Ratings for the strength of the recommendations (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence), conclusion grades (I-V), and statement labels (Conditional versus Imperative) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.
Vegetarian Nutrition (VN): Assessing Food and Nutrient Intake of Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
VN: Assessing Micronutrient Intake of Adolescent Vegetarians
For adolescent vegetarians, the registered dietitian (RD) should assess micronutrient intake, particularly iron, zinc, vitamin C and vitamin B-12. Research from a limited number of Western countries indicates that adolescent vegetarians or semi-vegetarians (11 to 19 years) may have lower intake than national standards for micronutrients such as iron, zinc and vitamin C. In addition, two studies measuring methylmalonic acid (MMA) levels showed that lacto-ovo vegetarian/lacto-vegetarian (LOV/LV) or omnivorous adolescents (9 to 15 years) who had followed a very restrictive vegetarian diet (macrobiotic) early in life, may be at risk for vitamin B-12 deficiency (41% of adolescents had MMA >290nmol/L and 21% had MMA >410nmol/L).
Strong, Imperative
VN: Assessing Dietary Intake of Adolescent Vegetarians
For adolescent vegetarians, the RD should assess intake of foods rich in calcium (e.g., dairy products, kale, broccoli, fortified soy milk, etc.). Research indicates that although dietary patterns differ among countries, adolescent vegetarians (11 to 19 years) tended to consume fewer dairy products.
Strong, Imperative
VN: Assessing Micronutrient Intake of Vegetarian Children
For vegetarian children, the RD should assess micronutrient intake, particularly vitamin B-12. Research studies measuring MMA levels indicate that small children (10 months to 11.7 years) of parents who follow a macrobiotic diet, had a high prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency (55% to 85%).
Weak, Imperative
VN: Assessing Macronutrient Intake of Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
For child and adolescent vegetarians, the RD should assess intake of protein and essential fatty acids (EFA). While meeting protein requirements is typically not an issue with vegetarian diets, the RD can recommend that children and adolescents include complementary mixtures of plant proteins. This can be achieved by consuming a varied diet throughout the day. In addition, some research suggests that blood and tissue eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels may be sub-optimal among patients who follow a vegetarian dietary pattern.
Consensus, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades II, III, and Consensus
VN: Assessing Knowledge, Beliefs and Motivations of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
VN: Assessing Knowledge and Beliefs of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
For adult, child and adolescent vegetarians, the RD should assess knowledge and beliefs about a vegetarian diet. Research indicates that vegetarian dietary patterns vary and fluctuate over time. Even within types of vegetarian diets, individuals may not always include a variety of healthful foods in their diet. Vegetarians who are on highly restrictive diets resulting from unhealthful food choices may be at nutritional risk. Specific nutrient considerations may need to be addressed in some vegetarian dietary patterns for optimal nutrition.
Strong, Imperative
VN: Assessing Motivations That Influence Vegetarian Dietary Lifestyle for Adults and Children
For adult, child and adolescent vegetarians, the RD should assess reasons for following a vegetarian lifestyle. Research indicates that the motivations for being vegetarian (e.g., health, ethical, environmental, cultural or religious, etc.) influence dietary practices which may impact nutrient intake. Dietary patterns based on health beliefs may be more flexible than dietary patterns based on religious or moral convictions.
Strong, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I and II
VN: Assessing for Signs of Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Adolescent and Young Adult Vegetarians
VN: Assessing for Signs of Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Adolescent and Young Adult Vegetarians
In adolescent and young adult (19 to 30 years) vegetarians, the RD should assess for problem behaviors such as dieting. Research finds that a subset of vegetarian adolescents and young adults shows higher patterns of unhealthful dieting practices than omnivores or more health conscious vegetarians of the same age.
Fair, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statement is Grade II
VN: Assessing Biochemical Data of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
VN: Assessing Biochemical Data of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
For adult, child and adolescent vegetarians for whom dietary assessment reveals inadequate intake, the RD should assess the biochemical data, medical tests and procedures including, but not limited to complete blood count (CBC), serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, vitamin B-12, zinc, vitamin D, and EFA. Research suggests that intake and/or bioavailability of these nutrients may be of special concern for vegetarian or vegan adults, adolescents and children. Assessment of these factors is needed to effectively determine nutrition diagnoses and plan the nutrition interventions. Inability to achieve optimal nutrient intake may contribute to poor outcomes.
Consensus, Imperative
VN: Assessing Vitamin B-12 Status of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
For adult, child and adolescent vegetarians, the RD should assess for dietary adequacy of vitamin B-12 intake. If dietary intake of vitamin B-12 is inadequate, then the RD may recommend using MMA if available, as a functional indicator of deficiency. Two research studies measuring MMA levels showed that LOV/LV or omnivorous adolescents (9 to 15 years) who had followed a very restrictive vegetarian diet (macrobiotic) early in life, may be at risk for vitamin B-12 deficiency (41% of adolescents had MMA >290nmol/L and 21% had MMA >410nmol/L). In addition, research studies showed that the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency among healthy, non-pregnant adult vegetarians ranged from 30% to 86%. When vegans and LOV/LV vegetarians were analyzed separately, vegans had even higher proportions of vitamin B-12 deficiency (43% to 88%). Among children (10 months to 11.7 years) and older adults (>55 years), the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency was 55% to 85% and 46.9% to 68%, respectively.
Fair, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I, III, and Consensus
VN: Assessing Food and Nutrient Intake of Adult Vegetarians
VN: Assessing Micronutrient Intake of Adult Vegetarians
For adult vegetarians, the RD should assess micronutrient intake, particularly vitamin B-12. Research studies measuring MMA levels showed that the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency among healthy, non-pregnant adult vegetarians ranged from 30% to 86%. When vegans, LOV/LV were analyzed separately, vegans had even higher proportions of vitamin B-12 deficiency (43% to 88%). Among older adults (>55 years), the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency was 46.9% to 68%.
Fair, Imperative
VN: Assessing Protein Intake of Adult Vegetarians
For adult vegetarians, the RD should assess intake of protein. While meeting protein requirements is typically not an issue with vegetarian diets, the RD can recommend that adults include complementary mixtures of plant proteins. This can be achieved by consuming a varied diet throughout the day.
Consensus, Imperative
VN: Assessing Essential Fatty Acid Intake of Adult Vegetarians
For adult vegetarians, the RD should assess dietary intake of EFA. Some research suggests that blood and tissue EPA and DHA levels may be sub-optimal among patients who follow a vegetarian dietary pattern.
Consensus, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I, III, and Consensus
VN: Assessing Food and Nutrient Intake During Pregnancy for Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
VN: Assessing Micronutrient Needs in Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adolescent and adult vegetarians, the RD should assess the patient's/client's intake of all micronutrients, particularly folate, vitamin B-12, iron, and zinc, to ensure the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) are met. Research indicates that pregnant vegetarians did not meet dietary requirements for at least one of these micronutrients. Two high quality studies report that pregnant vegetarians had significantly lower serum B-12 concentrations than pregnant non-vegetarians. In addition, research studies measuring MMA levels showed that the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency among healthy, non-pregnant adult vegetarians ranged from 30% to 86%. When vegans and LOV/LV were analyzed separately, vegans had even higher proportions of vitamin B-12 deficiency (43% to 88%).
Strong, Conditional
VN: Assessing Macronutrient Needs in Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adolescent and adult vegetarians and vegans, the RD should assess for adequate protein from a variety of complementary mixtures of plant proteins consumed throughout the day, compared to the DRI in pregnancy. While research indicates that pregnant vegetarians typically had lower protein intake than pregnant omnivores, they met or exceeded the national standards for protein intake for pregnant women in the populations studied.
Strong, Imperative
VN: Assessing Essential Fatty Acid Intake of Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adolescent and adult vegetarians, the RD should assess dietary intake of EFA. Some research suggests that blood and tissue EPA and DHA levels may be sub-optimal among patients who follow a vegetarian dietary pattern.
Consensus, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I, III, and Consensus
VN: Dietary and Micronutrient Intake of Vegetarian Children and Adolescents
VN: Micronutrient Intake of Adolescent Vegetarians
For adolescent vegetarians, the RD should specifically plan foods rich in micronutrients, such as iron, zinc, vitamin C and vitamin B-12, into the diet to meet the DRI. When appropriate, vitamin and/or mineral supplements may be indicated to prevent or resolve nutrient deficiency. Research from a limited number of Western countries showed that adolescent vegetarians or semi-vegetarians (11 to 19 years) may have lower intake than national standards for micronutrients such as iron, zinc and vitamin C. In addition, two studies measuring MMA levels showed that LOV/LV or omnivorous adolescents (9 to 15 years) who had followed a very restrictive vegetarian diet (macrobiotic) early in life may be at risk for vitamin B-12 deficiency (41% of adolescents had MMA >290nmol/L and 21% had MMA >410nmol/L).Fair, Imperative
Fair, Imperative
VN: Dietary Intake of Adolescent Vegetarians
For adolescent vegetarians, the RD should recommend a meal plan that incorporates foods rich in calcium (e.g., dairy products, kale, broccoli, fortified soy milk, etc.) or if appropriate, calcium supplements. Research indicates that although dietary patterns differ, adolescent vegetarians (11 to 19 years) tended to consume fewer dairy products.
Strong, Imperative
VN: Micronutrient Intake of Vegetarian Children
For vegetarian children, the RD should design a nutrition prescription to ensure the DRI for all micronutrients, particularly vitamin B-12, are met. If appropriate, vitamin and/or mineral supplements may be needed to prevent or resolve nutrient deficiency. Research studies measuring MMA levels indicate that small children (10 months to 11.7 years) of parents who follow a macrobiotic diet had a high prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency (55% to 85%).
Weak, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades II and III
VN: Diet Diversity and Vegetarian Diets for Children, Adolescents and Adults
VN: Diet Diversity of Vegetarian Diets for Children, Adolescents and Adults
If the adult, child or adolescent patient or client is on a highly restrictive vegetarian diet with a narrow range of food choices, then the RD should educate them on the importance of including a variety of foods within their diet to meet their nutritional needs. When appropriate, vitamin and/or mineral supplements may be indicated. Research shows that vegetarian dietary patterns vary and fluctuate over time. Even within types of vegetarian diets, individuals vary in the extent to which they include a variety of plant-based foods. Vegetarians who are on highly restrictive diets resulting from unhealthful food choices may be at nutritional risk.
Strong, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I and II
VN: Macronutrient Intake of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
VN Protein Intake of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
For adult, child and adolescent vegetarians, the RD should develop a nutrition prescription providing adequate protein, and offer comprehensive nutrition education and skill development on planning a diet which provides a variety of protein foods. While meeting protein requirements is typically not an issue with vegetarian diets, the RD can recommend including complementary mixtures of plant proteins. This can be achieved by consuming a varied diet throughout the day.
Consensus, Imperative
VN: Essential Fatty Acid Intake of Adult, Child and Adolescent Vegetarians
In the adult, child or adolescent vegetarian, if nutrition assessment of intake or blood levels of EPA and DHA reveals a potential deficiency or lower than optimal levels, the RD should counsel the patient or client to increase EPA and DHA levels by any of the following methods (as appropriate based on RD clinical judgment):
- Increasing intake of foods rich in EPA and DHA
- EPA and DHA supplementation
- Increase endogenous synthesis of EFA by decreasing intake of omega-6 fatty acid as well as reducing the amount of saturated fat and trans fat in the diet
Consensus, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are based on Consensus
VN: Micronutrient Intake of Adult Vegetarians
VN: Micronutrient Intake of Adult Vegetarians
For adult vegetarian patients or clients, the RD should design a nutrition prescription to ensure the DRI for all micronutrients, particularly vitamin B-12, are met. When appropriate, vitamin and/or mineral supplements may be indicated to prevent or resolve nutrient deficiency. Research studies measuring MMA levels showed that the prevalence of B-12 deficiency among healthy, non-pregnant adult vegetarians ranged from 30% to 86%. When vegans and LOV/LV were analyzed separately, vegans had even higher proportions of vitamin B-12 deficiency (43% to 88%). Among older adults (>55 years), the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency was 46.9% to 68%.
Fair, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I and III
VN: Nutrition Counseling to Support a Therapeutic Vegetarian Diet for Adults
VN: Nutrition Counseling to Support Therapeutic Vegetarian Diets for Adults
If a vegetarian diet is proposed as a therapeutic diet according to stage in the life cycle and disease state for adults, the RD should employ a variety of counseling approaches and strategies to promote adherence to the diet. Research shows that intensive support (e.g., frequent encounters, cooking demonstration, incentives, etc.) can improve nutrition-related outcomes when using a vegetarian diet therapeutically and nutrition counseling strategies such as motivational interviewing can improve adherence to recommendations and diet-related outcomes.
Strong, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I, II, and III
VN: Macronutrient Intake of Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians During Pregnancy
VN: Protein Intake of Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adult and adolescent vegetarians and vegans, the RD should develop a nutrition prescription and offer comprehensive nutrition education and skill development on planning a diet which provides adequate protein from a variety of complementary mixtures of plant proteins consumed throughout the day. While research indicates that pregnant vegetarians typically had lower protein intake than pregnant omnivores, they met or exceeded the national standards for protein intake for pregnant women in the populations studied.
Weak, Imperative
VN: Essential Fatty Acid Intake of Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For the pregnant adolescent or adult vegetarian, if nutrition assessment of intake or blood levels of EPA and DHA reveals a potential deficiency or lower than optimal levels, the RD should counsel the patient or client to increase EPA and DHA levels by any of the following methods (as appropriate based on RD clinical judgment):
- Increasing intake of foods rich in EPA and DHA
- EPA and DHA supplementation
- Increase endogenous synthesis of essential fatty acids (EFA) by decreasing intake of omega-6 fatty acid as well as reducing the amount of saturated fat and trans fat in the diet
Consensus, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grade III and Consensus
VN: Micronutrient Intake in Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians During Pregnancy
VN: Micronutrient Intake in Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adolescent and adult vegetarians, the RD should design a nutrition prescription to ensure the DRI for all micronutrients are met. If unable to meet the DRI for recommended levels of micronutrients, particularly iron, folate and zinc, the RD should recommend supplementation to ensure adequate intake. Research indicates that pregnant vegetarians did not meet dietary requirements for at least one of these micronutrients.
Fair, Conditional
VN: Vitamin B-12 Intake in Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Vegetarians
For pregnant adolescent and adult vegetarian or vegan patients or clients, the RD should design a nutrition prescription to ensure vitamin B-12 requirements are met by diet and/or supplementation, including prenatal supplements. Two high quality studies report that lacto-ovo vegetarian pregnant women are less likely than non-vegetarian pregnant women to meet dietary requirements for vitamin B-12 intake, and two high quality studies report that pregnant vegetarians had significantly lower serum B-12 concentrations than pregnant non-vegetarians. In addition, twelve studies measuring MMA levels showed that the prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency among healthy, non-pregnant adult vegetarians ranged from 30% to 86%. When vegans and LOV/LV were analyzed separately, vegans had even higher proportions of vitamin B-12 deficiency (43% to 88%).
Fair, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I and III
VN: Hyperlipidemia Treatment with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
VN: Treating Hyperlipidemia with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
If consistent with patient or client preference, the RD may recommend and educate on the benefits of a vegetarian diet for adults seeking treatment to lower total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, or if appropriate, to reduce weight. Research shows that various types of vegetarian diets (e.g., vegetarian Ornish, Portfolio diet, ovo-lacto vegetarian and vegan) lower TC from 7.2% to 26.6% and lower LDL-C from 8.7% to 35% (with five of the eight studies that provided comparison data showing a decrease between 10% and 20% for both TC and LDL-C). Vegan diets lower both TC and LDL-C more than other types of vegetarian diets.
Strong, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statement is Grade I
VN: Overweight and Obesity Treatment with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
VN: Treating Overweight and Obesity with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
If consistent with patient or client preference, the RD may recommend and educate on the benefits of the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet for adults seeking treatment for overweight or obesity. Research indicates that the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet is effective for treating overweight and obesity in both the short term (less than one year) and longer term (greater than one year), and may perform better than alternative omnivorous diets for the same purpose. Percent weight loss ranged from 3.2% to 9.3% at 12 months across studies.
Strong, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades I and III
VN: Type 2 Diabetes Treatment with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
VN: Treating Type 2 Diabetes with a Vegetarian Diet for Adults
If consistent with patient or client preference, the RD may recommend and educate on the benefits of the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet for adults seeking treatment for type 2 diabetes. Research indicates that a vegetarian diet may decrease or maintain blood glucose levels; a vegan diet may decrease hemoglobin A1c (A1c) as well as, or better than, an omnivorous diet. Additionally, a vegetarian diet may reduce diabetes-related co-morbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, obesity, and hypertension).
Fair, Conditional
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statements are Grades II and III
VN: Monitoring Adherence to Vegetarian Diet Prescriptions for Adults
VN: Adherence to a Vegetarian Therapeutic Diet for Adults
For adult patients or clients, the RD should monitor and evaluate adherence to a therapeutic vegetarian diet. Research indicates that these diets appear to perform as well and possibly better than omnivorous diets in terms of attrition rate, provided that patients receive nutrition education and appropriate dietary support. Many factors may influence the adherence to a diet, such as disease state, length of intervention, restrictiveness, and patient support.
Strong, Imperative
VN: Adherence to Vegetarian Diets for Treatment of Obesity and Overweight for Adults
For adult patients or clients seeking treatment for overweight or obesity with a vegetarian diet, the RD should monitor and evaluate adherence and provide continued nutrition education support. Research shows lower compliance rates for weight loss patients versus patients treated for other disease states.
Strong, Imperative
Recommendation Strength Rationale
- Conclusion statement is Grade I
Definitions:
Conditional versus Imperative Recommendations
Recommendations can be worded as conditional or imperative statements. Conditional statements clearly define a specific situation, while imperative statements are broadly applicable to the target population without restraints on their pertinence. More specifically, a conditional recommendation can be stated in if/then terminology (e.g., if an individual does not eat food sources of omega-3 fatty acids, then 1 g of EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acid supplements may be recommended for secondary prevention).
In contrast, imperative recommendations "require," or "must," or "should achieve certain goals," but do not contain conditional text that would limit their applicability to specified circumstances (e.g., portion control should be included as part of a comprehensive weight management program. Portion control at meals and snacks results in reduced energy intake and weight loss).
Conclusion Grading Table
Strength of Evidence Elements |
Grade I
Good/Strong |
Grade II
Fair |
Grade III
Limited/Weak |
Grade IV
Expert Opinion Only |
Grade V
Grade Not Assignable |
Quality
- Scientific rigor/validity
- Considers design and execution
|
Studies of strong design for question
Free from design flaws, bias and execution problems |
Studies of strong design for question with minor methodological concerns
OR
Only studies of weaker study design for question |
Studies of weak design for answering the question
OR
Inconclusive findings due to design flaws, bias or execution problems |
No studies available
Conclusion based on usual practice, expert consensus, clinical experience, opinion, or extrapolation from basic research |
No evidence that pertains to question being addressed |
Consistency
Of findings across studies |
Findings generally consistent in direction and size of effect or degree of association, and statistical significance with minor exceptions at most |
Inconsistency among results of studies with strong design
OR
Consistency with minor exceptions across studies of weaker designs |
Unexplained inconsistency among results from different studies
OR
Single study unconfirmed by other studies |
Conclusion supported solely by statements of informed nutrition or medical commentators |
NA |
Quantity
- Number of studies
- Number of subjects in studies
|
One to several good quality studies
Large number of subjects studied
Studies with negative results having sufficiently large sample size for adequate statistical power |
Several studies by independent investigators
Doubts about adequacy of sample size to avoid Type I and Type II error |
Limited number of studies
Low number of subjects studied and/or inadequate sample size within studies |
Unsubstantiated by published studies |
Relevant studies have not been done |
Clinical Impact
- Importance of studied outcomes
- Magnitude of effect
|
Studied outcome relates directly to the question
Size of effect is clinically meaningful
Significant (statistical) difference is large |
Some doubt about the statistical or clinical significance of effect |
Studied outcome is an intermediate outcome or surrogate for the true outcome of interest
OR
Size of effect is small or lacks statistical and/or clinical significance |
Objective data unavailable |
Indicates area for future research |
Generalizability
To population of interest |
Studied population, intervention and outcomes are free from serious doubts about generalizability |
Minor doubts about generalizability |
Serious doubts about generalizability due to narrow or different study population, intervention or outcomes studied |
Generalizability limited to scope of experience |
NA |
This grading system was based on the grading system from Greer, Mosser, Logan, & Wagstrom Halaas. A practical approach to evidence grading. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000;26:700-712. http://www.adaevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=1330 . In September 2004, The ADA Research Committee modified the grading system to this current version.
Criteria for Recommendation Rating
Statement Rating |
Definition |
Implication for Practice |
Strong |
A Strong recommendation means that the workgroup believes that the benefits of the recommended approach clearly exceed the harms (or that the harms clearly exceed the benefits in the case of a strong negative recommendation), and that the quality of the supporting evidence is excellent/good (grade I or II).* In some clearly identified circumstances, strong recommendations may be made based on lesser evidence when high-quality evidence is impossible to obtain and the anticipated benefits strongly outweigh the harms. |
Practitioners should follow a Strong recommendation unless a clear and compelling rationale for an alternative approach is present. |
Fair |
A Fair recommendation means that the workgroup believes that the benefits exceed the harms (or that the harms clearly exceed the benefits in the case of a negative recommendation), but the quality of evidence is not as strong (grade II or III).* In some clearly identified circumstances, recommendations may be made based on lesser evidence when high-quality evidence is impossible to obtain and the anticipated benefits outweigh the harms. |
Practitioners should generally follow a Fair recommendation but remain alert to new information and be sensitive to patient preferences. |
Weak |
A Weak recommendation means that the quality of evidence that exists is suspect or that well-done studies (grade I, II, or III)* show little clear advantage to one approach versus another. |
Practitioners should be cautious in deciding whether to follow a recommendation classified as Weak, and should exercise judgment and be alert to emerging publications that report evidence. Patient preference should have a substantial influencing role. |
Consensus |
A Consensus recommendation means that Expert opinion (grade IV) supports the guideline recommendation even though the available scientific evidence did not present consistent results, or controlled trials were lacking. |
Practitioners should be flexible in deciding whether to follow a recommendation classified as Consensus, although they may set boundaries on alternatives. Patient preference should have a substantial influencing role. |
Insufficient Evidence |
An Insufficient Evidence recommendation means that there is both a lack of pertinent evidence (grade V)* and/or an unclear balance between benefits and harms. |
Practitioners should feel little constraint in deciding whether to follow a recommendation labeled as Insufficient Evidence and should exercise judgment and be alert to emerging publications that report evidence that clarifies the balance of benefit versus harm. Patient preference should have a substantial influencing role. |
*Conclusion statements are assigned a grade based on the strength of the evidence. Grade I is good; grade II, fair; grade III, limited; grade IV signifies expert opinion only and grade V indicates that a grade is not assignable because there is no evidence to support or refute the conclusion. The evidence and these grades are considered when assigning a rating (Strong, Fair, Weak, Consensus, Insufficient Evidence - see chart above) to a recommendation.
Adapted by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) from the American Academy of Pediatrics, Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guideline, Pediatrics. 2004;114;874-877. Revised by the AND Evidence-Based Practice Committee, Feb 2006.