Abstract
Assessments of Antarctic temperature change have emphasized the contrast between strong warming of the Antarctic Peninsula and slight cooling of the Antarctic continental interior in recent decades1. This pattern of temperature change has been attributed to the increased strength of the circumpolar westerlies, largely in response to changes in stratospheric ozone2. This picture, however, is substantially incomplete owing to the sparseness and short duration of the observations. Here we show that significant warming extends well beyond the Antarctic Peninsula to cover most of West Antarctica, an area of warming much larger than previously reported. West Antarctic warming exceeds 0.1 °C per decade over the past 50 years, and is strongest in winter and spring. Although this is partly offset by autumn cooling in East Antarctica, the continent-wide average near-surface temperature trend is positive. Simulations using a general circulation model reproduce the essential features of the spatial pattern and the long-term trend, and we suggest that neither can be attributed directly to increases in the strength of the westerlies. Instead, regional changes in atmospheric circulation and associated changes in sea surface temperature and sea ice are required to explain the enhanced warming in West Antarctica.
Recent changes in Antarctic ice-sheet surface temperatures appear enigmatic when compared with global average temperature trends. Although the Antarctic Peninsula is one of the most rapidly warming locations on Earth, weather stations on the Antarctic continent generally show insignificant trends in recent decades1. However, all but two of the continuous records from weather stations are near the coast, providing little direct information on conditions in the continental interior. The widely used weather forecast reanalysis data are known to have errors owing to inconsistent assimilation skill in the satellite and pre-satellite eras3.
In this Letter, we use statistical climate-field-reconstruction techniques to obtain a 50-year-long, spatially complete estimate of monthly Antarctic temperature anomalies. In essence, we use the spatial covariance structure of the surface temperature field to guide interpolation of the sparse but reliable 50-year-long records of 2-m temperature from occupied weather stations. Although it has been suggested that such interpolation is unreliable owing to the distances involved1, large spatial scales are not inherently problematic if there is high spatial coherence, as is the case in continental Antarctica4.
Previous reconstructions of Antarctic near-surface temperatures have yielded inconsistent results, particularly over West Antarctica, where records are few and discontinuous5, 6, 7. We improve upon this earlier work in several ways. We use two independent estimates of the spatial covariance of temperature across the Antarctic ice sheet: surface temperature measurements from satellite thermal infrared (TIR) observations8, and up-to-date automatic weather station (AWS) measurements of near-surface air temperature. We use a method9, 10 adapted from the regularized expectation maximization algorithm11 (RegEM) for estimating missing data points in climate fields. RegEM is an iterative algorithm similar to principal-component analysis, used as a data-adaptive optimization of statistical weights for the weather station data. Unlike simple distance-weighting5, 6 or similar7 calculations, application of RegEM takes into account temporal changes in the spatial covariance pattern, which depend on the relative importance of differing influences on Antarctic temperature at a given time. Furthermore, the iterative nature of RegEM allows it to be used with discontinuous time series, permitting us to take full advantage of the data available from occupied weather stations. We assess reconstruction skill using reduction-of-error (RE) and coefficient-of-efficiency (CE) scores as well as conventional correlation (r) scores. Such verification metrics are lacking in previous Antarctic temperature reconstructions5, 6, 7, but are required for demonstrating skill relative to the climatological mean and are therefore critical for confidence in the calculation of temporal trends10. Skill metrics for our TIR-based reconstruction from split calibration and verification experiments are significant (>99% confidence) at all grid points except in some restricted areas, mostly on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula (Fig. 1).
Figure 1: Verification and upper-limit calibration statistics calculated for each grid point from the comparison of reconstructed and original satellite-derived monthly temperature anomalies.
a, Calibration r, 1982–1994.5; b, calibration r, 1994.5–2006; c, verification r, 1994.5–2006; d, verification r, 1982–1994.5; e, verification RE, 1994.5–2006; f, verification RE, 1982–1994.5. Warm colours in e and f (RE scores greater than zero) show where results are more accurate than the climatological mean temperature. Mean grid-point verification results are RE = 0.11, CE = 0.09 and r = 0.46. Crosses show locations of occupied weather stations.
High resolution image and legend (239K)Download Power Point slide (619K)Slides may be downloaded for educational use, according to the terms described in Nature Publishing Group's licensing policy.
Results from our AWS-based reconstruction agree well with those from the TIR data (Fig. 2). This is important because the infrared data are strictly a measure of clear-sky temperature8 and because surface temperature differs from air temperature 2–3 m above the surface, as measured at occupied stations or at AWSs. Trends in cloudiness or in the strength of the near-surface inversion could both produce spurious trends in the temperature reconstruction. The agreement between the reconstructions, however, rules out either potential bias as significant. Furthermore, detrending of the TIR data before reconstruction demonstrates that the results do not depend strongly on trends in said data (Supplementary Information).
Figure 2: Reconstructed annual mean Antarctic temperature anomalies, January 1957 to December 2006.
a, East Antarctica; b, West Antarctica. Solid black lines show results from reconstruction using infrared satellite data, averaged over all grid points for each region. Dashed lines show the average of reconstructed AWS data in each region. Straight red lines show average trends of the TIR reconstruction. Verification results for the continental mean of the TIR reconstruction are RE = 0.34, CE = 0.31 and r = 0.73. Grey shading, 95% confidence limits.
High resolution image and legend (33K)Download Power Point slide (508K)Slides may be downloaded for educational use, according to the terms described in Nature Publishing Group's licensing policy.
Our reconstructions show more significant temperature change in Antarctica (Fig. 2), and a different pattern for that change than reported in some previous reconstructions5, 7 (Fig. 3). We find that West Antarctica warmed between 1957 and 2006 at a rate of 0.17 0.06 °C per decade (95% confidence interval). Thus, the area of warming is much larger than the region of the Antarctic Peninsula. The peninsula warming averages 0.11 0.04 °C per decade. We also find significant warming in East Antarctica at 0.10 0.07 °C per decade (1957–2006). The continent-wide trend is 0.12 0.07 °C per decade. In the reconstruction based on detrended TIR data, warming in West Antarctica remains significant at greater than 99% confidence, and the continent-wide mean trend remains at 0.08 °C per decade, although it is no longer demonstrably different from zero (95% confidence). This is in good agreement with ref. 6, which reported average continent-wide warming of 0.082 °C per decade (1962–2003) and shows overall warming in West Antarctica, although statistical significance could not be demonstrated owing to the shorter length and greater variance of the reconstruction. We emphasize that, in general, detrending of predictand data lowers the quality of reconstructions by removing spatial covariance information10. The detrended reconstruction therefore represents a conservative lower bound on trend magnitude. Although ref. 7 concluded that recent temperature trends in West Antarctica are statistically insignificant, the results were strongly influenced by the paucity of data from that region. When the complete set of West Antarctic AWS data is included, the trends become positive and statistically significant, in excellent agreement with our results12.
Figure 3: Spatial pattern of temperature trends (degrees Celsius per decade) from reconstruction using infrared (TIR) satellite data.
a, Mean annual trends for 1957–2006; b, Mean annual trends for 1969–2000, to facilitate comparison with ref. 2. c–f, Seasonal trends for 1957–2006: winter (June, July, August; c); spring (September, October, November; d); summer (December, January, February; e); autumn (March, April, May; f). Black lines enclose those areas that have statistically significant trends at 95% confidence (two-tailed t-test). Where it would otherwise be unclear, NS (not significant) refers to areas of insignificant trends. Red circles and adjacent numbers in a show the locations of the South Pole and Vostok weather stations and their respective trends (degrees Celsius per decade) during the same time interval as the reconstruction (1957–2006). Black circles in b show the locations of Siple and Byrd Stations, and the adjacent numbers show their respective trends13 for 1979–1997.
High resolution image and legend (186K)Download Power Point slide (570K)Slides may be downloaded for educational use, according to the terms described in Nature Publishing Group's licensing policy.
Independent data provide additional evidence that warming has been significant in West Antarctica. At Siple Station (76° S, 84° W) and Byrd Station (80° S, 120° W), short intervals of data from AWSs were spliced with 37-GHz (microwave) satellite observations, which are not affected by clouds, to obtain continuous records from 1979 to 1997 (ref. 13). The results show mean trends of 1.1 0.8 °C per decade and 0.45 1.3 °C per decade at Siple and Byrd, respectively13. Our reconstruction yields 0.29 0.26 °C per decade and 0.36 0.37 °C per decade over the same interval. In our full 50-year reconstruction, the trends are significant, although smaller, at both Byrd (0.23 0.09 °C per decade) and Siple (0.18 0.06 °C per decade). Furthermore, the seasonal characteristics of these data13 agree well with those from our reconstructions, with the greatest amount of warming in austral spring and winter (Fig. 3). Independent analyses of tropospheric temperature trends have also found spring and winter warming to be greatest in West Antarctica14, 15.
The spatial and seasonal characteristics of our temperature reconstruction have important implications for understanding recent Antarctic climate change. Several studies have emphasized a warming-peninsula, cooling-continent pattern that is attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation associated with the southern annular mode (SAM)2, 16. Cooling over much of East Antarctica did occur in recent decades, but was strongest during the short time interval considered in earlier studies (1969–2000; Fig. 3b). Virtually all areas warmed between 1957 and 1980. Our reconstruction differs from the results of modelling experiments that tie Antarctic surface temperature change to stratospheric ozone loss through changes in the SAM16, 17, 18. In such simulations, the largest negative temperature anomalies in East Antarctica occur in summer, whereas in our reconstruction, East Antarctic cooling is restricted to autumn (Fig. 3). The simulations show warming in austral summer and autumn, restricted to the peninsula, whereas in our reconstruction the greatest warming is in winter and spring, and in continental West Antarctica as well as on the peninsula.
The well-known increases in temperature on the Antarctic Peninsula are strongly associated with changes in sea ice19. Similarly, negative anomalies in sea-ice extent20 and the length of the sea-ice season21 in the Amundsen–Bellingshausen Sea may be related to the warming trends we observe in adjacent West Antarctica. To explore this, we examined model output from the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) ModelE atmosphere-only and coupled general circulation models, which were run with multiple oceanic and atmospheric boundary conditions until the end of 2003 (ref. 22). A slightly earlier atmospheric version of GISS ModelE has been used in simulations of circulation anomalies associated with polar stratospheric ozone depletion17. When driven by observed sea-surface-temperature (SST) and sea-ice boundary conditions23, the model reproduces many of the basic features of our reconstruction, with warming over most of the continent and persistent in West Antarctica (Fig. 4). SST and sea-ice changes alone produced weak cooling over parts of East Antarctica during the 1980s and 1990s. The details of the comparisons obviously depend on the accuracy of the SST and sea-ice observations (the latter are not generally considered reliable before 1979), and multi-decadal internal variability in the model is substantial. However, it is noteworthy that both in the reconstruction and in the model results, the rate of warming is greater in continental West Antarctica, particularly in spring and winter, than either on the peninsula or in East Antarctica. In GISS ModelE, this is related to SST changes and the location of sea-ice anomalies, particularly during the latter period (1979–2003), when they are strongly zonally asymmetric, with significant losses in the West Antarctic sector but small gains around the rest of the continent (Fig. 4e). Radiative forcings alone are inadequate to account for the observations (Supplementary Information).
Figure 4: Comparison of reconstructed and modelled mean annual temperature trends (degrees Celsius per decade) for the periods 1957–1981 and 1979–2003.
a–d, 1957–1981; e–h, 1979–2003. a, e, Reconstructed surface temperature and observed 25-year change in sea-ice fractional area23. b, f, Surface air temperature from five-member GISS ModelE atmosphere-only ensemble simulations with observed sea-surface-temperature and sea-ice boundary conditions. c, g, Four-member ensemble with the same boundary conditions plus atmospheric forcings (changes in atmospheric concentrations of radiatively active species, including ozone). d, h, Difference between simulations with the same forcings but observed versus climatological sea ice, to isolate the effect of sea ice alone.
High resolution image and legend (221K)Download Power Point slide (603K)Slides may be downloaded for educational use, according to the terms described in Nature Publishing Group's licensing policy.
The net impact of SST, sea ice, and radiative forcings on Antarctic temperatures in GISS ModelE is in general agreement with our reconstruction. The same model, when run in coupled mode (that is, with a dynamic ocean) fails to reproduce the strong trends observed in West Antarctica and the peninsula. The probable cause of this discrepancy, common to other coupled models24, is inadequate representation of sea-ice anomalies and their associated higher-order modes of atmospheric circulation. In this context, it is important that the pattern of observed temperature trends closely resembles the pattern of temperature anomalies associated with the zonal wave-3 pattern in atmospheric circulation4. This circulation regime is efficient for the exchange of air between the ocean and the Antarctic continental interior, and is associated with atmospheric circulation anomalies in the Amundsen–Bellingshausen Sea, known to precede winter sea-ice anomalies25. Forced coupled models, including GISS ModelE, generally show a positive shift in the SAM and an associated increase in the circumpolar westerlies over recent decades, in good agreement with observations26. Observations also suggest a bias towards the positive phase in the wave-3 pattern25 since about 1979, which is not reproduced in the coupled models. Using observed SST and sea ice, GISS ModelE does produce substantial shifts in the wave-3 circulation. Under those model conditions, greater cyclonic flow in the Amundsen Sea region brings warm, moist air to West Antarctica, countering the effect of the enhanced circumpolar westerlies.
An outstanding question in Antarctic climatology has been whether the strong warming of the peninsula has also occurred in continental West Antarctica19. Our results indicate that this is indeed the case, at least over the last 50 years. Moreover, ice-core analyses indicate average warming of West Antarctica over the entire twentieth century27. Although the influence of ozone-related changes in the SAM has been emphasized in recent studies of Antarctic temperature trends, the spatial and seasonal patterns of the observed temperature trends indicate that higher-order modes of atmospheric circulation, associated with regional sea-ice changes, have had a larger role in West Antarctica.
Mean surface temperature trends in both West and East Antarctica are positive for 1957–2006, and the mean continental warming is comparable to that for the Southern Hemisphere as a whole28. This warming trend is difficult to explain without the radiative forcing associated with increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations. However, the future trajectory of Antarctic temperature change also depends on the extent to which changes in atmospheric composition (whether from greenhouse gases or stratospheric ozone) affect Southern Hemisphere sea ice and regional atmospheric circulation patterns. Improved representation in models of coupled atmosphere/sea-ice dynamics will be critical for forecasting Antarctic temperature change.
Methods Summary
We use near-surface air temperature data from 42 occupied stations and 65 AWSs from the READER (Reference Antarctic Data for Environmental Research) data set1. We use passive infrared brightness measurements (TIR) of surface temperature from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer8, a satellite of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We use the RegEM algorithm9, 10, 11 to combine the data from occupied weather stations with the TIR and AWS data in separate reconstructions of the near-surface Antarctic temperature field. Split calibration/verification tests are performed by withholding pre- and post-1995 TIR and AWS data in separate RegEM calculations. Calibration and verification statistics are calculated for each grid point from the comparison of the reconstructed time series and the original temperature time series. We show RE and correlation r values in Fig. 1. CE verification values yield results indistinguishable from RE in our study and are reported in Supplementary Information. Significance levels of the calibration/verification statistics are based on Monte Carlo simulations of red noise as the null hypothesis. In Fig. 2, the 95% confidence interval is the unexplained variance, 2, where = (1 - ), is the temporal variance in the original satellite temperature data and is the verification fractional resolved variance. Significance levels of trends are calculated using a two-tailed t-test, with the number of degrees of freedom adjusted for autocorrelation. In reporting trends for different areas, we define West Antarctica as 72°–90° S, 60°–180° W; East Antarctica as 65°–90° S, 300–180° E; and the Antarctic Peninsula as westerly longitudes north of 72° S.
Full methods accompany this paper.