Ensemble simulations are run with a global coupled climate model employing five forcing agents that influence the time evolution of globally averaged surface air temperature during the twentieth century. Two are natural (volcanoes and solar) and the others are anthropogenic [e.g., greenhouse gases (GHGs), ozone (stratospheric and tropospheric), and direct effect of sulfate aerosols]. In addition to the five individual forcing experiments, an additional eight sets are performed with the forcings in various combinations. The late-twentieth-century warming can only be reproduced in the model with anthropogenic forcing (mainly GHGs), while the early twentieth-century warming is mainly caused by natural forcing in the model (mainly solar). However, the signature of globally averaged temperature at any time in the twentieth century is a direct consequence of the sum of the forcings. The similarity of the response to the forcings on decadal and interannual time scales is tested by performing a principal component analysis of the 13 ensemble mean globally averaged temperature time series. A significant portion of the variance of the reconstructed time series can be retained in residual calculations compared to the original single and combined forcing runs. This demonstrates that the statistics of the variances for decadal and interannual time-scale variability in the forced simulations are similar to the response from a residual calculation. That is, the variance statistics of the response of globally averaged temperatures in the forced runs are additive since they can be reproduced in the responses calculated as a residual from other combined forcing runs.
Combinations of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings in Twentieth-Century Climate
Authors:
Gerald A. Meehl, Warren M. Washington, Caspar M. Ammann, Julie M. Arblaster, T. M. L. Wigley, and Claudia Tebaldi AffiliationsNational Center for Atmospheric Research, * Boulder, Colorado
Received: 18 July 2003
Final Form: 16 March 2004
Published Online: 1 October 2004
October 2004
![Publication Cover](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20170207165013im_/http://journals.ametsoc.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/ams/journals/content/clim/2004/15200442-17.19/15200442-17.19/production/15200442-17.19.cover.jpg)
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JCLI Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Newman et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 12
|
. |
Mears et al.
May 2016, Vol. 29, No. 10
|
. |
Poli et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 11
|
. |
Welhouse et al.
March 2016, Vol. 29, No. 5
|
. |
Dobricic et al.
April 2016, Vol. 29, No. 8
|
. |
Liu et al.
May 2016, Vol. 29, No. 9
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and ApplicationsRienecker et al.July 2011, Vol. 24, No. 14 -
2. Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10 -
3. Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21 -
4. A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration IndexVicente-Serrano et al.April 2010, Vol. 23, No. 7 -
5. An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13 -
6. Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface TemperatureReynolds et al.November 2007, Vol. 20, No. 22