Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force assures F-22 readiness following extensive testing
 
Photos
Previous ImageNext Image
Confident
(U.S. Air Force graphic/Corey Parrish, photo/TSgt Michael R. Holzworth)
Download HiRes
 
Air Force assures F-22 readiness following extensive testing

Posted 8/1/2012   Updated 8/1/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Amaani Lyle
American Forces Press Service


8/1/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFPS) -- Following months of life support systems components testing in the F-22 Raptor, officials have "determined with confidence" the source of previously unexplained physiological incidents, the director of operations for the Air Force's Air Combat Command said July 31 at a Pentagon news conference.

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta last week approved a gradual lifting of restrictions he placed on F-22 flights in May.

The combined medical disciplines of flight medicine, toxicology, physiology, human factors and occupational health have enabled the service to assemble "pieces of the mosaic" that reside in the cockpit, Maj. Gen. Charles W. Lyon, designated by Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley in January to lead an investigative task force, said at the news conference. The general pinpointed the upper pressure garment, oxygen delivery hoses, quick connection points and the air filter canister, that had been used for a few months in the aircraft, as contributing factors to previously unexplained physiological incidents in which some pilots complained of hypoxia-like symptoms.

"As we completed end-to-end testing in the life support systems components, we are able to piece together the contributing factors for our previously unexplained incidents," Lyon said, crediting an "integrated, collaborative approach by government and industry" in helping the Air Force develop its findings. The task force, Lyon said, leveraged the investigative efforts of numerous safety investigation boards and the Air Force's Scientific Advisory Board to eliminate contamination as the root cause of the incidents.

Air Force officials used intensive altitude chamber and centrifuge protocols to isolate variables in the flight gear and cockpit connections, the general said. They also analyzed thousands of samples of gases, volatile and semi-volatile compounds, solids and liquids, and compared that data to occupational hazard standard levels.

"Managing risks to our F-22 force has always been pre-eminent as we work through this complex set of factors," Lyon said. "In the end, there is no 'smoking gun.'"

The fleet, grounded for five months last year, has flown nearly 8,000 sorties totaling more than 10,000 flight hours since its last reported unexplained incident in March, Lyon said.

In a recent update to Panetta that led to the decision to roll back the restrictions, Air Force officials said the service employed thorough, in-depth analysis to eliminate contamination as a contributing factor to its most recent incident and charted a path to eliminate all significant contributing factors today and in the future.

"We left no stone unturned in the investigative process," Lyon said, adding that the service will continue to move forward with enhancements and fixes as NASA concludes an independent investigation.

The Air Force's investigative process also involved canvassing the F-22 communities to gauge pilot, maintainer and family member confidence in the aircraft's safety, Lyon said.

"I recently visited our F-22 bases, and I can tell you, their confidence is high," he said, noting that no hybrid high-altitude flight operations and high-maneuverability aircraft could be completely immune to such incidents. "There's no other aircraft our pilots would rather fly in the service of our nation," he added.

Panetta has authorized the deployment of a squadron of F-22 aircraft to Kadena Air Base, Japan, under altitude restrictions using the northern Pacific transit route. Upon completion of that mission, the Air Force likely will approve most long-duration flights, service officials said.



tabComments
8/14/2012 9:04:56 AM ET
I love the spin stories on F-22 and 35. Over budget blown schedule and planes that don't perform... yet contractors get return business I bet my next year's pay incentive and award fees were still paid and I've personally seen military leads in the Acq community get awards for and I quote here saving the government money and fielding aircraft to the warfighter. Integrity first indeed
KP, VA
 
8/13/2012 3:09:43 PM ET
Couldnt agree more Patrick the F-35 is even worse then the F-22 budget-wise
Maj Mike, DC
 
8/6/2012 5:10:29 PM ET
The F 22 has not been used in a combat despite the initial introduction of this jet in 2005.The last of the 188 planes rolled off the assembly line in April of 2012. It has cost The United States more than 64 billion more than double the initial expected cost.Now they have given another contract to Lockheed Martin to fix the mistakes of the 188 planes that have issues.The US spends more on its military than the next 19 biggest spending nations combined.This is where our nation needs to cut its spending.httpselectedface.comarticle_full_view.phpArtID67
Patrick Shane, PA PENNSYLVANIA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
AFSPC commander speaks at 11th Annual Air Force IT Day event

Through Airmen's Eyes: U.K. Airman places in 61.2-mile ultra-marathon  1

Academy cyber competition team takes 1st at NYU event  1

Gen. Shelton convenes accident investigation

Airmen rally to help save lives  1

Lost Johnny Carson film found at March

Brig. Gen. Witham nominated as ANG deputy director

AFPC Airman: Don't forget, they're not all home

Muncy Honored With Second Highest Private Citizen Award

AF nominates AFMC, AFSPC civilians for DOD award

Air Force medical treatment facilities not involved in multi-state meningitis outbreak

Hundreds on October supplemental promotion list

Construction of second runway continues at Osan, South Korea  |  VIDEO

Air Force Week in Photos  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Standards? What standards?   3

First things first: Get your degrees in order  39


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing