Opinion Contributor

Barack Obama’s campaign against coal

A coal plant is pictured. | AP Photo

The shuttering of record numbers of coal-fired power plants threatens jobs, the author says. | AP

During President Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, he declared one of his energy goals was to “bankrupt” the coal industry by making electricity prices “skyrocket.” That policy statement kick-started the president’s continuing war on coal miners, their families and the millions of Americans who rely on affordable coal-fired electricity.

Since his election, the president has tried at every turn to make that goal a reality — ardently supporting a cap-and-trade national energy tax and imposing onerous regulations on coal production. The president and his administration are waging a war on coal.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

The nonpartisan U.S. Energy Information Administration has all but confirmed the president’s aggressive war on coal with a report detailing a record number of coal-fired power plants to be closed this year — largely because of burdensome regulations and other compliance costs. Worse, 175 coal-fired power plants are scheduled to be shut down from 2012 to 2016, EIA estimated, requiring 27 gigawatts of electricity — enough to power 27 million homes — to be replaced by more expensive forms of energy.

The shuttering of record numbers of coal-fired power plants threatens thousands of the 555,270 direct and indirect coal-related jobs that help supply America with nearly half of its generated electricity and pay $36 billion in wages.

The House Natural Resources Committee has, over the past 18 months, aggressively investigated the Obama administration’s decision to rewrite a coal production regulation known as the 2008 Stream Buffer Zone Rule. This has been one of the most direct, yet covert, actions by the administration to destroy coal mining jobs and hurt coal production.

The Obama administration discarded a rule that underwent five years of environmental review and public comment; entered into a court agreement with environmental groups to rewrite the rule in an unachievable time frame; spent millions of taxpayer dollars and hired new contractors to do the rewrite; fired the contractors when it leaked that the revision would cost 7,000 jobs; attempted to manipulate data to conceal the true economic impact; and is now hiding its final rule from the public until after the election.

Read more about:

Also on POLITICO

Readers' Comments (22)

  1. default avatar for user IRONDEM
    IRONDEM
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #1
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 9:40 PM EST
  2. avatar for user As I See It
    As I See It
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #2
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 10:02 PM EST
  3. avatar for user nimbus58
    nimbus58
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #3
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 10:30 PM EST
  4. avatar for user Wellstone
    Wellstone
    Party: Liberal
    Reply #4
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 10:43 PM EST
  5. default avatar for user yinchiao
    yinchiao
    Party: NA
    Reply #5
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 11:08 PM EST
  6. avatar for user nimbus58
    nimbus58
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #6
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 11:13 PM EST
  7. avatar for user Fancy433
    Fancy433
    Party: Independent
    Reply #7
    Sep. 11, 2012 - 11:34 PM EST
  8. default avatar for user tp517
    tp517
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #8
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 12:45 AM EST
  9. default avatar for user rgdeliveryguy
    rgdeliveryguy
    Party: NA
    Reply #9
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 1:02 AM EST
  10. default avatar for user Harry Lime
    Harry Lime
    Party: NA
    Reply #10
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 6:10 AM EST
  11. default avatar for user rockribbed
    rockribbed
    Party: Tea Party
    Reply #11
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 7:09 AM EST
  12. default avatar for user sharp77
    sharp77
    Party: Independent
    Reply #12
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 10:49 AM EST
  13. default avatar for user mad skills
    mad skills
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #13
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 1:25 PM EST
  14. avatar for user Mr. Ponce
    Mr. Ponce
    Party: N/A
    Reply #14
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 2:23 PM EST
  15. default avatar for user amarks
    amarks
    Party: NA
    Reply #15
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 5:58 PM EST
  16. default avatar for user American Savy
    American Savy
    Party: NA
    Reply #16
    Sep. 12, 2012 - 8:36 PM EST
  17. default avatar for user jamit2me
    jamit2me
    Party: N/A
    Reply #17
    Sep. 13, 2012 - 8:43 AM EST
  18. default avatar for user J_Dawg
    J_Dawg
    Party: NA
    Reply #18
    Sep. 13, 2012 - 2:22 PM EST
  19. avatar for user ShyGuy
    ShyGuy
    Party: Independent
    Reply #19
    Sep. 14, 2012 - 4:54 AM EST
  20. default avatar for user Johnstone30
    Johnstone30
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #20
    Sep. 15, 2012 - 4:29 PM EST
Read all 22 comments in our forum

You must be logged in to comment

  • Email is Required
  • Password is Required

Not yet a member?

Register Now

Comment on this article

  1. Message is Required
    (9000 characters max)
  2. (200 characters max)
Close

Send to a friendBarack Obama’s campaign against coal

  • Please enter your e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
  • Please enter a valid e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
Cancel

Popular on POLITICO

Recommended on Facebook