U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Paradigm Lost?: Transitions and the Search for a New World Order

Authored by Dr. David Jablonsky.

Other Studies by Keyword

+[New World Order] +[Jablonsky] +[Strategic Theory] +[integrative forces] +[Hobbs realists] +[Utrecht] +[settlements] +[castlereagh] +[metternich] +[Europe] +[Balance of power] +[Kuhn]

Brief Synopsis

After every momentous event, there is usually a transition period, in which participants in the events, whether individuals or nation-states, attempt to chart their way into an unfamiliar future. In the United States in this century, there are three such transitions, each focused on America's role in the international arena. After World War I, the American people specifically rejected the global role for the United States implicit in Woodrow Wilson's strategic vision of collective security. In contrast to this "return to normalcy," after World War II the United States moved inexorably toward international leadership in response to the Soviet threat. The result was an acceptance of George Kennan's strategic vision of containing the Soviet Union on the Eurasian landmass and the subsequent bipolar confrontation of the two superpowers in a twilight war that lasted for over 40 years. Sometime in the penultimate decade of the 20th century, the United States and its allies won the cold war. Once again in the current transition period, the primary questions revolve around the management of power and America's role in global politics. Once again there are the issues of change and continuity. In terms of change, the cold war set in train a blend of integrative and disintegrative forces and trends that are adding to the complex tensions of the current transition. The integrative force that increasingly linked global economies in the cold war, for instance, also holds out the spectral potential of global depression or, at the very least, nations more susceptible to disintegrative actions, as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait demonstrated. In a similar manner, the advances in communications and transportation that have spread the results of medical and scientific discoveries around the world are countered by the malign transnational results of nuclear technology, the drug trade, terrorism, AIDS and global warming. All that is a reminder of the value of continuity in a Hobbesian w

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  A "Hollow Army" Reappraised: President Carter, Defense Budgets, and the Politics of Military Readine...

• 
  The Future of American Landpower: Does Forward Presence Still Matter? The Case of the Army in Europe

• 
  Lead Me, Follow Me, Or Get Out of My Way: Rethinking and Refining the Civil-Military Relationship

• 
  Russia and the Current State of Arms Control

• 
  The Prospects for Security Sector Reform in Tunisia: A Year After the Revolution

• 
  Perspectives on Russian Foreign Policy

• 
  The Promise and Pitfalls of Grand Strategy

Survey: Paradigm Lost?: Transitions and the Search for a New World Order

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

U.S. National Security: Beyond the Cold War
Time's Cycle and National Military Strategy: The Case for Continuity in a Time of Change
The Owl of Minerva Flies at Twilight: Doctrinal Change and Continuity and the Revolution in Military Affairs

View other pubs in the following categories:

Military Change and Transformation
Military Strategy and Policy
International