iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Steny Hoyer
 
GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Robert Brady
 

The Abandonment of the Election Assistance Commission

Posted: 09/18/2012 9:50 am

While the embarrassing debacle of the 2000 election may seem like a distant memory to some, the unfortunate reality is an encore may be on our doorstep.

The Election Assistance Commission was created by the bipartisan Help America Vote Act of 2002 in order to avoid a repeat of the disastrous 2000 election, inspired directly by the failure of effective election administration in Florida that year. The only federal agency whose primary mission is to assist states carry out their elections and provide assistance to local election officials, the EAC has succeeded in this capacity beyond even the most optimistic projections. But now, due either to intentional neglect or outright calls for the agency's elimination, the EAC is currently without any commissioners or a permanent executive director. While the agency persists in carrying out its mission, its spirit is sorely bruised.

During the 112th Congress, two Republican-sponsored bills -- H.R. 672 and H.R. 3463 -- were introduced to eliminate the Election Assistance Commission. Not only would they abolish an agency still supported and relied upon by local Republican and Democratic election officials from coast to coast, but they would also transfer the duties of the EAC to the Federal Election Commission, an enforcement agency whose sole responsibility is regulating campaign finance.

The specialized services provided by the EAC are essential to the effective administration of our elections -- and to their safety and fairness. By serving as an information clearinghouse, state and local election officials can turn to the EAC for the support and guidelines needed to run their elections. By providing this service, the EAC saves states considerable time and money, and by performing testing and certification services on voting machine hardware and software, the EAC ensures that ballots are accurately cast and counted. Perhaps most important, the EAC provides voters with confidence that their voices will be heard clearly.

Adding to the need for a strong and effective EAC, we've seen an unprecedented wave of new voting laws passed throughout the country. Lost in the debate over the motivation of these new laws is the question of how states will adapt in a presidential election year if there were no EAC to guide them. By attempting a complete overhaul of modern election law and by neglecting the only agency responsible for making sense of it, we are inviting chaos; a repeat of what occurred in Florida in 2000. But, more important, and most unforgivable, the right to vote is being undermined, and we've come too far to watch that fundamental right slip away.

The Election Assistance Commission is needed now more than ever, and it ought to be strengthened, not abandoned. Instead of attempting to dismantle it piece by piece, Republicans would be better off working across the aisle to ensure it has the leadership and resources it needs to safeguard the free and fair elections our country is counting on.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
While the embarrassing debacle of the 2000 election may seem like a distant memory to some, the unfortunate reality is an encore may be on our doorstep. The Election Assistance Commission was creat...
While the embarrassing debacle of the 2000 election may seem like a distant memory to some, the unfortunate reality is an encore may be on our doorstep. The Election Assistance Commission was creat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mzkitti
6/3/1927
11:41 AM on 09/18/2012
With just 48 days until Election Day 2012, a rash of egregious voter suppression laws threaten to deny millions of eligible voters their right to cast a ballot.
But a less obvious threat -- problems with voter registration -- could do nearly as much damage.
In 2008, 6 million Americans couldn't cast ballots because they missed their state's registration deadline, didn't know how or where to register, or just forgot. Don't make the same mistake! Take just a moment to register now and make sure you can make your voice heard in this year's high-stakes elections.

Click here to go to the National Voter Registration Day website and register to vote today!

With just a few clicks, you'll prepare the registration forms you'll need to send to your election officials, get the information you'll need on when and where you can vote and even sign up for text or email reminders so you won't miss any elections. Have you moved or changed your name? Outdated registration information could put your vote in jeopardy. You may need to re-register to vote now to prevent any problems at the polls on November 6.
Take just a moment, right now, to register or re-register to vote before your state's deadline.

All the best,Bob Edgar and the rest of the team at Common Cause
PS - Already registered? Take a moment to forward this email on to family or friends and make sure that every vote counts.
jhNY
Mercy.
11:38 AM on 09/18/2012
What's another stolen election among friends?

Maybe the next one will rouse the sleeping giant of public opinion against present circumstance, and build the rolls of Democratic Party voters. That seems to be the unspoken strategy, as so little has changed around the election process in 12 years, and nearly all of the changes have gone the wrong way: toward ALEC-coordinated voter suppression.

When has a Commission changed anything lately? See Simpson-Bowles. The main virtue of this tack to controversy: that when such a commission is abandoned by its more powerful foes, the weaker defenders, though too weak to prevail, can complain about the status quo and decry the abandonment of the commission, while mourning its unmet goals.

Had the Democrats after 2000 decided to take this little matter of free and fair elections seriously, I would have expected to see more court action, on a per state basis, given Constitutional constraints and responsibilities-- after all, whatever a Commission might recommend, the voting process remains the business of each state, and the leeway resident in that business is enormous and various, and so would remain.

Today, the majority of states are governed by Republicans and many of these states also have a GOP legislative majority. As they control the voting process therein, the Republicans like things just the way they are.