CLIMATE-CHANGE talks in Doha this week opened in a mood of pessimism about the chances governments will agree to and implement policies that might limit the rise in global temperature to less than 2ºC. But on December 5th a cheering announcement punctured the gloom: that Indonesia’s government had formally approved the country’s first project under the “REDD” scheme (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation).
Indonesia is one of world’s big emitters of carbon, largely because of logging. REDD, to which Norway has committed $1 billion in Indonesia, in essence pays developing countries not to chop down trees. In this project, known as Rimba Raya (“infinite forest”), an area of forest in Indonesian Borneo the size of Singapore will be preserved. Against the odds, it will not be turned into one of the vast palm-oil plantations that are eating up so much of Borneo and other Indonesian islands.
Investors in the project, which include Gazprom, the huge Russian gas producer, and Allianz, a German financial-services giant, will receive or be able to buy about 104m credits over the 30-year life of the project, each representing a tonne of averted carbon emissions. At current market rates, these would be worth as much as $500m. Money will be ploughed back into projects in the area—clean water, health services, microcredit, eco-tourism, etc.
All this is good news for orang-utans, an endangered species. Several hundred have fled the encroaching oil palms to take refuge in a national park, Tanjung Puting, adjacent to the project. There, a care centre run by Biruté Galdikas, a famous primatologist working in the area since 1971, rehabilitates orang-utan refugees. They should now be able to return to the wild.
Rimba Raya seemed on the verge of going ahead in 2010. Then it stalled and, at one point, the government said its area would have to be cut in half, which would have made it unviable. It faced problems that will dog the dozens of other REDD projects being considered in Indonesia.
Most important, for any plot of land to qualify for REDD, there has to be a real threat to the trees. In this case a big palm-oil company had overlapping concessions, which it has only just agreed to relinquish. Reuters news agency, which last year produced an excellent in-depth report on the project, has given one explanation of the combination of forces that persuaded the palm-oil company to change its approach.
That Rimba Raya has persisted and won through these obstacles is a tribute to the tenacity of its promoters, a small Hong Kong firm called infiniteEARTH. But their project seemed to have so much in its favour: thorough independent certification; influential investors; its location in Central Kalimantan, nominated as Indonesia’s “pilot” province for REDD; even, in those severely endangered orang-utans, the winning charm of some charismatic megafauna.
So the good news comes with two worrying questions: if a project with so much in its favour faces so much difficulty, what hope is there for the others? And will the governments meeting in Doha do enough to sustain an adequate carbon-credit market?
(Picture credits: Irene Slegt)
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Believe it , when i see it ! A country riddled with corruption , where rubber, palm oil and backhanders out way the needs of the wildlife , especially on the Indonesian side of Borneo . I'm sure years from , Singaporeans will still see and taste the destruction of Borneo's rain forest , as smoke from the clearing fires spread over SE Asia . Hope I am wrong !
I agree.
BUT it is also notable that Indonesia is being pressured by distant countries (EU) to stop its emissions while its neighbors chose to do nothing for the past few decades despite choking under monstrous levels of pollution caused by its annual forest burning.
(Singapore's only response was to euphemistically call the pollution 'haze')
I agree with TS2912. Singapore and Malaysia keep complaining about Indonesian forest fire only when the wind blows their way. They offer no long term solutions. And it's worth remembering that deforestation, especially those due to palm oil, is a regional problem, not only Indonesia's. Singapore-based banks provide the financing, Singapore-registered companies own the plantations, and Malaysian and Indonesian firms chop the trees. May be it's time that Singapore starts providing more financing for REDD projects than for palm oil.
This is good news, and I am happy for our planet's climate and biodiversity.
But as the article points out, it does little to ease the pressures on the remaining pristine forests. We must intensify our agriculture and do more with the land we already have under cultivation. And eat less meat, and be very careful with the promotion of biofuels. And offer family planning to all as part of universal basic health care coverage.
A world in which nature is what you find in a few fenced reserves is a very poor world.