Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 87 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 93 96 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 86 86 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 89 86 Bloomington, IN....................... 84 86 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 93 89 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 103 98 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 74 84 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 91 85 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 86 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 91 97 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 93 93 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93 97 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 93 90 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 92 95 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 89 94 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 97 95 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 96 89 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94 93 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 93 87 Great Falls, MT....................... 83 81 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 89 95 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 88 93 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 103 100 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 87 87 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 100 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 91 95 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 91 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 78 85 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 96 89 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 85 83 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 94 89 Bloomington, IN....................... 85 82 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 98 95 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 102 105 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 83 80 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 84 97 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 88 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 87 88 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 96 93 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 92 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 89 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 87 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 88 90 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 94 102 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 97 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 84 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89 92 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 91 97 Great Falls, MT....................... 73 90 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 90 85 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 84 91 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 101 111 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 79 84 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 108 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 96 81 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 93 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80 84 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 95 95 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 99 88 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 94 91 Bloomington, IN....................... 83 85 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 97 90 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 104 105 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 71 72 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 94 86 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 94 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 97 92 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 100 93 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 99 92 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 104 92 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 91 85 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 103 97 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 99 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 98 95 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 110 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 88 75 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 96 89 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 88 88 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 105 104 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 91 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 107 89 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 99 92 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 98 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 66 83 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 66 89 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 64 93 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 64 91 Bloomington, IN....................... 61 76 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 87 86 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 91 104 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 51 80 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 85 92 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 65 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 68 94 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 66 93 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 82 98 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 76 98 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 68 91 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 70 88 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 70 90 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 73 106 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 78 88 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86 80 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 83 105 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 80 86 Great Falls, MT....................... 78 93 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 68 82 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 57 79 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 84 98 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 74 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 86 97 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 69 87 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 71 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86 85 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 95 100 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 88 93 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 90 96 Bloomington, IN....................... 97 95 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 104 96 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 103 105 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 73 70 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 103 92 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 100 94 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 98 92 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 99 99 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 99 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 100 97 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88 83 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 99 97 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 106 98 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 114 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 101 103 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 98 91 Great Falls, MT....................... 88 95 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 99 97 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 103 95 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 107 103 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 102 93 Honolulu, HI.......................... 109 90 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 95 91 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 98 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 88 77 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92 89 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 97 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 82 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 81 77 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 102 103 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 88 83 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 88 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 91 95 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 93 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 100 95 Mobile, AL............................ 84 88 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 93 90 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 106 110 Ocala, FL............................. 82 71 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85 88 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 84 86 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 86 79 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 99 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 92 94 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 88 86 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 97 97 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 100 96 Reading, PA........................... 93 96 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 93 94 Richmond, VA.......................... 91 89 Rochester, NY......................... 93 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 89 87 Iowa City, IA......................... 88 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 77 86 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 93 89 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 91 104 Knoxville, TN......................... 87 74 Lincoln, NE........................... 78 85 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 101 105 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 87 90 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 87 80 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 86 93 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 88 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 96 109 Mobile, AL............................ 85 84 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 96 86 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 107 106 Ocala, FL............................. 78 84 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 86 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 79 86 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 80 89 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 99 96 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 96 92 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 89 87 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 93 105 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 101 98 Reading, PA........................... 90 91 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 92 91 Richmond, VA.......................... 90 90 Rochester, NY......................... 93 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 81 89 Iowa City, IA......................... 93 93 Johnstown, PA......................... 83 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 102 92 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 105 91 Knoxville, TN......................... 92 83 Lincoln, NE........................... 80 82 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 109 100 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 95 90 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 100 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 97 93 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 105 93 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 106 97 Mobile, AL............................ 83 85 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 100 91 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 109 108 Ocala, FL............................. 89 88 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 95 82 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 93 83 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 93 82 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 100 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 100 92 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 87 89 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 103 99 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 104 99 Reading, PA........................... 102 95 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 100 95 Richmond, VA.......................... 91 93 Rochester, NY......................... 97 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 71 89 Iowa City, IA......................... 80 84 Johnstown, PA......................... 68 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 77 87 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 81 95 Knoxville, TN......................... 62 80 Lincoln, NE........................... 61 82 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 83 104 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 71 87 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 69 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 72 87 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 81 86 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 84 97 Mobile, AL............................ 70 82 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 69 95 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 99 101 Ocala, FL............................. 61 87 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 79 83 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 71 85 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 73 87 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 80 101 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 64 91 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 70 88 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 80 99 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 84 105 Reading, PA........................... 74 88 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 71 99 Richmond, VA.......................... 65 93 Rochester, NY......................... 75 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 102 90 Iowa City, IA......................... 95 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 86 81 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 98 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 98 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 85 87 Lincoln, NE........................... 89 95 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 97 100 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 101 84 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 90 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 93 93 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 104 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 107 109 Mobile, AL............................ 96 99 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 108 97 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 103 101 Ocala, FL............................. 91 94 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 80 85 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 100 100 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 100 100 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 101 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 93 94 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 98 92 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 99 96 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 108 107 Reading, PA........................... 100 96 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 101 96 Richmond, VA.......................... 98 97 Rochester, NY......................... 100 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rockford, IL.......................... 90 84 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 100 100 Salinas, CA........................... 106 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 86 87 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 101 99 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 112 107 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 103 98 Springfield, MA....................... 102 92 Springfield, MO....................... 84 87 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95 91 Tallahassee, FL....................... 82 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87 89 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 79 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 92 82 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 101 98 York-Hanover, PA...................... 89 94 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 85 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rockford, IL.......................... 87 92 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 102 103 Salinas, CA........................... 112 115 San Antonio, TX....................... 90 83 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 100 107 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 112 116 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 99 110 Springfield, MA....................... 104 101 Springfield, MO....................... 80 84 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95 90 Tallahassee, FL....................... 76 87 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 82 90 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85 87 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 98 94 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 103 99 York-Hanover, PA...................... 92 89 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 82 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rockford, IL.......................... 99 89 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 103 95 Salinas, CA........................... 121 102 San Antonio, TX....................... 87 86 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 99 97 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 121 112 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 109 99 Springfield, MA....................... 103 103 Springfield, MO....................... 89 82 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 97 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 89 82 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 95 91 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 92 87 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 99 85 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 106 104 York-Hanover, PA...................... 90 88 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 89 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rockford, IL.......................... 87 88 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 89 102 Salinas, CA........................... 94 111 San Antonio, TX....................... 73 90 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 84 98 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 96 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 84 93 Springfield, MA....................... 88 93 Springfield, MO....................... 62 81 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 86 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 70 80 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 70 78 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 67 87 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 68 87 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 77 100 York-Hanover, PA...................... 75 89 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 68 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2009 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rockford, IL.......................... 97 100 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 114 105 Salinas, CA........................... 92 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 93 89 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 98 98 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 109 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 114 106 Springfield, MA....................... 106 106 Springfield, MO....................... 93 92 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85 91 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86 88 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 87 87 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 103 99 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 102 101 York-Hanover, PA...................... 95 95 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 91 82 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.