iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
GET UPDATES FROM Bill Moyers
 
GET UPDATES FROM Michael Winship
 

FCC May Give Murdoch a Very Merry Christmas

Posted: 12/05/2012 2:43 pm

Until now, this hasn't been the best year for media mogul Rupert Murdoch. For one, none of the Republicans who'd been on the payroll of his Fox News Channel -- not Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum or Mike Huckabee or Sarah Palin -- became this year's GOP nominee for president.

Oh sure, when Mitt Romney got the nod instead, Murdoch's TV and newspaper empire backed him big time but, on Election Night, Fox pundits like Dick Morris and Karl Rove -- the top GOP strategist and fundraiser -- had to eat crow as Barack Obama won a second term in the White House despite their predictions of a Republican landslide. (When the network called Ohio and the election for Obama, a desperate Rove tried to keep Fox statisticians from doing their job until the facts couldn't be ignored or denied. New York magazine reports that Fox News programming chief Bill Shine now "has sent out orders mandating that producers must get permission before booking Rove or Morris.")

On top of all that, just this week Murdoch's News Corp announced the shutdown of The Daily, its multi-million dollar attempt at a national iPad newspaper. And last week in London, the thousand-page report of an independent inquiry into the gross misconduct of the British press came out -- that big scandal over reporters illegally hacking into people's cell phones and committing other assorted forms of corruption, including bribery. Murdoch's gossip sheet, The News of the World, was right at the center of it, the worst offender. The fallout cost Murdoch the biggest business deal of his career -- the multi-billion buyout of satellite TV giant BSkyB -- and the report attacked his now-defunct News of the World for its "failure of management" and "general lack of respect for individual privacy and dignity."

But Murdoch's luck may be changing. Despite Fox News' moonlighting as the propaganda ministry of the Republican Party, President Obama's team may be making it possible for Sir Rupert to increase his power, perversely rewarding the man who did his best to make sure Barack Obama didn't have a second term. The Federal Communications Commission could be preparing him one big Christmas present, the kind of gift that keeps on giving -- unless we all get together and do something about it.

All indications are that Murdoch has his eye on two of the last remaining big newspapers in America -- the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, each owned by the now bankrupt Tribune Company. He could add one or both to his impressive portfolio, but even though the media mogul is splitting News Corp into two separately traded companies -- one for its print entities, the other for TV and film -- he would still come under current rules restricting media companies from owning newspapers and TV and radio stations in the same town. However, the FCC may be planning to suspend those rules, paving the way for Murdoch's takeover of either of the two papers.

In prior years, the FCC has granted waivers to the rules, but this latest move on their part would be more permanent, allowing a monolithic corporation like News Corp or Disney, Comcast, Viacom, CBS or Time Warner -- in any of the top twenty markets -- to own newspapers, two TV stations, eight radio stations and even the local Internet provider.

Once again, massive media conglomerates would be given free rein to gobble up more and more of our communications outlets, increasing their already considerable power, destroying independent voices, diluting or eradicating local news and community affairs coverage, eliminating competition and stomping even further on diversity. A recent study -- from the FCC itself -- shows that last year female ownership of commercial TV and radio stations is at 6.8 percent, Latino ownership is 2.9 percent, Asian ownership is half a percent, and African American ownership of commercial stations actually has decreased to less than one percent.

Suspending the current rules would only make this awful situation worse, which is one of the reasons why Vermont's independent Senator Bernie Sanders and several of his Senate colleagues sent a letter last week to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. "Congress tasked you with a mandate to promote localism and diversity in America's broadcast system," they wrote. "While the current ownership rules have not completely achieved these goals, they nonetheless remain a bulwark against mass consolidation and stand to preserve local voices."

This is not the first time the Federal Communications Commission has tried to change the rules. In 2003 and again five years ago, while George W. Bush was still in the White House, a Republican-dominated FCC made a similar attempt to sneak changes past, but the suspension was rejected by both the Senate and a Federal appeals court. Public comments -- three million of them -- ran ninety-nine percent against the attempt to make the media behemoths even bigger and more avaricious than ever. Among the opponents: freshman Senator Barack Obama and Senators Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.

Under Genachowski, the FCC has from time to time upheld its mandate to protect the public interest -- the recent decision to increase the number of low power community FM stations, for example, or the ruling that gave the public on-line access to who's buying political ads on TV and radio, and how much they're spending. But this time, it seems as if Chairman Genachowski may be trying to rush the rules change through on a technicality without sufficient time for public comments or even an open hearing.

Make your voices heard -- write or call Genachowski and the other commissioners -- you can find their names, email addresses and phone numbers at the website fcc.gov, or on the "Take Action" page at our website, BillMoyers.com. Write your senators and representatives, too, tell them the FCC must delay this decision and give the public a chance to have its opposition known. We've done it before.

Just ask the FCC this basic question: What part of "no" don't you understand?

Moyers & Company and BillMoyers.com are focusing deeply on this issue. Follow the coverage at the spotlight page "Fight Media Monopoly," where you'll find interviews with Free Press' Craig Aaron and former FCC commissioner Michael Copps, among other features and insight. The coverage culminates in this weekend's show featuring Senator Bernie Sanders. Watch a preview.

 
 
 

Follow Bill Moyers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BillMoyers

FOLLOW MEDIA
Until now, this hasn't been the best year for media mogul Rupert Murdoch. For one, none of the Republicans who'd been on the payroll of his Fox News Channel -- not Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum or Mi...
Until now, this hasn't been the best year for media mogul Rupert Murdoch. For one, none of the Republicans who'd been on the payroll of his Fox News Channel -- not Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum or Mi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 147
  • Pending Comments
  • 1
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
athiesttoo
reorganization: creating an illusion of progress
08:13 AM on 12/07/2012
Journalistic ethics are dead. Opinion is presented as truth, pundits quoted as experts , unknown sources used to present questionable facts. They are all guilty not just FOX. Great legs. short skirts, deep cleavage and white skin are all that's required anymore to run your mouth on TV.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:58 AM on 12/07/2012
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Deregulation and stripping anti-trust to the bone has done enormous damage to this nation. From the financial collapse to a less well informed electorate, all trace back to those mistakes. Concentrating so much media in so few hands is a recipe for disaster. Same with banking, or any other crucial industry. Those laws and regulations were created out of necessity and we damn well need them again, for the very same reasons!!!
Think about this...8 Corporations control 90% of US media! Once you add "convergence" into the equation, the number of extremely powerful financial interests exercise control drops to 5. FIVE
Now appreciate that the "Chinese wall" between newsrooms and corporate no longer exist. Those five powerful interests can and DO shape the narrative, alter opinions and influence policy. News is supposed to be a "public service" but now has become part of the entertainment complex and we all suffer for it! We are less well informed than at any time in the last 40 years!!!
photo
AnalyzeThisToo
At the fork in the road...veer left!
03:31 AM on 12/07/2012
We need someone to start a petition to the White House to say we want the media monopolies broken up.
I set up a petition but I don't have Facebook or Twitter so couldn't complete it.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/how-why/terms-participation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
11:55 AM on 12/07/2012
The White House doesn't want to hear from the public. It never has, never will.
4 hours ago ( 7:55 PM)
You can send your thoughts, disapproval and ideas to the FCC. Please do. If enough of us register our complaints, which lets them know we are indeed watching, they are not so quick to move in a direction that engenders our anger.
photo
AnalyzeThisToo
At the fork in the road...veer left!
03:28 AM on 12/07/2012
The FCC bought and paid for by Murdoch and cronies.

The FCC is allowing America to be controlled by propaganda and daily brainwashing.

The FCC or Supreme Court should break up media monopolies...now controlled by 5 people or corporations.

He who controls the airways, controls the country and its people's information and minds.

The average citizens is being dumbed down, lied to, filled with dogma and divisiness.

Wake up America...tell your Congress members to break up the monopolies, of course, Congress and the Supreme Court, the FCC are all owned by the corrupt Republicans.

We are losing our freedoms...we are being controlled (brainwashed conservatives are the prime example; they believe everything Fox News or Republican politicians tell them even though it is all provable lies).

George Orwell's Animal Farm and 1984...should be required reading for everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robg264
I am one of the 47%
02:39 AM on 12/07/2012
that's why some corporate media sucks today. Keep selling out to corporations and you will fail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
02:11 AM on 12/07/2012
You know the legalese is deep when Rupert Murdoch can use it to own all the newspapers in America.  Vertical integration of his media empire must stop.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
11:57 AM on 12/07/2012
Other than 'The Wall Street Journal,' News Corp. doesn't currently own a single newspaper read widely outside of New York.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
Being liberal is true freedom.
02:37 PM on 12/07/2012
If he buys the Chicago Tribune, he still won't own a paper that's widely read outside of New York. There's a reason it went bankrupt, it sukd.
ThinkGlobal
Americans United To Save the Middle Class
11:35 PM on 12/06/2012
NO please...
09:32 PM on 12/06/2012
face in the crowd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:22 AM on 12/07/2012
Terrible analogy.
09:31 PM on 12/06/2012
rosebud
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:22 AM on 12/07/2012
Even worse analogy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Rayburn
08:38 PM on 12/06/2012
The FCC sure isn't on the side of the American people with their latest rulings. First they give cable companies the right to further fleece their customers by allowing them to scramble their signal and thereby require the rental of cable boxes for all tvs and now they allow Rubert Murdock to have more control over the news media to further spread his lies. It sounds to me like they have sold out to the highest bidders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:16 AM on 12/07/2012
They always belonged to the highest bidders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeFake
Keepin' things real
07:33 PM on 12/06/2012
I just sent this email to the commissioners..
Dear Mr/Madam Commissioner
I am personally writing to you to not change the FCC rules on media ownership. Please consider the fact with so many avenues of information available to the public our ability to process it remains limited. As humans we then only seek out or scan so much information. To be able to process given the fact we have only so much time in any given day we therefore seek out information that aligns with our values and what makes sense. It is easier and information gathering is therefore already self limiting. If more stations are owned by a single company we will be limited in easy access and choice to seek broader information views. Any policy changes will therefore leave the American public to influenced by the policies and practices of a single owner thus limiting easy access to broader ideas and thinking.

I personally find the current bifurcation of the two primary idealogical views (conservative and progressive) held in this county propagated far too much by main stream media disturbing. You, and others who vote on these policies can make a difference, leave the current rules in place. I truly fear Rupert Murdock, his ethics, and what he and his media companies have done in the UK. If we as a nation and government cannot learn by the mistakes of others we are fools.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:21 AM on 12/07/2012
A waste of time. The FCC doesn't have to pay a second's worth of attention to public opinion. Your email won't even be read, let alone heeded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeFake
Keepin' things real
08:14 AM on 12/07/2012
maybo so Tom Sutpen but at least I tried..
4 hours ago ( 7:59 PM)
There were enough complaints in 2003 and 2007 to stop them from pushing through these rules. Complain to the FCC, your reps and senators and the White House.
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
lurkinman
Clear thinking is best served non-partisan
05:05 PM on 12/06/2012
I don't see how the public good is achieved by allowing one corporation to own 2 or more news media outlets - print or broadcast - in one market. Where does it stop? When that corporation owns the entire market?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:20 AM on 12/07/2012
Yes. That's the objective of any for-profit entity. The public good has never had anything to do with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
datenutloaf
RestInPieces GOP
04:01 PM on 12/06/2012
Oh! Hurray!

This makes the Smarmalade twins' a frabjous day!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:46 PM on 12/06/2012
We obviously have an FCC that is coopted by the industry it is supposed to regulate. That's the natural tendency of any regulator. Insuring it's independence is protected is vital. The FCC claims they must allow the industry to lead the way through the new growth forest of the future. Hey, regulator, that's your job. Weigh everyone's interests and get back to US. I can wait, I haven't seen Season II of Downton, yet.

In the UK they are presently fighting to demand that the independence of voluntary press regulation be made law. In otherwords, all this politicing of these slots would be illegal. I hope the UK can enshrine the independence of their press regulator into law. The last one sanctioned the Guardian for reporting on the phone hacking mess.

I'm on this, Bill. Lickity spit. Letters still make a better impression than an email.