U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

The Implications of Preemptive and Preventive War Doctrines: A Reconsideration

Authored by Dr. Colin S. Gray.

Brief Synopsis

Preemption and prevention are different concepts. To preempt is to attempt to strike first against an enemy who is in the process of preparing, or is actually launching, an attack against you. Preemption is not controversial. The decision for war has been taken out of your hands. Prevention, however, is a decision to wage war, or conduct a strike, so as to prevent a far more dangerous context maturing in the future. To decide on preventive war is to elect to prevent a particular, very threatening strategic future from coming to pass. Despite much legal argument, there is no legal difficulty with either concept. The UN Charter, with its recognition of the inherent right of sovereign states to self-defense, as generally interpreted around the world does not require a victim or target state to suffer the first blow. To strike preventively in self-defense is legal, though it will usually be controversial. Preventive war is simply war, distinguishable only by its timing, and possibly its motivation.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  A "Hollow Army" Reappraised: President Carter, Defense Budgets, and the Politics of Military Readine...

• 
  The Future of American Landpower: Does Forward Presence Still Matter? The Case of the Army in Europe

• 
  Lead Me, Follow Me, Or Get Out of My Way: Rethinking and Refining the Civil-Military Relationship

• 
  Russia and the Current State of Arms Control

• 
  The Prospects for Security Sector Reform in Tunisia: A Year After the Revolution

• 
  Perspectives on Russian Foreign Policy

• 
  The Promise and Pitfalls of Grand Strategy

Survey: The Implications of Preemptive and Preventive War Doctrines: A Reconsideration

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional
Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century
Schools for Strategy: Teaching Strategy for 21st Century Conflict
After Iraq: The Search for a Sustainable National Security Strategy
Irregular Enemies and the Essence of Strategy: Can the American Way of War Adapt?
Recognizing and Understanding Revolutionary Change in Warfare: The Sovereignty of Context
Transformation and Strategic Surprise
Maintaining Effective Deterrence

View other pubs in the following categories:

Landpower Employment & Sustainment
Military Change and Transformation
Military Strategy and Policy