Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force expands FY12 officer voluntary force management measures
 
Related Links
 Air Force officials announce FY12 voluntary force management measures
Air Force expands FY12 officer voluntary force management measures

Posted 12/9/2011   Updated 12/8/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Eric M. Grill
Air Force Personnel, Services and Manpower Public Affairs


12/9/2011 - RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, Texas (AFNS) -- Air Force leaders announced Dec. 6 the expansion of voluntary officer separation measures for fiscal 2012 as part of the service's ongoing force-management initiatives.

The leaders implemented a tailored, multi-year program in 2010 to reduce the personnel numbers to meet the service's authorized end-strength level of 332,800 active-duty Airmen by Sept. 30, 2012.

In September, the Air Force announced the FY12 Officer 10-8 Commission Waiver Program allowing eligible officers in the line of Air Force, Line of the Air Force-Judge Advocate General, Chaplain, Biomedical Service Corps and Medical Service Corps competitive categories, unless specifically excluded, to retire with reduced active commissioned service. Based on Air Force needs, eligible officers may request to retire with at least 20 years Total Active Federal Military Service and a minimum of eight years total active federal commissioned service as of the approved retirement date.

Also announced in September was the FY12 Officer Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program which allows officers otherwise eligible for the 10-8 Commission Waiver Program to help facilitate their retirement no later than Sept. 1, 2012, officials said. The expansion to the voluntary FY12 Force Management Program now include the FY12 Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Waiver Program being offered to lieutenant colonels and below as well as the addition of the FY12 Time-in-Grade Waiver Program and the FY12 PALACE CHASE Program.

The Time-in-Grade Waiver Program is offered to lieutenant colonels in certain competitive categories or Air Force specialties and allows them to request retirement in their current grade if they have two years time in grade and 20 years total active federal military service as of the requested retirement date.

The Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Waiver Program is now open to officers in selected Air Force specialties to request retirement or separation prior to completing specified active duty service commitments or service obligations. Officers approved for a waiver must retire no later than Sept. 1, 2012 or separate no later than Sept. 29, 2012.

The FY12 PALACE CHASE program provides additional active duty service commitment waiver authority for lieutenant colonels and below in select Air Force specialties to facilitate transfer from active-duty service to an Air Reserve Component. Transfer to an Air Reserve Component results in a one-to-one (not less than one year or greater than six years) commitment.

Air Force officials regularly review the service's manpower and personnel capabilities to ensure they align with current, emerging and future Air Force missions. Airmen transitioning from active-duty service as a result of force management are eligible to continue serving in the Air Force Reserve or Air National Guard.

Additionally, Airman and family readiness centers around the world host the Department of Labor Transition Assistance Program, offering Airmen information about the GI Bill and vital resources for a successful transition from the Air Force.

For more information on force management programs, visit the Air Force Personnel Services website at https://gum-crm.csd.disa.mil.



tabComments
1/12/2012 2:15:09 PM ET
I also agree about dangling the AFR and ANG thing out there. I've been trying to get to a slot but unless you are a pilot there is NOTHING out there.
Capt ES, Hawaii
 
12/14/2011 8:49:52 AM ET
I agree with JD's comment. I'd love to take AFPC up on their PALACE CHASE offer to thin the ranks of Active Duty but I spent all day on the phone yesterday with Reserve recruiters and there are NO slots available. AFPC can't be serious about getting end-strength down this way when the Reserves don't need anybody.
pro-separating, Ft Sam
 
12/10/2011 7:46:57 AM ET
I agree with 20 and out. Instead of offering VSP and these other programs, why don't we just lower the promotion rates and enforce high year tenure. We promote 95 percent to Capt and then say we have too many Capts. We promote 90 percent to Major and then have too many Majors. Let's make promotion to Capt 85 percent or less and then remove those that don't make it at their four year point. Do something similar with those going for Major or Lt Col. I understand exceptions of letting those with 14, 16 or 18 years stay in until retirement. Let's cut the bottom people instead of letting/encouraging the top to leave. Move up or move out.
Paul, SWA
 
12/10/2011 6:21:02 AM ET
The AF made the right call. There's too much fat in some of the wrong places, just look as we have most general officers per troops of any service and NAF/MAJCOM staffing is still ridiculous. Totally about numbers. And to the poster above, there is a system in place for that... something called a REPORTING system. Sound familiar?
Felix, Asia
 
12/9/2011 11:24:03 PM ET
all about the numbers...
realist, colorado
 
12/9/2011 5:14:49 PM ET
I think we know the answer, its only about the numbers.BTW the Guard and Reserve units are full. So I dont know why they dangle that carrot out there when its not an option for most people. Our recruiter gets several calls a day from people who want to transfer or join. All the other units I spoke to are the same way. I guess its a way to get people to quietly leave. Good luck folks.
JD, LA
 
12/9/2011 1:42:57 PM ET
We always hear about meeting end strength and these measures are another way to break ADSCs and allow the USAF to meet quotas. But we never hear about what is the plan or strategy to RETAIN the quality people. I am sure we will lose many stellar prior service Capts or Lt Cols and many burner O-6s because they now have a reduced TIG or commissioned service requirement. Or is it just about the numbers? Just curious.
20 and Out, Colo Spgs
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Former Little Rock AFB commander and spouse receive 2012 O'Malley award

Reservist sets latest mark in battle for Schriever track record

CSAF shares perspective during AETC Senior Leader Conference

Thule boilers save big in first year

Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

Top female AF general tells personal examples of women's progress in military

Wizards salute Andrews Airmen, service members

Online access simplifies dependent updates

Aviano unveils first locally painted F-16

'Green Flag' keeps Airmen, Soldiers mission ready

Contingency Response Airmen battle elements at JRTC  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing