U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional

Authored by Dr. Colin S. Gray.

Brief Synopsis

Strategic theory should educate to enable effective strategic practice, but much of contemporary theory promotes confusion, not clarity, of suitable understanding. A little strategic theory goes a long way, at least it does if it is austere and focused on essentials. Unfortunately, contemporary strategic conceptualization in the U.S. defense community is prolix, over-elaborate, and it confuses rather than clarifies. Recent debate about irregular, as contrasted allegedly with traditional, challenges to U.S. national security have done more harm than good. Conceptualization of and for an operational level of war can imperil the truly vital nexus between strategy and tactics. In much the same way, the invention of purportedly distinctive categories of challenge endangers the relationship between general theory for statecraft, war, and strategy, and strategic and tactical practice for particular historical cases. It is not helpful to sort challenges into supposedly distinctive categories. But, if such categorization proves politically or bureaucratically unavoidable, its potential for harm can be reduced by firm insistence upon the authority of the general theory of strategy.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  A "Hollow Army" Reappraised: President Carter, Defense Budgets, and the Politics of Military Readine...

• 
  The Future of American Landpower: Does Forward Presence Still Matter? The Case of the Army in Europe

• 
  Lead Me, Follow Me, Or Get Out of My Way: Rethinking and Refining the Civil-Military Relationship

• 
  Russia and the Current State of Arms Control

• 
  The Prospects for Security Sector Reform in Tunisia: A Year After the Revolution

• 
  Perspectives on Russian Foreign Policy

• 
  The Promise and Pitfalls of Grand Strategy

Survey: Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century
Schools for Strategy: Teaching Strategy for 21st Century Conflict
After Iraq: The Search for a Sustainable National Security Strategy
The Implications of Preemptive and Preventive War Doctrines: A Reconsideration
Irregular Enemies and the Essence of Strategy: Can the American Way of War Adapt?
Recognizing and Understanding Revolutionary Change in Warfare: The Sovereignty of Context
Transformation and Strategic Surprise
Maintaining Effective Deterrence

View other pubs in the following categories:

Military Strategy and Policy
War and Society
National Security Strategy