Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > AFSO21 Rapid Improvement Event streamlines report process
 
Photos 
Osan AFSO21 RIE
Capt. Christopher Moeller (left) briefs Col. Patrick C. Malackowski (far right) during an Air Force Smart Operations for the 21st Century Rapid Improvement Event Oct. 8, 2010, at Osan Air Base, South Korea. Captain Moeller is assigned to the 51st Fighter Wing and Colonel Malackowski is the 51st FW commander. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Eric Burks)
Download HiRes
AFSO21 Rapid Improvement Event streamlines report process

Posted 10/19/2010 Email story   Print story

    


by Staff Sgt. David Whitecar
51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs


10/19/2010 - OSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea (AFNS) -- Officials here are bringing change to the performance reporting process, thanks to a recent week-long Air Force Smart Operations for the 21st Century Rapid Improvement Event.

Subject matter experts from the wing gathered with a goal of streamlining the enlisted and officer performance reports processes -- doing things right the first time. Performance report specialists from all units laid bare the current EPR and OPR processes from start to finish, highlighting deficiencies and waste. At the end of the week, they outlined a renewed and streamlined process, reducing the number of people involved, while delivering a higher-quality product at each stop.

"I think it's going to help out because it will create standard roles for everybody," said 2nd Lt. Emilee Stewart, the 51st Operations Group executive officer. "The quality will be better, because everybody knows their job."

Capt. Kimberly Jennings, from the 51st Force Support Squadron, said the objective is to be 100 percent on-time for all reports. Under the current process, performance reports have been delayed dramatically. Reports for some Osan Air Base Airmen were taking up to 138 days to process from start to finish. The goal is to reduce that time to 45 days.

During the RIE, team members identified layers and quality as major deficiencies in the current process.

Master Sgt. Chad Chapman, the 51st Fighter Wing executive staff superintendent, said multiple layers of "eyes on" each performance report often leads to complacency.

"Throwing more people at it doesn't solve the problem," he said. "Even simple errors such as a missing signature or unchecked box were going unnoticed as each level assumed the one below them had already scrubbed the report."

Another goal of the plan is standardization -- minimizing style differences among reviewers.

To address this concern, a new Osan AB EPR/OPR writing guide will soon be made available to the base, providing in-depth guidance for producing quality reports.

Staff Sgt. Stacy Jordan, from the 51st FSS, said the RIE was eye-opening.

"I learned why the process was taking so long, and how many people were involved," she said. "I think streamlining the process is going to be very helpful, and it will work if (leaders hold)  everyone accountable."

To that end,  "I will hold our wing accountable to the process, but I need you as experts to train and 'buddy-up' your first sergeants," said Col. Patrick C. Malackowski, the 51st Fighter Wing commander. "For those of us that are master sergeants and above, we need to look at our front line supervisors -- our lieutenants, our staff sergeants and our captains -- and hold them accountable.

"For all of us, as supervisors, we've got to document this and get the process right," he said.

Col. Brou Gautier, the director of AFSO21 for Pacific Air Forces, who served as the RIE facilitator, said, "The biggest complaint I hear from Airmen is they never have enough time to do all the things required of them."

"I'm excited because this team took that challenge and will deliver a product that will create more time for Airmen to focus on other critical 51st Fighter Wing tasks," he continued. "I think it's going to work and it has the potential to impact processes throughout PACAF," said Colonel Gautier. "There are some lessons learned that could even impact processes at the Air Force level."

(Staff Sgt. Eric Burks contributed to this article)



tabComments
10/22/2010 11:18:39 AM ET
Here's an idea, make the EPR five bullets or at most one bullet per each assessment area and the rating is either promote or not promote. I'm sure that will speed up the process.
MM, FL
 
10/22/2010 5:05:02 AM ET
There's a trick they are totally missing - wait until the last week before the closeout and then write the EPR. It becomes so hot on everyone's plate that it gets done super fast and therefore wastes less time. Well it works for me anyways. I've gotten EPRs through in three days.
Yeah that's right, conus
 
10/21/2010 10:58:23 AM ET
This is probably the third such AFSO21 event involving the evaluation process in the past few years...I believe one was benchmarked by AMC. The evaluation process in and of itself is not rocket science...but each base or wing comes up with some ingenious way to complicate it and wonder why it takes nearly 2 months to get a report through coord. I feel this problem needs to be addressed at the AF level and we should stop wasting resources AFSO21-ing the same thing over and over. Just my humble opinion.
Don, Colorado
 
10/21/2010 8:08:51 AM ET
Also kudos to the team...interesting thing is we did the same AFSO21 at Peterson 2-3 years ago...is there a data base that centrally collects this AFSO21 data?
Maj M, Pentagon
 
10/20/2010 5:04:51 PM ET
Wow A whole article about how great this AFSO21 event was and not a single detail explaining how this process will be improved. A writing guide is a great thing but that doesn't change the fact that leadership all over the base is constantly changing and they all have different writing styles. How about cutting the time each person in the chain has to update the E/OPR to keep the process moving I know the leadership is busy....but so is everyone else Having an eval submitted 75-90 days before the close out date does a disservice to the Airman. They are losing out on 75-90 days worth of bullets. As a supervisor you shouldn't be suprised that one of your Airman has an eval due. My 2 cents.
NAT, DM
 
10/20/2010 12:44:47 PM ET
Kudos to the team at Osan but it is sad they had to do this in the first place. We desperately need a standardized performance report process throughout the Air Force Each MAJCOM Wing Group and Squadron has a different process. Senior Leaders please listen to your Airmen and fix this mess
MB, Edwards
 
10/20/2010 9:15:27 AM ET
As long as you have human elements who differ in writing styles meeting suspenses forget what they corrected before and editing styles the EPR/OPR system will always be cumbersome. I have seen many efforts to streamline the EPR/OPR system--I hope this AFSO21 RIE is a success.
Chief W--Retired, Tennessee Valley
 
10/20/2010 9:14:19 AM ET
Why is everyone re-inventing the wheel. This should be an AF-wide concept Amazing
T, Charleston
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Missing for 46 years, air commando laid to rest

Air mobility response team readies for 'Sandy'

As Sandy closes in, Mobility Airmen stand ready

Air Force Week in Photos

U.K. F-35 fleet increases capability at Eglin AFB

Avon Park Air Force Range receives Interior Secretary award

Former Little Rock AFB commander and spouse receive 2012 O'Malley award

Reservist sets latest mark in battle for Schriever track record

CSAF shares perspective during AETC Senior Leader Conference

Thule boilers save big in first year

Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing