Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Health plan to remain free for troops, officials emphasize
 
Photos 
TRICARE
TRICARE to remain free for troops
Download HiRes
Health plan to remain free for troops, officials emphasize

Posted 1/10/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service


1/10/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Though Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates seeks modest premium increases for working-age military retirees who use the TRICARE Prime health plan, the benefit will remain free to service members, defense officials emphasized Jan. 7.

Secretary Gates unveiled sweeping, cost-cutting initiatives Jan. 6, including a recommendation to increase TRICARE Prime premiums for working-age retirees in fiscal 2012, the first increase in the plan's 15-year history.

"For some time, I've spoken about the department's unaffordable health costs, and in particular the benefits provided to working-age retirees under the TRICARE program," he said.

"Many of these beneficiaries are employed full-time while receiving their full pensions, and often forego their employers' health plan to remain with TRICARE," he said. "This should not come as a surprise, given that the current TRICARE enrollment fee was set in 1995 at $460 a year for the basic family plan, and has not been raised since."

Secretary Gates noted the dramatic increase in insurance premiums during that period for private-sector and other government employees. Federal workers pay roughly $5,000 a year for a comparable health insurance program, he said.

"Accordingly, with the fiscal year 2012 budget, we will propose reforms in the area of military health care to better manage medical cost growth and better align the department with the rest of the country," Secretary Gates said. "These will include initiatives to become more efficient, as well as modest increases to TRICARE fees for ... working-age retirees, with fees indexed to adjust for medical inflation."

These initiatives could save the department as much as $7 billion over the next five years, he said.

Military retirees automatically are enrolled in one of two TRICARE plans, program spokesman Austin Camacho explained. Retirees who join TRICARE Prime, the system's managed-care option that covers active-duty members, pay an annual enrollment fee of $230 per year for an individual, or $460 for a family. Those in TRICARE Standard, a fee-for-service plan, pay no enrollment fee or premium. Instead, they pay a yearly deductible of $150 per person or $300 per family, as well as co-payments or cost shares for inpatient and outpatient care and medications, up to a $3,000 annual cap on out-of-pocket expenses.

Military retirees aren't required to report whether they have jobs that offer insurance plans, Mr. Camacho said, noting that having other insurance does not take them off the TRICARE rolls. Rather, he explained, TRICARE becomes the "second payer" for health care, picking up co-payments and deductibles from the primary insurance plan.

Meanwhile, the senior TRICARE officer said the system is poised to support Secretary Gates' new efficiency measures and already is making progress as it strives to provide the best health care at the best cost.

"All of these things help us work together to help us achieve the secretary's goals, and we are already starting to make progress," Navy Rear Adm. (Dr.) Christine S. Hunter said. "We need to be very aware that there is a pressure (to improve efficiency and control costs) and the resources are not infinite. But we are all part of the solution."



tabComments
1/21/2011 10:36:06 AM ET
Randy the government does not offer free smartphones or free cellphones. SafeLink Wireless offers a free cell phone and approximately one hour of free minutes a month to low income households however the cellphone is provided by SafeLink Wireless at no cost to the taxpayer. In the Reagan era the FCC began the Lifeline program. This program subsidies landline telephone service for low income families in order to ensure access to emergency services. In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 this program was extended to subsidies cell phone service as well. This service only includes voice and text no internet. Also we can't all ask the government to not cut programs that we benefit from that would mean nothing changes in our budget. We all have to pay to make the budget balanced.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
1/19/2011 4:40:33 PM ET
It amazes me that when there is a need to spend less money the powers that be always look to the military and the benefits it's members earn. That is right we earned it. The money that is trimmed is only a very small fraction of the overall national budget and will have no impact for the nation. At the same time the government has made substancial increases in free money for social programs that are rediculous. Free internet phones and all sorts of programs for people of lesser means is a nice thing to do. But they did not earn it. Many never will. When will the madness stop.
Randy, Oklahoma
 
1/14/2011 10:21:30 AM ET
military wife if we truly want to balance our country's budget then we must look at cutting costs across the board. 7 billion here 7 billion there adds up. We all have been taking more from the budget than is there and we all need to stop in order to fix it. By the way Secretary Gates is an appointed official not an elected official. As such he does not have a campaign.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
1/14/2011 8:29:36 AM ET
I understand that we may need to look a changing things but lets really look at the entire picture. As a retiree I can tell you that we are at the bottom of the list when it comes to getting healthcare at our local MTF which is more a clinic than a Hospital. As the President imposes cost savings he is targeting those who have served our country and those that got a ZERO cost of living increase and won't for the next two years. That's great the ecomony is down please are struggling so let's just keep putting preassure on everyone with an increase to what everyone thinks is great medical care. I urge our congressional leaders to use our system as their primary medical. I assure you we whould have sweeping changes in the other direction. What ever happened to living up to promises that were made to provide FREE medical for life for our men and women that served our country...I see this is a political agenda brought to the table by those who have NEVER served in our Nations Armed
Ranger_ak, Texas
 
1/13/2011 7:39:31 PM ET
I thought I would put my 2 cents in and that would be the end of it but someone has to call me out. So S.B in Texas, it is written about Retirement entitlements in an AFI so before you write something, check your facts. Maybe it's a good thing you did get out.
JC, Rome NY
 
1/13/2011 3:51:57 PM ET
I believe that the people who served now and before should maintain the same benefits and if they want to change things to keep up with the corporations tell the new enlistees so they can make their own decision if it comes down to that. 7 billion in saving over 5 years is really not that much if you look at the government budget. All they are trying to do is make sure they keep the same pay they have, and cut the budget for people they really don't care about. I bet if military personal go together and gave money to his campaign he would be quick to negate this change .
military wife, sacramento
 
1/12/2011 9:30:54 AM ET
I know some are saying that the guarantee of medical care for life was not written and I can probably agree with that. But I can also say that it was common knowledge throughout the ranks that if you served for 20 years you and your family would be provided free medical care. Usually this was provided at a BASE hospital. As we know these are far and few between. If you think about it if they did not promise health care after you retired then why are we currently and have we in the past provided free health care. Do you really think it was out of the goodness of the GOVERNMENT's Heart NO it was because they promised it and they were good honest men who stood by their word and did what the United States said they would do for the people who served their country. The United States and its current leaders need to look at Defense Programs that should be CANNED before looking at taking away benefits that were promised yes promised to those that served Our Country. I can name at
R Cannon, Utah
 
1/11/2011 11:15:24 PM ET
An ungrateful nation with incompetent commanders and politicians. Interestingly how supposed military commanders sell out those who served. Wonder who'd be stupid enough to join the US armed forces any more. I wouldn't. In fact if I had it to do over again I'd have gone to Canada with my peers to attend graduate school.
Dave, CA
 
1/11/2011 6:56:23 PM ET
Brian I hope your joking about your comment. One of the reasons our country has such a huge spending problem is because both sides aren't willing to negotiate because it will affect them in some way or another. It's a very childish attitude.
Simon, Las Vegas
 
1/11/2011 5:21:01 PM ET
J.C. in Rome NY I don't have a piece of paper saying I am entitled to my retirement pay or any other benefit I receive for my 20 years of service the fact of the matter is TRICARE is what we have for health care and therefore it should be left alone. Cut ships planes combat vehicles and bullets before you cut people and people programs because its the people that operate the military.
S. B., Texas
 
1/11/2011 4:04:11 PM ET
It would be nice if TRICARE would have to follow the same rules that the new Health Care Reform Act has made other health care providers like dependent care to age 26.
awacker, Scott AFB
 
1/11/2011 3:00:59 PM ET
TriCare is NOT free I repeat NOT free. My husband retired from the military in 1999 has been paying for TriCare ever since for the both of us. Admittedly it is much cheaper than any civilian insurance we STILL PAY FOR IT.
Melissa Duarte, Luke AFB AZ
 
1/11/2011 2:07:43 PM ET
What about all of the Politicans who have free medical dental care for life? Why not charge them for their excellent coverage they receive? Oh yeah I forgot only a few served in the military and of course they don't need Tricare. Maybe Gates could ask the Politicans to kick some money out of their pay checks
T , Summerville SC
 
1/11/2011 12:13:57 PM ET
Can anyone present paperwork that said you would be given Free Medical Care for life? I heard this was told to WWII veterans but I have been part of the Military for the past 30 years and this was never mentioned to me. I think we have it pretty good, so where are they going to get the money. Should they start charging the AD and their dependents? I think not. As a retiree I know that things will change and I can accept this as long as it its fair. But just because I served doesn't make me any better than anyone else. We all must sacrifice.
JC, Rome NY
 
1/11/2011 12:13:09 PM ET
The US Government needs to balance the budget but only by cutting the programs that do not affect me.
Brian, VA
 
1/11/2011 11:28:47 AM ET
Its only a matter of time and it won't pay to serve a full 20 years in our military. I guess the cost of fighting 2 wars and paying for all the health care needs associated with them has taken its toll on the retiree healthcare program. Secretary Gates noted the dramatic increase in insurance premiums during that period for private-sector and other government employees. Federal workers pay roughly 5000 a year for a comparable health insurance program he said. There is NO comparison between the 2 programs as TRICARE is right there with MEDICARE when it comes to availability and quality of service. Federal employees are NOT military retirees, so yes they are going to pay into a program just like in the private sector. Military retirees paid with their faithful service. Leave TRICARE alone.
S. B., Texas
 
1/11/2011 9:55:18 AM ET
Balance the budget... just not my part of the budget. If we really expect the budget to get balanced we have to expect that it will cost all of us something. We can't really expect the numbers to add up any other way. Just sayin....
Analyst, Barksdale
 
1/11/2011 8:30:54 AM ET
I served only 10 years but I never heard during any portion of my service that retirees will get cost free health care. Maybe these people served long long long before me. Just be thankful that you have benefits that most people dream of having and having after only serving 20 years. I currently pay close to 500 a month for health insurance for my family and it irritates me to hear folks complain that they may have to pay a small deductible. You are pretty naive to assume your benefits would not change.
Vapor, USA
 
1/11/2011 8:25:33 AM ET
This is all part of spreading the wealth. You take away some of our health care to give it to those who have never worked a day in thier life. I gave this country the best twenty years of my life. I could have gotten out and made 4 to 5 times my military salary but I stayed so I would have free health care and a pension for the rest of my life. I'm already paying for my free health care and dental care. If you raise it so that it's comparable to what I can get in the civilian world then you are giving me nothing I am getting to the point that I am sorry I served my country and I don't know why anyone would serve this country voluntarily We are not done....We need unite and vote these people out of office
Scott, Pa
 
1/11/2011 12:30:07 AM ET
People no need to complain here. Get in touch with your Senators and Representatives and demand the present retiree Tricare fees remain the same. I have already done so. Secretary Gates must NOT be allowed to balance the defense budget on the backs of military retirees. HE may draw a big paycheck but not all working-age military retirees even have jobs.
Otis R. Needleman, USA
 
1/10/2011 10:54:32 PM ET
Just raise the fee for everything in the under 65 group.Then I'll be forced to drop my FERS retirement health care and Tricare Prime can be the first and only payer. Private insurance is really taking the hit at this time. They know it, and are raising their premium over 250 percent, and in most cases Tricare pays nothing.
Gene Smith, Luke AFB-USAF Ret.
 
1/10/2011 9:56:44 PM ET
I totally agree with all previous comment made by other uniform serving professionals. I served over 30 years of active military USAF time and my wife had to deal with that for 27 of those 30 years and she is still with me for the long haul. I remember telling her about all the great retirement benefits we would have after we retired. I guess I was wrong.Carl Hunsinger CMSgt Retired
Carl Hunsinger, Scott AFB area
 
1/10/2011 6:36:51 PM ET
Here we have people who served their country for over 20 years and now want to raise their rates on health care This is a way bigger issue than openly gay people in the military. Our leaders consistanly do this. Show you one problem that attracts the frenzy while slipping another one right passed.
TSGT, Nellis AFB
 
1/10/2011 3:54:02 PM ET
It went the way of the COLA raise for retirees, the way of affordable dental care for retirees through DELTA and all the other promises that were made to us if we just stayed at least 20 years and then retired. I'd do it again in a second, but with a much more critical eye when it came to listening to our leadership make promises to us they have no intention of keeping.
Mike, Florida
 
1/10/2011 11:57:59 AM ET
Ok, Ill be the first to speak out, knowing it falls on deaf ears. What happened to the promise of Free Medical care until Death for all those who gave 100 percent of their youth in defense of our Great Nation? Slowly but surely that promise fades into history, but they should never have promised if they could not honor the pledge. We never placed conditions on how we served, and when we retired there were none who would have said no if we were called back for a real need of our skills. How do you justify giving SS and other free benefits to those who are not American, some not even legally in the Country, but you keep cutting away from the few who gave their youth and whatever was asked until they retired? We look around and see others who receive big Company retirements with medical benefits plus SS benefits and they own their own home. However I still do not regret serving my Country, so Peace may be enjoyed by all in this Great Land.
Mike Solon USAF Retired, West Chester Ohio
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Building culture to sustain resilient Airmen  2

Through Airmen's Eyes: Retired Airman recalls first AF flight over North Pole

Living a dream, one note at a time  2

'Today's Air Force' visits AF Honor Guard, Comic-Con

Predators, Reapers break flying record  1

Sound barrier pioneer celebrates 65 years  15  |  VIDEO

Army UH-1H finds new home with Air Force

Academy cadets to conduct 'Flightline of the Future' research

Intel experts converge for 2012 GEOINT Symposium  1

AF training instructor responds to traffic accident  3

Air Force leaders salute Navy on 237th birthday  1

AFSPC commander speaks at 11th Annual Air Force IT Day event

Through Airmen's Eyes: U.K. Airman places in 61.2-mile ultra-marathon  1

Academy cyber competition team takes 1st at NYU event  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  4

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing