Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Academy officials break ground on solar array
 
Photos 
AFA solar array
Officials from with U.S. Air Force Academy and Colorado Springs Utilities broke ground on a solar array Nov. 1, 2010, at the Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo. Once complete, the Academy's $18 million array will provide approximately 6 megawatts of power to the base's electrical grid. (U.S. Air Force photo illustration)
Download HiRes
Academy officials break ground on solar array

Posted 11/3/2010 Email story   Print story

    


by John Van Winkle
U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs


11/3/2010 - U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) -- U.S. Air Force Academy officials broke ground on their latest and most ambitious solar energy project Nov. 1 here.

The 6-megawatt solar array will occupy 30 acres of the Academy's land and is scheduled to be completed next summer.

The solar array is the result of a partnership between the Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs Utilities and SunPower.

"It will cut our power from burning fossil fuels by 11 percent and, by the way, save us a half million dollars a year," said Lt. Gen. Mike Gould, the Academy superintendent.

This $18.3 million project is funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as a result of government mandates for federal facilities to use increasing amounts of renewable energy.

Colorado Springs Utilities has contracted with SunPower to design, build, own, operate and maintain the plant. SunPower will sell the power generated at the plant to Colorado Springs Utilities for delivery to the Academy under a 25-year power purchase agreement.

"This solar power system will create local jobs, reduce the demand for fossil fuels and improve air quality in our community," said Jerry Forte, the CEO for CSU. "We are confident that, with SunPower as our experienced solar provider, the Air Force Academy solar plant will be built to high quality standards and will meet forecast output over the 25-year life of the system."

The system will use high-efficiency SunPower solar panels with the SunPower Tracker system. The tracker follows the sun's movement during the day, increasing sunlight capture by up to 25 percent more than conventional fixed-tilt systems, while significantly reducing land-use requirements. This technology has allowed the project to increase its top expected output, from when the stimulus dollars were allocated to the Academy, through the beginning of construction.

The 30-acre system will prove that solar power provides a secure, independent source of power in the United States, said Karen Butterfield, the SunPower's director of federal accounts.

According to Environmental Protection Agency estimates, the system at the Academy will avoid more than 9,400 tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year, the equivalent of removing 40,900 cars from Colorado's highways over 25 years.

The solar array is part of a much larger energy vision, said Col. Rick LoCastro, the 10th Air Base Wing commander.

"From the development of the Academy's first energy strategic plan in 2009 to our all-encompassing 'Falcon Green' environmental program to the amazing solar array that we break ground on today, I'm here to tell you, we're just getting started," he said.

This solar array is the latest step in the Air Force Academy's Net-Zero Initiative, which sets a goal for the Academy to generate 100 percent of the electricity it needs via on-base renewable energy sources by the year 2015. Other Academy energy efforts include ongoing renovations, installation of solar panels on rooftops, the addition of hybrid and E-85 vehicles to the Academy's fleet and measures to reduce the base's overall energy use.



tabComments
11/5/2010 12:43:57 PM ET
Solar panels are only good for about 20 years so that means over their lifepan they will save 10 million. That puts the project 8.3 million in the hole
JC, Tyndall
 
11/5/2010 9:21:13 AM ET
FYI: the project wasn't started solely to save money; that's a bonus. It was for renewable energy, fossil fuels expenditure, and to cut down on emissions.
Diego, Mexico
 
11/4/2010 5:57:30 PM ET
Spend a lot to save a little.
Big J, Alabama
 
11/4/2010 12:42:26 PM ET
I can produce 2 MW with a windmill on an acre of ground or less. This is not good land use. How much plant life was eradicated the make room for this green power?
MM, NE
 
11/4/2010 10:17:15 AM ET
30 Acres for 6 megawatts. This is why wind and solar are unattractive alternatives. The energy production to land mass ratio is far too low. Ugly solar panels on the Academy's beautiful grounds - Not cool.
SA, Texas
 
11/4/2010 2:53:36 AM ET
Take advantage of some free money? I am a average American who pays taxes to support the military and proudly so. The ARRA should never have been made law because we couldn't afford it and as pointed out we have to borrow the money for this and dozens of other projects to cover it. Too many more projects like this and tax payers will be forced to make a choice pay for solar power or pay for the military. I say stay away from the make work junk and invest in far more important and useful things like well trained and well equipped Airmen.
JEB, Colorado Springs CO
 
11/4/2010 12:01:29 AM ET
While a laudable goal, we must all note that we are borrowing millions of dollars from China in hopes of saving us hundreds of thousands of dollars. So we are spending the first 18.5 million and piling up interest charges as well. We sure can't handle too many more of these ideas. E85 fuel is a solution in search of a problem as well. Let's not boast about that. The real impact is going to be people having to unplug coffee pots at 3 p.m. and hang their power cords where they are visible.
Charles Phillips LtCol USAF Retired, Houston Texas
 
11/3/2010 2:50:18 PM ET
JPL - while I agree that the perceived return on investment is not so great, don't forget that the project is being funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, not the AF. So in fact it will actually save the AF 500,000 a year because the AF is not funding the project to begin with. That ARRA money has to be spent anyway, so I think it's great news that we in the AF get to take advantage of some of it.
ak, Tyndall
 
11/3/2010 2:23:14 PM ET
How much return on investment do you get on an F-16 or a C-17? Investments in national security don't always pay back in dollars.
PB, US
 
11/3/2010 12:30:34 PM ET
They're spending 18.3 million to save 0.5 million per year. So the project will pay for itself after 37 years No exactly the Return on Investment I look for in my portfolio.
JPL, LAFB
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

Top female AF general tells personal examples of women's progress in military

Wizards salute Andrews Airmen, service members

Online access simplifies dependent updates

Aviano unveils first locally painted F-16

'Green Flag' keeps Airmen, Soldiers mission ready

Contingency Response Airmen battle elements at JRTC  1

AF awards $25K to essay winners

Through Airmen's Eyes: Ultimate wingman helps save friend's life  12

Declassified document shows 'real' flying saucer

Hurlburt Airman found dead after boating mishap identified

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing