Trumpeter Swan - Cygnus buccinator
Species of Concern
Global Rank:
G4
State Rank:
S3
Agency Status
USFWS:
USFS:
SENSITIVE
BLM:
SENSITIVE
FWP Conservation Tier:
1
PIF:
1
External Links
Listen to an Audio Sample
Copyright by The Trumpeter Swan Society.
General Description
Trumpeter Swans are the largest waterfowl in North America. They can be up to 5 feet in length, have a wingspan up to 80 inches (almost 7 feet) and weigh over 20 pounds. Males are larger than females, but otherwise the sexes are similar in appearance. The adult Trumpeter Swan is entirely white, although the head and neck are sometimes stained an orange color due to iron-rich waters and mud where they forage for food. The webbed feet and legs are black. The bill is straight, rarely shows any yellow spot in front of the eyes (lores) and also is black. Sometimes the lower mandible shows a salmon-red line along the upper edge (Mitchell 1994). Juvenile swans are mostly white, but can retain a gray or brown head, neck and body feathers. Their feet may be yellowish, grayish or dull black. Hatchlings (cygnets) are all gray in color and have pinkish feet and a black and pink bicolored bill (Mitchell 1994).
The vocalization of Trumpeter Swans is limited to only a call sounding like oh-OH. They can make this call either with their mouths open (louder) or closed (nasal-like). Other sounds made include peeps, hisses and gurgles (Mitchell 1994).
Diagnostic Characteristics
Trumpeter Swans are similar in appearance to, but larger than, Tundra Swans. Trumpeter Swans rarely show any yellow on the lores, while Tundra Swans have very evident yellow lores (Mitchell 1994). The easiest method of separation between these two species is vocalization. Trumpeter Swans are less vocal, much lower pitched and have a more nasal quality than the louder, clearer sounds of Tundra Swans (Sibley 2000). Trumpeter Swans are also similar in size and weight to the introduced Mute Swans. However, the bill of Mute Swans is mostly orange rather than all black. Also, male Mute Swans have a black knob at the base of the bill. Trumpeter Swans do not have this knob (Mitchell 1994).
General Distribution
Summary of Observations Submitted for Montana
Number of Observations: 882
(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version)
Map Help and Descriptions
Relative Density
Recency
Breeding
(direct evidence "B")
Breeding
(indirect evidence "b")
No evidence of Breeding
(transient "t")
Overwintering
(regular observations "W")
Overwintering
(at least one obs. "w")
(Records associated with a range of dates are excluded from time charts)
Migration
Trumpeter Swans breeding in Montana are non-migrants. They spend both the breeding season and the winter in southern Montana's lakes, ponds, and streams of the Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge. The Canadian subpopulation breeding in parts of British Columbia, Alberta, the Yukon, and the Northwest Territories will move south in late October to early November (Mitchell 1994).
Fall migration dates for the Bozeman area are November 15 to December 15 (Skaar et al. 1969). They usually follow the Rocky Mountain Front moving further south as water freezes or food diminishes. They eventually arrive in southern Montana and winter along with the resident population. Canadian swans leave their wintering grounds in early March to early April, moving up the Rocky Mountain Front toward their breeding habitat further north (Mitchell 1994). Migration dates for Bozeman are February 25 to April 15 (Skaar et al. 1969).
Habitat
The breeding habitat for Trumpeter Swans in the Red Rock Lakes/Centennial Valley of Montana includes lakes and ponds and adjacent marshes containing sufficient vegetation and nesting locations. Along the Rocky Mountain Front the breeding habitat is small pothole lakes, generally with sufficient water to maintain emergent vegetation through the breeding season (MTNHP 2003). Habitat requirements for breeding include room to take off (~100 m), shallow, unpolluted water with sufficient emergent vegetation and invertebrates, appropriate nest sites (i.e. Muskrat lodges), and areas with little human disturbance (Mitchell 1994).
Their nonbreeding habitat in Montana is the many large and small lakes and ponds in extreme southern Montana, including the breeding area of the Red Rock Lakes/Centennial Valley. Trumpeter Swans also winter in the Ennis Lake and Madison River complex, as well as Hebgen Lake and the surrounding area. During winter appropriate habitat is areas where water does not freeze and food is plentiful and accessible. Trumpeter Swans will move out of one lake or pond to another if conditions become too severe.
Ecological Systems Associated with this Species
- Details on Creation and Suggested Uses and Limitations
How Associations Were Made
We associated the use and habitat quality (high, medium, or low) of each of the 82 ecological systems mapped in Montana for
vertebrate animal species that regularly breed, overwinter, or migrate through the state by:
- Using personal observations and reviewing literature that summarize the breeding, overwintering, or migratory habitat requirements of each species (Dobkin 1992, Hart et al. 1998, Hutto and Young 1999, Maxell 2000, Foresman 2001, Adams 2003, and Werner et al. 2004);
- Evaluating structural characteristics and distribution of each ecological system relative to the species’ range and habitat requirements;
- Examining the observation records for each species in the state-wide point database associated with each ecological system;
- Calculating the percentage of observations associated with each ecological system relative to the percent of Montana covered by each ecological system to get a measure of “observations versus availability of habitat”.
Species that breed in Montana were only evaluated for breeding habitat use, species that only overwinter in Montana were only evaluated for overwintering habitat use, and species that only migrate through Montana were only evaluated for migratory habitat use.
In general, species were associated as using an ecological system if structural characteristics of used habitat documented in the literature were present in the ecological system or large numbers of point observations were associated with the ecological system.
However, species were not associated with an ecological system if there was no support in the literature for use of structural characteristics in an ecological system,
even if point observations were associated with that system.
High, medium, and low habitat quality was assigned based on the degree to which the structural characteristics of an ecological system matched the preferred structural habitat characteristics for each species in the literature.
The percentage of observations associated with each ecological system relative to the percent of Montana covered by each ecological system was also used to guide assignments of habitat quality.
If you have any questions or comments on species associations with ecological systems, please contact Bryce Maxell at
bmaxell@mt.gov or (406) 444-3655.
Suggested Uses and Limitations
Species associations with ecological systems should be used to generate potential lists of species that may occupy broader landscapes for the purposes of landscape-level planning.
These potential lists of species should not be used in place of documented occurrences of species (this information can be requested at:
http://mtnhp.org/requests/default.asp) or systematic surveys for species and evaluations of habitat at a local site level by trained biologists.
Users of this information should be aware that the land cover data used to generate species associations is based on imagery from the late 1990s and early 2000s and was only intended to be used at broader landscape scales.
Land cover mapping accuracy is particularly problematic when the systems occur as small patches or where the land cover types have been altered over the past decade.
Thus, particular caution should be used when using the associations in assessments of smaller areas (e.g., evaluations of public land survey sections).
Finally, although a species may be associated with a particular ecological system within its known geographic range, portions of that ecological system may occur outside of the species’ known geographic range.
Literature Cited
- Adams, R.A. 2003. Bats of the Rocky Mountain West; natural history, ecology, and conservation. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado. 289 p.
- Dobkin, D. S. 1992. Neotropical migrant land birds in the Northern Rockies and Great Plains. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region. Publication No. R1-93-34. Missoula, MT.
- Foresman, K.R. 2001. The wild mammals of Montana. Special Publication No. 12. Lawrence, KS: The American Society of Mammalogists. 278 p.
- Hart, M.M., W.A. Williams, P.C. Thornton, K.P. McLaughlin, C.M. Tobalske, B.A. Maxell, D.P. Hendricks, C.R. Peterson, and R.L. Redmond. 1998. Montana atlas of terrestrial vertebrates. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. 1302 p.
- Hutto, R.L. and J.S. Young. 1999. Habitat relationships of landbirds in the Northern Region, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-GTR-32. 72 p.
- Maxell, B.A. 2000. Management of Montana’s amphibians: a review of factors that may present a risk to population viability and accounts on the identification, distribution, taxonomy, habitat use, natural history, and the status and conservation of individual species. Report to U.S. Forest Service Region 1. Missoula, MT: Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana. 161 p.
- Werner, J.K., B.A. Maxell, P. Hendricks, and D. Flath. 2004. Amphibians and reptiles of Montana. Missoula, MT: Mountain Press Publishing Company. 262 p.
Food Habits
In the Yellowstone ecosystem dominant foods (over 10% in at least one season) included Chara spp. (21.7%), Elodea canadensis (11.4%), Potamogeton spp. (32.2%), and Potamogeton pectinatus tubers (15.7%) (Squires and Anderson 1995); however, Hampton (1981) reported up to 10% of food was animal matter, primarily invertebrates and fish.
Ecology
At Red Rocks National Wildlife Refuge, the population increased until 1954 and has declined steadily since, possibly due to a decrease in Elodea canadensis (Page 1976), or to lack of migration and the resultant poor nutritional gain, producing inviable eggs/young (Hampton 1981).
Reproductive Characteristics
Nesting begins in late April or early May in the intermountain western U.S. Clutch size is 2 to 9, usually about 5). In Yellowstone National Park and environs, clutch size is about 4 (Shea 1979). Incubation, mainly conducted by the female, lasts 33 to 37 days (Harrison 1978). Hatching occurs in June in the intermountain western U.S. In Yellowstone National Park, the hatching rate is approximately 49%. 54% of nests hatched at least one egg. The average brood size at hatching is 3.3 and 2.0 at fledging (Shea 1979). Nestlings are precocial but remain with adults until the subsequent spring. Fledging occurs at 100 to 120 days. Young remain with parents through winter; siblings may stay together for a few years and may rejoin parents after the nesting period. Trumpeter Swans first nest at 4 to 5 years (may form pair bonds earlier) and form a life-long pair bond. Rarely does more than one pair nest on a single body of water.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with biannual Trumpeter Swan Surveys of the Rocky Mountain Population, monitor Trumpeter Swan reproduction in Montana closely. Since 1972, every September and February surveys are initiated across southern Montana to document the presence of Trumpeter Swans. These surveys also separate the number of white birds (adult or subadult) from gray birds (cygnets). February surveys have shown some fluctuation of the wintering swan population in Montana over the last 30 years with a record high number of 704 birds (600 white and 104 gray) in 2002 and a low of 214 birds (153 white and 61 gray) in 1995 (USFWS 2003). Overall, the wintering Rocky Mountain Population has increased drastically from about 609 birds in 1973 to over 4400 in 2002. It appears the population in Montana is remaining steady, where increasing populations in Idaho and Wyoming are the cause for the overall increase in the Rocky Mountain Population (USFWS 2003). September surveys for Trumpeter Swans have been conducted since 1967. From then up to 1992, swan numbers in the state were fairly consistent with the total number of birds ranging from 202 birds (174 white and 28 gray) in 1986 to 365 (242 white and 123 gray) in 1968 (USFWS 2001). After 1992 swan numbers in the state declined drastically. Only 76 swans (60 white and 16 gray) were recorded in 1993 and since that time the highest number of Trumpeter Swans recorded was 151 (127 white and 24 gray) in 2000 (USFWS 2001). The breeding population for the entire Rocky Mountain Population has apparently remained fairly constant over the same period of time (1967-2002). 1988 recorded a high with 658 birds recorded. The low year for breeding swans was 1993 with only 354 (USFWS 2001).
Management
Management for Trumpeter Swans began in Montana in the early 1930's with the designation of Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge (RRLNWR). This refuge was specifically created for continued Trumpeter Swan presence and for active management practices. These early management practices consisted of protection from shooting, winter feeding stations, and relocation to other breeding locations (Mitchell 1994). Some of these management activities are still in practice today, along with others including habitat restoration, human recreation management, breeding, wintering habitat management, and winter translocation work (Mitchell 1994).
Since 1988, Trumpeter Swans have been relocated from Red Rock Lakes NWR in southern Montana to locations in Idaho, Oregon, Wyoming and Utah to promote exploration of new wintering and habitats and to remedy the increasing problem of overpopulation in the refuge during winter. The goal is to have less than 10% winter at any one site and no swans winter at Red Rock Lakes NWR (Baskin 1993). In 1993, winter feeding stations were terminated in the Red Rock Lakes NWR. It was believed these stations were reducing the winter range expansion work, as birds would not actively explore new wintering locations if food were made readily available in the refuge. Since then, Trumpeter Swans have indeed dispersed to new areas in the west and the remaining population in RRLNWR has stabilized.
Other management techniques include the biannual Trumpeter Swan surveys conducted in the state, the management of Mute Swan populations, and the implementation of land-use guidelines on state, federal and provincial lands. All these practices are described and supported by The North American Management Plan for Trumpeter Swans (1984). As noted in the distribution comments, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes in northwestern Montana are also reintroducing Trumpeter Swans on the Flathead Indian Reservation. Trumpeter Swans are a Species of Management Concern in Region 6 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1995).
References
- Additional ReferencesLegend:
View WorldCat Record 
View Online Publication
Do you know of a citation we're missing?
The Trumpeter Swan Society. 1986. A trumpeter swan bibliography, J. A. Cooper and D. K. Weaver (eds). The Trumpeter Swan Society, Maple Plain, Minnesota.- Abel, B. 1992. Snapping turtle attacks on trumpeter swan cygnets in Wisconsin. Passenger Pigeon 54(3): 209-213.
- American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds, 6th ed. Amer. Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
- American Ornithologists' Union. 1998. Check-list of North American birds. 7th edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. 829 pp.
- Anderson, D. R., R. C. Herron, and B. Reiswig. 1986. Estimates of annual survival rates of trumpeter swans banded 1949-82 near Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Montana. J. Wildlife Manage. 50 :218-221.
- Banko, W. E. 1960. The trumpeter swan: its history, habits, and population in the United States. North Am. Fauna 63:1-214.
- Casey, D. 2000. Partners in Flight Draft Bird Conservation Plan Montana. 281 pp.
- Childress, D. 1986. Trumpeter swan expansion in Montana. In D. Compton, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., West Yellowstone. 9:47.
- U.S. Forest Service. 1991. Forest and rangeland birds of the United States: Natural history and habitat use. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Agricultural Handbook 688. 625 pages.
- Drewien, R. C., K. R. Clegg, and M. N. Fisher. 1992. Winter capture of trumpeter swans at Harriman State Park, Idaho, and Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Montana. In C. D. Mitchell, J. R. Balcomb and J. E. Comely, 008., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Salt Lake City, UTe 13:38-46.
- Ehrlich, P., D. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birder’s Handbook, A Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds. Simon and Schuster Inc. New York. 785 pp.
- Gale, R.S., E.O. Garten, and I.J. Ball. 1987. The history, ecology, and management of the Rocky Mountain population of Trumpeter Swans. Unpubl. Manuscript. Montana Wildlife Cooperative Unit, University of Montana. 314 pp.
- Gomez, D. 1994-2001. Trumpeter Swan survey of the Rocky Mountain population/ U.S. flocks, Fall. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge.
- Hampton, P. D. 1981. The wintering and nesting behavior of the Trumpeter swan. M.S. thesis. Univ. of Montana, Missoula. 185 pp.
- Hand, R.L. 1969. A distributional checklist of the birds of western Montana. Unpubl. rep. 55 pp.
- Harrison, C. 1978. A field guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of North American birds. Collins, Cleveland.
- Herbert, J. 1992. Rocky Mountain population of trumpeter swans - a Pacific Flyway Study Committee perspective. In C. D. Mitchell, J. R. Balcomb and J. E. Comely, eds., Prac. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Salt Lake City, UTe 13: 19-21.
- Herbert, J. 1992. Summary of Montana's tundra swan hunting seasons, 1970-90. In C. D. Mitchell, J. R. Balcomb, and J. E. Comely,eds., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Salt Lake City, UT. 13:60-63.
- Hughlett, C. A., F. C. BelIrose, H. H. Burgess, A. S. Hawkins, and J. A. Kadlec. 1986. Declining productivity of trumpeter swans at Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Lima, Montana. In D. Compton, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., West Yellowstone. 9: 124-131.
- Hull, A. V. 1939. Trumpeter swans -- their management and preservation. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 4:378-382.
- Jean, C., P. Hendricks, M. Jones, S. Cooper, and J. Carlson. 2002. Ecological communities on the Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge: inventory and review of aspen and wetland systems. Report to Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge.
- Johnsgard, P.A. 1979. Birds of the Great Plains: breeding species and their distribution. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 539 pp.
- Johnsgard, P. A. 1986. Birds of the Rocky Mountains with particular reference to national parks in the Northern Rocky Mountain region. Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder. xi + 504 pp.
- Johnson, S. R. and D. R. Herter. 1989. The Birds of the Beaufort Sea. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., Anchorage, Alaska. 372 pp.
- Lenard, S., J. Carlson, J. Ellis, C. Jones, and C. Tilly. 2003. P. D. Skaar's Montana Bird Distribution, 6th Edition. Montana Audubon: Helena, MT, 144 pp.
- Lockman, D. C., C. Mitchell, B. Reiswig, and R. Gale. 1990. Identifying potential winter habitat for trumpeter swans. In D. Compton, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Everett, WA. 11:20-22.
- Mceneaney, Terry, B. Twist and D. Lockman. 1985. 1985 Midwinter trumpeter swan survey. Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, USFWS. 7 pp.
- McEneaney, T. 1984. 1984 tri-state trumpeter swan survey. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Lakeview. 15 pp.
- McKelvey, R. W., and N. A. M. Verbeek. 1988. Habitat use, behaviour and management of trumpeter swans, CYGNUS BUCCINATOR, wintering at Comox, British Columbia. Canadian Field-Nat. 102:434-441.
- Meng, A., R. E. Carter, and D. T. Parkin. 1990. The variability of DNA fingerprints in three species of swan. Heredity 64:73-80.
- Mitchell, C.D. 1994. Trumpeter Swan (CYGNUS BUCCINATOR). In: The Birds of North America, No. 105. A. Poole and F. Gill, eds. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia and The American Ornithologists Union, Washington, D. C.
- Mitchell, C. D., R. Shea, D. C. Lockman, and J. R. Balcomb. 1991. Demographic analyses of a trumpeter swan population in western U.S.A. P. 142 in J. Sears and P. J. Bacon, eds., Proc. 3rd International Waterfowl and Wetlands Res. Bur. International Swan Symp., Oxford, U.K., 1989. Wildfowl Supplement No.1. (abstract).
- Mitchell, C. D. 1990. Efficiency of techniques for feeding trumpeter swans. In D. Compton, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Everett, WA. 11:170-173.
- Mitchell, C. D., and L. Shandruk.. 1992. Rocky Mountain population of trumpeter swans, status, distribution and movements. In C. D. Mitchell, J. R. Balcomb, and J. E. Comely, eds., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Salt Lake City, UTe 13:3-18.
- Mitchell, C. D. 1991. Update on trumpeter swans in Montana, 1988-89. In J. Voigt-Englund, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Minneapolis, MN. 12:189-192.
- Niethammer, Kenneth. 1994. 1994 Mid-winter Trumpeter swan survey. Red Rock Lakes NWR. USFWS Lakeview, Montana. 19pp.
- Niethammer, K. 1993. 1993 Trumpeter Swan survey of the Rocky Mountain population/ U.S. flocks, Fall. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge.
- Page, R.D. 1976. The ecology of Trumpeter Swans on Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Montana. Dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula.
- Palmer, R. S. 1962. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 1. Loons through flamingos. Yale University Press, New Haven. 567 pp.
- Reiswig, B. 1986. Status of the Tristate Subpopulation and the Rocky Mountain winter population of trumpeter swans. In D. Compton, ed., Proc. Trompeter Swan Soc. Conf., West Yellowstone. 9:7-10.
- Root, T. 1988. Atlas of Wintering North American Birds: An Analysis of Christmas Bird Count Data. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 312 pp.
- Shandruk, L. 1987. A review of habitat requirements and management priorities for the Canadian breeding population of trumpeter swans. In: Endangered species in the prairie provinces, 9:179-187. Holroyd, G. L., et al (eds).
- Sharp, W.M. 1951. Observations on predator-prey relations between wild ducks, trumpeter swans, and golden eagles. J. Wildl. Manage. 15:224-226.
- Shea, R.E. 1979. The ecology of Trumpeter Swan in Yellowstone National Park and vicinity. M.S. Thesis. University of Montana, Missoula.
- Shea, R. 1981. Movements of trumpeter swans into and within the tri-state area of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. In D. K. Weaver, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Anchorage, AK. 6:92-93.
- Shea, R. 1992. Response of trumpeter swans to trapping at Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, and Harriman State Park, Idaho, Winter 1990-91. In C. D. Mitchell, J. R. Balcomb, and J. E. Comely, eds., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., Salt Lake City, UT. 13:31-37.
- Shea, R., D. C. Lockman, and C. D. Mitchell. 1991. Trumpeter swan, Cygnus buccinator, range expansion programs in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. Pp. 348-351 in J. Sears and P. J. Bacon, eds., Proc. 3rd IWRB International Swan Symp., Oxford, U.K., 1989. Wildfowl Supplement No.1. 400 pp.
- Shields, B. 1986. Management of the tristate swan subpopulation. In D.. Compton, ed., Proc. Trumpeter Swan Soc. Conf., West Yellowstone. 9:5-7.
- Sibley, D. A.. 2000. National Audubon Society The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc: New York, NY, 544 pp.
- Spahr, R., L. Armstrong, D. Atwood, and M. Rath. 1991. Threatened, endangered, and sensitive species of the Intermountain Region. U.S. Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.
- Stroops, E. D. 1981. Current status of wild populations of trumpeter swans on national wildlife refuges in the lower 48 states. In D. K. Weaver, ed., Proc. Trompeter Swan Soc. Conf., Anchorage, AK. 6:24-26.
- Subcommittee on the Interior Population of Trumpeter Swans. 1997. Mississippi and Central flyway management plan for the Interior population of Trumpeter Swan. Mississippi and Central Flyway Councils. [c/o USFWS, Migratory Bird Coordinator] Twin Cities, MN. Unpubl. rept.
- USDI National Park Service., 2000, Bison Management for the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Interagency Bison Management Plan for the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park. Vol. I. August 2000.
- U01OLS01MTUS is the most current, accurate source code for this reference. USFWS. 2001. Trumpeter Swan Survey of the Rocky Mountain Population, Fall 2001. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Lakeview, MT.
- U03DUB02MTUS is the most recent accurate source code for this reference. USFWS. 2003. Trumpeter Swan Survey of the Rocky Mountain Population, Winter 2003. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Birds and State Programs Mountain-Prairie Region, Lakewood, CO.
- Western Energy Co., Colstrip, MT., 1982, Western Energy Company Rosebud Mine, Colstrip, Montana: Annual Wildlife Report, 1982.
- Web Search Engines for Articles on "Trumpeter Swan"
- Additional Sources of Information Related to "Birds"
