Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Obama: Defense strategy will maintain U.S. military pre-eminence
 
Photos 
New Defense Strategy
(U.S. Air Force Graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
 
Related Stories
 Strategy calls for military to handle full range of contingencies - 1/5/2012
 Obama: Future force will be smaller, agile, ready - 1/5/2012
 Even with cuts, military will remain capable, official says - 1/6/2012
Obama: Defense strategy will maintain U.S. military pre-eminence

Posted 1/5/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service


1/5/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- President Barack Obama announced a defense strategy Jan. 5 that he said will allow the military to defend the United States and its national interests while cutting military spending in a responsible, balanced manner.

The president spoke about the conclusions of the defense strategy review at the Pentagon briefing room. The strategy review's bottom line is that the United States armed forces will remain the pre-eminent military force in the world, the president said in a letter attached to the review.

White House and Pentagon planners will use the strategy to fund the budget Obama will submit to Congress in February. The strategy will lead to more than $450 billion in defense cuts over the next 10 years.

"As commander in chief, I am determined that we meet the challenges of this moment responsibly and that we emerge even stronger in a manner that preserves American global leadership, maintains our military superiority and keeps faith with our troops, military families and veterans," Obama said.

The president stressed that this is a moment of transition for the military; after 10 years of war, he said, now is the time to make these changes. He pointed to successes against al-Qaida -- including killing Osama bin Laden -- as well as the withdrawal from Iraq and the beginning of the turnover of areas in Afghanistan to Afghan control as signs that the sacrifices American Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen and civilians are having an effect.

As the conflicts end, the U.S. military will regroup and focus on broader challenges, especially as they pertain to the Asia-Pacific region, the president said. Obama had vowed to shift the focus during a trip to the region last year.

The U.S. also will work to maintain progress in the Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa. "We are supporting political and economic reform and deepening partnership as to ensure regional security," he said.

The strategy is not limited to the Defense Department, Obama said. All aspects of the U.S. government must work together, he explained, including diplomacy, development, homeland security and intelligence.

The president vowed to avoid mistakes made in downsizing the military after past wars, such as the "hollow force" of the late 1970s and early 1980s that followed the Vietnam War. "We will ensure that our military is agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies," Obama said.

The United States will continue to invest in capabilities to combat the full-range of threats, the president said. He specifically mentioned investing in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance programs and counterterrorism capabilities, combating anti-access technologies, countering weapons of mass destruction and prevailing in all domains, including the cyber world.

"Most importantly, we will keep faith with our troops, military families and veterans who have borne the burden of a decade of war and who make our military the best in the world," the president said. While the military must make tough fiscal choices, Obama said, funding will continue to focus on wounded warriors, mental health programs and families.



tabComments
1/9/2012 8:39:10 PM ET
Will the ignorance never cease? Bush has been out of office for four years. You CANNOT keep blaming him. Obama's whole platform for his presidency was change. If you hate the state of things because they havent CHANGED from the Bush administration, then blame your current leader who promised to turn it around. And no, Jerrica, we are not at war because of Bush. He didn't hijack the planes and crash them into the Towers and the Pentagon or force those people to crash into the field in PA to prevent any more people from being killed. You spit on their selfless sacrifice with that comment. And if you want to look at trimming the fat, socialized medicine is a good place to start.
Some SrA, S. Pacific
 
1/9/2012 8:06:49 PM ET
The next time I hear someone compare our defense spending to the rest of the world based on amount of money spent, Im going to scream. LOOK AT GNP VS. DEFENSE SPENDING PEOPLE. Compare that number to the rest of the world. Now how does the US compare? Know what GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT is? Look it up, then learn how we compare to other nations in Defense vs GNP. Here's a hint: we don't spend as much on defense PROPORTIONALLY compared to many nations of the world. We are a rich nation. If you look at sheer dollars, there is one picture; if you look at proportional costs and GNP, I think you'll be quite surprised. Make sure you look at entitlement programs and their portions of the budget, too.
Chuck, NJ
 
1/9/2012 3:46:23 PM ET
At Jerrica, we were at war because of terrorist attacks on our soil. But I think you knew that.
bubba, CO
 
1/9/2012 1:10:26 PM ET
Ryan, President Bush signed the US-Iraq security agreement in Nov 2008 which stated that all troops will be out of Iraq by Jan. 1, 2012. President Obama was obligated by treaty to complete that promise. He has failed to deliver on promises to close Guantanamo, use civilian trials for detainees, reform defense contractor oversight and create a military advisors corps. Much more importantly, however, not dealing with defense, he has failed to deliver on his promised to create a college football playoff system. Yes, he really did promise this in Nov 2008.
Maj, SWA
 
1/9/2012 11:27:09 AM ET
@Jerrica. You are wrong. We are in a war because of terrorists, not Bush. Also, how do you define a great leader? Bush has been out of office for a while now. Is responsibility ever going to placed on the current administration? When? 4 yrs? 8 yrs?
MSgt Wills, Peterson AFB CO
 
1/8/2012 2:36:23 PM ET
I believe that Obama is a great leader. Has anyone taken the time out to actually think why were we in a war in the beginning Because of Bush. So before we go and start downing Obama let us look back over past leadership. Bush has cost us billions of dollars. Then he left Obama to clean up his mess. Now with that said I believe that cutting the military is not a good idea but all we can do is pray about it. Prayer changes everything
Jerrica, Mississippi
 
1/8/2012 12:13:54 PM ET
I find it interesting that everyone is saying that we need to raise our defense budget. If you look at the defense budgets for the 10 next highest spending countries you will find that we outspend them all if you combine them. I think there is a certain point where you have to look at waste and I believe the administration is dealing with the cards it was dealt. If we are outspending the next 10 defense budgets all put together we should be looking to trim the fat. It is unfortunate if that trimming comes from personnel costs i.e. separations reduction in pay bonuses and retirement benefits but we in the military aren't immune to the same financial constraints as our civilian counterparts. Time to shape up or get out if you are in the United States military. The military provides excellent benefits such as the new GI bill and for a kid with only a high school education you still have Tuition Assistance free health care and a good paycheck for our education level. Have some
SSgt Dounglomchan Glad to still be enlisted, Incirlik AB Turkey
 
1/7/2012 5:54:46 PM ET
Bill when have you known the current administration to care much about the Constitution
CJ, South Carolina
 
1/6/2012 4:06:50 PM ET
Gotta agree with Jerry on this one the policy-driven spending pace the previous administration placed us on was unsustainable so tough choices and cuts must be made. We are in severe debt. Increased spending and regional presence is not the answer without additional revenues. Want to keep the high level of personnel and weapon systems Who is willing to raise their hand and say increase my taxes to keep that defense gravy train rolling. Less with less is the right approach as emotional a subject that can be for current and former GIs.
Barney, Box Elder SD
 
1/6/2012 1:08:29 PM ET
The bottom line is that the US is broke and has no choice but to cut the deficit. No one wants to pay more taxes so the only other option is to reduce spending. As long as budget reductions are spread across all federal level departments I don't have a problem with thr DoD sharing some of the pain. As far as I can tell there aren't even any real planned reductions in the DoD budget simply a reduction in the rate of growth. Big difference.Maybe the DoD will stop relying on deep pockets are learn to run more efficiently. We could definately learn some things about cost effectiveness in daily operations from the private sector.
Christian, Little Rock AR
 
1/6/2012 4:14:40 AM ET
Stump This President has done just about everything he said he would during his 2008 campaign as far as defense goes. We went after and got Osama Bin Laden he ended the war in Iraq and we have made more progress in Afghanistan than the previous CINC. Stop being so partisan and see the facts here. The President has had troubles with his relationship with Congress but much of that has to do with the Republicans in Congress spending all their time wooing tea party potential voters instead of wanting to get things done. So who is self serving Don't need anyones pity for I am proud to serve under this CINC.
Ryan, Germany
 
1/6/2012 1:07:09 AM ET
Wow. I can't believe that comment made it on the site Stump. I agree completely but can't believe it's published. Well said.
Glad to have retired, Florida
 
1/5/2012 4:39:18 PM ET
This is a time of austerity. No matter who was in charge cuts would have to be made. This is what the executive branch has proposed. The actual programs and amounts must be approved by Congress. People have complained about the statement we must do more with less. At least this proposed Defense Strategy recognizes we will be doing less with less. It is different in that instead of looking at threats and determining requirements to meet those threats it seems to be looking at capabilities and matches the capabilities to what threats they can meet. It is a capabilities driven strategy instead of a threat driven strategy. The difference is it seems to have been created by accountants and not soldiers. But this is one of the reasons we have civilian control of the military.
jerry, Oklahoma
 
1/5/2012 3:49:15 PM ET
Our enemies and potential enemies around the world are very happy to see this.The defense budget should be increased not decreased. To Provide for the Common Defense is one of the reasons for our Constitution.
Bill Brockman, Atlanta GA
 
1/5/2012 2:26:29 PM ET
The strategy is not limited to the Defense Department, Obama said. All aspects of the U.S. government must work together, he explained, including diplomacy development, homeland security and intelligence. So how exactly is the CINC going to do any of this since he has completely, unequivocally, totally failed at getting anything or anyone to work together? All he has done since he wooed the public with his 'change' agenda is ram program after program down our throats. I pity those who serve today under this misguided, self-serving failure of a leader.
stump, parkland co
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
SecAF, community honor Keesler AFB

2012 Football Frenzy underway at AF clubs

Space ops unit takes over newest GPS satellite

Reservists can carry leave balance after training tours

In wake of Sandy, mobility Airmen poised to 'answer the call'

McGuire continues recovery efforts, FEMA base of operations

Hercules flies through the night

Sheppard Airmen spring into action; save woman from burning car

AF accepting distinguished civilian award nominations

Watching 'Sandy'

More than 7,400 National Guard members responding to Hurricane Sandy

Vanguard nominees sought

Weather recon squadron takes last look at 'Sandy'

AF officials eliminate civilian skill code requirements

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Domestic violence awareness 'experiment'  1

Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing