Examining the “Fiscal Cliff” Agreement
Budget Deal Makes Permanent 82 Percent of President Bush’s Tax Cuts
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), which President Obama signed into law last night, makes permanent 82 percent of President Bush’s tax cuts. Read more
The Next Act: Further Deficit Reduction Must Include a Mix of Revenues and Spending Cuts
The revenue increases in the new budget deal coupled with the large cuts in discretionary spending that policymakers enacted in 2011, will achieve more than $2 trillion in deficit reduction over the next ten years. That’s a substantial amount, but it’s not enough to stabilize the country’s debt as a share of the economy over the decade ahead. To reach that goal, policymakers will need to produce about $1.2 trillion in additional revenue increases and spending cuts.
Some Republicans leaders have indicated that they will push to achieve the additional deficit reduction entirely through spending cuts, with no further revenue increases at all. If this view holds, then when all of the deficit reduction efforts are tallied together, spending cuts will outpace revenue increases by nearly 5 to 1 — hardly a balanced approach. Read more
Budget Deal Gives New Tax Cut to Wealthy – And Pretends It’s a Tax Increase
The new budget deal delays the across-the-board spending cuts (or “sequestration”) for two months — and covers half of the resulting $24 billion cost through spending cuts and half through tax increases. This 50-50 balance between spending cuts and revenue increases marks an important principle that policymakers should follow in producing the additional long-term deficit reduction that the nation needs. Unfortunately, while the spending cuts in question are real, the tax increase isn’t. It’s fake.
Actually, it’s worse than fake — it’s a new tax cut, primarily for affluent households, that’s being portrayed as a tax increase. Read more
More: Federal Budget Analyses
Health Reform and the States
Medicaid Expansion: A Good Deal for States
Expanding Medicaid will add very little to what states would have spent on Medicaid without health reform while providing health coverage to 17 million more low-income adults and children.
It will reduce state and local government costs for uncompensated care and other services they provide to the uninsured, which will offset at least some — and in a number of states, possibly all or more than all — of the modest increase in state Medicaid costs. Read more
- More:
- Health Reform Analyses
New From the Center
-
Two Sequestrations
December 28, 2012
-
Correcting Misunderstandings About Obama’s Latest Tax Offer Vs. Boehner’s “Plan B”
December 20, 2012
-
SSI and Children with Disabilities: Just the Facts
December 14, 2012
-
States Should Embrace 21st Century Economy by Extending Sales Taxes to Digital Goods and Services
December 13, 2012
-
Coordinating Human Services Programs with Health Reform Implementation
Updated December 11, 2012
- More:
- View All
Center in the News
For Obama, a Victory That Also Holds Risks
New York Times
January 3, 2013
The legacy of the Bush tax cuts, in four charts
Washington Post, WonkBlog
January 2, 2013
Texas among 10 states facing lawsuits over education funding
Washington Post
January 2, 2013
The ‘fiscal cliff’s’ estate tax fight, explained
Washington Post, WonkBlog
December 30, 2012
Georgia’s Hunger Games
Slate
December 26, 2012
Boehner’s ‘plan B’ would redistribute wealth upwards
Washington Post, The Plum Line
December 20, 2012
Further Estate Tax Cut Would Be a Disgrace
Huffington Post
December 18, 2012
A Worthy Alternative to the Payroll Tax Cut
Huffington Post