Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Surprise: New insurance fee in health overhaul law

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Your medical plan is facing an unexpected expense, so you probably are, too. It's a new, $63-per-head fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

    The charge, buried in a recent regulation, works out to tens of millions of dollars for the largest companies, employers say. Most of that is likely to be passed on to workers.

    Employee benefits lawyer Chantel Sheaks calls it a "sleeper issue" with significant financial consequences, particularly for large employers.

    "Especially at a time when we are facing economic uncertainty, (companies will) be hit with a multi-million dollar assessment without getting anything back for it," said Sheaks, a principal at Buck Consultants, a Xerox subsidiary.

    Based on figures provided in the regulation, employer and individual health plans covering an estimated 190 million Americans could owe the per-person fee.

    The Obama administration says it is a temporary assessment levied for three years starting in 2014, designed to raise $25 billion. It starts at $63 and then declines.

    Most of the money will go into a fund administered by the Health and Human Services Department. It will be used to cushion health insurance companies from the initial hard-to-predict costs of covering uninsured people with medical problems. Under the law, insurers will be forbidden from turning away the sick as of Jan. 1, 2014.

    The program "is intended to help millions of Americans purchase affordable health insurance, reduce unreimbursed usage of hospital and other medical facilities by the uninsured and thereby lower medical expenses and premiums for all," the Obama administration says in the regulation. An accompanying media fact sheet issued Nov. 30 referred to "contributions" without detailing the total cost and scope of the program.

    Of the total pot, $5 billion will go directly to the U.S. Treasury, apparently to offset the cost of shoring up employer-sponsored coverage for early retirees.

    The $25 billion fee is part of a bigger package of taxes and fees to finance Obama's expansion of coverage to the uninsured. It all comes to about $700 billion over 10 years, and includes higher Medicare taxes effective this Jan. 1 on individuals making more than $200,000 per year or couples making more than $250,000. People above those threshold amounts also face an additional 3.8 percent tax on their investment income.

    But the insurance fee had been overlooked as employers focused on other costs in the law, including fines for medium and large firms that don't provide coverage.

    "This kind of came out of the blue and was a surprisingly large amount," said Gretchen Young, senior vice president for health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee, a group that represents large employers on benefits issues.

    Word started getting out in the spring, said Young, but hard cost estimates surfaced only recently with the new regulation. It set the per capita rate at $5.25 per month, which works out to $63 a year.

    America's Health Insurance Plans, the major industry trade group for health insurers, says the fund is an important program that will help stabilize the market and mitigate cost increases for consumers as the changes in Obama's law take effect.

    But employers already offering coverage to their workers don't see why they have to pony up for the stabilization fund, which mainly helps the individual insurance market. The redistribution puts the biggest companies on the hook for tens of millions of dollars.

    "It just adds on to everything else that is expected to increase health care costs," said economist Paul Fronstin of the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    The fee will be assessed on all "major medical" insurance plans, including those provided by employers and those purchased individually by consumers. Large employers will owe the fee directly. That's because major companies usually pay upfront for most of the health care costs of their employees. It may not be apparent to workers, but the insurance company they deal with is basically an agent administering the plan for their employer.

    The fee will total $12 billion in 2014, $8 billion in 2015 and $5 billion in 2016. That means the per-head assessment would be smaller each year, around $40 in 2015 instead of $63.

    It will phase out completely in 2017 — unless Congress, with lawmakers searching everywhere for revenue to reduce federal deficits — decides to extend it.

     

    713 comments

    • david  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      Hmm... wonder how many more surprises will pop up with the new healthcare??
      • Carol 6 hrs ago
        The charge, buried in a recent regulation. This was just added.
    • D  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      You think health care is expensive now,wait until Its free
      • Traveler 1 hr 46 mins ago
        I can assure you that if Big Blue's health care costs increased ten fold over the next five years, it would make no difference to him. He would still continue kissing Odumbo's backside. Why? Simple, he knows he is in that entitlement group that all of the rest of us pay for. He will NEVER pay for his own healthcare, or anything else. It is easy to support a liberal POS like Odumbo, when you are one of the useless, lazy, won't work, entitlement lemmings that put him back in a position that he has proven he is unable to handle. Only 2160899 minutes until this POS is out of our WH.
    • Heather  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      Is anybody really surprised? Just wait, though, there's more to come!
      • Peter 4 hrs ago
        special k.. if the clinics are so great, why do we need this stupid HC bill?
    • Smoke Dis  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      There is no such thing as a temporary tax. The Federal Government only knows how to take and spend more than it takes.
    • cfydyhger  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      You aint seen nothing yet.
    • ron  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      free is expensive
      • Leavemebe 7 hrs ago
        I don't know, I thought Sandra Fluke was the sole reason ACA was approved.
    • Tim  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      Anyone notice how when this is reported that it's always about money and how they're going to take more of it away from us. It's never been about health care.
      • Nat 12 hrs ago
        When was Obama Care EVER about health care? Doesn't anyone out there understand that?
    • Richard  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      Oh yeah! The fun is just beginning! It will be interesting, and amusing, to watch this debacle unfold! Get ready for the screaming!
      • Jac 1 day 3 hrs ago
        Can anyone see Greece from your house? It's coming to America! We are broke and we can't pay for all this massive entitlement programs the Progressives are passing in DC! If they don't tackle the entitlements we have now, no amount of tax rate increases will ever handle the deficit Obama is accumulating!
    • Fred  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      ....a temporary #$%$sment levied for three years starting in 2014....does anyone honestly believe that in 3 yrs the Gov will give up a revenue source??
    • glen  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      The Obama health Plan is what the Supreme Court said it was...an Obama Tax Plan.
      • tom 1 day 8 hrs ago
        Thats the only thing Robrerts got right.
    • Gila Monster  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      America you voted for Take,Take,Take,Take,Take and more Take. Nothing is free.
      • gs 4 hrs ago
        travis go play your superiority games elsewhere. Seeing how you live in mommy's basement I believe your issues are the ones that need to be dealt with. Now boring child bug off.
    • JOBar  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      And, Obama doesn't want to tax the middle class or poor! What the heck is more increase(s) on health care considered? Didn't Supreme Court Justice Andersen say, "...it is a tax."
    • keith  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      i love the headline "SUR...PRISE " Reminds me of Gomer Pyle....sur...prise, sur...prise,sur...prise ! Aint no surprise we {well most} of us knew it was commin' .
    • ron  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      WHAT??? health care cost going up ? can't be Barry said it would go down $2,500 OR did Barry LIE AGAIN?
    • Harry Baals  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      6 million middle class Americans will have an Obamacare tax penalty next year for not having insurance

      It's the largest middle class tax increase in Americas history
    • GrandmasterB  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      do the taxes ever stop from this monstrosity?
    • Trust Who  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      Just one of many "surprises" in Obamboozle's "health care" bill. Remember, "You got to pass it to read what's in it?", Pelosi?
    • Rick  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      Surprise! Who'da thunk it? Obama promised we would all experience a reduction in health care costs. All these insurance companies have to cover their costs if they are expected to stay in business. An inconvenient fact Obama either overlooked, or just didn't understand. I know it was the latter...
    • Thunderstud  •  1 day 8 hrs ago
      The darn thing passed 3 years ago and it is just being read. Granted queen nancy wouldn't disclose what was in it before it was passed but there was plenty of time to read it by now. Greece is going to look like a paradise compared to the third world disaster obama is turning this country into.
    • thinker  •  1 day 7 hrs ago
      $63 will be the least of your worries when all of the 21 nex taxes in Obamacare take effect.
    • Lawyer: Guatemala judge orders McAfee released
      Lawyer:  Guatemala judge orders McAfee released

      A lawyer for John McAfee said Tuesday that a judge has ordered the software company founder released from a Guatemalan detention center where he has been fighting being returned to Belize.

    • Real-Life Hobbit Face Revealed
      Real-Life Hobbit Face Revealed

      Researchers have revealed what the face of a controversial ancient human nicknamed "the Hobbit" might have looked like.

    • Review: 'The Hobbit' suffers from story bloat
      Review: 'The Hobbit' suffers from story bloat

      Judging part one of Peter Jackson's "The Lord of the Rings" prelude "The Hobbit" is a bit like reviewing a film after seeing only the first act.

    • "Hobbit" actor McKellen has prostate cancer
      "Hobbit" actor McKellen has prostate cancer

      LONDON (Reuters) - "The Hobbit" actor Ian McKellen said in an interview published on Tuesday that he had had prostate cancer for the last six or seven years, but added that the disease was not life-threatening. McKellen, 73, played Gandalf in the hit "Lord of the Rings" movie trilogy, and reprises the role in three prequels based on J.R.R. Tolkien's novel "The Hobbit". The first of those, "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey", recently had its world premiere in New Zealand, where it was shot under the directorship of Peter Jackson. ...

    • Court grants restraining order blocking release of mock "Hobbit" film

      NEW YORK (TheWrap.com) - A U.S. District Court in California granted a temporary restraining order on Monday preventing a parody of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" from going on sale three days before Peter Jackson's movie opens in theaters nationwide. Global Asylum, a film production company that makes parodies of blockbuster films, such as "Transmorphers" in place of ‘Transformers," has made a parody of "The Hobbit" titled "Age of the Hobbits." It was set to go on sale on DVD, Blu-Ray and online platforms December 11. ...

    • Andy Serkis plays dual role in "Hobbit" - Gollum and director
      Andy Serkis plays dual role in "Hobbit" - Gollum and director

      LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Andy Serkis reprises his role as Gollum in "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey," to be released worldwide this week, but his main role this time was as a second unit director, shooting battle sequences in 3D for director Peter Jackson. The British-born actor, 48, who rose to fame as the obsessive Gollum in Jackson's "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, spoke with Reuters about playing the popular CGI character, and his role behind the camera in New Zealand for "The Hobbit. ...

    • Reconstructed Face of Extinct Hobbit Species Is Startlingly Humanlike
      Reconstructed Face of Extinct  Hobbit  Species Is Startlingly Humanlike

      Reconstructed Face of Extinct Hobbit Species Is Startlingly Humanlike

    Follow Yahoo! News