NATO Review 2009
Edition 1: The Arctic: too hot to ignore?
Current Edition:
NATO at 60
In the next issue Law, order and the elections in Afghanistan
 Videos
 RSS
 Subscribe
All archives - Schedule
LANGUAGE
Due to translations, the other language editions of NATO Review go online approximately two weeks after the English version.
© - About
  
 Subscribe
NATO at 60
View the first NATO Review video story on the surroundings of the 60th anniversary summit in Strasbourg, France and Kehl, Germany.
View the second NATO Review video story on the surroundings of the 60th anniversary summit in Strasbourg, France and Kehl, Germany.
View the third NATO Review video story on the surroundings of the 60th anniversary summit in Strasbourg, France and Kehl, Germany.
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, NATO’s Secretary General, speaking before his final NATO Summit, claims that there are three major challenges facing the NATO Alliance.
So you know what NATO stands for. But how much more do you know about the Alliance? These 20 questions will test your knowledge on what it is and what it does.
Since the birth of NATO 60 years ago, there has been a number of key events in its history. This photostory provides a brief snapshot of some of those moments.
Charles Kupchan of the Council of Foreign Relations outlines where NATO has to make some difficult decisions: Russia, consensus and global reach.
From NATO’s inception until now, the changing role of the Secretary General has been one of the more interesting transformations of the Alliance.
Daniel Korski, Senior Policy Fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, sets out the Alliance’s challenges at 60 – and how they could be addressed.
As NATO prepares to draft a new Strategic Concept, Jan Petersen highlights the issues he feels it needs to address.
Diego A. Ruiz Palmer, the Head of the Planning Section in NATO’s Operations Division, discusses the evolution of NATO’s rapid reaction forces used in deterrence, defence and crisis-response operations.
Professor Sir Brian Heap, former UK Representative on the NATO Science Committee, outlines the role science has played in NATO – and where it goes from here.

1949, the year that NATO was established, was dripping with reminders of the past and signs of the future.

The world was still awakening from the nightmare of the Second World War. Rationing of clothes in the UK, a wartime necessity, came to an end. Berlin, the heart of the Third Reich four years earlier, was now torn in half, with the West part being blockaded by the USSR.

Growing disagreements with the Soviets took on a new hue, with the explosion of their first atomic bomb in 1949. It was also the year that Communists won the Chinese civil war. Fears over growing totalitarianism were embodied in George Orwell’s book published that year, entitled ‘1984’.

But as well as fears, there were also signs of progress. The first computer with a memory was made in 1949. The first non-stop flight around the globe was made by a US Air Force plane.

In the midst of this, NATO was formed. It was in part a response to two strong emotions at the time: fear and hope. The fear of an uncertain, and rapidly changing, world order was tangible. But so was the hope that the worst was behind us. NATO, a defensive force, became a major player almost immediately in this context.

The intervening years, up to 2009, have seen a breadth and pace of change unmatched in human civilisation. Space exploration, digital communication and mass international travel have made the world smaller and more interconnected.

But despite these advances, the emotions of fear and hope remain strong today. And so does NATO.

Paul King

Editor, NATO Review