Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Officials reaffirm Pentagon's commitment to F-35
 
Related Stories
 SecDef: U.S. remains committed to F-35 program - 3/28/2012
Officials reaffirm Pentagon's commitment to F-35

Posted 3/30/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Karen Parrish
American Forces Press Service


3/30/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Estimated costs for the F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter have increased over the life of the program, but the Defense Department is working to contain cost growth and remains committed to the fifth-generation fighter, defense officials said March 29.

Frank Kendall III said during confirmation testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee that cost overruns for the stealth fighter are about $150 billion. Kendall is acting undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, and if confirmed will assume that position officially.

"We are doing everything we can to drive down the cost of the joint strike fighter," Kendall told committee members.

He noted the program is still in testing, with about 20 percent of that process complete.

"We are finding design issues as we go through the test program that we have to correct," he acknowledged. "So there are some cost adjustments associated with that."

Kendall outlined the department's actions to rein in the program's price tag.

"We are attacking the production costs by putting strong incentives on the contractor to control costs, to get the changes that have to be made cut in quickly," he said.

Concurrent engineering design is one issue that has raised costs, he told the panel. In that approach, which is intended to develop a finished product faster, a new system may simultaneously be in engineering, production and testing processes, he explained.

"Most programs start production before they have completely finished their developmental tests," he said. "The question is how much."

The joint strike fighter was an "extreme example" of concurrency, he said, pointing out that production was started more than a year before the first flight tests.

Lessons learned during the F-35's development are now being applied to other systems, Kendall said. "What we are doing now is setting up exit criteria so that we don't make that production commitment until we are confident that the design is reasonably stable," he added.

Kendall cautioned, however, that the joint tactical vehicle and ground combat vehicle could experience cost overruns.

Given the design complexity and the urgency common to new defense equipment requirements, "I am not confident that any defense program will not experience overruns," he said.

The department now sets targets early for programs, Kendall said, which should help to force the supplier and the customer to meet target cost caps by making any necessary tradeoffs between cost and capability.

Kendall said he and his team also are working to contain sustainment costs, "which are larger actually than the production costs." Those costs represent the greatest potential cost cuts, he said, and the department will continue to pursue those savings.

"I do think that the strike fighter is getting under control," he added.

Kendall signed an acquisition decision memorandum yesterday on the F-35, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little told reporters March 29.

Little said in keeping with the Defense Department's better buying power initiative, which requires tracking affordability targets and costs associated with acquisition programs, the memorandum sets the current outlook for F-35 final per-unit costs in 2019, when the fifth-generation fighter is scheduled to reach full production.

In today's dollars, that cost is estimated at $81.4 million per aircraft, which when adjusted for inflation is estimated at $94.9 million in 2019 dollars, Little said.

Overall operating and support costs of the program are estimated at $1.1 trillion, up from last year's estimate of $1 trillion, the press secretary added.

Little noted some of that long-term increase comes from the department's decision, reflected in the 2013 defense budget request, to help in meeting requirements for short-term spending cuts by postponing purchase of some of the fighter aircraft.

"We remain fully committed to the F-35 program," Little said, echoing Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta's remarks March 27 during a visit to Canada's capital of Ottawa. "It's very important to our capabilities (and) to our alliances."

The United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Turkey, Israel and Singapore are partners or participants in the aircraft's development program, and the Japanese government announced in December it will buy 42 of the fighters.

"We are taking steps to ensure that we maintain fiscal discipline inside the program," Little said. Panetta has said Kendall and the department's acquisition, technology and logistics team have done an outstanding job working to contain costs for the stealth fighter, he added.

"This is a fifth-generation fighter," Little noted. "It's important for a variety of reasons: to maintain the U.S. military's technological edge, to increase interoperability with our allies, and ... for a range of other purposes."



tabComments
4/2/2012 12:07:13 PM ET
Serving up another glass of koolaid for Congress and the force. When will we all refuse to drink Concurrent engineering design is the biggest problem with F-35 after poor management. This promised better and faster but it has failed to deliver. 'Commonality' failed under McNamara and we haven't learned the lesson YET. And it's gulping down DoD's budget. Did Kendall say 'about 150 billion' with a straight face Canx the STOVL F-35B and have one CTOL version. Heresy from an Airman but the AF has bought USN planes and served quite well with them. Enough of OUR money poured into this aircraft that hasn't even proven that it's ready to test.
DMPI, Al JBAB DC
 
4/1/2012 7:32:30 PM ET
Can the F-35. 150 billion in cost overruns and no end in sight. Something so complex is doomed to fail. We've put all of our eggs into this swiss army knife of an airplane and have gotten NO return. The aircraft it's meant to replace are combat proven and capable of doing the mission. Upgrade themreplace them but for heaven's sake do not buy this piece of junk airplane that promises the world and can't deliver.
c-man, CO - Colorado
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
New York Air National Guard supports Antarctic research  2

AF officials releasing enlisted quarterly assignment listing

Wounded warrior gets help with canine wingman

Little Rock squadron plays crucial role in one of Mobility Air Force's largest exercises

F-35: Newest fighter much more than just 'stealthy plane'  3

Hero at 30,000 feet

Silver Star represents 44-year closure for KIA Airman's family  1

Building culture to sustain resilient Airmen  2

Through Airmen's Eyes: Retired Airman recalls first AF flight over North Pole  1

Living a dream, one note at a time  2

'Today's Air Force' visits AF Honor Guard, Comic-Con

Predators, Reapers break flying record  2

Sound barrier pioneer celebrates 65 years  21  |  VIDEO

Army UH-1H finds new home with Air Force  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  15

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing