Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).

Search General Jurisdiction

Case Title
Keywords
Case Number
Judge
Filed Year
Filed Month
Filed Day

Date FiledJudgeCase NameKeywords: Click here to download opinion
10/11/2012BradenLISA ADAMS, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated V. THE UNITED STATES [10-60C]Class Action Settlement; 38 U.S.C. §§ 7453, 7454; RCFC 23(e)(2)(Settlement of class action).
10/09/2012BradenPHOENIX MANAGEMENT, INC. V. THE UNITED STATES [12-325C]Bid protest; Executive Order 13,495, 74 Fed. Reg. 6103 (2009); Federal Acquisition Regulations 3.104-7(a)(1) (duty to report violations involving proprietary or source selection sensitive information)
10/04/2012HewittCAREY W. BROOKER et al V. THE UNITED STATES [12-605C]Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Pro Se; Bad-Faith Conduct; Sanction Pursuant to Court's Inherent Power
10/03/2012MargolisRUTH R. MILLER V. THE UNITED STATES [11-766C]OPINION
10/03/2012WheelerEXTREME COATINGS, INC. V. THE UNITED STATES [11-895C]Contract Disputes Act; Failure of Contractor to Submit Claim to Contracting Officer Where Jurisdiction Exists as to Other Claims
10/02/2012AllegraCLARENCE GANAWAY V. THE UNITED STATES [12-654C]OPINION AND ORDER
10/02/2012Miller, C.CLARENCE and HELEN ANN CHAPMAN, et al. V. THE UNITED STATES [12-183L]Takings; Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a) (2006); wildfire control; destruction of timber; destruction of personal property; RCFC 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
10/01/2012BushGOLDEN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. V. THE UNITED STATES [12-317C]Pre-Award Bid Protest; Cardinal Change Doctrine; Whether Amendment of Solicitation Requires New Competition; Proper Standing Test for Pre-Award Bid Protests When Bids Have Been Received and Evaluated.
09/28/2012BradenJOHN DACOSTA et al., v. THE UNITED STATES [10-674 T]MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
09/28/2012SmithCHARLES J. RUSSELL V. THE UNITED STATES [08-349C]Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Arbitrary and Capricious Standard of Review; Substantial Evidence, Physical Evaluation Board; Disability Rating; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; 38 C.F.R. § 4.130.