- 15th Allied Air Force
- 5th District
- Agriculture
- Airport Security
- Army
- Autism
- Bailouts
- Body Scanners
- Border Security
- Budget
- CIA
- Congress
- Congressional Pay Raises
- Debt Ceiling
- Earmarks
- Economy
- Education
- Energy Independence
- Energy Jolt
- Environment
- Federal Budget
- Federal Funding of Abortion
- Federal Regulations
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Policy
- Foreign Relations
- Government Shutdown
- Haiti
- Health Care
- Hero
- Holiday Travel
- Homeland Security
- Hot Topic
- Hurricane Relief
- Illegal Immigration
- Iran
- IRS
- Israel
- Jobs
- Libya
- Life
- Medicare
- Military
- National Security
- Navy SEALs
- Nazi Germany
- News
- Norway
- Operation Halyard
- Parenting
- Physician's Issues
- Presidential Budget
- Romania
- Russia
- Second Amendment
- September 11
- Social Security
- Somalia
- Special Needs Children
- Spending
- State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
- State of the Union
- Stimulus
- Stimulus Funding
- Subcommittee on Europe and Eurasia
- Tax Reform
- Taxes
- Tea Party
- Terrorism
- Town Halls
- Transportation Security Administration
- Tribute to a fallen veteran
- Unemployment
- Veterans Affairs
- Veterans Day
- Wall Street Bailout
- War on Terror
- Weekly Roundup
- World War II
- Youth Leadership Conference
Congressman Burton Supports Ruling of ‘Unconstitutional’ Healthcare Mandate
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Joshua Gillespie
December 13, 2010 (317) 848-0201
Congressman Burton Supports Ruling of ‘Unconstitutional’ Healthcare Mandate
Washington, D.C. – Congressman Dan Burton issued the following statement after Federal District Judge Henry E. Hudson in the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Richmond, Virginia, ruled that the health care reform law’s individual mandate requiring most Americans to purchase health care coverage by 2014 was unconstitutional:
“I am extremely pleased with Judge Hudson’s ruling on the individual mandate of the health care law. In early November, many of my Republican colleagues and I signed an Amicus Brief filed in the state of Florida that clearly demonstrated that the Congress lacks the authority under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause to impose the individual mandate, and that the lack of a severability clause would cause the entire bill to fail if the court struck down the individual mandate. In his ruling Judge Hudson stated that the individual mandate ‘exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article I [the U.S. Constitution]’. This decision represents an extremely important part in my fight against socialized medicine. With more than 20 states filing lawsuits against the Federal government over the health care reform law, many Americans are concerned with government overstepping its boundaries.
“While the rest of the health care law remains intact for now, the future of the individual mandate is uncertain. This court decision opens the door to repeal and replace the current law with legislation that would contain meaningful reforms focused on lowering cost and protecting American jobs.”
Background:
On March 22, 2010, Representative Burton introduced H.R. 4910, which would repeal Obamacare, the Democrats' unconstitutional health care bill, and replace it with H.R. 3400, the “Empowering Patients First Act.” H.R. 3400 is centered on four main pillars: access to coverage for all Americans; coverage that is truly owned by the patient; improve the health care delivery structure, and rein in out-of-control costs. Rep. Burton intends to reintroduce his bill in the 112th Congress.
Rep. Burton was noted for saying, “This bill demonstrates that Republicans are not simply about voting no on health care reform. This bill is about repealing the government-run solution jammed through the Congress by the Democrats in favor of real cost effective health care reform.”
###