Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Proposal would save $3.2 billion in health care costs
 
Photos 
Health Care Costs
(U.S. Air Force graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
Proposal would save $3.2 billion in health care costs

Posted 5/5/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Army Sgt. 1st Class Michael J. Carden
American Forces Press Service


5/5/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Defense Department's proposal to reform the TRICARE health plan and the military health system would save at least $3.2 billion between 2012 and 2016, the Pentagon's chief financial officer told Congress yesterday.

In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee's personnel subcommittee, Robert F. Hale said the initiatives would support President Barack Obama's debt-reduction plan, which calls for a $4 trillion reduction in the federal budget by 2023.

President Obama's plan includes a reduction of $78 billion in DOD's fiscal 2012 budget and an additional $400 billion in national security cuts through 2023.

Mr. Hale said that although $3.2 billion is only modest savings toward the president's overall goal, the savings are "substantial" within DOD.

"The federal government as a whole would save money under this plan -- not a lot, but there are modest savings," he explained. "The department savings from this proposal would be very substantial. We're looking out over the whole career of an individual and setting aside money to pay for it, so you immediately see major effects."

The fiscal 2012 budget request calls for $52.5 billion to support the military health system's 9.6 million beneficiaries, which include retirees, active-duty members and their families. The department's health care bill has more than tripled from $19 billion in 2001.

"We've got to find ways to maintain the quality of health care but slow the growth in cost," Mr. Hale said.

Meeting that challenge begins with streamlining operations at the health affairs headquarters, he said, which means cutting more than 700 civilian contractors from the TRICARE staff.

The proposal also calls for reforms for beneficiaries, including a maximum $5 per month increase for working-age military retirees under 65, raising the co-payment for prescription drugs, and regulatory changes that would eliminate special subsidies for community hospitals that serve beneficiaries, Mr. Hale said.

Mr. Hale noted that TRICARE enrollment fees have not increased since Congress appropriated funds for the program in 1994.

Families pay an estimated $460 annually for TRICARE Prime coverage, but had the fees been indexed today to meet the growth in per capita national health expenditure, those fees would now be more than $1,000 per family each year, he said.

Beginning in 2013, future enrollees would pay fees based on the national health expenditure if the proposal is enacted, Mr. Hale said, and that, he added, still would be significantly less than what beneficiaries would pay in the private sector for health insurance.

The proposals would save an estimated $430 million over the next five years and would stabilize cost sharing in TRICARE at a level much more favorable than what Congress envisioned in the 1990s, Mr. Hale said.

Reform proposals in pharmaceuticals include incentives for allowing the department to prescribe generic drugs and deliver prescriptions by mail, saving $2.5 billion by 2016, he added.

Mr. Hale told the panel that the rates DOD pays to "sole community hospitals" that serve military beneficiaries are substantially higher than the rates it pays to other hospitals. Sole community hospitals are determined by Medicare rules that factor in distance from other hospitals, capacity and other criteria.

Federal law requires that the department adopt Medicare rates when practical, and combined with lower rates paid to sole community hospitals, the proposal would save the department $395 million through 2016, Mr. Hale said.

"We will phase in this change slowly, at least over a four-year period, in order to avoid adverse effects on care provided at these hospitals," he added.

Mr. Hale also discussed the department's proposal for equitable treatment for all Medicare-eligible military retirees.

Under current law, he said, some Medicare-eligible enrollees are allowed to remain in the U.S. Family Health Plan, a TRICARE Prime option that provides care to active-duty family members and all military retirees regardless of whether they participate in Medicare Part B, which covers doctor services, outpatient care and home health services that Part A does not.

DOD officials, Mr. Hale added, seek legislation that requires those who are part of the U.S. Family Health Plan to join Medicare, as all other retirees must.

This, he added, will ensure that TRICARE does not pay claims that exceed Medicare rates when military retirees qualify for both programs.

"We will make these fee changes very gradually, very slowly, and 'grandfathering' all those who are currently over age 65 and in the Family Health Plan, so it will take place over a number of years," Mr. Hale said. "I particularly ask the committee's support for the provisions affecting the sole community hospitals and for legislation to permit changes to the U.S. Family Health Plan."

The proposals are more than reasonable, Mr. Hale said, and strike a solid balance between bringing savings and maintaining quality health care for veterans and their families.

None of the proposals would affect active- duty troops, he emphasized.

"These proposals generate savings that will help us pay for needed training and equipping of the armed forces," Mr. Hale said. "If we don't get authority to do this, we'll face major holes in the military budget, and it will be very hard to handle in difficult budgetary times. But most importantly, these proposals will lay the groundwork for a sustainable future of the military health care system."



tabComments
5/9/2011 1:28:39 PM ET
@CKJ- I looked at all the comments and only one addressed President Obama directly, so I'm not real sure where you comment is directed. Let's look at the facts: the Obama administration is pushing for this increase in TRICARE as did the Bush administration for at least three years. During the years that the Bush administration was pushing for this increase then Senator Obama said he would not support placing the increased costs of TRICARE onto the backs of the military retiree. I know this because he was my Senator at the time and I received several letters from his office over my concerns that military retirees where getting stuck with paying this bill. I'm just curious why then Senator Obama wouldn't support this increase but President Obama does. This increase is just as bad an idea now as when it was first proposed by the Bush administration.
SMSgt Retiree, Illinois
 
5/9/2011 10:30:02 AM ET
@Dave BreckYour argument would be better if you had the facts. Congress has been under FERSFEHPB since 1984. For retirement and health care benefits they are just more federal workers. That also means they do NOT get retirement after one term. @all who say they are breaking their promiseThey broke that in the 1990's with TRICARE. Anyone who retired since then should have been aware of it.@those complaining about the low increase in retired payThat has nothing to do with President Obama. It's because that's the results of the system that has computed retiree benefits since the 1970's - and when the CPI-W on 30 September of some year exceeds the peak it had in 2008 there will be an increase in retired pay.Certainly we can argue if the proposed index is correct or not or what we should get but when you argue based upon falsehoods it spoils your arguments.
soon to be retiree, stateside
 
5/8/2011 12:12:42 AM ET
To the folks blaming President Obama for the reduction of retirement benefits, it's time you got a clue. Military retiree benefits have been in the cross-hairs for DECADES. It's okay to complain of how our benefits are under attack but save your uninformed half-baked political opinions for other news sites. It's unbecoming for our Air Force's website.
CKJ, SWA
 
5/7/2011 9:32:41 PM ET
Wow is motrin really getting that expensive?
unbelievable, WY
 
5/6/2011 3:31:42 PM ET
The constant erosion of benefits is one reason people need to be involved. Professional organizations such as AFA, NCOA and AFSA are fighting this, but we need to write our congressional leaders and be heard as well.
EZ, MT
 
5/6/2011 2:37:15 PM ET
I agree with CMSgt Chandler. Be careful when you raise your right hand and they have their hands behind their backs with crossed fingers. Promises are easy to break when you're a captive audience. So much for promised free medical care for life.
MSgt Retired, San Antonio
 
5/6/2011 2:01:39 PM ET
I have no beef about higher Tricare fees. Just off set by having my retirement match Inflation.
James Halterman, CONUS
 
5/6/2011 12:57:02 PM ET
Approximately 9 percent of the U.S. population has ever served or is currently serving in the military. Yet this segment of the population is consistently asked to set the example by not receiving pay raises and having their promised benefits modified or cut by politicians who've never served a day in uniform. I'm proud of my service and don't regret a day of it; however, the military and its retirees need to defend their entitlements. Retired CMSgt, Colorado
Steve Mazurek, Peterson AFB CO
 
5/6/2011 12:45:44 PM ET
Go ahead and change the benefits and advertise the facts of what one can expect in reality when they serve 20 plus years. Then start recuriting with the realityfacts. A year or two later the USG will need to bring back the draft as there will be no one who stays on for a career that pays less and has no benefits to sustain them in retirement years. Yes the civilian coporations have mostly stopped retirements for new hires and now it is all about 401K plans and how much you can save while the stock market fluxuates so you lose and gain and hopefully end up with a nest egg you can share with the USG in taxes. So, 80 years later the same old plan continues - the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. However, I still think the USA is the greatest Nation on Earth and continue to pray for all our military families to stay strong and be all you can be. Thanks for your service.
Mike Solon USAF Retired, West Chester Ohio
 
5/6/2011 12:32:30 PM ET
I could deal with the Tricare increase a lot better if they would just pay me my full retired pay and my disability.
Brian , Edwards AFB
 
5/6/2011 12:03:09 PM ET
The obvious solution to the problem of rising costs for military retirees is simple. The military needs to have an annual RIF that removes members who are within one year of being retirement eligible. Problem solved. If you think this solution won't be used eventually, you don't understand the current and future civilian leadership. Remember the promise of lifetime health care for military retirees. Yeah, people belived that one, too.
jdh, USA
 
5/6/2011 11:56:03 AM ET
So lets look at this. Retirement pay is pegged to a reduced inflation rate, but the cost of TRICARE premiums will be pegged to the pseudo-statistical NATIONAL HEALTH EXPENDITURE. This figues is about 2 to 3 times the current rate used to figure increases in retirement pay and will continue to rise dramatically. So what happens to the military retiree? The answer is WHO CARES as long as we can cut retirement costs.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
5/6/2011 11:03:46 AM ET
Do the math. No increase in retired pay supposedly due to no inflation, while the costs for gas, milk and bread all go up substantially. Then, add increased costs for medical care on top of a tax increase already incurred to cover the costs of a national healthcare plan for others. Our retired pay is continually going in the wrong direction. The DOD is a puppet to what the administration wants to achieve and is treating military benefits as it does its social programs. Stay very mindful during the next election of what's been taken away from you instead of getting caught up in hope for the future.
D. Patrick, San Antonio
 
5/6/2011 10:35:48 AM ET
Sad to see more piecemeal, ineffectual solutions to our domestic healthcare crises, especially one that merely shifts more cost to the patient. The only true solution is a National Single Payer system, which cuts out insurance industry overhead and profit and gives every U.S. citizen, both military and civilian, the healthcare they deserve. Every industrialized nation on Earth has some form of socialized medicine except us. Tragically, we continue to put profit before health.
James McCord, Aviano AB Italy
 
5/6/2011 8:51:20 AM ET
Once again our government will attempt to balance its budget by taking money away from the sector that gets the least pay. We make sacrifice after sacrifice for our nation and it thanks us by attempting to level our benefits with the private sector, who goes home to their family at night doesn't PCS every few years and gets compensated when the job asks them to stay late or come in on the weekends. Way to go, Mr. Hale. Rip off the men and women who give their lives to this great nation once working day at a time.
Ben, LRAFB AR
 
5/6/2011 8:30:01 AM ET
I don't have a problem paying a little more for TRICARE, but I truly believe there may be better ways to control these costs. We spend $6.7B a MONTH to fight in Afghanistan. I'm sure we could spend a little less each month there to pay the $640M a year we would need to leave TRICARE alone. In my opinion, TRICARE is ran by too few contracted companies, which in my opinion increases costs. Why keep paying Healthnet, Humana and TriWest crazy amounts of money for their inefficiencies? We should go with smaller regions and more companies.
Retired SMSgt, Florida
 
5/6/2011 6:43:46 AM ET
Okay, I agree with a working age and able working retiree paying a few dollars more. The problem is the rates will go up anyway. How about we stop footing the bill for the free loading outside society. Our Social Programs are so wacked it isn't funny. Don't even get started on the politicians that we elect on false premise that get lifetime retirement after just a few years.
Dave Brett, Korea
 
5/6/2011 6:05:34 AM ET
I thought we're not supposed to use public relations venues to disseminate political propaganda.
Sgt Whoever, conus
 
5/6/2011 3:28:33 AM ET
The DoD could save money by not letting everyone buy a 52" LCD for every meeting/conference room they have. Privatized housing is a financial joke. Quit eliminating troops to pay for equipment; it doesn't save money. Doing more with less is indeed doing more with less. How about doing less and realize that is the only way it works? Let's start with these.
Wow, AZ
 
5/6/2011 2:55:03 AM ET
Listen up fella's. Those making comments here know of what they speak. At a recent meeting, I heard a profound comment made by a long-time veteran. He said at a recent testimony in Washington, he told a panel, "If you don't want to support the veterans, don't make any more of them." I, too, know from way back that promises are not kept. There are literally thousands upon thousands still living that are living proof. Our legislators are no longer experienced veterans; there are fewer and fewer of them today. They cannot relate to us as in yesteryear. Remember CYA is as demanding today as ever.
R Soucy USAF Ret., N. Calif
 
5/5/2011 9:04:39 PM ET
No. NO raise in Retiree Tricare Prime fees. Do NOT balance the defense budget on the backs of those who have already given so much. Saving $430 million over five years? Please. That's a rounding error in the budget. Want to save money? Make sure illegal aliens get no federally-funded benefits.
Otis R. Needleman, USA
 
5/5/2011 8:30:11 PM ET
Increasing TRICARE fees by the amount of CPI and retired pay increases seems fair, but not by some arbitrary multiplier related to health care increases that cannot be verified. Have Congress pass a law: do not allow the DOD to solve other budget shortfalls using TRICARE fee increases. Remember active duty and military retirees are in better medicare health than the average civilian retiree. DOD is very suspect to me after the attempts made in recent past years to jack up fees without any validation or facts. It was an attempt to stick it to the GI by OSD and DOD leaders.
Chuck Martin, Alexandria VA
 
5/5/2011 6:46:49 PM ET
You who voted for Obama voted for change and now you are seeing the results. Hope saner minds prevail in 2012
CMSgt R L H Retired, Col Springs
 
5/5/2011 5:44:04 PM ET
100 percent old fashioned snake oil. Ultimate hidden agenda to merely medically treat low-cost healthy population of active duty military only, just move stealthily a big step closer to reality by slipping this one in. Progressively whittle down traditional so-called military benefits over time is the end game. Retirement plans continuously mutated until final nail in coffin. Just meager check at age 60-plus after 30 years service is quietly ramped up to divert attention with some TSP smoke and mirrors promise. Fold in TRICARE copayments for your dependants, evolve nominal rent and utility bills for government housing, or wedge in a subtle no COLA justification for a year or two or three. Furtive collaboration subterfuge of faceless bean counters to save DOD pennies from people/programs to procure high-priced hardware. Yet same 24/7 blood, sweat and tear dedication required to get mission done demanded from America's all-volunteer force.
Vexed Warrior, USAFE
 
5/5/2011 4:56:58 PM ET
Real cost saving: 1 Tort reform. Real cost saving: 2 on Tort reform. Wake up, Congress.
SMSgt Scott, Florida
 
5/5/2011 4:45:20 PM ET
Rather than charge me more for my TRICARE benefit, maybe the DOD can just take the $452/month they steal from my rerirement check each month and throw that into the TRICARE bucket.
Retired SMSgt, Illinois
 
5/5/2011 4:15:37 PM ET
The TRICARE machine is so big that not even the people on the phones know the policies. We've been told on the phone a certain visit to a specialty doctor is paid for, and then the claim was denied. When we asked for the reason why, i.e. where in the handbook or website, all we get is because the letter we sent you says so. If you are TRICARE Prime, it is my experience that most doctors in-network are HORRIBLE.
Capt, Dacis-Monthan AFB AZ
 
5/5/2011 3:34:31 PM ET
The additional amount per month for insurance, and even having to pay more for prescriptions, can be absorbed by most beneficiaries. The real problem is the item regulatory changes that would eliminate special subsidies for community hospitals that serve beneficiaries, Mr. Hale said. When hospitals stop being able to cover costs to treat TRICARE patients, guess what happens? You will hear, "I am sorry, but we dont take TRICARE." It is already getting harder to find doctors who will take TRICARE, because the reimbursement amounts are much smaller than other insurance. So the only doctors available are either those doctors who take TRICARE as a part of public service or doctors who really need more patients but may not be the best.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
5/5/2011 2:44:08 PM ET
Raising the rates for premiums is fine, but future rate increases shouldn't be automatic. They should be justified separately each time.
Robert, Eglin AFB
 
5/5/2011 1:57:41 PM ET
Yep, just increase the retiree benefit costs to offset TRICARE increases. Another ripoff for veterans -- especially disabled vets of so-called working age. Not thought out well and a stab in the back for retirees. Watch out, active duty. The promises are never kept.
CMSgt Ken Chandler, Arizona
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
California Air Guard members prepare to assist with Hurricane Sandy response

Outreach to teach: Volunteers connect with Afghan children  |  VIDEO

Missing for 46 years, air commando laid to rest

Air mobility response team readies for 'Sandy'

As Sandy closes in, Mobility Airmen stand ready

Air Force Week in Photos

U.K. F-35 fleet increases capability at Eglin AFB

Avon Park Air Force Range receives Interior Secretary award

Former Little Rock AFB commander and spouse receive 2012 O'Malley award

Reservist sets latest mark in battle for Schriever track record

CSAF shares perspective during AETC Senior Leader Conference

Thule boilers save big in first year

Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing