Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > Center for Financial Research





Center for Financial Research

Skip Left Navigation Links
0
CFR Home
People
Research Programs
Papers & Publications
Bank Data & Statistics
Events Calendar
Visiting Fellows Program
Finance, Economics, & Banking Links
FDIC Research Job Opportunities
Search the CFR
Past Conferences and Symposia
Contact the CFR
CFR Working Paper Series 2012
The CFR sponsors original research on issues associated with deposit insurance, banking performance, risk measurement and management, corporate finance, and financial policy and regulation. The results of CFR-sponsored research, FDIC staff research, and other invited papers on these CFR research lines appear in the CFR Working Paper Series.

Working Paper Series:    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008     2007     2006     2005     2004    


Working Paper NumberTitle
2012-03 Inside Debt, Bank Default Risk and Performance during the Crisis
Rosalind L. Bennett, Levent Güntay, and Haluk Unal
2012-02 On the Real Effects of Bank Bailouts: Micro-Evidence from Japan
Mariassunta Giannetti, Andrei Simonov
2012-01 The Supply-Side Determinants of Loan Contract Strictness
Justin Murfin


Inside Debt, Bank Default Risk and Performance during the Crisis - PDF (PDF Help)

FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 2012-3
Rosalind L. Bennett, Levent Güntay, and Haluk Unal


May 2012

ABSTRACT
In this paper, we examine whether the structure of the chief executive officer's (CEO) compensation package can explain default risk and performance in bank holding companies (BHCs) during the recent credit crisis. Using a sample of 371 BHCs, we show that in 2006 lower holdings of inside debt relative to equity by a CEO has an association with higher default risk and worse performance during the crisis period. We also show that inside debt is a better signal of the BHCs' performance and default risk than inside equity measures. Finally, we provide evidence that supervisors issued favorable ratings to the lead bank in BHCs that paid their CEOs relatively higher inside debt.

Keywords: Executive compensation, financial crises, bank risk

JEL Classifications: G01, G21, G28, G32

On the Real Effects of Bank Bailouts: Micro-Evidence from Japan - PDF (PDF Help)

FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 2012-02
Mariassunta Giannetti, Andrei Simonov


September 2011

ABSTRACT
Exploiting the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s as a laboratory, we investigate the effects of bank bailouts on the supply of credit and on the valuations and the real performance of banks' clients. Consistent with recent theories, our findings indicate that the size of the capital injections relative to the banks' initial financial conditions is crucial for the success of bank bailouts. Capital injections that are sufficiently large to reestablish bank capital requirements increase the supply of credit and spur investment. In contrast, not only do capital injections that are too small fail to increase the supply of credit, but they also encourage the evergreening of non-performing loans and favor investment by unviable "zombie" firms.

Keywords: Recapitalization; merger; banking crisis

JEL Classifications: G21; G34

The Supply-Side Determinants of Loan Contract Strictness - PDF (PDF Help)

FDIC Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 2012-01
Justin Murfin


November 7, 2011

ABSTRACT
Using a novel measure of contract strictness based on the ex-ante probability of a covenant violation, I investigate how lender-specific shocks impact the strictness of the loan contract that a borrower receives. Exploiting between-bank variation in recent portfolio performance, I find evidence that banks write tighter contracts than their peers after suffering payment defaults to their own loan portfolios, even when defaulting borrowers are in different industries and geographic regions than the current borrower. The effects of recent defaults persist after controlling for bank capitalization, although compression in bank equity is also strongly associated with tighter contracts. The evidence is most consistent with lenders using their default experience to make inference about their screening ability and adjusting contracts accordingly. Finally, contract tightening is most pronounced for borrowers who are dependent on a relatively small circle of lenders, with a one standard deviation increase in lender defaults implying covenant tightening nearly equivalent to that of a two-notch downgrade in the borrower's own credit rating.

Keywords: Covenants, Control Rights, Bank Loans, Financial Contracting, and Defaults

JEL Codes: G21




Last Updated 3/7/2012 cfr@fdic.gov