‹ Analysis & Projections

Annual Energy Outlook 2012

Release Date: June 25, 2012   |  Next Early Release Date: January 23, 2013  |   Report Number: DOE/EIA-0383(2012)

Market Trends — Emissions

Concerns about future GHG policies affect investments in emissions-intensive capacity


figure data

In the AEO2012 Reference case, the cost of capital for investments in GHG-intensive technologies—including new coalfired power plants without carbon capture and storage (CCS), new CTL and CBTL plants, and capital investment projects at existing coal-fired power plants (excluding CCS)—is increased by 3 percentage points to reflect the behavior of utilities, other energy companies, and regulators concerning the possible enactment of GHG legislation that could require owners to purchase emissions allowances, invest in CCS, or invest in other projects to offset their emissions in the future. The No GHG Concern case illustrates the potential impact on energy investments when the additional 3 percentage points added to the cost of capital for GHG-intensive technologies is removed. In the No GHG Concern case, the lower cost of capital leads to 40 gigawatts of new coal-fired capacity additions from 2011 to 2035, up from 17 gigawatts in the Reference case (Figure 121).

As a result, additions of both natural gas and renewable generating capacity are lower in the No GHG Concern case than in the Reference case. In the end-use sectors, all new coal-fired capacity additions in the No GHG Concern case are at CTL and CBTL plants, where part of the electricity is used to produce synthetic liquids and the remaining portion is sold to the grid. As a result, production of coal-based synthetic liquids totals 0.7 million barrels per day in 2035, compared with 0.3 million barrels per day in the Reference case. Total coal consumption (including coal converted to synthetic fuels) increases to 24.3 quadrillion Btu in 2035 in the No GHG Concern case, 2.6 quadrillion Btu (12 percent) higher than in the Reference case. Energy-related CO2 emissions in 2035 are 5,900 million metric tons in the No GHG Concern case, about 2 percent higher than in the Reference case and 2 percent lower than their 2005 level.

Projected energy-related carbon dioxide emissions remain below their 2005 level


figure data

On average, energy-related CO2 emissions in the AEO2012 Reference case decline by 0.1 percent per year from 2005 to 2035, as compared with an average increase of 0.9 percent per year from 1980 to 2005. Reasons for the decline include an expected slow and extended recovery from the recession of 2008-2009, growing use of renewable technologies and fuels, efficiency improvements, slower growth in electricity demand, and more use of natural gas, which is less carbon-intensive than other fossil fuels. In the Reference case, energy-related CO2 emissions remain below 2005 levels through 2035, when they total 5,758 million metric tons—238 million metric tons (4.0 percent) below their 2005 level (Figure 122).

Petroleum remains the largest source of U.S. CO2 emissions over the projection period, but its share falls to 40 percent in 2035 from 44 percent in 2005. CO2 emissions from petroleum use, mainly in the transportation sector, were at relatively low levels in 2009. Although they increase somewhat from 2025 to 2035, emissions from petroleum use remain fairly stable, as improvements in transportation fuel economy and the expanded use of ethanol and other biofuels outweigh expected increases in travel demand. CO2 emissions from petroleum would be even lower if proposed fuel economy standards covering MYs 2017 through 2025 were included in the Reference case.

Emissions from coal, the second largest source of CO2 emissions, remain below 2005 levels through 2035 in the Reference case. Coal's share of total U.S. CO2 emissions remains relatively unchanged through 2035, because the percentage decline in emissions from coal combustion is roughly the same as the percentage decline in total CO2 emissions over the period. The natural gas share of CO2 emissions increases from just under 20 percent in 2005 to 25 percent in 2035 as the use of natural gas to fuel electricity generation and industrial applications increases.

Power plant emissions of sulfur dioxide are reduced by further environmental controls


figure data

In the AEO2012 Reference case, SO2 emissions from the U.S. electric power sector fall from 5.1 million short tons in 2010 to a range of 1.3 to 1.7 million short tons in the 2015-2035 projection period. The reduction occurs in response to the EPA's Cross- State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) [138]. Although SO2 is not directly regulated by the MATS, the reductions are achieved as a result of the technology requirements for acid gas and non-mercury metal controls on coal-fired power plants. AEO2012 assumes that, in order to continue operating, coal plants must have either flue gas desulfurization (FGD) or dry sorbent injection (DSI) systems installed by 2015. Both technologies, which are used to reduce acid gas emissions, also reduce SO2 emissions.

EIA assumes a 95-percent SO2 removal efficiency for FGD units and a 70-percent SO2 removal efficiency for DSI systems. DSI systems can achieve 70-percent efficiency when they include a baghouse filter, which also is assumed to be needed for compliance with the non-mercury metal component of the MATS.

From 2010 to 2035, approximately 48 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity is retrofitted with FGD units in the Reference case, and another 58 gigawatts is retrofitted with DSI systems. By 2015, all operating coal-fired power plants are assumed to have either DSI or FGD systems installed on units larger than 25 megawatts. As a result, after a 75-percent decrease from 2010 to 2015, SO2 emissions increase slowly from 2016 to 2035 (Figure 123), as total electricity generation from coalfired power plants increases.

Nitrogen oxide emissions show little change from 2010 to 2035 in the Reference case


figure data

Annual emissions of NOX from the electric power sector, which totaled 2.1 million short tons in 2010, range between 1.8 and 2.0 million short tons from 2015 to 2035 (Figure 124). Annual NOX emissions from electricity generation dropped by 43 percent from 2005 to 2010 due to implementation of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which led to the installation of additional NOX pollution control equipment.

In the AEO2012 Reference case, NOX emissions are 5 percent below 2010 levels in 2035, despite a 2-percent increase in coalfired electricity generation over the same period. The drop in emissions is a result primarily of CSAPR [139], which includes both annual and seasonal cap-and-trade systems for NOX in 28 States. A slight rise in NOX emissions after 2015 corresponds to a recovery in coal-fired generation as natural gas prices rise in the later years of the projection period.

The MATS does not have a direct effect on NOX emissions, because none of the potential technologies required to comply with MATS has a significant impact on NOX emissions. However, because MATS contributes to a reduction in coalfired generation overall, it indirectly reduces NOX emissions in the power sector in States without CSAPR where coal- and oilfired units are used.

Coal-fired power plants can be retrofitted with one of three types of NOX control technologies: selective catalytic reduction (SCR), selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR), or low-NOX burners. The type of retrofit used depends on the specific characteristics of the plant, including the boiler configuration and the type of coal used. From 2010 to 2035, 28 gigawatts of coalfired capacity is retrofitted with NOX controls in the Reference case: 69 percent with SCR, 3 percent with SNCR, and 29 percent with low-NOX burners.

Endnotes for Market trends: Emissions

138 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Mercury and Air Toxics Standards," website www.epa.gov/mats.

139 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)," website epa.gov/airtransport.

Reference Case Tables
Table 2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - United States XLS
Table 2.1. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - New England XLS
Table 2.2. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - Middle Atlantic XLS
Table 2.3. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - East North Central XLS
Table 2.4. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - West North Central XLS
Table 2.5. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - South Atlantic XLS
Table 2.6. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - East South Central XLS
Table 2.7. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - West South Central XLS
Table 2.8. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - Mountain XLS
Table 2.9. Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - Pacific XLS
Table 8. Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions XLS
Table 18. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - United States XLS
Table 18.1. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - New England XLS
Table 18.2. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - Middle Atlantic XLS
Table 18.3. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - East North Central XLS
Table 18.4. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - West North Central XLS
Table 18.5. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - South Atlantic XLS
Table 18.6. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - East South Central XLS
Table 18.7. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - West South Central XLS
Table 18.8. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - Mountain XLS
Table 18.9. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source - Pacific XLS
Table 19. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by End Use XLS
Table 55. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - United States XLS
Table 55.1. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Texas Regional Entity XLS
Table 55.1. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Reliability First Corporation / Michigan XLS
Table 55.11. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Reliability First Corporation / West XLS
Table 55.12. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - SERC Reliability Corporation / Delta XLS
Table 55.13. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - SERC Reliability Corporation / Gateway XLS
Table 55.14. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - SERC Reliability Corporation / Southeastern XLS
Table 55.15. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - SERC Reliability Corporation / Central XLS
Table 55.16. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - SERC Reliability Corporation / Virginia-Carolina XLS
Table 55.17. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Southwest Power Pool / North XLS
Table 55.18. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Southwest Power Pool / South XLS
Table 55.19. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Western Electricity Coordinating Council / Southwest XLS
Table 55.2. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Western Electricity Coordinating Council / California XLS
Table 55.2. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Florida Reliability Coordinating Council XLS
Table 55.21. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Western Electricity Coordinating Council / Northwest Power Pool Area XLS
Table 55.22. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Western Electricity Coordinating Council / Rockies XLS
Table 55.3. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Midwest Reliability Council / East XLS
Table 55.4. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Midwest Reliability Council / West XLS
Table 55.5. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / Northeast XLS
Table 55.6. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / NYC-Westchester XLS
Table 55.7. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / Long Island XLS
Table 55.8. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Northeast Power Coordinating Council / Upstate New York XLS
Table 55.9. Electric Power Projections for EMM Region - Reliability First Corporation / East XLS