This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details
Graphic detail

Charts, maps and infographics

Daily chart

A big problem

Dec 21st 2012, 15:23 by Economist.com

People often suffered from too little to eat; today’s ills come from consuming too much

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

HyunSmith

Pet obesity is also a growing problem (in Developed countries) that contributes to ever growing cost of animal healthcare (and a burden/drain on the economy), it sounds as easy as not over feeding your pet, but having the willpower to resist can be daunting.
-
(pictures of overweight pets)
http://imgur.com/xFnZS (SFW)
http://myfatpet.com/ (SFW)
-
As you can see there is a direct correalation between human obesity and pet obesity, working on solutions for pet obesity can lead to dramatically lower rates of Human obesity, things such as simply walking the dog, cat sweaters, and posting pet videos on youtube can help dramatically.

freebean

Remember that sugar, as we know it, didn't exist until the 17th century, and it is no wonder that evolution hasn't had a chance to adjust our bodies to deal with abundant calories of this type.
Self-control has a big part to play - try keeping apples in the refrigerator as the default 'snack' when you don't know exactly what you want to eat.
There is actually nothing wrong with feeling hungry and not eating straight away. In fact, research shows hunger, and mild fasting, sharpens the mind and can even 'reset' body mechanisms related to cholesterol levels.

BWWilds in reply to freebean

In my book "Advancing Time" I go over the history of man on Earth, we are having a hard time adjusting to the ever more rapid changes around us. This is just one more example. You are correct in that more discipline and smart planning is needed, man is still an animal, that is something we often forget. I would be remiss if I didn't put up a link;

http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2012/04/whats-in-footprint.html

ZA Observor

Obesity in South African has contributed to rapid escalation of "first world" burden of diseases such as High blood pressure (almost 1 in 2 adults over 40), Cholesterol, Diabetes and increases cost of concomitant risks of stroke, heart attack and bypasses, and premature death. Wellness Days held by corporate employers, show that up to 10% of their workforce - mainly people of colour - are morbidly obese.

On one level the changing burden of disease is attributable to a rapid rise of income arising from Black elite empowerment (BEE) policies, which transfer resources and wealth to a ruling political alliance between labour, the ANC and the Communist party. More fundamentally, however, it is a by-product of the race by fast food franchises such as McDonalds and KFC to cash in on higher worker incomes, trading dollars in exchange for saturated fats loaded with flavour enhancers, 'preservatives' and colourants.

Politicians such as SA's ANC VP, Cyril Ramaphosa who McDonalds awarded the Developmental Licensee (DL) for South Africa in 2011, leverage the changing income demographic for commercial gain, despite the inadequacy of a failed, dysfunctional public health system to cope with first world disease such as CAD.

Ironically, more than a third of South Africa's 50 million population who are reliant on social grants, face different health challenges posed by "shebeens" who sell liquor and drugs instead of food coupons. A further quarter of the population are unemployed - up to 50% in the Xhosa speaking Eastern Cape province that is the home of Nelson Mandela - and in rural areas still lack running water, toilets and sanitation, compounding chronic under nourishment.

The Gini coefficient of inequality in SA not only mirrors the failure of the ruling ANC's BEE policies, it correlates with an explosion of burden of disease and drug dependancy in many disparate directions. Fundamentally, the problem is less one of health policy, than a challenge to the ruling party to be more socially responsible than the historic orgy of self indulgence that has followed 'liberation' in 1994.

atlas shrugs

What a ridiculous article. BMI is completely useless as a way of measuring obesity. Anyone with a relatively muscular body, who plays sports, will register as overweight or even obese by BMI measurements. They cite 77kg as a limit for anyone measuring 1.75m. I'm 1.76m and weigh 86k with almost no visible bodyfat because I work out regularly. BMI also fails to take into account different body types, frame sizes, etc. It's a useless figure, along with the concept of a universal "ideal bodyweight."

HyunSmith in reply to atlas shrugs

I agree, especially if you strength train, do any p90x, High intensity interval training, which all should be included in a healthy excericise regime. But still relatively muscular people are a rather very small percentage of the overall population.

Deebles in reply to atlas shrugs

Waist-to-height (healthy being >0.4 and <0.5) or waist-to-hip (targets depending on gender) are better measures, it's true. But BMI is true enough for enough people, and there's no way of getting to a BMI of 40 (morbidly obese) that's remotely healthy.

THEGAP

The only question about obesity is how long our welfare states will last with this burden...
And I think that this question includes an answer to the obesity epidemic.

Deebles

As and when the Millenium Development Goals' deadline of 2015 is reached, we may want to consider some more goals. When we do, I'd like to suggest the following:
- Not confining the goals to low or middle-income countries, but making them global
- Including a goal on basic healthy lifestyles, with targets along the lines of <10% of the population smoking (or 25% lower than a suitable reference year, e.g. 2010); <10% of the population being obese (or 25% lower etc.); and >80% (or 25% more) of the population getting regular exercise.

fefe19

All the more reason to move away from car-centric land use and transportation systems. Let's all aim to walk more, bike more, and take the stairs more as part of our daily routines!

MarkyMark11J

This problem isn't one that is easily fixable though. We can tax; subsidize and do all sorts of things to try and encourage people to eat healthier food, but I guarantee that when it comes down to a food or drug or substance that people eat, drink or smoke on a regular basis; the government will fail every time. The issue is by and large a sociocultural one. There are many in America that are literally proud of being overweight or obese. It's so common that many accept being "fat" as part of their identity. It becomes "who they are"; and anyone who has a problem with it must be some kind of health freak.

What many don't realize is that being overweight or being obese for that matter is not a vanity issue. It's a serious health issue. It makes me sad to see parents so tolerable about their own children being overweight or obese; it's almost sickening to be honest.

We can fight this epidemic by restructuring our values and perceptions of obesity and lack of physical activity. How about education that teaches teenagers how to read a food label, the differences between carbs, fats and protein, and the effects of certain ingredients on the body? Maybe even teach kids how to cook something healthy instead of relying on pizza and other fast food chains. We need to promote fitness as well. Get more people interested in not only watching sports, but playing sports as well.

David8a in reply to MarkyMark11J

How ridiculous to suggest that people are proud of being fat. A few might joke about it, but to suggest that they want to be fat and unattractive and sick...
Sugar and wheat are both highly addictive, so giving up the standard american diet is harder than getting off many other drugs (scientific studies referenced at growyouthful dot com).
The solution is simple. Tax the hell out of sugar, processed and junk food, polyunsaturated vegetable oils, and many other toxic inputs to food factories. And perhaps subsidise real, unadulterated fresh food. This is a perfect example of a good tax that benefits virtually everyone. The only losers in the long term - the processed food industry, their lobyists, and the politicians and other decision makers who accept their bribes.

MarkyMark11J in reply to David8a

Who says all overweight people consider themselves unattractive and sick? You can find many people (including celebrities) that embrace the idea of being "big body" or "big boned" or however you want to phrase it. People don't have to be outright proud to be fat, but they sure do seem content with it. And you're right, sugars are way too abundant in our typical diets. I also understand the effects of sugar on the body (the insulin spike, the sugar high,etc.).
But once again I think the obesity problem is still largely a sociocultural issue. You can tax sugar all you want, but unless those taxes far surpass the cost and time of a person to buy fresh meat and produce and actually cook it; I'm not sure how effective such a measure would be. I don't see the price of everyday processed foods as being so elastic as you seem to imply.

BWWilds in reply to David8a

Sadly some people, men in particular see being larger as making them more substantial, more in control, and stronger. I have heard these guys "throwing their weight around", the argument that it mask or covers insecurities is debatable. Also I,m told that in some cultures where food is costly it symbolizes being wealthier. I think "taxing away" the problem of obesity is easier said then done.

David8a in reply to MarkyMark11J

When I said "tax the hell" out of processed food, I meant so that it becomes perhaps 10 times more expensive. Start to price it at its true cost to the community. Start to raise SIGNIFICANT tax revenue from immoral, sickening products. I agree that sugary, addictive junk foods would not be particularly price elastic. In every way they are the perfect product to tax.

bernardpalmer

More excerpts from 'What is the Primary Fundamental Right?'

"Obesity can also be tenuously linked to the War on Drugs. Fear of 'criminals' is the main reason people vote for 'Tough on Crime' politicians and it is usually the news media that conveys this fear which in turn helps sell their product. People pay the most attention to things that scare them and this fear keeps the symbiotic relationship between the media and the politicians profitable for both.

This fear is usually delivered via television. Scared people vote for the politicians who will give them more police to keep them safe in their homes and in front of their TV's, and that's usually where they put on all the extra weight, eating and drinking the sweet things they see advertised. No pleasant night time walks for them, it's much too dangerous out there.

It's unlikely scared and depressed people seek attention so unconsciously they could be making themselves unattractive by becoming fat thus reducing the amount of attention they produce and also reducing the amount of time spent outside their homes. For example the sexual attack of a fat child or woman is probably quite rare simply because rapists probably don't find them attractive enough to produce an erection.

Professor Richard Johnson at the University of Florida announced in December 2005 that he and his team had found a new correlation between fructose sugar and obesity. In trials using rats they found that fructose caused the rats to continue eating even after they eaten enough. The researchers managed to stop the rats from getting fat by interrupting the way their bodies processed this simple sugar and the uric acid it produces that apparently causes a reduction of nitric oxide in the blood vessels causing high blood pressure and from there Metabolic Syndrome, otherwise known as Insulin Resistance Syndrome.

Over the last thirty odd years fructose consumption in the west has increased over 1000 fold with much of it going into soft drinks. This probably all came about because in 1982 in a vote buying move the Socialist US government restricted sugar imports thereby forcing up the price of cane sugar and making corn sugar a cheaper alternative. Because of the price both Coca Cola and Pepsi changed to high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in November 1984. Now most processed foods world wide supposedly use HFCS. Human eating disorders have about tripled since then. This means that the possibility exists that the US government is responsible for the western world's obesity epidemic and that Socialism always interferes with the natural ecology of human development.

When finally the War on Drugs is over then 'crime' should fall around 80% seeing as this is about the percentage the so called 'drug crimes' make up in the jail statistics of western societies. Possibly this could bring about a similar percentage reduction in the amount of over weight people if the two problems are linked by expensive Socialist governments. Once the fatties fear levels drop they should no longer feel the need to protect themselves by staying indoors and eating all those sweet things in front of their fear inducing TV. Especially all those foods made with large amounts of appetite stimulating HFCS."
http://www.primaryfundamentalright.org/index.php?pageName=pfrWhatIs

HyunSmith

Whenever I come back to the States I always find it extraordinary watching all the fat people at Walmart, its like they're a different species, really bizarre.
-
People think Japan and Korea are weird, but the US looks like some dystopian future with massively oddly shaped mutants wandering about.
-
TL;DR
The US is a strange place.

James Daniel

Its not that we are eating too much food, it is that we eat the wrong types of food. Just some food for thought :)

BWWilds in reply to James Daniel

Well said, well put! Unfortunately it is more fun to eat and be merry then it is to diet, exercise and be disciplined. As the comment above yours pointed out the body shapes we are seeing about are a bit "bizarre", in the past many of these shapes would be found in a circus freak show.

My apologies if you find this offensive or politically incorrect.

dutchinfrance

Is the BMI also valid for all ages? When you're over 50 and your BMI goes down to 20, I think it is rather a sign of serious illness and not of health...

Although I studied physics, something puzzles me. I'm eating a bar of chocolate of 100 grammes and I gain 500 grammes. How's this possible?

Deebles in reply to dutchinfrance

Weight loss without trying is generally a bit sinister, but a BMI of 20 can be perfectly healthy for a 50-year-old.

As for the chocolate bar question... without meaning to be offensive, I think this might be a difference between perceived and actual consumption.

Subgame Perfect

Wait a second, at 0:44 you tell us 2/3 of American adults have a BMI of 25-30. Then at 0:46 we see that 36% of American adults have a BMI of 30+. Are we so large that there are more than 100% of us? <(o.O)>

PW23 in reply to Subgame Perfect

Maybe the second fact includes adults who have BMI equal to and greater than 30. And the first fact is taking about those whose BMI are equal to or less than 30. But good call, I wonder if someone can clarify that...

environmentalist

The figures just don't pass the sanity test. Have you been to Mexico and the USA recently? There is just no way that Mexicans are fatter than Americans. It is not even close. Yes, as the country has become richer one does see more overweight people than before down south, but it is still no where close to American levels.

Statistics from third world countries are highly unreliable and often made up to serve some political purpose.

calbearz in reply to environmentalist

Yes, it does pass the sanity test. While in the U.S. many people eat tons of junk food, there is also a movement towards eating healthy and to exercise. There are tons of gyms and events every weekend such as 10k runs and marathons just about everywhere. Doesn't make the U.S. fit overall, but certainly I can see how Mexico would be worst.

Connect The Dots

Some think the cure to obesity is in science, technology, gene manipulation or a miracle drug that an undiscovered fungus growing on the back of a rare beetle in the Amazon forest.

___________________________

Gluttony is a problem of behavior and self control.
And it is as old as humanity.

The Solution is known.
And within our hands.
And can be implemented immediately
And cost nothing.
And is available world wide.

And the solution is simple:
EAT LESS AND EXERCISE MORE.
__________________________

We lack self discipline.
Cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and illegal drugs--we just can't help ourselves.

Now add ice cream, coffee frappachinos, fried foods, soda pop, steak, pastries, and cake.

Each of those obese calories were voluntarily brought to your mouth, place on your tongue, chewed by your teeth, and swallowed by your gullet with no terrorist holding a gun to your temple.
There is no Ossama bin Lard Cooking.
Or Al Qaeda Cult of Deep Frying.

___________________________

Blame the person in the mirror.
And that person is the only one on the planet who can solve your problem.

We see the enemy and it is us.
And they are devilishly crafty--beware.

HyunSmith in reply to Connect The Dots

Naww, that would make too much sense, its the delicious foods fault, and the spoons I use to shovel the food into my mouth, ban spoons and food, thats the answer.
-
Taking responsibility, hahahahha, ridiculous, next your going to tell me, im not entitled to a $100,000 job after completing my liberal arts degree. silly old man.

I agree with you to an extent, but you seem to demonize certain foods. It is not my belief that this should be the case. There are not bad foods, just overeating of food in general.

Ironically I'm writing this from my bed in the hospital due to being underweight because of a health condition.

KTinCA in reply to Connect The Dots

It saddens me to read such hostility and lack of compassion towards obese people. It's almost as if the overweight are the only group it is safe to stereotype and show disgust for. I'm sure there are plenty of people who are simply gluttonous, but there are other things that drive people to overeat. Stress, anxiety, loneliness are some reasons. It is not an accident that people in lower socioeconomic groups are more overweight than other. There's not much that's more stressful than being worried about how you are going to pay your bills, not to mention being ashamed of being poor and being told it is your own fault. Unrelenting marketing and greater variety and accessibility of garbage food greatly aggravates the problem.

About Graphic detail

A new chart or map every working day, interactive-data features and links to interesting sources of data around the web

Advertisement

Videographics

Explore trending topics

Comments and tweets on popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events

Advertisement