Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > New RPA career field graduates first RQ-4 pilots
 
Related Factsheets
 RQ-4 Global Hawk
New RPA career field graduates first RQ-4 pilots

Posted 1/19/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Senior Airman Shawn Nickel
9th Reconnaissance Wing Public Affairs


1/19/2012 - BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) -- Two members of Beale Air Force Base were recognized as the first RQ-4 Global Hawk pilots in the new 18X career field during a winging ceremony Jan. 13 here.

Second Lts. Jacob and Scott began training Oct. 3, 2011, after a decision by Air Staff officials in June 2011 established undergraduate training for remotely piloted aircraft pilots across the service.

"It's history repeating itself to have our pilots ushering in this new time in our career field," said Lt. Col. Steve, the 1st Reconnaissance Squadron commander. "The 1st RS, previously the 1st Aero Squadron, was the first (flying squadron in history)."

The new classification 18X is designated for RPA pilots coming from non-rated career fields as well as newly commissioned officers. The commander said selection standards for this program are rigorous, to include physiological and academic requirements.

"With these pilots not coming from traditional training and not being experienced aviators, this is untested territory," the colonel said. "But the stringent requirements the Air Force has in place will ensure success."

The pilots will begin flying operational and humanitarian missions immediately in support of combatant commanders worldwide.

"We were told we were leading a newly edged sword into the Air Force and this has become a reality," Scott said. "It's a privilege to be the first in this platform at this capacity. I'm ready to become part of such an intense history and pave the way for the rest of the pipeline students."

Steve said the current plan is to convert all RQ-4 pilots to the new career field beginning with 40 percent of the trainees by the end of 2012.

"Based on the performance of these two Airmen, I have high hopes for the future of the program and the 18X pilots," he said. "It's bringing a youthful dynamic to the RPA program, which will bring it to new heights."

(Editor's note: The full names of the Airmen in the story were left out based on operational security concerns.)



tabComments
2/8/2012 9:28:34 PM ET
For those of you wondering why these pilots' and sensors' names can't be released maybe you should take a second to realize the real danger they face-- and not just from foreign enemies. Back when full names could be released pilots who were on TV or in articles received hate mail letters from inmates and some even received threats due to their positions. People don't understand what RPAs do. They don't understand that they follow the same chain of command as a fighter or bomber aircraft to employ ordnance. Think of all the controversy sparked by Al Awlaki-- the constitutionality of the order was questioned the world over. Would you really want to tell the whole world your name knowing half of America thinks your career field is stupid or a video game When they don't understand a real person is flying the plane It's too new for people to understand- give it time.
LC, USAF
 
1/26/2012 12:08:58 PM ET
Congratulations graduates... less than a week after your accomplishment your program has been cancelled. Come on Big Blue, keep modernizing, no need to keep extending the U-2 until someone dies flying a dinosaur
Paul, Edwards CA
 
1/25/2012 10:03:29 PM ET
Chief so and so--you're misled and misleading part of a sect out there that whine's about what officers can do that enlisted cannot. Without realizing it, every person that does this blog after blog degrades there own credibility by projecting a sheer lack of understanding of a very simple princible--it's not just a well-trained NCO that could fly a recon aircraft; ANYONE could fly a recon aircraft. When someone becomes an officer, they don't instantaneously become more capable of anything, but they are granted a level of responsibility and with it a level of accountability that is commensurate with the rank they hold. The military's intent is to hold individuals accountable at the highest reasonable level for decisions made and equipment owned by and affecting the taxpayer. Highly destructive weapons, high cost aircraft, etc, are geneally in this category. By now you get my point anyone that understands responsibility understands the intent driving a lot of these types of dec
capt obvious, u.s. of a.
 
1/25/2012 3:41:35 PM ET
So what does this mean for RPA sensor operators? Will the RQ-4 be opened up the 1U AFSC?
A1C, Holloman AFB NM
 
1/24/2012 9:11:02 AM ET
Load, I read the article. If OPSEC was truly the case, then every article posted on this site and in the AF Times would be in the same format. Save the cloak and dagger stuff for the movies. RPA fliers are not that special to warrant their full names to be omitted.
Mo, MidSouth
 
1/23/2012 9:53:43 AM ET
With the DOD and AF budget in dire straits, we continue to pay officers to fly an aircraft that is not offensive in nature A well-trained NCO could fly a recon aircraft just as well as an O and he or she will be quite a bit cheaper to the DOD in the long haul. Come on AF, it's time to start seriously considering putting wings on enlisted members.
Chief so and so, Somewhere in the eastern US
 
1/21/2012 7:41:18 PM ET
ddub, I think you did miss the mark. enlisted aerospace medicine folks do not wear G suits and neither do RPA crews. Just like you, they're all at 1 G. Mo, read the editor's note at the bottom for your answer. MSgt Don, maybe you should go talk to your OPSEC folks on base and learn a few things. They've had 18X at Creech for a couple years now, but they still bring a lot of other rated officers to RPA just to fill slots.
Load, NV
 
1/21/2012 2:30:34 AM ET
Funny how the first two comments criticize leaving out the full names of the officers but don't themselves list their full names or locations.Of course I'm not listing my full name or specific location, but I'm also OK with the article not including that info either.
GA, UT
 
1/21/2012 12:55:36 AM ET
ddub, what are you talking about? No one wears a g-suit except when they are in an aircraft requiring it or training for it. Some enlisted folks in aerospace medicine probably put on a g-suit regularly during training so they have first hand knowledge of what the people they are supporting use. Of course Global Hawk pilots don't wear g-suits. I have a question for you though. Do you ever wear your ABUs when you aren't trying to be camouflaged and hide from the enemy? That question, while petty, is at least logical.
Maj, SWA
 
1/20/2012 3:03:42 PM ET
Do RPA operators wear the G-suit? Just like the enlisted folks that work in aerospace medicine, how many Gs are they subjected to that authorizes them wearing the G-suit? I'm probably missing the mark.
ddub, TX
 
1/20/2012 1:21:09 PM ET
I find it a bit overzealous to omit the last names of the people involved for the sake of OPSEC. In fact it looks downright silly. There is nothing classified or sensitive about their positions. Maybe the entire AF should remove last names from name tags and lets all go on a first name basis.
MSgt Don, Can't tell ya
 
1/19/2012 5:39:05 PM ET
So they don't put their full names in the article because why?
Mo, MidSouth
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
SecAF, community honor Keesler AFB

2012 Football Frenzy underway at AF clubs

Space ops unit takes over newest GPS satellite

Reservists can carry leave balance after training tours

In wake of Sandy, mobility Airmen poised to 'answer the call'

McGuire continues recovery efforts, FEMA base of operations

Hercules flies through the night

Sheppard Airmen spring into action; save woman from burning car

AF accepting distinguished civilian award nominations

Watching 'Sandy'

More than 7,400 National Guard members responding to Hurricane Sandy

Vanguard nominees sought

Weather recon squadron takes last look at 'Sandy'

AF officials eliminate civilian skill code requirements

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Domestic violence awareness 'experiment'  1

Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing