponsored coverage for early retirees.

    The $25 billion fee is part of a bigger package of taxes and fees to finance Obama's expansion of coverage to the uninsured. It all comes to about $700 billion over 10 years, and includes higher Medicare taxes effective this Jan. 1 on individuals making more than $200,000 per year or couples making more than $250,000. People above those threshold amounts also face an additional 3.8 percent tax on their investment income.

    But the insurance fee had been overlooked as employers focused on other costs in the law, including fines for medium and large firms that don't provide coverage.

    "This kind of came out of the blue and was a surprisingly large amount," said Gretchen Young, senior vice president for health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee, a group that represents large employers on benefits issues.

    Word started getting out in the spring, said Young, but hard cost estimates surfaced only recently with the new regulation. It set the per capita rate at $5.25 per month, which works out to $63 a year.

    America's Health Insurance Plans, the major industry trade group for health insurers, says the fund is an important program that will help stabilize the market and mitigate cost increases for consumers as the changes in Obama's law take effect.

    But employers already offering coverage to their workers don't see why they have to pony up for the stabilization fund, which mainly helps the individual insurance market. The redistribution puts the biggest companies on the hook for tens of millions of dollars.

    "It just adds on to everything else that is expected to increase health care costs," said economist Paul Fronstin of the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    The fee will be assessed on all "major medical" insurance plans, including those provided by employers and those purchased individually by consumers. Large employers will owe the fee directly. That's because major companies usually pay upfront for most of the health care costs of their employees. It may not be apparent to workers, but the insurance company they deal with is basically an agent administering the plan for their employer.

    The fee will total $12 billion in 2014, $8 billion in 2015 and $5 billion in 2016. That means the per-head assessment would be smaller each year, around $40 in 2015 instead of $63.

    It will phase out completely in 2017 — unless Congress, with lawmakers searching everywhere for revenue to reduce federal deficits — decides to extend it.

     

    779 comments

    • Rhett  •  3 hrs ago
      Decided that if Americans want this type of government, I will not complain anymore, I am 60, you can face all of this, since so many believe if the punis#$%$ent of those who made it. Where is the American dream? Is it dying? What is the sense in dreaming of success if all you get for it is taxes that take you back down......those up stay and everyone else stay down, this is just not the Constitution that I learned in school, do you think they forgot that the people ruled or have the people forgotten what they have done? Great question.
    • Louisiana Stephen  •  16 days ago
      It is important to point out that this was not in the original plan, the GOP congress just added it
    • david  •  25 days ago
      Hmm... wonder how many more surprises will pop up with the new healthcare??
    • D  •  25 days ago
      You think health care is expensive now,wait until Its free
    • Heather  •  25 days ago
      Is anybody really surprised? Just wait, though, there's more to come!
    • Tim  •  25 days ago
      Anyone notice how when this is reported that it's always about money and how they're going to take more of it away from us. It's never been about health care.
    • cfydyhger  •  25 days ago
      You aint seen nothing yet.
    • Smoke Dis  •  25 days ago
      There is no such thing as a temporary tax. The Federal Government only knows how to take and spend more than it takes.
    • Richard  •  25 days ago
      Oh yeah! The fun is just beginning! It will be interesting, and amusing, to watch this debacle unfold! Get ready for the screaming!
    • JOBar  •  25 days ago
      And, Obama doesn't want to tax the middle class or poor! What the heck is more increase(s) on health care considered? Didn't Supreme Court Justice Andersen say, "...it is a tax."
    • Jobless vets save Ohio robbery victim, nab suspect

      CINCINNATI (AP) — A homeless man and another who was recently homeless are being hailed as heroes for coming to the aid of a man who was being robbed in downtown Cincinnati.

    • Jobless veterans rescue Ohio robbery victim

      CINCINNATI (AP) — A homeless man and another who was recently homeless are being hailed as heroes for coming to the aid of a man who was being robbed in downtown Cincinnati.

    • Healthy Hollywood: Fab Food Friday - Miss Universe's Miracle Diet!

      Miss Universe Olivia Culpo is one of the most beautiful women in the world. So, what's her secret? It starts with a healthy diet!

    • Backward step for reform in Myanmar?

      Myanmar's military has stepped up attacks on ethnic Kachin rebels in recent days with airstrikes. This move calls into question efforts by the United States and other international powers to richly and quickly reward the nominally civilian regime there for a series of gestures toward political reform.

    • Poll: Fight obesity crisis but keep the junk food

      WASHINGTON (AP) — Everyone could use a little help keeping those New Year's resolutions to slim down. But if it means the government limiting junk food, the response is an overwhelming, "No."

    • Poll: Obesity's a crisis but we want our junk food

      We know obesity is a health crisis, or every new year wouldn't start with resolutions to eat better and get off the couch. But don't try taking away our junk food.Americans blame too much screen time and ...

    • Google’s original Android mascot would have given children everywhere horrible nightmares

      It’s a good thing that companies don’t normally let software engineers produce marketing materials. Exhibit A is Android engineer Dan Morrill, who posted pictures on his Google+ page this week showing his original stand-in concept art for Google’s (GOOG) Android logo that he prepared for a presentation. In short, Morrill’s sketches are terrifying. Instead of the cute little green “bug man” Android logo that we’ve all come to love over the past few years, Morrill depicted a menacing, crazy-eyed deathbot that looks as though it was found drawn on the walls of a remote Siberian Soviet-era insane asylum. It’s hard to pinpoint the most disturbing aspect of Morrill’s doodle: The robot’s multicolored spiral eyes, its ladder mouth or the way

    • Senator Claims Angels Visited Him in Hospital

      Illinois Senator Mark Kirk has wrestled with lots of devilish political issues during his 28-year political career, but after suffering a stroke one year ago, he claims he had a very different experience: an encounter with angels.

    Follow Yahoo! News