U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

War in the Balkans, 1991-2002

Authored by Dr. R. Craig Nation.

Other Studies by Keyword

+[Balkans] +[Balkan Conflict] +[Bosnia-herzegovina] +[Kosovo] +[Macedonia] +[sfor] +[ifor] +[Milosevic] +[Dayton] +[Humanitarian Intervention] +[War in the Balkans]

Brief Synopsis

The author writes a comprehensive history of the Balkan wars which were provoked by the collapse of the Yugoslav Federation in 1991. These wars, and the instability that they have provoked, became preoccupations for international security management through the 1990s. After an initial phase of distancing and hesitation, Balkan conflict drew the United States and its most important European allies into an open-ended commitment to peace enforcement, conflict management, and peace-building in the region, importantly supported by the U.S. Army. These efforts are still underway, and significant tensions and potential flashpoints remain in place within former Yugoslavia and the entire Southeastern European area. The lessons learned from the new Balkan wars, and the successes and failures of U.S. and international engagement, will be a significant foundation for future efforts to manage intractable regional conflict. The Balkan conflict of the 1990s, as a case study in state failure and medium intensity warfare, international conflict management and intervention, and U.S. military engagement, provides an excellent framework for asking basic questions about the dynamic of international security at the dawn of a new millennium. War in the Balkans, 1991-2002 is intended to provide a foundation for addressing such questions by surveying events in both contemporary and larger historical perspectives and posing preliminary conclusions concerning their larger meaning. There will, regretfully, be other situations comparable in broad outline to the violent decline and fall of socialist Yugoslavia. The policies of the international community in the Yugoslav imbroglio have been criticized widely as ineffective. However, in the end, after years of futility, the conflict could be contained only by a significant international military intervention spearheaded by the United States, and a long-term, multilateral commitment to post-conflict peace-building.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  Russia's Homegrown Insurgency: Jihad in the North Caucasus

• 
  Russia and the Current State of Arms Control

• 
  Perspectives on Russian Foreign Policy

• 
  Arms Control and European Security

• 
  2012-13 Key Strategic Issues List

• 
  Against All Odds: Relations between NATO and the MENA Region

• 
  Can Russia Reform? Economic, Political, and Military Perspectives

• 
  The Role of Small States in the Post-Cold War Era: The Case of Belarus

Survey: War in the Balkans, 1991-2002

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

Russian Security Strategy under Putin: U.S. and Russian Perspectives
Russia, the United States, and the Caucasus
The United States and Russia into the 21st Century

View other pubs in the following category:

Eastern Europe