Habib Najm
BES Requirements Worksheet
1.1. Project Information - Computational Reacting Flow with Detailed Kinetics
Document Prepared By |
Habib Najm |
Project Title |
Computational Reacting Flow with Detailed Kinetics |
Principal Investigator |
Habib Najm |
Participating Organizations |
Sandia National Laboratories |
Funding Agencies |
DOE SC DOE NSA NSF NOAA NIH Other: |
2. Project Summary & Scientific Objectives for the Next 5 Years
Please give a brief description of your project - highlighting its computational aspect - and outline its scientific objectives for the next 3-5 years. Please list one or two specific goals you hope to reach in 5 years.
This project focuses on computations and analysis of flames with detailed chemical kinetics. We compute reacting flows, using hydrocarbon fuels, where the objective is analyzing and understanding reacting flow structure. Our work provides improved understanding of the detailed structure of hydrocarbon flames and their interaction with transport processes in two-dimensional laboratory scale flows. Such understanding is important for building simplified flow-flame interaction models for more complex combustion systems.
The computational challenges are largely driven by the complexity and stiffness of chemical models, and the large range of length and time scales in these flows. We use highly resolved spatial meshes in 2D and employ operator-split time integration with implicit stiff time integration of chemical source terms.
In the next 3-5 years we plan to extend our current computations with complex hydrocarbon fuels to physical problems of enhanced complexity. This will include initially steady-state and then time-unsteady laminar lifted jet flames. We will target these flows initially with methane-air chemistry, moving to nHeptane, and iso-Octane fuels.
3. Current HPC Usage and Methods
3a. Please list your current primary codes and their main mathematical methods and/or algorithms. Include quantities that characterize the size or scale of your simulations or numerical experiments; e.g., size of grid, number of particles, basis sets, etc. Also indicate how parallelism is expressed (e.g., MPI, OpenMP, MPI/OpenMP hybrid)
Our current primary code is "dflame". It is a uniform-mesh 2D finite-differenc low Mach number reacting flow code that is second-order in space and time. It uses a projection scheme for the momentum equations, employing an FFT pressure solver, coupled with an operator-split time integration for the species and energy equations. We use an RKC/RK2 time integrator for the transport terms and an implicit time integrator for the chemistry terms. We typically use meshes on the order of 1024x2048, and have used up to 560 chemical species in the chemical model thus far. The code uses hybrid MPI/OpenMP parallelism.
3b. Please list known limitations, obstacles, and/or bottlenecks that currently limit your ability to perform simulations you would like to run. Is there anything specific to NERSC?
We are currently working on enlarging the mesh, and will need to address scalability issues.
3c. Please fill out the following table to the best of your ability. This table provides baseline data to help extrapolate to requirements for future years. If you are uncertain about any item, please use your best estimate to use as a starting point for discussions.
Facilities Used or Using |
NERSC OLCF ACLF NSF Centers Other: |
Architectures Used |
Cray XT IBM Power BlueGene Linux Cluster Other: |
Total Computational Hours Used per Year |
122,000 Core-Hours |
NERSC Hours Used in 2009 |
122,000 Core-Hours |
Number of Cores Used in Typical Production Run |
1936 |
Wallclock Hours of Single Typical Production Run |
20-36 |
Total Memory Used per Run |
24 GB |
Minimum Memory Required per Core |
0.24 GB |
Total Data Read & Written per Run |
20 GB |
Size of Checkpoint File(s) |
6 GB |
Amount of Data Moved In/Out of NERSC |
80 GB per year |
On-Line File Storage Required (For I/O from a Running Job) |
0.03 GB and 1 Files |
Off-Line Archival Storage Required |
GB and Files |
Please list any required or important software, services, or infrastructure (beyond supercomputing and standard storage infrastructure) provided by HPC centers or system vendors.
DVODE, LAPACK, NERSC consulting, craypat
4. HPC Requirements in 5 Years
4a. We are formulating the requirements for NERSC that will enable you to meet the goals you outlined in Section 2 above. Please fill out the following table to the best of your ability. If you are uncertain about any item, please use your best estimate to use as a starting point for discussions at the workshop.
Computational Hours Required per Year |
|
Anticipated Number of Cores to be Used in a Typical Production Run |
|
Anticipated Wallclock to be Used in a Typical Production Run Using the Number of Cores Given Above |
|
Anticipated Total Memory Used per Run |
GB |
Anticipated Minimum Memory Required per Core |
GB |
Anticipated total data read & written per run |
GB |
Anticipated size of checkpoint file(s) |
GB |
Anticipated On-Line File Storage Required (For I/O from a Running Job) |
GB and Files |
Anticipated Amount of Data Moved In/Out of NERSC |
GB per |
Anticipated Off-Line Archival Storage Required |
GB and Files |
4b. What changes to codes, mathematical methods and/or algorithms do you anticipate will be needed to achieve this project's scientific objectives over the next 5 years.
We will need to improve parallel scalability.
4c. Please list any known or anticipated architectural requirements (e.g., 2 GB memory/core, interconnect latency < 3 #s).
4d. Please list any new software, services, or infrastructure support you will need over the next 5 years.
4e. It is believed that the dominant HPC architecture in the next 3-5 years will incorporate processing elements composed of 10s-1,000s of individual cores, perhaps GPUs or other accelerators. It is unlikely that a programming model based solely on MPI will be effective, or even supported, on these machines. Do you have a strategy for computing in such an environment? If so, please briefly describe it.
Yes we have a hybrid MPI-OpenMP code in place.
New Science With New Resources
To help us get a better understanding of the quantitative requirements we've asked for above, please tell us: What significant scientific progress could you achieve over the next 5 years with access to 50X the HPC resources you currently have access to at NERSC? What would be the benefits to your research field if you were given access to these kinds of resources?
Please explain what aspects of "expanded HPC resources" are important for your project (e.g., more CPU hours, more memory, more storage, more throughput for small jobs, ability to handle very large jobs).