Skip Navigation
PrintDownload PDFGet Adobe ReaderDownload to WordDownload as HTMLDownload as XMLCitation Manager
Save to Favorites
Guideline Summary
Guideline Title
Guideline on management of acute dental trauma.
Bibliographic Source(s)
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). Guideline on management of acute dental trauma. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD); 2011. 9 p. [97 references]
Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on management of acute dental trauma. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2007. 14 p.

This guideline was republished in 2011.

Jump ToGuideline ClassificationRelated Content

Scope

Disease/Condition(s)

Acute traumatic dental injuries, including:

  • Infraction
  • Crown fracture (uncomplicated or complicated)
  • Crown/root fracture
  • Root fracture
  • Concussion
  • Subluxation
  • Lateral luxation
  • Intrusion
  • Extrusion
  • Avulsion
Guideline Category
Diagnosis
Management
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Dentistry
Emergency Medicine
Pediatrics
Surgery
Intended Users
Dentists
Emergency Medical Technicians/Paramedics
Health Care Providers
Health Plans
Managed Care Organizations
Physicians
Public Health Departments
Guideline Objective(s)

To define, describe appearances, and set forth objectives for general management of acute traumatic dental injuries

Target Population

Children with acute traumatic dental injuries

Interventions and Practices Considered

Diagnosis

  1. Radiographic assessment
  2. Clinical assessment

Management/Treatment

  1. Flexible splinting
  2. Maintaining structural integrity and pulp vitality with continued monitoring, endodontic treatment, and reattachment of the crown fragment
  3. Restoring normal esthetics and function with fixed or removable appliances
  4. Examining injured lips, tongue, and gingiva for tooth fragments
  5. For small fractures, smoothing rough margins and edges
  6. Pulpal treatment alternatives for primary teeth:
    • Pulpotomy
    • Pulpectomy
    • Extraction
  7. Pulpal treatment alternatives for permanent teeth:
    • Direct pulp capping
    • Partial pulpotomy
    • Full pulpotomy
    • Pulpectomy (start of root canal therapy)
  8. Tooth removal
  9. Coronal fragment removal followed by supragingival restoration or necessary gingivectomy; osteotomy; or surgical or orthodontic extrusion to prepare for restoration
  10. Repositioning and stabilization of displaced tooth (passive, active, and/or surgical)
  11. Follow tooth for pathology
  12. Tooth replantation
  13. Tetanus prophylaxis
  14. Antibiotic coverage
  15. Transitional therapy for periodontal ligament management
  16. Antiresorptive-regenerative therapies
  17. Orthodontic movement considerations, including use of mouthguards

Note: It is not recommended to reposition and stabilize the coronal fragment in primary teeth with root fracture.

Major Outcomes Considered
  • Pulp vitality
  • Esthetics and function

Methodology

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

The guideline is an update of the previous document revised in 2007. It is based on a review of the current dental and medical literature related to dental trauma. An electronic search was conducted using the following parameters: Terms: "teeth", "trauma", "permanent teeth", and "primary teeth"; Field: all fields; Limits: within the last 10 years; humans; English. There were 5269 articles that matched these criteria. Papers for review were chosen from this list and from references within select articles. In addition, a review of the journal Dental Traumatology was conducted for the years 2000-2009.

Number of Source Documents

Ninety-seven electronic and hand-searched articles met the defined criteria and were included.

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Expert Consensus (Committee)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

The oral health policies and clinical guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) are developed under the direction of the Board of Trustees, utilizing the resources and expertise of its membership operating through the Council on Clinical Affairs (CCA).

Proposals to develop or modify policies and guidelines may originate from 4 sources:

  1. The officers or trustees acting at any meeting of the Board of Trustees
  2. A council, committee, or task force in its report to the Board of Trustees
  3. Any member of the AAPD acting through the Reference Committee hearing of the General Assembly at the Annual Session
  4. Officers, trustees, council and committee chairs, or other participants at the AAPD's Annual Strategic Planning Session

Regardless of the source, proposals are considered carefully, and those deemed sufficiently meritorious by a majority vote of the Board of Trustees are referred to the CCA for development or review/revision.

Once a charge (directive from the Board of Trustees) for development or review/revision of an oral health policy or a clinical guideline is sent to the CCA, it is assigned to 1 or more members of the CCA for completion. CCA members are instructed to follow the specified format for a policy or guideline. All oral health policies and clinical guidelines are based on 2 sources of evidence: (1) the scientific literature; and (2) experts in the field. Members may call upon any expert as a consultant to the council to provide expert opinion. The Council on Scientific Affairs provides input as to the scientific validity of a policy or guideline.

The CCA meets on an interim basis (midwinter) to discuss proposed clinical guidelines. Each new or reviewed/revised guideline is reviewed, discussed, and confirmed by the entire council.

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation
Comparison with Guidelines from Other Groups
Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Once developed by the Council on Clinical Affairs (CCA), the proposed guideline is submitted for the consideration of the Board of Trustees. While the board may request revision, in which case it is returned to the council for modification, once accepted by majority vote of the board, it is referred for Reference Committee hearing at the upcoming Annual Session. At the Reference Committee hearing, the membership may provide comment or suggestion for alteration of the document before presentation to the General Assembly. The final document then is presented for ratification by a majority vote of the membership present and voting at the General Assembly. If accepted by the General Assembly, either as proposed or as amended by that body, the document then becomes the official American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) clinical guideline for publication in the AAPD's Reference Manual and on the AAPD's Web site.

Recommendations

Major Recommendations

Infraction

Definition: Incomplete fracture (crack) of the enamel without loss of tooth structure.

Diagnosis: Normal gross anatomic and radiographic appearance; craze lines apparent, especially with transillumination.

Treatment Objectives: To maintain structural integrity and pulp vitality.

General Prognosis: Complications are unusual.

Crown Fracture - Uncomplicated

Definition: An enamel fracture or an enamel-dentin fracture that does not involve the pulp.

Diagnosis: Clinical and/or radiographic findings reveal a loss of tooth structure confined to the enamel or to both the enamel and dentin.

Treatment Objectives: To maintain pulp vitality and restore normal esthetics and function. Injured lips, tongue, and gingiva should be examined for tooth fragments. When looking for fragments in soft tissue lacerations, radiographs are recommended. For small fractures, rough margins and edges can be smoothed. For larger fractures, the lost tooth structure can be restored.

General Prognosis: The prognosis of uncomplicated crown fractures depends primarily upon the concomitant injury to the periodontal ligament and secondarily upon the extent of dentin exposed. Optimal treatment results follow timely assessment and care.

Crown Fracture - Complicated

Definition: An enamel-dentin fracture with pulp exposure.

Diagnosis: Clinical and radiographic findings reveal a loss of tooth structure with pulp exposure.

Treatment Objectives: To maintain pulp vitality and restore normal esthetics and function. Injured lips, tongue, and gingiva should be examined for tooth fragments. When looking for fragments in soft tissue lacerations, radiographs are recommended.

  • Primary Teeth: Decisions often are based on life expectancy of the traumatized primary tooth and vitality of the pulpal tissue. Pulpal treatment alternatives are pulpotomy, pulpectomy, and extraction.
  • Permanent Teeth: Pulpal treatment alternatives are direct pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, full pulpotomy, and pulpectomy (start of root canal therapy). There is increasing evidence to suggest that utilizing conservative vital pulp therapies for mature teeth with closed apices is as appropriate a management technique as when used for immature teeth with open apices.

General Prognosis: The prognosis of crown fractures appears to depend primarily upon a concomitant injury to the periodontal ligament. The age of the pulp exposure, extent of dentin exposed, and stage of root development at the time of injury secondarily affect the tooth's prognosis. Optimal treatment results follow timely assessment and care.

Crown/Root Fracture

Definition: An enamel, dentin, and cementum fracture with or without pulp exposure.

Diagnosis: Clinical findings usually reveal a mobile coronal fragment attached to the gingiva with or without a pulp exposure. Radiographic findings may reveal a radiolucent oblique line that comprises crown and root in a vertical direction in primary teeth and in a direction usually perpendicular to the central radiographic beam in permanent teeth. While radiographic demonstration often is difficult, root fractures can only be diagnosed radiographically.

Treatment Objectives: To maintain pulp vitality and restore normal esthetics and function.

  • Primary Teeth: When the primary tooth cannot or should not be restored, the entire tooth should be removed unless retrieval of apical fragments may result in damage to the succedaneous tooth.
  • Permanent Teeth: The emergency treatment objective is to stabilize the coronal fragment. Definitive treatment alternatives are: to remove the coronal fragment followed by a supragingival restoration or necessary gingivectomy; osteotomy; or surgical or orthodontic extrusion to prepare for restoration. If the pulp is exposed, pulpal treatment alternatives are pulp capping, pulpotomy, and root canal treatment.

General Prognosis: Although the treatment of crown-root fractures can be complex and laborious, most fractured permanent teeth can be saved. Fractures extending significantly below the gingival margin may not be restorable.

Root Fracture

Definition: A dentin and cementum fracture involving the pulp.

Diagnosis: Clinical findings reveal a mobile coronal fragment attached to the gingiva that may be displaced. Radiographic findings may reveal 1 or more radiolucent lines that separate the tooth fragments in horizontal fractures. Multiple radiographic exposures at different angulations may be required for diagnosis. A root fracture in a primary tooth may be obscured by a succedaneous tooth.

Treatment Objectives

  • Primary Teeth: Treatment alternatives include extraction of coronal fragment without insisting on removing apical fragment or observation. It is not recommended to reposition and stabilize the coronal fragment.
  • Permanent Teeth: Reposition and stabilize the coronal fragment in its anatomically correct position as soon as possible to optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply while maintaining esthetic and functional integrity.

General Prognosis: Pulp necrosis in root-fractured teeth is attributed to displacement of the coronal fragment and mature root development. In permanent teeth, the location of the root fracture has not been shown to affect pulp survival after injury. Therefore, preservation of teeth with root fractures occurring in the tooth's cervical third should be attempted. Young age, immature root formation, positive pulp sensitivity at time of injury, and approximating the dislocation within 1 mm have been found to be advantageous to both pulpal healing and hard tissue repair of the fracture.

Concussion

Definition: Injury to the tooth-supporting structures without abnormal loosening or displacement of the tooth.

Diagnosis: Because the periodontal ligament absorbs the injury and is inflamed, clinical findings reveal a tooth tender to pressure and percussion without mobility, displacement, or sulcular bleeding. Radiographic abnormalities are not expected.

Treatment Objectives: To optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and maintain pulp vitality.

General Prognosis: For primary teeth, unless associated infection exists, no pulpal therapy is indicated. Although there is a minimal risk for pulp necrosis, mature permanent teeth with closed apices may undergo pulpal necrosis due to associated injuries to the blood vessels at the apex and, therefore, must be followed carefully.

Subluxation

Definition: Injury to tooth-supporting structures with abnormal loosening but without tooth displacement.

Diagnosis: Because the periodontal ligament attempts to absorb the injury, clinical findings reveal a mobile tooth without displacement that may or may not have sulcular bleeding. Radiographic abnormalities are not expected.

Treatment Objectives: To optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply.

  • Primary Teeth: The tooth should be followed for pathology.
  • Permanent Teeth: Stabilize the tooth and relieve any occlusal interferences. For comfort, a flexible splint can be used. Splint for no more than 2 weeks.

General Prognosis: Prognosis is usually favorable. The primary tooth should return to normal within 2 weeks. Mature permanent teeth with closed apices may undergo pulpal necrosis due to associated injuries to the blood vessels at the apex and, therefore, must be followed carefully.

Lateral Luxation

Definition: Displacement of the tooth in a direction other than axially. The periodontal ligament is torn and contusion or fracture of the supporting alveolar bone occurs.

Diagnosis: Clinical findings reveal that a tooth is displaced laterally with the crown usually in a palatal or lingual direction and may be locked firmly into this new position. The tooth usually is not mobile or tender to touch. Radiographic findings reveal an increase in periodontal ligament space and displacement of apex toward or though the labial bone plate.

Treatment Objectives

  • Primary Teeth: To allow passive or spontaneous repositioning if there is no occlusal interference. When there is occlusal interference, the tooth can be gently repositioned or slightly reduced if the interference is minor. When the injury is severe or the tooth is nearing exfoliation, extraction is the treatment of choice.
  • Permanent Teeth: To reposition as soon as possible and then to stabilize the tooth in its anatomically correct position to optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply while maintaining esthetic and functional integrity. Repositioning of the tooth is done with digital pressure and little force. A displaced tooth may need to be extruded to free itself from the apical lock in the cortical bone plate. Splinting an additional 2 to 4 weeks may be needed with breakdown of marginal bone.

General Prognosis: Primary teeth requiring repositioning have an increased risk of developing pulp necrosis compared to teeth that are left to spontaneously reposition. In mature permanent teeth with closed apices, pulp necrosis and pulp canal obliteration are common healing complications while progressive root resorption is less likely to occur.

Intrusion

Definition: Apical displacement of tooth into the alveolar bone. The tooth is driven into the socket, compressing the periodontal ligament and commonly causes a crushing fracture of the alveolar socket.

Diagnosis: Clinical findings reveal that the tooth appears to be shortened or, in severe cases, it may appear missing. The tooth's apex usually is displaced labially toward or through the labial bone plate in primary teeth and driven into the alveolar process in permanent teeth. The tooth is not mobile or tender to touch. Radiographic findings reveal that the tooth appears displaced apically and the periodontal ligament space is not continuous. Determination of the relationship of an intruded primary tooth with the follicle of the succedaneous tooth is mandatory. If the apex is displaced labially, the apical tip can be seen radiographically with the tooth appearing shorter than its contra-lateral. If the apex is displaced palatally towards the permanent tooth germ, the apical tip cannot be seen radiographically and the tooth appears elongated. An extraoral lateral radiograph also can be used to detect displacement of the apex toward or through the labial bone plate. An intruded young permanent tooth may mimic an erupting tooth.

Treatment Objectives

  • Primary Teeth: To allow spontaneous re-eruption except when displaced into the developing successor. Extraction is indicated when the apex is displaced toward the permanent tooth germ.
  • Permanent Teeth: To reposition passively (allowing re-eruption to its preinjury position), actively (repositioning with traction), or surgically and then to stabilize the tooth with a splint for up to 4 weeks in its anatomically correct position to optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply while maintaining esthetic and functional integrity. For immature teeth with more eruptive potential (root 1/2 to 2/3 formed), the objective is to allow for spontaneous eruption. In mature teeth, the goal is to reposition the tooth with orthodontic or surgical extrusion and initiate endodontic treatment within the first 3 weeks of the traumatic incidence.

General Prognosis: In primary teeth, 90% of intruded teeth will re-erupt spontaneously (either partially or completely) in 2 to 6 months. Even in cases of complete intrusion and displacement of primary teeth through the labial bone plate, a retrospective study showed the re-eruption and survival of most teeth for more than 36 months. Ankylosis may occur, however, if the periodontal ligament of the affected tooth was severely damaged, thereby delaying or altering the eruption of the permanent successor. In mature permanent teeth with closed apices, there is considerable risk for pulp necrosis, pulp canal obliteration, and progressive root resorption. Immature permanent teeth that are allowed to reposition spontaneously demonstrate the lowest risk for healing complications. Extent of intrusion (7 mm or greater) and adjacent intruded teeth have a negative influence on healing.

Extrusion

Definition: Partial displacement of the tooth axially from the socket; partial avulsion. The periodontal ligament usually is torn.

Diagnosis: Clinical findings reveal that the tooth appears elongated and is mobile. Radiographic findings reveal an increased periodontal ligament space apically.

Treatment Objectives

  • Primary Teeth: To allow tooth to reposition spontaneously or reposition and allow for healing for minor extrusion (<3 mm) in an immature developing tooth. Indications for an extraction include severe extrusion or mobility, the tooth is nearing exfoliation, the child's inability to cope with the emergency situation, or the tooth is fully formed.
  • Permanent Teeth: To reposition as soon as possible and then to stabilize the tooth in its anatomically correct position to optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply while maintaining esthetic and functional integrity. Repositioning may be accomplished with slow and steady apical pressure to gradually displace coagulum formed between root apex and floor of the socket. Splint for up to 2 weeks.

General Prognosis: There is a lack of clinical studies evaluating repositioning of extruded primary teeth. In permanent mature teeth with closed apices, there is considerable risk for pulp necrosis and pulp canal obliteration. These teeth must be followed carefully.

Avulsion

Definition: Complete displacement of tooth out of socket. The periodontal ligament is severed and fracture of the alveolus may occur.

Diagnosis: Clinical and radiographic findings reveal that the tooth is not present in the socket or the tooth already has been replanted. Radiographic assessment will verify that the tooth is not intruded when the tooth was not found.

Treatment Objectives

  • Primary Teeth: To prevent further injury to the developing successor. Avulsed primary teeth should not be replanted because of the potential for subsequent damage to developing permanent tooth germs.
  • Permanent Teeth: To replant as soon as possible and then to stabilize the replanted tooth in its anatomically correct location to optimize healing of the periodontal ligament and neurovascular supply while maintaining esthetic and functional integrity except when replanting is contraindicated by:
    1. The child's stage of dental development (risk for ankylosis where considerable alveolar growth has to take place)
    2. Compromising medical condition
    3. Compromised integrity of the avulsed tooth or supporting tissues

Flexible splinting for 2 weeks is indicated. Tetanus prophylaxis and antibiotic coverage should be considered. Treatment strategies are directed at avoiding inflammation that may occur as a result of the tooth's attachment damage and/or pulpal infection.

General Prognosis: Prognosis in the permanent dentition is primarily dependent upon formation of root development and extraoral dry time. The tooth has the best prognosis if replanted immediately. If the tooth cannot be replanted within 5 minutes, it should be stored in a medium that will help maintain vitality of the periodontal ligament fibers. The best (i.e., physiologic) transportation media for avulsed teeth include (in order of preference): Viaspan™, Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (tissue culture medium), and cold milk. Next best would be non-physiologic medium such as saliva (buccal vestibule), physiologic saline, or water. Although water is detrimental to cell viability due to its low osmolality and long term storage (i.e., more than 20 minutes) in water has an adverse effect on periodontal ligament healing, it is a better choice than dry storage. Limited tooth storage in a cell-compatible medium prior to replantation has produced similar healing results as compared with immediately-replanted teeth. The risk of ankylosis increases significantly with an extraoral dry time of 20 minutes. An extraoral dry time of 60 minutes is considered the point where survival of the root periodontal cells is unlikely. In permanent avulsed teeth, there is considerable risk for pulp necrosis, root resorption, and ankylosis.

Additional Considerations: Recent evidence suggests that success of replantation is dependent upon many factors, some of which the clinician can manipulate in a manner that favors more successful outcomes. Decision Trees for acute management of avulsed permanent incisors have been developed with up-to-date information in an easy to use flowchart format.

Revascularization: An immature (i.e., open apex) tooth has the potential to establish revascularization when there is a minimum of a 1.0 mm apical opening. Complete pulpal revascularization has been shown to occur at a rate of 18% among immature teeth. It appears that antibiotic treatment reduces contamination of the root surface and/or pulp space, thereby creating a biological environment that aids revascularization. On the other hand, a mature tooth (i.e., closed apex or apical opening <1 mm) has little or no chance of revascularization. Researchers have demonstrated that immature teeth soaked in doxycycline solution have a greater rate of pulp revascularization.

Periodontal ligament (PDL) management – transitional therapy: When a tooth has been out of the oral cavity and in a dry environment for greater than 60 minutes, the PDL has no chance of survival. If such a tooth is replanted, it is likely to undergo osseous replacement resorption and, over time, the tooth will become ankylosed and ultimately will be lost. Because pediatric dentists need to consider the growth and development of the child patient, the goal for a tooth that has been avulsed for greater than 60 minutes with dry storage is to delay the osseous replacement and, hence, ankylotic process as long as possible. To slow down this process, the remaining PDL should be removed because otherwise it becomes a stimulus for inflammation that accelerates infection-related resorption. The remaining PDL can be removed by several methods: gentle scaling and root planning, soft pumice prophylaxis, gauze, or soaking the tooth in 3% citric acid for 3 minutes. This should be followed by a sodium fluoride treatment for 20 minutes. The rationale for this fluoride soak is based upon evidence that this procedure will delay, but not prevent, ankylosis; fluoroapatite is more resistant to ankylosis than hydroxyapatite. When teeth are soaked in fluoride before replantation, it has been shown to reduce significantly the risk of resorption after a follow-up of 5 years. Despite these recommendations, teeth that have been out of the oral cavity for greater than 60 minutes with dry storage have a poor prognosis and will not survive long term. Possible contraindications to replantation: There are possible contraindications to tooth replantation. Examples are immunocompromised health, severe congenital cardiac anomalies, severe uncontrolled seizure disorder, severe mental disability, severe uncontrolled diabetes, and lack of alveolar integrity.

Current Research: Antiresorptive-regenerative therapies may have potential for enhancing the prognosis of avulsed teeth. Treatment strategies are directed at avoiding or minimizing inflammation, increasing revascularization, and producing hard barriers in teeth with open apices.

New treatment strategies also are directed at specific clinical challenges that include decoronation as an approach to treat ankylosis in growing children and transplantation of premolars as an approach for replacing avulsed teeth. Dental practitioners should follow current literature and consider carefully evidence-based recommendations that may enhance periodontal healing and revascularization of avulsed permanent teeth.

Orthodontic Movement of Traumatized Teeth

Teeth that have been traumatized must be evaluated carefully prior to beginning or continuing orthodontic movement. Even with more simple crown/root fractures without pulpal involvement, a 3 month wait is recommended before tooth movement should begin. Other minor trauma to the tooth and periodontium (e.g., minor concussions, subluxations, and extrusions) also require a 3 month wait. When there has been moderate to severe trauma/damage to the periodontium, a minimum of 6 months wait is recommended. Teeth that have sustained root fractures cannot be moved for at least 1 year. Where there is radiographic evidence of healing, these teeth can be moved successfully. In teeth that require endodontics, movement can begin once healing is evident. Because teeth that have sustained severe periodontal injury have been found to undergo pulp necrosis when orthodontic movement was initiated even after a rest period, light intermittent forces are recommended along with avoidance of prolonged tipping forces and contact with the buccal or lingual cortical plates.

The use of a mouthguard during fixed appliance therapy is recommended. Studies have found the most effective is a modified custom mouthguard. The newer stock ortho-channel mouthguards may be more convenient, but there are no studies to date on their effectiveness.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

Decision Trees for management of an avulsed permanent tooth are available. See the "Availability of Companion Documents" field.

Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

When data did not appear sufficient or were inconclusive, recommendations were based upon expert and/or consensus opinion including those from the 2008 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) "Symposium on Trauma: A Comprehensive Update on Permanent Tooth Trauma in Children." The recommendations are congruent with the 2007 guidelines developed by the International Association of Dental Traumatology.

Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations

Potential Benefits
  • Improved functional and esthetic outcome for children who experience dental trauma
  • Improved psychological outlook for such children
Potential Harms

The risk of ankylosis increases significantly with an extraoral dry time of 20 minutes.

Contraindications

Contraindications
  • Replantation of avulsed primary teeth is contraindicated because of the potential for subsequent damage to developing permanent tooth germs.
  • There are possible contraindications to tooth replantation. Examples are immunocompromised health, severe congenital cardiac anomalies, severe uncontrolled seizure disorder, severe mental disability, severe uncontrolled diabetes, and lack of alveolar integrity.
  • Replanting is contraindicated by:
    • The child's stage of dental development (risk for ankylosis where considerable alveolar growth has to take place)
    • Compromising medical condition
    • Compromised integrity of the avulsed tooth or supporting tissues

Implementation of the Guideline

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

Implementation Tools
Clinical Algorithm
Resources
For information about availability, see the Availability of Companion Documents and Patient Resources fields below.

Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM Care Need
Getting Better
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Safety

Identifying Information and Availability

Bibliographic Source(s)
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). Guideline on management of acute dental trauma. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD); 2011. 9 p. [97 references]
Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released
2001 (revised 2010; republished 2011)
Guideline Developer(s)
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry - Professional Association
Source(s) of Funding

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Guideline Committee

Council on Clinical Affairs

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Not stated

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Council members and consultants derive no financial compensation from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry for their participation and are asked to disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on management of acute dental trauma. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2007. 14 p.

This guideline was republished in 2011.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Web site External Web Site Policy.

Print copies: Available from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 211 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 700, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

Availability of Companion Documents

The following are available:

  • Overview. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry 2010-11 definitions, oral health policies, and clinical guidelines. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2010. 2 p. Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Web site External Web Site Policy.
  • Decision trees for management of an avulsed permanent tooth. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2010. 2 p. Electronic copies: Available in PDF from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Web site External Web Site Policy.
Patient Resources

None available

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on March 16, 2005. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 18, 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 3, 2008. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on April 30, 2008. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on December 30, 2010. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on May 9, 2011. The information was republished by the guideline developer in 2011 and updated by ECRI Institute on October 20, 2011.

Copyright Statement

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

Disclaimer

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

Read full disclaimer...