By Jonathan Welsh
- Jonathan Welsh
- Mazda CX-5
It seems like the old-fashioned car can’t catch a break. In the 1990s many drivers ditched their traditional sedans in favor of sport-utility vehicles and large pickup trucks.
Rising fuel prices eventually put the brakes on that trend, but consumers still appreciate certain truck-style qualities like a high, upright seating position and a cabin with more headroom that is easier to enter and exit without ducking one’s head. Could those traits be built into a more fuel-efficient vehicle?
Enter the compact crossover.
Many car makers these days are betting on small sport-utility vehicles that are based on small-car platforms. These vehicles are cheap to develop because the chassis is mostly there already, underpinning their small cars. Crossovers also have more profit potential as drivers are generally willing to pay more for them than for compact cars. The Mazda CX-5′s base price ranges from $20,695 to $27, 045. The Mazda3 compact sedan costs $15,200 to $22,900.
Mazda’s CX-5 is meant to compete with other new or redesigned models including the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape. It is also meant to give a roomier, more flexible option to drivers on a small-car budget. The CX-5 is a lot of vehicle and drivers are likely to find it more comfortable and easy to live with in day-to-day use.
It seems like the old-fashioned car can’t catch a break. In the 1990s many drivers ditched their traditional sedans in favor of sport-utility vehicles and large pickup trucks.
Rising fuel prices eventually put the brakes on that trend, but consumers still appreciate certain truck-style qualities like a high, upright seating position and a cabin with more headroom that is easier to enter and exit without ducking one’s head. Could those traits be built into a more fuel-efficient vehicle?
Enter the compact crossover.
Many car makers these days are betting on small sport-utility vehicles that are based on small-car platforms. These vehicles are cheap to develop because the chassis is mostly there already, underpinning their small cars. Crossovers also have more profit potential as drivers are generally willing to pay more for them than for compact cars. The CX-5′s base price ranges from $20,695 to $27,045. The Mazda3 compact sedan costs $15,200 to $22,900.
Mazda’s CX-5 is meant to compete with other new or redesigned models including the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape. It is also meant to give a roomier, more flexible option to drivers on a small-car budget. The CX-5 is a lot of vehicle and drivers are likely to find it more comfortable and easy to live with in day-to-day use.
Compared with compact cars like the Mazda3, the CX-5 is easier to get into and feels like a larger vehicle. I felt fresh after driving long distances that typically leave me stiff and worn-out when driving small cars. The CX-5 also gave me a more commanding view of the road and didn’t make me feel as if I was sitting on the ground. Its fairly high seat also meant I could simply step out from behind the wheel instead of lifting myself out, which is difficult to do gracefully.
What set my CX-5 test vehicle apart from many small SUVs I have driven is its fuel economy. The front-wheel-drive sport model with a manual transmission is rated at 26 miles per gallon in city driving and 35 mpg on the highway. The automatic version has a 26/32 rating and the all-wheel-drive version is 25/31.
My automatic test car easily topped 30 miles per gallon on the highway with a smoother, quieter ride than the typical small car. Mazda attributes the CX-5′s gas mileage to a system called Skyactiv, a combination of features from electronic engine management to aerodynamics and friction-reducing parts. In the past it has been difficult to get anywhere near 30 mph in even the smallest crossovers and SUVs.
The downside is a lack of pep. While the CX-5′s 155-horsepower four-cylinder engine moves it competently around town, it seems to scream for mercy when accelerating to highway speed in fast traffic. Overall the CX-5 is pleasant to drive, but Mazda’s “Zoom-Zoom” marketing theme doesn’t apply.
We just bought a CX-5 with the 6-speed manual transmission. It is definitely peppier than the automatic version we test drove, and the manual trans allows you to overcome any potential performance shortfalls in real world driving by just delaying the shift a bit. If you don’t need 4WD, just need a no-frills SUV (the manuals are devoid of tech options), and aren’t worried about resale value (which will be abysmal on a stick-shift FWD CUV), this is a great option in the class.
Needed to write you the little word to be able to say thank you yet again on the fantastictips you’ve shared on this website. It was certainly wonderfully open-handed of you to grant extensively all many people would have offered as an electronic book to generate some bucks on their own, most notably considering that you might well have done it if you desired. These basics in addition served as a good way to comprehend the rest have the identical dreams the same as my personal own to learn a whole lot more with regards to this matter. I’m certain there are some more pleasant moments up front for individuals who discover your website. replica louis vuitton bags
Glenn makes a good point about errors
Gents, can you guys proofread your articles?
Looks like the first 5 paragraphs are word-for-word duplicates of each other…and ever since the New Corp acquisition of the Journal, I find all kinds of typo errors in the hard copy, online and iPad versions of the paper. I once interviewed for a consulting job working on print systems (didn’t get the gig) but I can see why there was a need…and still is.
Agree that the 2.0 petrol version lacks punch, but wait till the 2.2 turbo diesel comes to America (sometime in 2013 I believe) like Europe and Australia have now, it will easily be one of the best driving compact SUVs around (regardless of price)!